Social media platforms have rapidly altered the portability, expansiveness, and fundamental nature of digital spaces. Communities within such platforms are notably susceptible to the activities of social media influencers (SMIs). This paper explores the effects SMIs have on online communities, and how they facilitate the development of authentic relationships within such. Feelings of sincerity and authenticity are generated through practices such as vlogging, attention labour engagement, consistent communication protocols, and the diminishing of hierarchical community structures. Combined, these factors enable SMIs to acquire mass viewership and influence vast audiences. This then has notable implications for digital marketing and product placement. Because of their unique positioning and genuine community engagement, this paper finds that SMIs possess the ability to influence mass markets, without compromising their authenticity.

 

Main text

Social media networks and their platform capabilities have transformed the expansiveness, portability, and spontaneity of online digital spaces in the past decade. The exploration of community dynamics and user relations within these platforms have been extensively researched in academic settings. From such emerges consideration for social media influencers, consumer susceptibility, and digital marketing. The global industry of influencer marketing is anticipated to exceed $490 million by 2027 (Statista, 2020). The industry’s evolution was accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, which increased consumer’s reliance on social media, not only for social and entertainment purposes, but also for purchasing and product acquisition desires (Kim & Kim, 2021). Social media influencers (SMIs) are critical pillars in this digital commerce sphere. SMIs can be defined as individuals with large online followings and recognised credibility, who possess expert knowledge in their field, and thus have influence over their peers and follower’s decisions (Ki & Kim, 2019). From influencer’s large followings develop communities within virtual spaces. Online communities are those facilitated by digital platforms, and that enable mass collaboration, social connectivity, innovation, and communal welfare (Faraj et al., 2011). Modern technologies and their fluid design enable users to overcome historical inhibitors of community, being geography, kinship, and occupation (Hampton & Wellman, 2018). This also eliminates hierarchical dynamics, and encourages the creation of resilient bonds, collaboration, and community building. Community members are no longer bound by their locality; they can find more meaningful connections beyond their immediate vicinity. In these ways, social media networks facilitate the development and sustainment of loyal, authentic communities, while also enabling mass audience influence and immense e-marketing success.

 

To influence purchasing decisions, SMIs need to effectively generate feelings of sincerity, authenticity, and a sense of community on online platforms. One means of achieving this is via emotional labour engagement with their followers (Mardon et al., 2018). Emotional labour describes the management and self-regulation of feelings for the purpose of enriching interpersonal relationships (Mardon et al., 2018). The degree of sincerity expressed by influencers in this regard varies, though these emotions can indeed be genuine, and can inadvertently lead to favourable outcomes, namely profit and loyalty (Mardon et al., 2018). Attention labour is particularly relevant in regard to emotional investment development in online communities (Brooks et al., 2021). This goes beyond the production of content, and places greater emphasis on the emotional connections developed within these communities via comment response, being receptive to fans, and engaging in interactive web capabilities such as polls and Q&As (Brooks et al., 2021). Factors that can potentially harm the devotion of an SMI’s fanbase are a lack of sponsorship disclosure and transparency, prioritisation of commercial interests over community welfare, and diminishing interaction with followers (Mardon et al., 2018). Even still, these moral infidelities are redeemable, so long as SMIs engage in self-conscious behaviours, whereby influencers can escape the perils of condemnation and cancellation, and instead provoke community members to empathise with and understand their actions (Mardon et al., 2018). For example, after failing to meet consumer expectations, and being met with backlash, SMIs may retreat from social media or express embarrassment and guilt. In 2014, beauty-guru Zoella uploaded a YouTube video during which she expressed discontentment and guilt for her recent production of unexceptional content (Mardon et al., 2018). The teary Zoella engaged in remorseful behaviours in this video, as she felt her online community were deserving of much higher-quality entertainment. This self-conscious admission was met with support by Zoella’s following, and motivated community members to justify her actions and protect the influencer, rather than criticize and condemn. Subsequently, this strengthened the online community’s bond and perceived closeness to each other and the SMI (Mardon et al., 2018). This form of emotional labour, and the compassion it elicits among audiences, enables SMIs to exploit commercial prospects whilst preserving loyalty and authentic community relations.

