Abstract

This paper explores the effect Instagram has had on the modern-day teenager, and how their identities are being influenced by its features. Whilst Instagram’s original purpose was always to share and promote people, teenagers have used the apps interactive features to compare their own sense of self with that of their peers. Features such as photo sharing, filter options and the like button have each created their own means for influence on the teenage population. Photo sharing and viewing has been associated with poor body image and self-esteem issues as this comparison made by teenagers is almost impossible to avoid. Filters also promote unrealistic beauty standards in which teens also may compare themselves to. Teenagers may also use these interactive features as a means for validation, with the like button serving as a quantitative measuring tool of popularity amongst teens. Overall Instagram promotes teens to value vanity-based qualities above other more important attributes.  

 

Full Text

In the digital era, the creation of an online presence has become a contemporary social expectation and has had a consequent effect on the way the younger demographic develops their identity. As explained by Watson (2019), identity refers to how individuals have a sense of themselves, and how they define themselves with consideration to their beliefs, values and roles in society. Teens are considered the more impressionable demographic in comparison to others, and this is evident from the negative affect social media has had on them (Watson, 2019). The new technologies available for globally widespread use are some of the many new external influences negatively affecting teenagers. Social media platforms on the internet, for example Instagram, have evidently cause an array of mental health complications in teenagers (Watson, 2019). In Australia teens spend an average of 14.4 hours a week online according to eSafety Commissioner (2021) and of those surveyed, a large percentage voted Instagram as their preferred platform of use. Since the emergence of Instagram, its culture has evolved with the development of its new and improved interactive features. Through new photo sharing options, the like button and filters, users can manipulate and shape their identities online (Instagram, 2022). Instagram’s culture has come to favour the narcissist perspective as many who use the app choose to post content about themselves. Tucker (2017) finds that people who build their self-worth from the criticism and comment of others tend to post self-portraits more frequently. As the younger generation crave a sense of belonging amongst their peers this makes them especially vulnerable on social media (Dr Jantz, 2017). The values of younger users who frequently use sites such as Instagram are becoming increasingly more vanity based as they focus more on their social status. Photo sharing features have become the optimal resource for image obsessed teenagers as they post photograph of themselves frequently for judgement. Filter options provided by the app have also promoted unrealistic beauty standards which have consequently affects the body images of many teenagers (Alarcon-Najarro, 2021). Unhealthy comparison of popularity through the like feature has also contributed to the validation users seek to confirm their identity. This paper will explore how the identity of developing teens is negatively influenced by interactive features of Instagram, such as viewing and posting content, using provided filters and interacting with the like button.

With the average teenager spending a large portion of their week participating in online activities, it is impossible the avoid the internet’s influence. 57% of teens claim that Instagram is their preferred social media application (eSafety Commissioner, 2021) and 37.6 percent of total Instagram users are between ages 13 and 24 (Statista, 2022). Instagram is an app where vanity flourishes, with many people posting photographs of themselves regularly (Tucker, 2017). Therefore it is easy to identify that physical attractiveness is becoming greatly valued by people who use Instagram frequently. As the younger demographic are such frequent users of the site this behaviour of seeking approval of one’s own social image is becoming more prevalent (Dr Jantz, 2017). Due to Instagram’s focus on vanity, it provides the perfect environment for comparison and whilst comparison is natural during a child’s development, constant social comparison can slowly deteriorate their mental health (The Washington Post, 2021). The effect on teenage development and understanding of their identity can be externally influenced and may cause teens to concoct nasty feelings towards themselves and their self-worth. They may begin to doubt their sense of themselves they had previously as a result of this constant comparison and need for social approval.

Whilst teenagers may find themselves comparing themselves to photographs content posted on the app, they may fail to understand that with the apps limited sharing features it cannot completely present a person’s life accurately. Despite there being several options in which users can share content, their identity only can be interpreted with limited perspective. A person’s identity in real life will always be different to their identity online as the characteristics they display in either world are unique. For this reason, people can construct their image online in a way that may be only partially recognisable to their real self. Creators offer a controlled perception of their daily proceedings through purposefully selected content (Internet Society, 2011).

