Even before the creation of Tumblr, for LGBTQ+ and gender diverse youth the internet has been an invaluable resource for finding information, friendship, and community in an otherwise hostile heteronormative and cisgendered world. With the advancement of mobile communications, internet connectivity, and of course, participatory media, queer users may find even greater connection online, but must also contest with new problems these online spaces present, from harassment and “default publicness” to structures and affordances designed for heteronormative and cisgendered users and social lives. In a world that requires queer youth to rely on underground practises of expression and community, it is vital queer youth occupy spaces online where they can negotiate identity, find peers, and build communities that may be unavailable elsewhere. Here I would argue that although Tumblr was not designed specifically for Queer and Gender-diverse users, the infrastructure and affordances of Tumblr as a Social Network Site (SNS) have lent themselves crucially to the practices of its young LGBTQ+ users and communities.
How Tumblr’s Blogging-Style Infrastructure effects Queer Identities and Communities Online
In a 2016 Project, “Scrolling Beyond Binaries,” five Australian Digital Media Scholars (Byron et al., 2019) surveyed young LGBTQ+ people between the ages of 16 to 35 regarding their social media use. What they found was that a striking 64% of queer respondents had used Tumblr before, in comparison to only 14% of youth respondents in general population surveys. (Robards B. et al, 2020) Notably, an enormous 65% of these surveyed LGBTQ+ Tumblr users reported their primary motivation for using the platform was to find and communicate with “people who are like me” (Robards B. et al, 2020, pp.282). Whilst it is no surprise that the internet has been pivotal in helping people who are gender diverse or queer find community online, when an enormous 65% of survey respondents choose Tumblr specifically to connect with likeminded users, we cannot deny the platform’s capacity to build systems of belonging and community for LGTBTQ+ youth. (Robards et al., 2020) I would argue that whilst platforms such as Facebook, Snapchat, or even Instagram foster community and connections around existing bonds of family or friendship, Tumblr is distinct in that its queer users are instead motivated to connect with an almost unstructured sense of “community” based solely on similar experiences and interests (Robards et al., 2020; Byron et al., 2019; Duguay, 2018). Hence, the importance of Tumblr’s “diary” or blogging-style infrastructure becomes apparent, with the facilitation and sharing of lived queer experiences and interests allowing LGBTQ+ users to find “people who are like me” through building both queer identities and communities online simultaneously.
Since its origin in the early nineties, blogging has transformed in the era of web 2.0 and participatory media to intersect with the content sharing practises of social media sites such as Facebook, Instagram, and Tumblr, where users are encouraged to generate content that depicts their lives. (Notes 3 – p6) At its core, Tumblr is similar to Social Network Sites like Facebook or Instagram as it allows users to create and repost content that viewable on a user’s profile. Each of these platforms allow users to build an ever-growing compilation and archive of previous content interactions and posts on their profile that can serve both as context behind the user’s new posts, as well as display what scholar Karen McCullagh (2008) describes as “an evolving portrait of the blogger’s interests and experiences.” (McCullagh, 2008, pp.2) Essentially, these social media sites each offer users a curatorial online environment that can be used to record, narrate, or process various life experiences and events, existing as a unique space for individuals to construct or work on self-identity through self-expression and social interaction online. (McCracken, 2017, F; McCullagh, 2008) Yet, whilst Tumblr shares this blog-style infrastructure with popular social media platforms, the site’s affordance of anonymity allows its users to approach this blog-style content creation, curation, and identity work distinctly.
In the 2016 Project, “Scrolling Beyond Binaries,” (Byron et al., 2019) LGBTQ+ youth consistently referred to Tumblr “like a diary of sorts,” prompting scholars to view the blogging and self-expression practises of Tumblr as driven by a desire for self-reflection and realization, rather than community building. (Byron et al., 2019, pp. 2249) Effectively, much like a regular diary, Tumblr allows its users to focus on profile creation and curation as a personal act largely constructed by and for oneself. In one such description by a “Scrolling Beyond Binaries” respondent Jasmine (aged 29, trans female, lesbian, urban), Tumblr is described as “…my diary when I was trying to figure out what my gender was…[I]t was through Tumblr that I figured out what I was, or at least what I wasn’t.” (Byron et al., 2019, pp. 2249) Here Jasmine shows us just one example of Tumblr being used as a personal diary and archive, her self-expression being oriented towards self-reflection or self-realization associated with gender.
On Tumblr it is not unusual for users to post these “diary-style” lived experiences or stories like those referenced by Jasmine. In fact, this use of the blogging-style infrastructure for highly personal content is a trend particular to Tumblr. Instead, through the anonymity affordance of the platform and its step away from networks built upon existing family and friend relationships, it affords queer users’ greater chances for direct and honest communication without real-world consequences or dangers. (Burton, 2020) What this means is that since Tumblr users can safely curate personal content and experiences, they are more likely to create personal and critical self-reflecting profiles than users on other social media sites. (Byron et al., 2019) This means that individual users find greater opportunities for self-expression and reflection, but also that users can connect, network, and learn through sharing lived queer experiences, opinions, and interests, or through connecting or viewing these self-reflecting profiles.