 

The creation of vulnerable personas and maintenance of ‘ordinary’ status aligns SMIs with their audience, creating a sense of relatability and equality. Leveraging this dynamic enables SMIs to exert great influence over their loyal followers. The origins of SMIs as normal and ordinary individuals creates a perception of relatability to audiences and leads to higher regards of authenticity than traditional celebrities who customarily appear in commercial advertising (Scholz, 2021). Depictions of online personalities as relatable are reinforced through the immediacy and apparent proximity of SMIs, made possible through the affordances of digital platforms. The ability to maintain persistent contact (broadcasting information instantaneously and from anywhere), and pervasive awareness (provision of knowledge regarding whereabouts, interests, and activities) (Hampton, 2016), cements this idea of psychological closeness. This diminishing of distance between consumer and SMI fortifies the integrity and authority of the influencer (Scholz, 2021). Vlogging is one method through which closeness and intimacy in online communities are established. Vlogging is the act of filming the evidently mundane occurrences in day-to-day life, and is intrinsically linked to self-expression, familiarity, and invitingness into one’s personal space (Berryman & Kavka, 2017). Thus, vlogs function as a medium through which authenticity can be obtained. Vlogging invites vulnerability and intimacy with SMIs, as they provide an unfiltered and raw insight into the lives of influencers. For example, many beauty influencers appear in their vlogs with little-to-no makeup, and without the performative desire to be perceived as perfect. Viewers are able to identify with this feeling of being ‘naked’ and one’s true, authentic self (Berryman & Kavka, 2017). Feelings of belonging and community are generated in this way, as online communities identify as being members of the inner circle and feel valued by the SMI. The trust associated with SMIs then transfers onto the products and brands influencers affiliate themselves with, transforming SMIs into remarkably lucrative commodities (Berryman & Kavka, 2017). With influencers positioned as equals, recommendations are deemed highly trustworthy by consumers. In vast contrast to traditional celebrities, SMIs and their lifestyles are perceived to be attainable and relatable. Their accessibility on online networks, consistent and responsive communicative techniques, and openness translates into approachability and dependability. With audience members and influencers essentially on the same playing field, authentic communities are established and are more commonplace on the internet than in non-digital realms. Thus, by collapsing the temporal and spatial inhibitors of community (Hampton & Wellman, 2018), and by producing intimate content (Berryman & Kavka, 2017), affective and loyal relationships form between audiences and SMIs.

 

Through the creation and nurturing of online communities, SMIs gain the ability to influence the purchasing decisions of their followers. As SMI’s position themselves as accessible and similar to their audiences, they are deemed to be more authentic than their celebrity counterparts (Zhou et al., 2021). Digital users make the conscious decision to follow online personalities whose positioning they find appealing. The community of followers then formulate a common understanding of the SMI’s character and values (Leung et al., 2022). Social capital theory dictates that this shared perspective establishes cognitive capital, which can then be utilised to facilitate brand performance (Leung et al., 2022). This is particularly crucial, due to the changed behaviour of consumers in regard to digital marketing. Scepticism and uncertainty towards direct advertising endeavours is mounting, and brands are finding it increasingly difficult to gain the trust and loyalty of patrons. A feasible alternative is presented in the form of influencer marketing.

 

SMIs use influencer marketing by integrating endorsement and product placement into their daily narratives, making content seem genuine and reflective of their own taste (Leung et al., 2022). This integration of commercial content seems so authentic, in fact, that many users are unable to discern paid promotion from regular recommendations (Kim & Kim, 2021). Although sponsorships can be met with adverse reactions, influencers are in a unique position to appeal to their following by exhibiting congruence with their interests, specialities, and promotions. Endorsement of a brand is accepted and justified, so long as the SMI provides reasonable links to their identity, and it is a conceivable extension of prior content (Kim & Kim, 2021). Having such an intimate bond with their community, influencers must be considerate of their follower’s interests, and be careful in selecting the right product or brand to promote. It is critical that SMIs prioritise their community’s interests first and centre perspective around their followers (Leung et al., 2022). This is achieved by understanding and gratifying their needs with relevant, directed content. For example, integration of preferred and branded content is frequently demonstrated by fitness influencers. Endorsements of supplements or sport apparel brands are flawlessly incorporated into gym routine videos or daily vlogs. By posting content that ties commercial products with customer’s goals, SMI’s sponsorships are interpreted as less intrusive than celebrity-endorsed and scripted advertisements, thereby enhancing consumer reactions to such content (Kim & Kim, 2021). Additionally, SMI’s authenticity is enriched through the offering of unbiased and honest reviews (Leung et al., 2022). Beauty influencers will often be sent free products or samples to trial by companies such as Sephora, who encourage SMIs to give their sincere thoughts and opinions. By providing reviews that are not consistently positive, genuineness is fostered and greater authenticity results, both for the commercial entity and the SMI (Leung et al., 2022). This community appreciation for sincerity can lead to the transferability of influencer success across a multitude of online and offline platforms. 