Within the teenage demographic, the pressure of presenting this perfect image has proven to influence their mental health. Chua and Chang (2016) found that young girls feel pressured to present themselves as admirable on social media sites and as a result, providing the perfect image has resulted in a common anxiety. Research has also shown that engagement in photo-based activities such as photo sharing has been linked with a negative impact on body image (Cohen et at., 2017; Wallace et al., 2021; Prichard et al., 2021; Chua and Chang, 2016). Specifically, girls who participated in sharing photos of themselves reported having a greater dissatisfaction with their body image. Comparison is an obvious consequence of people attempting to put the best version of themselves on display. It is reported that a range of mental health complications including eating disorders, body dysmorphia and depression have resulted from engaging in photo-based activities (Wallace, 2021). Teens who are already conscious of public opinion may greatly be affected with the interaction they receive on their posts, as they have placed their image onto the site essentially for judgement and validation.

Not only is poor self-esteem and body dissatisfaction a result of these photo-based activities, but many young teens are also encouraged to believe the lifestyle they lead is unfavourable. Many high value influencers on social media are constantly posting content that flaunts their success and the lavish lifestyle they live. In an interview with CBC News, 17-year-old Scarelett Pourmatin, a Canadian teen who frequently uses social media claims social media makes it impossible for users not to compare their lives with others. She explains how their lives may appear “way better than [hers] or way more perfect” (CBC News, 2021, para.8). The teen further expresses how she occasionally feels depressed as a result of seeing her peers engage in fun activities as though her own life is less exciting than others. The comparison that results from constantly seeing others succeed can influence how teens perceive their own success and they may use these posts as indicators of their own failure (Laderer, 2018).

This supposed high standard of life users aim to achieve is easy to find on Instagram and as well as this, users may also present themselves according to standard of beauty that is promoted in society. What many users tend to ignore however, despite the communities’ counter efforts, is the extensive amount of time that creators may spend producing and editing their posts. People can manipulate angles, change lighting and almost reconstruct their photos entirely. Instagram even provides a range of filters which are a set of predetermined lighting options users can place over their photos (Tiggmann and Anderberg, 2019). In addition, there are also many face-filters available on the app that alter the users facial features. Although many have been created for comedic purposes, some filters were designed to enhance a person’s facial features such as reshaping them, smoothing over the skin or even adding makeup to the face. The purpose of these filters appears to be directed at “improving” the user’s physical appearance. This is potentially dangerous for the mental health of impressionable teenagers who are already conscious of their appearance. They may begin to rely on the use of filters when capturing photos of themselves and avoid taking photos without them. They may not choose to but begin to value their appearance as Instagram indirectly informs them, they are not on par with the beauty standards (Alarcon-Najarro, 2021).  

With unrealistic body idealisations constantly presented on the app, young individuals may become anxious of their own image. For example, they may think they are “not good enough” because they do not match societies distorted expectations (Cohen et at., 2017). One common aspect of the teenage experience is acne and when Instagram promotes clear skin, it further discourages many who are suffering with acne. Cultenea Life Science (2017) found through a survey aimed at teens aged 15-19 in the US living with acne, that participants felt social media sites such as Instagram made having acne more difficult and had negative effects on both their self-esteem and body image. 45% of teens have claimed that when using social media, they often feel embarrassed to post photos of themselves whilst having acne. The teenage community who are more likely to have acne may be more susceptible to identity issues as a result of social media as the commonly supported standard of clear skin is more accepted by online communities.

Whilst sharing photos is the main feature of Instagram, the “like” button is just as used on the site. Even though the feature is a commonly used tool over multiple social media sites, it has proven the most conflicting on Instagram. There has been a great debate on whether the like button provides significant functional purpose in comparison to its cost on mental health. While the like button can be used in marketing, its use for personal content can cause the owner to form an unhealthy obsession. The like button has always served a purpose of displaying popularity, however young communities have taken concept to the extreme. In a recent study it was found that teenage girls tend to use the like feature primarily for this purpose, and more detrimentally as a comparative tool to measure themselves against other users (Chua and Chang, 2016; Prichard, et al., 2021). Chua and Chang also found that girls who received a higher amount of likes on their selfies were considered more popular and attractive. On the flip side, girls who had a lower number of likes were known to feel slightly embarrassed or insecure. Likes have become a method for young girls to receive validation from their peers, as they are using other people’s opinions to form an identity for themselves.