Scholars Robards et al. write in their recent 2020 paper, Tumblr as a Space of Learning, Connecting, and Identity Formation for LGBTIQ+ Young People, that:
“When queer and gender diverse people are hidden or erased in education and accessible cultural forms, stumbling across “people like me” on Tumblr can be revelatory and also a moment of learning and discovery: new words, new languages for self-expression, and new opportunities to connect one’s own experiences with others through this learned language.” (pp. 286)
What these scholars highlight here is the ability for identity work on Tumblr (or the creation and curation of queer experiences, opinions, and interests) to additionally effect and build a larger queer community online. To quote the work of scholar Delanty (2018, pp. 200), the Tumblr community is built upon communication and connection. For many Tumblr users, the platform offers opportunities not only to share and write their own personal experiences, but the invaluable chance to access other queer youth whose shared experiences they can learn from, as well as be affirmed by. (Byron et al., 2019, pp. 2245) In turn, through sharing personal experiences online, or displaying the vocabulary and knowledge of queer users, Tumblr serves as a vital resource for learning from and connecting to queer and gender-diverse peers, even indirectly. (Robards et al., 2020, pp. 287; Byron et al., 2019, pp. 2244) In one such case recorded by “Scrolling Beyond Binaries” (2016) respondent Colin (aged 27, male, gay, urban) states that whilst he sees the queer community on Tumblr, he doesn’t participate in it. However, through following, being followed, posting, and reblogging, he is directly engaging and building upon the queer community. He, similar to those who share their personal stories, is still documenting, curating, and making visible, aspects of queer experiences, opinions, and interests online (Byron et al., 2019, pp. 2249).
What we can understand here is that whilst Tumblr shares a similar blogging-style infrastructure to other popular social media sites, its anonymity and networking style allow users to create more personal and personalised profiles. As these profiles online are often the site of identity work this means that queer users are able to express, narrate, explore, and make visible, the nuances of queer life online. On Tumblr, the practice of creating, and even sharing content engaged with queer experiences, opinions, and interests is no longer restricted to just individual identity work, but integrated with the practice of community building, where affirmation and knowledge is created through shared understandings and experiences.
Anonymity, Privacy, and Tumblr as a Counterpublic
It surely surprises no one to say that in the modern era new technologies are more embedded in forms of social life than ever before. With new forms of mobile technology, internet connectivity, and of course, participatory media, scholars like Delanty (2018) believe that mobile communication technologies “…do not simply reflect social life but constitute it,” reorganising the space between the public and private spheres in ways that drastically change the geography of our social lives. (Delanty, 2018, pp. 203; Papacharissi, 2011, pp. 307)
Yet whilst this technology has allowed both people and information to move more freely, connecting people all over the world, individuals are more likely than ever to be exposed to a variety of not only intentional, but accidental audiences in online spaces (Hampton & Wellman, 2018, pp. 647; Papacharissi, 2011, pp. 307) As social media sites such as Facebook or Instagram are designed to connect and reconnect individuals with established relationships, the scope of community stretches the traditional boundaries of place or time. (Byron et al., 2019, pp. 2243; Abidin, 2021) Here, scholars like Alexander Cho have found that for minority groups and in particular, queer or LGBTQ+ individuals, it can be difficult to control your potential audience, instead experiencing social media platforms like Facebook or Instagram as spaces of “default publicness.” (Cho, 2018) In comparison to these “default public” spaces, where LGBTQ+ youth can experience forced outings, online harassment, or even real danger, anonymity is a vital affordance of Tumblr supported by both the architecture of the platform, and by the culture of the queer community itself. (Cho, 2018) Perhaps most strikingly of all, it is through this anonymity that Tumblr’s queer community remains an affective counter–public, unable to control potential audiences, but able to safely perform activism through queer visibility.