 

Because the relationship between influencers and community members is symbiotic and not hierarchical, audiences wish for influencers to acquire longevity and achieve their goals (Brooks et al., 2021). Viewers want to share in the SMI’s success, as they feel somewhat responsible for such. As a result, SMI’s success is universally celebrated and experienced in online communities of followers. Even if individuals are envious of an influencer’s position, beauty, or material possessions, favourable perceptions of SMIs still result (Lee & Eastin, 2020). Rather than eliciting antagonistic feelings, envy can increase the perceived trustworthiness of an SMI, as followers experience awe and a desire to be similar to them. The most successful and authentic influencers are ones that prioritise and understand their audience. Through the constant exchange of online communication, influencers are rewarded with comments, likes, views, and stronger community loyalty and trust (Kim & Kim, 2021). Consistent and authentic relationships within communities enable SMIs to transfer their follower’s loyalty across platforms and into other entrepreneurial endeavours. One illustration of this is beauty influencer Michelle Phan’s creation of popular beauty subscription service Ipsy. Phan invested her time and effort into her social media, eventually building a devoted fanbase and becoming self-celebrified (Brooks et al., 2021). Celebrification requires the ability of influencers to transport their audiences across different platforms (such as on social media, television, or podcasts) and partnerships, enhancing the portability of community. An influencer can only achieve longevity and sustained success if they possess passionate, committed followers, who are willing to follow SMIs and their creative endeavours across platforms (Brooks et al., 2021). Phan exemplifies this phenomenon with her ability to convert a loyal community of followers, into a community of patrons who actively support the influencer’s e-marketing activities in order to see her succeed. Only once an influencer demonstrates a genuine interest in their community and content, can they garner a dedicated fanbase, and facilitate the development of authentic communities in online spaces. Such a commitment is often rewarded with an audience’s disposition to support SMIs commercial content and financial endeavours.

 

With the affordances of digital technology and social networks, geography, kinship, and occupational hinderances of community development are alleviated. Portability and spontaneity enable the formation of expansive online connections. SMIs now play a pivotal role in this facilitation of online communities. Through personal investment and engagement in emotional and attention labour, strong emotional ties form between influencers and followers. Vulnerability and ‘everydayness’ are performed through technological forms, such as vlogging, to enhance a community’s commitment to themselves and SMIs. Such techniques speak to the value of authenticity and relatability of influencers in comparison to their celebrity counterparts. Audiences perceive SMIs as inspirational, and their success attainable, leading to feelings of shared accomplishment and the desire to further expand and develop their communal outreach. Combined, these factors lead to an SMI’s ability to influence mass markets, while remaining sincere in their recommendations, and truthful to their followers. Thus, social media and the influencers who contribute to such platforms, support the creation and sustainment of authentic online communities, illustrated by the immense success of e-marketing and the unwavering loyalty of community members in digital spaces.

 

PDF download: Conference Paper – Brooke Birch

 

References

 Berryman, R., &. Kavka, M. (2017). ‘I guess a lot of people see me as a big sister or a friend’: The role of intimacy in the celebrification of beauty vloggers. Journal of Gender Studies, 26(3), 307-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2017.1288611

 

Brooks, G., Drenten, J., & Piskorski, M.J. (2021). Influencer celebrification: How social media influencers acquire celebrity capital. Journal of Advertising, 50(5), 528-547. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2021.1977737

 

Faraj, S., Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Majchrzak, A. (2011). Knowledge collaboration in online communities. Organization Science, 22(5), 1224-1239. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0614

 

Hampton, K. N., & Wellman, B. (2018). Lost and saved… Again: The moral panic about the loss of community takes hold of social media. Contemporary Sociology (Washington), 47(6), 643-651. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094306118805415

 

Ki, C. C., & Kim, Y. (2019). The mechanism by which social media influencers persuade consumers: The role of consumers’ desire to mimic. Psychology & Marketing, 36(10), 905-922. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21244

 

Kim, D. Y., & Kim, H. (2021). Influencer advertising on social media: The multiple inference model on influencer-product congruence and sponsorship disclosure. Journal of Business Research, 130, 405-415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.02.020

 

Kim, D. Y., & Kim, H. (2021). Trust me, trust me not: A nuanced view of influencer marking on social media. Journal of Business Research, 134, 223-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.024

 

Lee, J. A., & Eastin, M. S. (2020). I like what she’s #endorsing: The impact of female social media influencers’ perceived sincerity, consumer envy, and product type. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 20, 76-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2020.1737849

 