In July of 2019, Instagram removed the ability for users to view the like count of other users on the app. The gesture by Instagram was felt widely by users as it removed the quantitative ability to measure one’s character (Prichard et al., 2021). However, in May of 2021 Instagram announced the reinstatement of the like’s visibility as the company believed they needed to provide the users with more control over their online experience. Many have speculated the decision made was business related however, Instagram has denied all these claims. But the question remains; If Instagram willed to make a depressurised environment for their users, then why would they restore this feature? Although users have a choice as to whether they show the amount of likes they collect, many teens may return to seeking validation from their peers and feel lesser than those who receive more likes than themselves (King, 2021).

Social media sites such as Instagram have become well established in the teenage community and are generally affecting the way identity is developed by the demographic. There is a new age of concerns due to the new and unexplored effects that social media is causing. Teenagers are dealing with an unhealthy amount of comparison nurtured by the Instagram app which is causing them to feel inadequate with their own sense of self (The Washington Post, 2021; Tucker, 2017). A large portion of teenagers who with the Instagram app presented with body image and self-esteem issues, due to the comparison. Teens also felt pressured to present the “best” versions of themselves which effectively caused many to develop a growing obsession with physical appearances and lavish lifestyles (Chua and Chang, 2016). Instagram has ultimately had a negative effect on the development of the teenage identity as many have come to value vanity-based attributes, such as attractiveness, popularity and success (The Washington Post, 2021). Instagram has provided ideal measuring tools such as the like button which has been associated with popularity status. Many have used Instagram to validate their feelings in an unhealthy manner which has often had the opposite effect on their mental health (Chua and Chang, 2016). Teenagers should limit their use of Instagram as it can heavily influence the future development of their minds and how they perceive themselves.

 

Reference List

Alarcon-Najarro, M., (2021, October 20). Instagram filters are detrimental to our mental health and body image. The Commonwealth Times. https://commonwealthtimes.org/2021/10/20/instagram-filters-are-detrimental-to-our-mental-health-and-body-image/

 

Chua, T. H. H., Chang, L. (2016). Follow me and like my beautiful selfies: Singapore teenage girls’ engagement in self-presentation and peer comparison on social media. Computers in Human Behaviour, 55(1), 190-197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.011

 

Cohen, R., Newton-John, T., Slater, A. (2017). The relationship between Facebook and Instagram appearance-focused activities and body image concerns in young women. Body Image, 23(1), 183-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2017.10.002

 

Cultanea Life Sciences Inc. (2017, December 5). New survey reports on acne, social media behaviour and teenagers’ self esteem. PR Newswire. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/new-survey-reports-on-acne-social-media-behavior-and-teenagers-self-esteem-300566154.html

 

Dr Jantz, G. (2017). Teens: Why do I care what other people think? Dr Gregory Jantz. https://www.drgregoryjantz.com/teens-why-do-i-care-what-other-people-think/#:~:text=Most%20teenagers%20want%20to%20belong,to%20be%20accepted%20by%20them.

 

eSafety Commissioner. (2021). The digital life of Aussie teens. Australian Government. esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2021-02/The%20digital%20lives%20of%20Aussie%20teens.pdf

 

Gollom, M. (2021, October 7). Instagram fuels both body-image issues and social connections. CBC News. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/instagram-girls-body-image-1.6200969

 

Instagram. (2022). https://instagram.com

 

Internet Society. (2011). Understanding your own online identity: An overview of identity. https://www.internetsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Understanding-your-Online-Identity-An-Overview-of-Identity.pdf

 

King, M. (2021, May 27). Instagram likes are back. but you can still hide them. Triple J HACK. https://www.abc.net.au/triplej/programs/hack/instagram-likes-are-back.-but-you-can-still-hide-them/13360524

 

Laderer, A. (2018). Why others accomplishments sometimes make you feel terrible. Talkspace. https://www.talkspace.com/blog/why-sometimes-other-peoples-accomplishments-make-you-feel-terrible/#:~:text=It’s%20possible%20that%20people%20around,Rachel%20O’Neill%2C%20Ph.