The anonymity opportunities of Tumblr are not an affordance unique to the platform, what is unique however, is the way this anonymity is constituted, and how it effects the content that is shared and created between users. At a structural level, Tumblr blogs are typically anonymous or pseudonymous. In addition to this, the platform, unlike similar sites like Facebook or Instagram, is also unlikely to connect or reconnect users to the accounts of people they have existing “real-world” relationships with. (Byron et al., 2019, pp. 2243) Whilst some users may actively choose to display their “real-names” and connect with prevailing family, friends, or social networks, scholars such as Burton (2020) suggest that by allowing users to negotiate the boundaries of their own privacy online, Tumblr “…affords young people a particular kind of privacy more in tune with their priorities and lived realities.” (pp. 104) Whilst for many LGBTQ+ youth on Tumblr this means keeping their identity secret and their networks separate from “real-life,” these spaces that afford privacy for minority groups offer a set of unique dynamics that Burton (2020) suggests are “a result of this position at the margins of digital social life.” (pp. 104) Resulting from this, Tumblr acts as a “space of possibility” where communities are able to construct new ways and practises of being that speak to their particular needs and priorities. For Tumblr in particular, this includes the practises around the creation and sharing of lived queer experiences. In Burton’s 2020 article, “Screaming into the Void,” they include a Tumblr post from a young woman featuring a selfie in the colours of the bisexual pride flag for Bi Visibility Day. Below this image is the caption, “I’M STILL CLOSETED OFFLINE! DO NOT SHARE!” (Burton, 2020, pp. 103) What this post highlights is a trend for queer users to “go public” with “private information” on Tumblr, seeking comfort, identity creation, and community through being open in a space they perceive as safe and distant from “real-life” relationships. Additionally, even though this post includes an identifying photo, the user’s choice to post with a caption instructing other users to respect their privacy highlights the anonymity and privacy practises of queer Tumblr users. As Burton (2020) writes, there is an understanding between users that “personal” posts are not to be shared, allowing Tumblr’s privacy to “…run more on social norms established by its various communities.” (Burton, 2020, pp. 109) What this means for queer users that whilst they may face “default publicness” on platforms such as Facebook and Instagram, Tumblr’s greater privacy control allows them to post greater personal content, allowing the platform to become a space where queer users perform activism through making visible queer experiences and narratives.
Scholars Byron & Hunt (2017) would argue that in posting personal content on Tumblr, queer users are not seeking an active response, but are instead attempting to say, “I need to share this and be heard.” When queer users seek a sense of belonging or identity on Tumblr through the sharing of lived queer experiences, these users assist in building a personalized queer community “…embodied in networks and centred on the individual.” (Delanty, 2018, pp. 211) Since both structural affordances and cultural practises on Tumblr allow users to share personal experiences and identity-work online safely, this queer community is built around the experiences, interests, and opinions of networked queer individuals. (Byron et al., 2020) This community, through presenting and making visible online, the resources, diversity, and activities of queer individuals, has the ability to perform activism. As scholars Hampton and Wellman (2018) suggest afterall, “[a]n awareness of newfound diversity could increase access to (and possibly understanding of) diverse points of view and counter a tendency to form intolerant echo chambers.” (pp. 648; Abidin, 2021; Papacharissi and Trevey, 2018) In this sense, Tumblr’s queer community can be understood as a Counterpublic. As suggested by Warner (2002), a Counterpublic has an audience, a unique language, and a distinct discourse oriented to a distinct future. In this example we can see that Tumblr users fit this description through their engagement with gender and sexuality related discussions and visibility. (Byron, 2019)
In conclusion, with surveys showing that 64% of LGBTQ+ youth choose to use Tumblr, 65% of whom are seeking to find “people like me,” we cannot ignore that platform’s ability to cater to the needs and practises of LGBTQ+ youth communities online. Although Tumblr was not designed specifically for use by Queer and Gender-diverse youth, the platforms blogging-style infrastructure and privacy affordances lend themselves crucially to the practices of young LGBTQ+ users and communities online. Whilst the community networks of Facebook and Instagram rely on connecting or reconnecting individuals with existing relationships, Tumblr allows users greater control over potential audiences through structural anonymity. Similarly, through the sites blogging-style interface, the site encourages the posting of personal content, and the curation of archival profiles that create opportunities for identity work online. Finally, although Tumblr offers infrastructure that supports the building of queer communities online, this infrastructure has been negotiated and transformed by the very practises of the queer community that uses it. This is all to say that whilst Tumblr was not created for the queer community, it acts currently as a crucial online space and example of the affordances that best suit queer communities online.
Download the PDF paper below:
HOW TUMBLR ACTS AS A CRUCIAL RESOURCE FOR ONLINE QUEER COMMUNITIES – Audrey Menz
REFERENCES:
Abidin, C. (2021). From ‘networked Publics’ to ‘Refracted Publics’: A Companion Framework for Researching ‘Below the Radar’ studies. Social Media + Society. Jan-March.
Burton, J. (2020). “Screaming into the Void:” Reconceptualizing Privacy, the Personal, and the Public through the Perspectives of Young Tumblr Users. In McCracken, A., Cho, A., Stein, L., & Hoch, I. N. (Eds), A Tumblr Book : platform and cultures. (pp. 103-113) The University of Michigan Press.
Byron, P., & Hunt J. (2017) ‘That happened to me too’: young people’s informal knowledge of diverse genders and sexualities.’ Sex Education, 17:3, pp. 319-332.
Byron, P., Robards, B. (2017) There’s something queer about Tumblr. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/theres-something-queer-about-tumblr-73520
Byron, P., Robards, B., Hanckel, B., Vivienne, S., & nChurchill, B. (2019). “Hey, I’m Having These Experiences”: Tumblr Use and Young People’s Queer connections. University of Southern California, Annenberg School for Communication & Journalism, Annenberg Press.
