Activism on social media as a public sphere.

Social Network

Abstract.

Social media have progressively became extensive and enormous. Nonetheless, the written works on political issues and the internet has not completely clutched just how much the global computer network have crucially and radically changed the aspect of organisational interaction, ranging from an independent party having the power and mean to directly assemble materials to making grassroots transnational governmental issues more organisationally plausible and practical. A huge aperture in the writings is the absence of apprehension of how the internet have structured social movement organisations and the organisation of social movements. This problem brings jointly a distinctive collection of articles that plan and remarked on the domain of social media and social movements. In this sphere, the work grants to literature by inspecting how the internet is not only structuring constitutional coalition, advocacy and activism from the viewpoint of organisational communication but as well as developing the means in which activists communicate with one another. Hence, this work is mainly focused on how social media is being galvanised to manipulate public opinion and organised political active service. In short, the focal point of this conference paper will principally explore the aspect of how social media is being a public sphere when it comes to activism such as the campaign of Obama and Ségolène Royal, the Black Lives Matter, the Women March, the Occupy Wall Street movement and the Arab Spring- which has to do with politics. This collection produces an analytical starting point to apprehend the internet and social movement effectively, a field which is crucially vital to a variety of disciplines but is intensely under searched and under rated.

To begin with, the exposure of the Internet in the early nineties, shortly became obvious that this brand new manifestation of technology had the prospective of developing a cyberspace for governmental debate. The emergence of the global computer network has permitted for an unparalleled proficiency of data sharing. The flexibility of the Internet sites means one can connect with an extensive audience, no matter if it is via the low commitment of the 140-character count on Twitter, the visual-audio feature of Instagram, or the accessibility of Facebook. The causes of community can be made completely apparent through 30-second videos which can be easily shared by millions of computer operators. The efficient circulation of statistics by social media has granted to the case of social media activism, where administrative dynamism are quickly spread among users via social networking. Nowadays, Internet websites like Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, MySpace, Wikipedia, Flickr and YouTube are the top activities on the World Wide Web. For instance, since April 2011, Facebook has roughly 600 million recorded users and according to marketers, people spend more time on Facebook than on Google (R. Effing et al, 2011). Today, the utilisation of mobile internet gave an extra uplift and push to the use of social media. Communities such as bureaucratic parties are attempting to keep up with this changing environment. By carrying activism on media platforms, politicians are able to share ideas and exchange views to million within minutes (Social media and political participation, 2018).

In 1992, Garnham, a television director asked ‘what new political institutions and new public sphere might be necessary for the democratic control of a global economy and polity?’’. The answer credibly showed itself with the entry of the Web in the beginning of the nineties. A sphere which empowered human to communicate across any distance, regardless of age and status, caste and gender. Furthermore, face to face communication of the public realm was over, ‘democracy must henceforth take into account new forms of electronically mediated discourse’ (Poster, 1997). Social media was shown as more active and dynamic and anyone who had computer and Internet facilities could be rewarded from its communication and online civic engagement. Finally, today social media is pushing forward a present-time public space through online discussion and networked communication without any unfairness or partiality. This part of the scholarly work, lay importance on the fact that earlier everybody did not get the chance of bringing forward their perspective but with the progression of social media they easily shared their views openly and have the ability to take part in online activism carried out by political bodies.

How social media as a public space led to a success in activism are shown in the case of Obama and Ségolène Royal political campaign. The case of Obama’s election crusade was substantially and consistently bottomed on online media platforms. Next to his own website, the former president of the United States of America, used fifteen social media web pages to promote his works. He very well perceived and interpreted the power of flattering the offline work with an online campaign. The latter coherently connected the online community with the offline social actions such as fundraising. His social work was seen by million across the planet through the site of the Internet like Twitter, which gave him the image of an ideal and noble president. Thus, his use of the global computer network was a significant feature of his general campaign master plan (J. Hillegersberg et all, 2011). Additionally, another victorious case was the campaign of Ségolène Royal during the French elections in 2007. The latter was able to conduct a connection with a massively huge crowd in the online world. Her activism done on social media, led to a rise in her party membership from 120, 000 to 200, 000 members. Surprisingly, earlier 90% of a sudden rise had not been a member of an administrative party. Therefore, with examples of mass mobilisation like inhabitant oppositions in Iran and other Middle-Eastern nations, it is secure and relevant to claim that social media are changing the game of party politics (Social media and political participation, 2018).