 

McCormack, A. (2019, July 18). Instagram is now hiding the number of ‘likes’ on posts for all Australian users. ABC News. https://www.abc.net.au/triplej/programs/hack/instagram-hiding-likes/11318748

 

Prichard, I., O’Toole, S. Wu, Y., Harford, J., Tiggemann, M. (2021). No likes, no problem? Users’ reactions to the removal of Instagram number of likes on other people’s posts and links to body image. Body Image, 38(1), 72-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2021.03.007

 

Statista. (2022) Instagram: distribution of global audiences 2022, by age and gender [Data set]. Statista Research Department. https://www.statista.com/statistics/248769/age-distribution-of-worldwide-instagram-users/

 

Tiggemann, M., Anderberg, I. (2019) Social media is not real: The effect of ‘Instagram vs reality’ images on women’s social comparison and body image. New Media and Society, 22(12), 2183-2199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819888720

 

Tucker, A. (2017). The science behind why we take selfies. Bustle. https://www.bustle.com/p/the-psychological-reasons-why-we-post-selfies-49562

 

Wallace, J. B. (2021, September 17). Instagram is even worse than we thought for kids. What do we do about it?. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/2021/09/17/instagram-teens-parent-advice/

 

 

 

 

10 thoughts on “The Development of Identity: How the Teenage Demographic is Suffering as a Result of Instagram’s Interactive Features

  1. Brendan Cohen says:

    I enjoyed your paper, Zoe. I know from the many parents I speak with, including close relatives, there is clearly some sort of global epidemic (at least in Western countries) of teenage depression, eating disorders, self-harm. I would suggest much greater numbers among the young than Covid. As someone who was a teenager in the early 80s, I am often quite staggered by what I’m hearing and reading. There is a flip-side. The internet does provide teens the means and possibilities for exploring their identity online in relative safety and anonymity, out of the judgemental eyes of family, peers, community. They should be able to explore and change and develop their identity, or even several different ones, freely and creatively. It would seem like we should see a healthier, happier generation of teens than in the restricted past. So what is going on? I’m fascinated by this paradox.

    • Zoe Sawatzky says:

      Thanks for reading Brendan, I completely agree! This new technology available seems to have the opposite effect than expected from a platform that provides such freedom to explore identity. It’s quite distressing to research and even observe the effects first hand of this new technology. The way social media sits in backseat of most minds is a sad reality of the new sharing platforms. It has become less about discovering and interacting with new communities and more about upholding image. I look forward to reading your paper!

  2. andrea perry says:

    I enjoyed reading your paper, Zoe. As a mum of a pre-teen girl this is an area of great concern for me. I was unaware of Instagram taking the like button away in 2019, but then reinstating it again 2 years later. Do you know what their original reasoning was for taking it away in the first place? I’m curious if it was to combat the quantitative measuring of popularity and if so, their ‘excuse’ for bringing it back is infuriating. It’s really sad to see how this is impacting young girls self-worth and mental health, after all this was the premise of the original Facebook – rating young girls on attractiveness.

    Brendan, your utopian view of the internet seems true of the old web, before social media, back when anonymous chat groups and forums were popular. You’re right, how did we get here then? Are we able to move back to the nonymous web? I’m not sure. Discord is a new platform introduced to me through this unit and it seems to ring of the old days, doesn’t it? I think it is extremely hard to move away from that visual feel we embrace today. With that said, Audio style SNSs seem to be gaining some traction. Here’s an interesting read from Forbes talking about decentralised platforms being the potential future of social media: https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesbusinesscouncil/2021/07/23/what-could-social-media-look-like-in-2022-and-beyond/?sh=4bd42709f750

    • Zoe Sawatzky says:

      Hi Andrea,
      Thanks for reading, I believe the original reasoning for removing the like button was to combat the growing issues that were beginning to stem from unhealthy social comparison made through the quantity of likes received on posts. The app wanted to ease to growing tension of this comparison by removing the like button so that people had to value the content for what it was rather than how many likes it received. An article that discusses this original removal is “Instagram is now hiding the number of ‘likes’ on posts for all Australian users” and can be found here: https://www.abc.net.au/triplej/programs/hack/instagram-hiding-likes/11318748 It seems completely hypocritical of Instagram to reinstate the like button as it contradicts the original statements that where made by the platform regarding social comparison. It is truly saddening to notice how young teenagers have been resorting back to comparing the amount of likes they have on their posts and revealing them to other users as a means to show popularity. Whilst you can still hide the number of likes on a post, I myself have found that I once considered popularity important and valued myself through this system. When the like button was removed I found that there was indeed a weight lifted, and less pressure on myself to prove I was worthy of others attention. Since this time I have found value for myself now limiting my social media usage, but in no way does this reversed action help this growing pressure for young girls.