Cho, A. (2018). Default publicness: Queer youth of color, social media, and being outed by the machine. New Media & Society, 20(9), 3183–3200. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817744784
Delanty, G. (2018). Virtual Community: Belonging as Communication. Community 2nd edition. Routledge.
Duguay, S. (2018). Why Tumblr’s ban on adult content is bad for LGBTQ youth, The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/why-tumblrs-ban-on-adult-content-is-bad-for-lgbtq-youth-108215
Hampton, K. N., & Wellman, B. (2018). Lost and Saved . . . Again: The Moral Panic about the Loss of Community Takes Hold of Social Media. Contemporary Sociology. 37(6), pp. 643-651.
McCullagh, K. (2008) Blogging: self presentation and privacy, Information & Communications Technology Law, 17:1, 3-23, DOI: 10.1080/13600830801886984
Papacharissi, Z. (2011). Conclusion: A Networked Self (Chapter 15). In Z. Papacharissi (ed) A Networked Self: Identity, Community and Culture on Social Network Sites. Routledge.
Papacharissi, Z., & Trevey, M. T. (2018). Affective Publics and Windows of Opportunity: Social media and the potential for social change. In M. Graham (ed) The Routledge Companion to Media and Activism. Routledge.
Robards, B., Byron, P., Churchill, B., Hanckel, B., & Vivienne, S. (2020) Tumblr as a Space of Learning, Connecting, and Identity Formation for LGBTIQ+ Young People. In McCracken, A., Cho, A., Stein, L., & Hoch, I. N. (Eds), A Tumblr Book : platform and cultures. (pp. 281-292) The University of Michigan Press.
Warner, M. (2002). Publics and Counterpublics. Public Culture, 14(1), pp. 49‒90.
Hi Audrey,
Your paper was exciting to read and well written. I agree with you on various points, especially on the point where Tumblr gives anonymity for users to share their lives in a “diary-style” post. Anonymity is of great help in these social media platforms, as it provides people of the LGBTQ community platforms to voice out without the fear of being judged.
You can check my paper on how social media helped in creating terror and panic during the covid-19 pandemic in Mauritius below:
https://networkconference.netstudies.org/2022/csm/374/social-media-helped-in-creating-terror-and-panic-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-in-mauritius/
Thank you.
Hi Nadarajan,
Thank you so much! I’ll definitely give your paper a read. I think it sounds especially poignant as the pandemic is such a recent occurrence. I’m excited to give it a read.
Thank you Audrey.
Hi Audrey,
Thanks for the great paper! Before reading your paper, I did not know that Tumblr is such an important platform for the queer community and that it is more of a diary-type entry “rather than community building”. I agree that Tumblr is a space where the Queer community can post more personal information about themselves compared to Facebook or Instagram. However, I wonder if Tumblr is only used by queer people who want to maintain their anonymity or if Queer people who have already ‘come out’ use this platform as well? Also, I wonder if anonymity can be a contributing factor to online harassment?
My paper also addresses a similar topic, however, from a different point of view. My paper focuses on the topic of LGBTQ+ youth and the support they receive on Facebook. It discusses how LGBTQ+ youth use Facebook to explore and disclose their identity to their online and offline communities. If you are interested, I think my paper presents a different perspective on Facebook, and I would love to hear your thoughts on it. https://networkconference.netstudies.org/2022/csm/111/lgbtq-youth-and-community-support-on-social-media/?fbclid=IwAR050KaxB_L7Fqy2tTFJk3hsPqoSfqZA0z16y_3fZNqWf8Zt3-AoijMcNBU
Thanks again for your paper!
Hi Erica,
Thanks for your questions 🙂
In my research I found that whilst not all users choose to remain anonymous on Tumblr, the majority do. Unlike social media sites like Facebook or Instagram, users of Tumblr are unlikely to build online communities with people they already know offline, but to build new relationships with other anonymous users. This is in part due to the anonymity affordance of Tumblr, but also the fact that unlike Facebook or Instagram, Tumblr does not attempt to connect users with ‘people they may know,’ or make friend suggestions of related users.
Whilst I did not find that all users remained anonymous (and disconnected from known family or friends), it certainly seems like the majority of users do. This wasn’t always due to the fact that a user was not ‘out,’ but sometimes simply due to the personal nature of the content posted. Whilst research in papers like Burton’s (2020). “Screaming into the Void” captures the stories of Queer users who have not yet come out, the 2016 “Scrolling Beyond Binaries” Project (Byron et al., 2019) suggests that Queer users sometimes remain anonymous so they can build online identities separate from their offline lives. I think that Queer people who have already ‘come out’ use may very well be a huge aspect of the Tumblr Queer community as well.