Ultimately, because of the essence of the Internet, activism is allowed to enlarge its definition to those who are constantly sharing links, appeal and other Internet resources to stimulate their political interests. Individuals are effortlessly able to team with the protests via hashtags or changing their online avatar. Anybody out there with Internet accessibility have the ability to be a social activist and make their voice heard across borders. Conceivably, the most important part of social networking activism is the capability of translating words into action. The huge oppositions of the yesteryears have all been planned via different social media sites. Remarkably, the Women’s March in Washington was arranged on a Facebook event by women with no early acquaintance. Three acclaimed women activists had distinctly posted about a feasible women’s march opposing President Trump’s establishment. They team up, enrolled other activists to plan the big event. Eventually, thousands and thousands of people stipulated their objective to attend via a ‘’Répondez s’il vous plaît’’ to the Facebook event and it finally acquired hundreds of supporting parade all over the universe. The occurrence victoriously provoked the interest of the nation, assembling upward about two million individual in a mass protest. Precisely, the creation of the march were able to be broadly perceived and accessible to anyone. The obtainability of social media permitted a large-scale support base which will subsequently stop such a movement from being seen as something useless (R. Lau, 2017).

Consequently, the Internet regularly issues a way of recognition.  Once again, with the intervention of hashtags, social media users have the facility of distinguishing themselves with the movement of activism. The most well-known example is the inventive use of the ‘’Black Lives Matter’’ hashtag in its conflict in opposition of police cruelty and consistent racism. Here, the Internet has demonstrated itself as a monstrous tool in providing a voice to individual all over the planet mainly to the marginalised sectors. The Black Lives Matter movement started with a hashtag on websites and the support of the so-called ‘’slacktivitist’’ on social media made it ‘’a member-led global network of more than 40 chapters’’, according to the Black Lives Matter webpage. Moreover, the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis ice bucket challenge, which filled all platforms of social media with videos of people submerge the head with ice water, raised $115 million and an additional $13 million was given into charity to the institution’s regional branches (N. Langfield, 2017). Furthermore, corresponding hashtags were utilised to boycott against the Hudson Bay Company, for the eviction of Ivanka Trump’s stock and Uber, for its CEO’S participation in Donald Trump’s advisory board. These tags permits posts to be classified, facilitate it for viewers to be in line with the happenings. Finally, the Hudson Bay Company flown out a declaration concerning the avoidance and Uber’s CEO left from the advisory board. Hence, while putting a hashtag to a tweet may seem like a tiny action but it certainly results to triggering answers from authority (Social media as tool for meaningful political activism, 2017).

Once again, the noticeable Black Lives Matter movement as well shows the power of a social movement widely footed on Internet sites as a substitute voice for the repressed. While traditional media may not be willing to involve certain occurrences in its printing because of political pressures, tensions and corporate restrictions, a coalition free from these imprisonment may proclaim itself without any fear or hesitation. For instant, the death of Travyon Martin, the crime which flickered the organisation, was limitedly wrapped by the old media till a journalist persuade big channels to take up the story. After the death of Martin, upcoming unfairness undertaken by the Black Lives Matter movement were published on web pages under the hashtag. The old media’s defeat to label white greatness, and in the duration its criminalisation of Black victims, led voices on social networking sites to become a relevant source of data (R. Lau, 2017). Thus, once again the Internet has been shown as a public sphere for activism.

Likewise, a fresh blog post by an ex female Uber worker revealing its coherent prejudices against women initiated an investigation by Uber’s chief executive. The website post which had the detailed incidents of sexual molestation by the top management and the brush off of concern by the human resources, resonated with many women workers from the technical stream and unmasked a bigger issue of sexism inside the fraternity. Uber is one among the big companies with a notable impact and it is understandable to see why media channel would refuse to take up any such story. The very same story when posted on media platforms like Twitter were shared a thousand times and it obtained traction once it was supported and fought by other female workers who left Uber. Popular bloggers who have huge amount of followers were able to provoke change via their prospective capability to associate with their people, unlike news outlets, where the publishers were restricted by the editors and tackled by the people who contradict (Social media as tool for meaningful political activism, 2017).