  3. Lorena Neira says:

    Hi Zoe,
    Great paper! I found your paper very insightful to the features of Instagram and how it has major impact on teenagers and adults today. I found your discussion of Influencers very interesting. With Influencers being such a large part of Instagram culture and their ability to create more intimate environments for their followers, flaunting and giving insight into their “perfect” life. It can create this sense of guilt and “obsession with physical appearances and lavish lifestyles” as followers especially teens believe this aesthetic life and look is how one should be living. This sense of obsession can be harmful as many followers attempt to follower same dietary styles and health advice from these influencers who don’t have training or credentials. Leading to many body image issues like you have discussed above.

    Great paper with many interesting insights !

  4. Felicity Dureau says:

    Hello Zoe,

    I thoroughly enjoyed your paper and found it touched on some really interesting points. I liked how you talked about how these interactive features often lead to unrealistic comparisons as that is a big issue in today’s world. Do you believe there’s a future on Instagram for less interactive features and more realism?

    Thanks, Felicity.

    • Zoe Sawatzky says:

      Hi Felicity,

      Unfortunately I don’t believe there is a future for sites such as Instagram without their interactive features. The very nature of social media sites is to provide a platform where it’s users can interact and develop. However, I definitely believe there is room for Instagram to focus more on the wellbeing of it’s users through adapting some of these features, and moderating them. Reinstating the like button definitely disregarded the previous mental health issues identified and could be adapted and monitored with more care. For example, the like button was allegedly reinstated to allow users to have more control over their experiences on the app (heres a link to an article by Triple J called “Instagram likes are back. But you can still hide them” in which reports on the like button’s reinstatement https://www.abc.net.au/triplej/programs/hack/instagram-likes-are-back.-but-you-can-still-hide-them/13360524 ). However this contradicts their original argument for removing the feature. Perhaps Instagram can raise the age required to use the app (it is currently 13 years old) to better protect the wellbeing of these younger users, or even have better regulation of who can display the amount of likes they recieve on a post (non personal accounts such as businesses). I also fear as social media progresses realism will be harder to determine on the app. While efforts are made to counter these unrealistic standards created, the new technology available is making it easier to adapt images and edit content regardless of whether Instagram itself offers.

      Thanks for reading, Zoe.

  5. Hi Zoe,

    Good work on your paper. I agree that Instagram does have an impact on teenagers mental health. And why wouldn’t IT if it influences them when they’re on it 14.4 hours a week! I do disagree that Instagram that is just for narcissistic people though because there are plenty of accounts that counteract the the selfie-centric accounts that you see. I think of accounts like notyourmanicpixiedreamcurl – https://www.instagram.com/notyourmanicpixiedreamcurl/?hl=en – which actually seeks to celebrate natural beauty and be a critic of the beauty industry.

    I do see your point about about how Instagram would encourage teenagers to compare themselves to others. Do you think this is just because of Instagram? I believe Instagram doesn’t help teenager’s mental health but I also believe the issues of comparison and popularity existed prior to Instagram. Think of print magazines aimed at teenagers such as Teen Vogue, Dolly, Cleo etc.

    Instagram likely does impact more teenagers these days because it is more accessible with mobile phones. Instagram also encourages the use of filters and, I think, making teenagers appear the same as everyone else. It almost takes away their individuality.

    I find it interesting that Instagram reinstated the like feature. Surely there had to be a business decision surrounding it. Like a businesses wouldn’t spend money to implement something if there was no economic benefit for them. I definitely agree with what Dr Belinda Barnett said in the ABC article you mentioned: ‘They care about whether or not they sell you advertising’. Much like print magazines I suppose.

    Would love if you can check out my paper also! https://networkconference.netstudies.org/2022/csm/667/dangers-of-social-media-misinformation-the-influence-of-the-anti-vaccination-movement-on-covid-19-vaccine-hesitancy-and-offline-social-behaviours/

    Cheers

    Chantal

  6. Zoe Sawatzky says:

    Hi Chantal,

    You make some thoughtful points, I definitely agree that Instagram isn’t just for narcissistic people! I know of many accounts that reconstruct the beauty standard that has embedded itself into modern society. And definitely the beauty standard wasn’t created by Instagram I think magazines are a good example of how media has warped expectations prior to social media sites such as Instagram. The way Instagram filters make everyone look similar indeed takes away individuality but I suppose could also express it. People are able to make their own filters on Instagram should they choose.

    Thanks for your comment, I’ve read through your paper and it was quite the insightful read!
    Zoe

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>