Just as you’ve identified as well, I found that anonymity was a contributing factor to online harassment, even contributing to many users leaving the site (Byron et al., 2019). My paper focuses primarily upon the benefits of anonymity for Queer users, but I think the downsides of anonymity is interesting topic I would honestly love to read more on!
Your paper sounds amazing and I am excited to give it a read!
Hi Audrey
Thank you for this excellent paper. It’s so refreshing to read about social media’s positive aspects, and the LGBTIQ+ communities on Tumblr seems to be one story with no flipside. Sure, there will be trolls and other unpleasantness, but the picture you’ve put together is one sharing, finding identity and trust. In particular, that example that you mentioned where a young woman posted a photo of herself and entrusted her community not to share it, as she was not yet ‘out’ in her offline world. How safe she must feel in that online space to do that! The benefits of being able to be anonymous on Tumblr are obvious here. I was under the impression that Tumblr use was on the way out, so it’s great to read this paper and see that it’s found a niche audience and an important social and inclusive function.
Well done!
Hi Diana,
Thank you for your wonderful feedback & for taking the time to read my paper!
I completely agree! Learning that there is not just infrastructure in place to afford anonymity on Tumblr (which is not an unusual social media feature), but cultural parameters created and upheld by the Tumblr Queer community to afford anonymity, was very interesting. Not to mention, something I haven’t heard discussed regarding other social media sites. It definitely stood out for me when writing this paper how tightly bound the online queer community was on Tumblr. If you are interested in reading more about this I would suggest checking out the paper by Burton (2020), “Screaming into the Void:” Reconceptualizing Privacy, the Personal, and the Public through the Perspectives of Young Tumblr Users,” as it delves deeper into this concept.
I can’t speak too much on whether Tumblr use “is on the way out” (although with new platforms like Tiktok taking off I wouldn’t be surprised if we were beginning to see a new era of social media platforms preferred by Queer users), but I can say that in studies such as the 2016 “Scrolling Beyond Binaries” Project (Byron et al., 2019), most users eventually move away from Tumblr as a platform. Here scholars Byron, Robards, Hanckel, Vivienne, & Churchill (2019) found that queer users would be drawn to Tumblr as a space to share and interact with personal stories, experiences and opinions in anonymity, but move away from Tumblr as they outgrew the community. As Tumblr is such a vital space for identity formation and critical self-reflection for young queer users, it is no surprise that queer users who have grown more self-assured or actualized may no longer be drawn to the platform or community there. I cannot know for sure, but I wonder if this is in part what you are referencing? I’ll be sure to reply if I come across any additional information on this 🙂
Thank you so much again for your reply!
I’ll also be sure to pop over and give your paper a read as well!
This was really very interesting and I am intrigued with one specific point I would love your view on. I take from your paper that the connection to the story is a powerful reason as to why the queer community use Tumblr – and that it is that connection that has helped create a community. Given some of the other platforms have a much more dynamic way of story telling – thinking Instagrams reels and stories – why have the other platforms not been as successful given the richness the stories are able to be told in them?
Hi Anthony,
Thank you for taking the time to read my paper and leave a comment. I apologise that my reply is a little lengthy!
I think you’ve touched on a great point here: That if other social media platforms such as Instagram and Facebook afford users to self-publish more dynamic forms of personal stories (like the reels and story features you’ve identified), why have I suggested that they are less appropriate (or less successful spaces) for building queer communities?
As you’ve said above, I do definitely believe that “storytelling” is a huge aspect of Tumblr’s Queer Community as queer users come together to recognise and share personal stories that are counter narratives to normative social expectations and ideals.
Now, whilst I definitely agree that the posting/publishing affordances of platforms such as Instagram and Facebook allow more dynamic storytelling than those of Tumblr, I would also suggest that Tumblr has plenty of engaging storytelling features I haven’t covered in this paper: from the inclusion of pictures and videos in posts, to the personalisation of profile pages for users. I don’t, however, believe this is why Tumblr has been such an important space for Queer users.
Instead, whilst I would argue that the sharing of queer stories is vital to the building of a queer community on Tumblr, as I stated in my paper, this has only been so successful due to the support of Tumblr’s affordances such as anonymity and the diary-style curation of personal content and experiences that Tumblr’s infrastructure generates.
I believe that whilst platforms such as Instagram and Facebook do allow greater dynamic posts, these affordances do not encourage users to create personal and critical self-reflecting posts in the same way that Tumblr’s affordances do. (Byron et al., 2019) Instead, whilst not being dynamic, Tumblr affords anonymity that allows queer users to share more personal stories without fear of ‘public-outings’, and a diary-style curation of personal content and experiences that influences users to explore identity creation online.
What I am trying to say here is that Tumblr has been so successful in building a Queer community because it is not the most dynamic posts that will bring together a queer community, but storytelling and posts that offer personal self-expression and reflection that queer users can connect with and learn from. The queer stories published on Instagram or Facebook may allow more dynamic storytelling, but through my research I have found that it is infact the intersection of Tumblr’s affordances with Queer storytelling online, that has made it such a vital space for the queer community.