Coming back to the real politics side of things, social media has become a mean for political institutions all over the political spectrum. In order to understand how this change occurred, it is important to look a bit in the past. Six years ago, a sequence of well-known movements all over the planet spelled hope for Facebook and Twitter as a mean of social change. The first one starting in 2011 was the Occupy Wall Street movement. It was all began as a small protest but quickly turned into a transnational movement, pulling consciousness to the concentration of cash in a few wealthy ‘’one-percenters’’. The occupiers of Wall Street pulled it off by the use of Twitter to unfurl their message. While Occupy was in many ways a non-resistant and acceptably failed organisation, its victory in mobilisation sowed seeds which bore fruits in upcoming activists campaigns (D. Murthy, 2018).

Another big argument how social media acts as a public space for activism is the Arab Spring. The second version of the Arab Social Media Report disclosed that almost nine out of ten Egyptians and Tunisians utilised Facebook to plan and publicised protests and almost all protests took place. Additionally, the document found that the use of Facebook risen and doubled between January and April 2011. The overall amount of operators had augmented by thirty percent in comparison to the eighteen percent rise in 2010. Its utilisation in Bahrain soared by fifteen percent in three month time. It is argued that during the time of protests in Egypt and Tunisia, eighty eight percent Egyptian and ninety four percent Tunisians revealed that they were receiving their information through social media websites. On twitter the tweets summited at particular incidents just like the January 14 protest in Tunisia and they augment days after the Bahraini affirmation started on February 14. Ultimately, the Egyptians hashtag ‘’Egypt’’ gained 1.4 million tags in three month (Arab Social Media Report, 2011). This kind of digits show the unexpected level of participation in social media.

In conclusion, previously parliamentary posts on the Internet were denigrated for their incapacity to impact genuine change. However, acclaimed organisations unfolded a different reality. When people get the feeling of a reasonable pain to rectify, they will go to extreme extent to make it known. This has been proved by the turnout of Occupy in 2011, the Black Lives Matter and the transnational participation in the Women’s March. Activism on the Internet has obviously grown into a pivotal part of impactful political theory. Government bodies prolong mobile Twitter accounts and online appeal are frequently shared on the Web. Consequently, the Internet has permitted people from small sector to make a change in their own way possible. It has make data become inequity towards the commanding group. Internet activists acknowledge the capability of online community and while there are enquiry about the originality of unfiltered voices, the rate and result of such a system are licencing and empowering.

Reference list:

Badoura, S. The role of social media in the Arab Spring. Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/JUGUN%20DIKSHA/Downloads/Badoura.pdf

Effing, R., & Hillegersberg, J., & Huibers, T. (2011). Social Media and Political Participation: Are Facebook, Twitter and YouTube Democratising Our Political Systems? Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221353460_Social_Media_and_Political_Participation_Are_Facebook_Twitter_and_YouTube_Democratizing_Our_Political_Systems

Kim, S (2017).  Can we use social media as a form of activism? Retrieved from http://www.jhunewsletter.com/article/2017/12/can-we-use-social-media-as-a-form-of-activism

Langfield, N. (2017). Social media activism is no joke. Retrieved from http://www.queensjournal.ca/story/2017-10-27/lifestyle/social-media-activism-is-no-joke/

Lau, R. (2017). Social Media as Tool for Meaningful Political Activism. Retrieved from http://mcgillleftreview.com/article/social-media-tool-meaningful-political-activism

Moyer, J. (2017).  POLITICAL ACTIVISM ON SOCIAL MEDIA HAS GROWN SOME TEETH. Retrieved from https://psmag.com/social-justice/social-media-activism

Murthy, D. (2018). Introduction to Social Media, Activism and Organisation. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2056305117750716#

Xu, C. (2017). Going Viral: Using Social Media for Activism. Retrieved from https://medium.com/social-media-stories/going-viral-using-social-media-for-activism-78cade6e2371