Thanks Audrey – this is really insightful and actually upon reflection of your comments, an amazing example of a community enabled by technology. I have also reflected on my comments and think you have been able to make me reassess my bias. I was thinking more about the way the story was being told rather than the story itself. Thanks for sharing. I really appreciate both the effort you put into the paper and the education I have received from it. Thank you!
No worries Anthony! I completely understand where you were coming from. Your comment helped me pin-point that it is really the affordances and infrastructure of Tumblr that allows the storytelling aspect of the site to assist in the building of LGBTQIA+ communities – so thank you!
I’ve seen that you also have a paper in the ‘Communities & Social Media’ stream and are definitely going to take a look 🙂
Hello Audrey,
Great paper! It was an extremely interesting read on how the anonymity of Tumblr allows for safe spaces to be created for queer youths to express themselves freely.
There has, however, been a decrease in the user base of tumblr over the years, as many of the users preferred to move to different platforms instead. I do think that TikTok is one of the most commonly used social media platforms in 2022, however a major part of this platform involves users showing themselves on camera, which somewhat takes away the element of anonymity.
Do you think that other platforms such as Twitter or Discord might be able to replicate the experience that Tumblr created for future generations?
Also, if I may, here is my paper on the impact of the pandemic on fandoms and fan culture. Would be very grateful if you could give it a read! https://networkconference.netstudies.org/2022/csm/412/fandoms-and-the-pandemic-a-safe-haven-amidst-the-crisis/
Once again, a very insightful paper. I really enjoyed reading it.
Hey Dina! I’m glad you enjoyed my paper – great question too.
I agree that Tumblr has seen a decrease in user base over the years whilst platforms like Tiktok have grown exponentially! That being said, even as Tumblr’s user base decreases, I think studying how the platform remained a vital queer online community for so many years should allow us to see how other platforms may replicate this success. I agree that spaces like Twitter and Discord could become successful queer spaces (or ‘queer-centric’ spaces as Grace put in her paper, “THE ‘QUEERIFICATION’ OF THE INTERNET,” which I would also recommend reading) so long as they offer the affordances that have proven to make queer online spaces successful. This may not mean offering full anonymity or long-form blogging-style content creation like Tumblr, but a network that doesn’t attempt to connect users to people they might know (creating ‘default publicness’ and forced outings), and an infrastructure that encourages the personalization of a users profile, and the sharing of personal stories, experiences, interests, and opinions.
I think that as both Discord and Twitter allow users a level of privacy, personalization, and personal content creation, they are well on the way to being vital spaces for queer communities. I would love to know if you agree 🙂
Hello Audrey,
Thank you for your reply. I do agree with you that the personalisation of user profiles available on these platforms gives users room for self-expression, which is crucial for queer youths.
While Twitter and Discord may not possess all of the features which Tumblr has to offer, I believe that they perform their main duty – that is bringing users closer to one another and forming communities based on shared interests and experiences – quite adequately.
Thank you for telling me about Grace’s paper! I will be sure to give it a read as well.
Hi Audrey,
This has been an insightful examination of the ways in which Tumblr has allowed queer youth to build online communities based on their shared experiences. I believe that you are correct that the blogging style infrastructure makes users feel as if they are conversing in a way that allows them to narrate and share their life, and the anonymity encourages a bond to occur through shared vulnerability. Do you think that Tumblr has allowed for more people to feel confident in their own voices by providing them a platform to form communities through shared experiences, and thus encouraged them to start actively speaking about their experiences in face to face settings? Carlson & Kennedy (2021) believe that Social Media allows for people to engage with one another and to connect in large groups which often haven’t been facilitated by society, and it seemsTumblr has been one of the most successful to do this.
Regards,
Taylah.
Hey Taylah,
Absolutely! I think you’ve hit the nail on the head. In my research I found that reading and posting online on Tumblr allowed queer users to perform identity work and self-reflection through learning, discovering, and expressing their identities online (particularly through personal storytelling). Specifically, in a 2016 Project “Scrolling Beyond Binaries,” five Australian Digital Media Scholars (Byron et al., 2019) surveyed young LGBTQ+ people between the ages of 16 to 35 regarding their social media use and found that they reported (exactly as you’ve said) feeling more confident in, and knowledgeable of, their gender and/or sexuality.
As queer or LGBTQIA+ youth do not always have safe, respectful, and informative spaces to explore their identities in the offline world, I think it is vital that they have spaces like Tumblr. If the research of “Scrolling Beyond Binaries” is anything to go by, I would suggest that these online spaces have definitely allowed queer users to explore their identities in a safe environment and effected the ways in which they express and share their experiences in an offline environment.
Thank you so much for giving my paper a read!
Hey Audrey,
I just want to say that this paper is super well written. Like others I thought Tumblr was almost being forgotten but it’s so sick to see that people are able to freely express themselves and find online support through the platform! I wonder if another platform is going to be created specifically for the LGBTQ community that has a similar structure to Tumblr? Or maybe Tumblr may even rebrand itself and become an expression based forum altogether who knows? It’s interesting to see how social media platforms are still being repurposed and used in different ways.
Have a read of my paper if you have time: https://networkconference.netstudies.org/2022/csm/1213/tik-tok-strengthens-newer-ideas-of-community/
Hey Nathan,
Thanks for giving my paper a read!
I think you’re quite right in saying that Tumblr is being forgotten. Honestly, as Social Media Sites (SNS) like Tiktok become more popular with adolescents I believe that we are moving away from older sites like Tumblr (not to mention that there have been changes to Tumblr’s community guidelines in the last few years that have negatively affected the LGBTQIA+ community online).
I do think however that one of the main points I took from this research is how Tumblr’s affordances and infrastructure have assisted with the building of an LGBTQIA+ community online. Like you said, Tumblr might be rebranded in the next few years, but even if it doesn’t, personally I would love to see what we’ve learnt from Tumblr being applied to new online community spaces!
I’m keen to give you’re paper a read as an avid Tiktok user myself – thanks for reaching out 🙂
Hi Audrey,
What a great paper! I love Tumblr so much and used to use it as an outlet to write about all my feelings under an anonymous account, and it was the most freeing, weight lifting feeling ever. This makes me so happy to read your stats and know there’s a safe place out there for the queer community to connect and be able to share thoughts and experiences free from judgment. Do you think there are other websites/applications that provide a similar sense on anonymity that are a safe space for queer people or do you believe Tumblr takes the cake. Do you think Tumblr will maintain its longevity for this reason? Would love to hear your thoughts.
Amazing work!!
– J
Hey Jessica!
I also grew up using Tumblr so it was really interesting to be able to write about how it fosters online communities. I can completely relate to the freedom that comes from sharing personal content from an anonymous account and really resonate with the research that shows this is a form of identity formation and performance for youth!
Great question too! Whilst researching I found myself focusing on the benefits of Tumblr specifically. It was not until this online conference that I had considered newer platforms. I’ve found a few papers that explore similar themes of anonymity/privacy and the queer community online including “THE ‘QUEERIFICATION’ OF THE INTERNET” by Grace Mathews, and “NEGOTIATION OF PRIVACY AND SOCIAL MEDIA TO EXPLORE LGBTQIA+ IDENTITY AND ADVOCATE FOR THEIR COMMUNITIES” by Tracy Kim. I can say that following reading these papers I have high hopes for platforms like Twitter, Reddit, and even Discord to be the next homes to queer communities online. I would suggest that whilst Tumblr has been a vital online space for Queer communities in the past, it is facing a decrease in it’s user base. In place of this I think we will see newer platforms like Reddit and Discord (that offer new communication affordances and anonymity), plus Twitter (which creates advocacy and activism through personal story sharing) become more important modern queer spaces.
Also I would definitely suggest you check out these two papers –
1. THE ‘QUEERIFICATION’ OF THE INTERNET: WHY QUEER YOUTH NEED ONLINE COMMUNITIES – by Grace Matthews:
https://networkconference.netstudies.org/2022/csm/943/the-queerification-of-the-internet-why-queer-youth-need-online-communities/#comment-2155
2. & NEGOTIATION OF PRIVACY AND SOCIAL MEDIA TO EXPLORE LGBTQIA+ IDENTITY AND ADVOCATE FOR THEIR COMMUNITIES – by Tracy Kim:
https://networkconference.netstudies.org/2022/ioa/184/negotiation-of-privacy-and-social-media-to-explore-lgbtqia-identity-and-advocate-for-their-communities/#comment-2135
Hey Audrey,
As an avid Tumblr user, your article was great to read! Even though it has decreased in popularity, I really value the privacy it affords users. As you’ve said, LGBTQIA+ users greatly benefit from being able to safely express and explore themselves without fear of being ‘found out’ in their real lives. As social media sites push for more and more information from users, do you think that LGBTQIA+ users will be left behind or feel pressured in the way they perform their identities online? It will be interesting to see how this affects social media trends in the future.
Hi Matthew,
Thanks for giving my paper a read!
I do think that there is a definite issue for Queer or LGBTQ+ users where platforms require too much personal information, not just because this information is often times being gathered and sold (If I was you I’d give Brendan Cohen’s paper a read if you want more information on data-mining), but because these platforms either create spaces of default publicness or discrimination for queer users. I think one of the best examples of this has to be Facebook which requires users to have their “real name” featured on their profile, lest their account be flagged and taken down. This often times causes issues for Drag Queens who have unusual names, or Queer users who may want to either remain anonymous or change their names.
I think that as more and more platforms require more information from users, Queer and LGBTQ+ users will be required to rethink or readjust how they use and interact with these spaces.
I found this topic really interesting in a paper by Tracy Kim, “NEGOTIATION OF PRIVACY AND SOCIAL MEDIA TO EXPLORE LGBTQIA+ IDENTITY AND ADVOCATE FOR THEIR COMMUNITIES,” and suggest you have a read on how queer users negotiate spaces that are not made to support them 🙂
You can find these conference papers here:
Tracy Kim – https://networkconference.netstudies.org/2022/ioa/184/negotiation-of-privacy-and-social-media-to-explore-lgbtqia-identity-and-advocate-for-their-communities/#comment-2135
Brendan Cohen – https://networkconference.netstudies.org/2022/ioa/300/me-2-0-the-ability-for-individuals-to-perform-multiple-selves-online-allows-greater-freedom-than-ever-to-explore-their-identity-at-a-cost/
Hi Audrey.
Congratulations on a really well-written and coherent argument. I appreciate the in-depth approach you have taken to Tumblr. My paper is on a similar topic, but investigates notions of Privacy and how LGBTQIA+ are navigating this on different platforms. https://networkconference.netstudies.org/2022/ioa/184/negotiation-of-privacy-and-social-media-to-explore-lgbtqia-identity-and-advocate-for-their-communities/, you may like to check it out and I’d be keen for your thoughts.
You said, “What this means for queer users that whilst they may face “default publicness” on platforms such as Facebook and Instagram, Tumblr’s greater privacy control allows them to post greater personal content, allowing the platform to become a space where queer users perform activism through making visible queer experiences and narratives.” While I agree with the “default publicness” of Facebook, I would argue that Tumblr allows greater personal content due to its anonymity affordances, rather than is privacy controls per say. And works in part because the community is such that they respect each other’s boundaries when they ask not to share content. Thoughts?
Thanks again for a wonderful paper.
Tracy
Hey Tracy,
Thanks for giving my paper a read, and for leaving a comment!
I completely agree. I was excited to read in papers such as Burton’s (2020) “Screaming into the Void,” that the Tumblr community often developed their own community guidelines that aimed to respect the privacy of other users (such as not reposting content labelled with #donotrepost or #private hashtags).
I also agree that it is the affordance of anonymity that allows this community to thrive through encouraging the safe sharing of personal narratives, experiences, interests, and opinions online. I think here I am using ‘privacy control’ and ‘anonymity affordance’ rather interchangeably. These terms may not be completely interchangeable, yet as I researched for my paper I found that many users, despite being afforded anonymity on Tumblr, would still choose to use either their real names, or share facts that may identify them in their content. I came to consider that the affordance of anonymity was not one that all Queer individuals would use on Tumblr, but rather, negotiate, hence ‘privacy control.’ Perhaps my use of these terms needs to be revisited, but in essence, I completely agree that it is due to the fact that the platform and community respects users boundaries, that Tumblr is such a successful queer space.
Hi Audrey,
A really interesting topic. I can relate to at least some of it – as a former queer youth (still queer but getting older) who used to be a regular Tumblr user, I think you’ve really captured a lot of the reason it was so attractive to me and my friends at the time. Clearly something was enough to make Tumblr attractive to queer youth even while it lacked for many years very basic features like a private messaging system.
I also wonder how much the customisation Tumblr offers plays into this particularly user base choosing it over other platforms. Tumblr is very rare among modern social media platforms in allowing users to almost completely customise their personal page – something more akin to old platforms like Myspace. This really detailed level of self expression, creating your aesthetic self in both the content you post and the actual physical appearance of the website when someone views your page – do you think that may also play a part in Tumblr’s attraction over other platforms like Instagram?
The ease by which users can also create new blogs for each particular niche that they interact with – and customise each independently to reflect that facet of their interests – may also encourage exploration, by allowing users to put a toe in the water and test a community out without having to commit to it hard. Even the fact that when you change your tumblr username, all links to your former name break (instead of redirect, as on other platforms), may allow users to move from one exploration of identity to another more easily. What are your thoughts?
Hi Audrey,
Great article, I really enjoyed reading it!
I was a Tumblr user back in Highschool (quite a few years ago now haha) and I certainly noticed that it became somewhat of a safehaven for people belonging to the LGBTQ community but the stastics you shared as still astounding, 64%!
I find your points about the archival style of tumblr and it lending itself to identity work particularly interesting because we all seem so drawn to short, sharp content these days with the emergance of features like reels and Tiktok. It makes sense though because recently I went back into one of my old Tumblr profiles and I was amazed by how it told the story of exactly who I was all those years ago and how much I have changed! I’d be interested to know to what extent the policy changes to Tumblr as it has changed hands over the years has affected the formation of communities though.
I wrote about the formation of LGBTQ communites on Tiktok if you are interested – https://networkconference.netstudies.org/2022/onsc/895/legitimizing-and-supporting-lgbt-identities-through-social-media-counter-publics/
Cheers,
Robyn