Leung, F. F., Gu, F. F., & Palmatier, R. W. (2022). Online influencer marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 50(2), 226-251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-021-00829-4

 

Mardon, R., Molesworth, M., & Grigore, G. (2018). YouTube beauty gurus and the emotional labour of tribal entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Research, 92, 443-454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.04.017

 

Scholz, J. (2021). How consumers consume social media influence. Journal of Advertising, 50(5), 510-527. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2021.1980472

 

Statista. (2020). Influencer marketing worldwide. Statista. https://www.statista.com/study/28362/influence-marketing-statista-dossier/

 

Zhou, S., Blazquez, M., McCormick, H., & Barnes, L. (2021). How social media influencers’ narrative strategies benefit cultivating influencer marketing: Tackling issues of cultural barriers, commercialised content, and sponsorship disclosure. Journal of Business Research, 134, 122-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.011

 

26 thoughts on “The pivotal puzzle piece: How influencers facilitate authentic online community development and mass e-marketing

  1. Diana Baric says:

    Hi Brooke

    I really enjoyed your paper, you make lots of excellent points. Influencer culture is so interesting, because as you say it relies on the appearance of authenticity to create a loyal following, and yet the influencer no doubt tailors their persona and alters their performance to what attracts followers, at least until they gain their desired audience. I found your sections on attention labour and emotional labour really fascinating, particularly your use of Zoella as an example, emotionally playing her audience to win them back. The notion of psychological closeness, on which viewers base their trust of an influencer, works not just in selling products but also in selling political ideas. I’d be keen to hear your thoughts on my paper which discusses right-wing influencers on YouTube, as we cover a bit of the same ground:
    https://networkconference.netstudies.org/2022/csm/276/youtube-and-its-role-in-the-creation-of-a-third-place-for-right-wing-communities/

    • Brooke Birch says:

      Hi Diana,

      Thanks so much for taking the time to read and comment on my paper! I too find influencer culture fascinating – their ability to sell mass audiences on not just products, but also ideologies, is unprecedented. I think there is definitely an element of deception or tailoring to audience, as you suggest, but with most SMI’s use of participatory affordances, symbiotic positioning and transparency, this is ideally kept to a minimum. I really enjoyed reading your paper as it gave me an alternative perspective on the dramatic influence online personalities can have on their viewership.

      Thanks again 😊
      Brooke

  2. Hi Brooke,
    I enjoyed reading your paper.
    Your interpretation of community is no longer being localised; therefore, connections can be made broadly by the facilitation of social media and how that contributes to e-marketing was perfectly summarised. The point on the growth of the influencing role was significant. Do you know if the $490 million by 2027 stat is just for Australia or worldwide?
    As you mentioned, the COVID-19 pandemic has revolutionised how business is conducted and how we operate as a society. I think it will be interesting to see as we transition back to face-to-face interactions if the value of SMIs increases or drops off. What are your thoughts on influencer marketing post-pandemic?
    The example you gave of Zoella, aka Zoe Sugg is so interesting. I note that she currently has 9.3 million followers on Instagram, not including the 1.1 million followers on her @zoella account, evidence that she remains a successful influencer. As you state, ‘Vlogging invites vulnerability and intimacy with SMIs, as they provide an unfiltered and raw insight into the lives of influencers’. Playing to people’s emotions online is a decisive action, and tears seem to be a winning formula. Whether intentional or not, it was also a winning formula for influencer @adelemaree, who gained the majority of her following base from this action.

    Our papers both touch on how influencers integrate products into their daily lives, and we both agree that the most successful ones are the ones who engage their followers through their content.
    I wonder if they remain honest and open with their followers, is the success with online marketing ensured, or do they also need to have a point of difference to attract brands? Let me know what you think.
    Thank you for bringing to my attention the similarities of our papers.
    Wishing you the best for the conference
    Veronica

    • Brooke Birch says:

      Hi Veronica,

      Thank you so much for your insightful comments and queries. The $490 million figure was a worldwide statistic I found in an article, but I have since read papers that predict the industry will surpass $10 billion by this time, so there appears to be conflicting theories. I think the lower value might represent the marketing of influencer-created products, rather than brand-endorsed ones, which could explain the discrepancy. You raise a really interesting point in regards to the marketing environment post COVID-19. I honestly can’t see SMI-marketing decreasing any-time soon. Regardless of the return of face-to-face interactions, I feel that influencer marketing will continue to dominate in years to come. The last few years have really shown how the digital capabilities of the internet can amplify the reach to mass markets, and be considerably more effective in garnering consumer’s attention and their willingness to engage.

      I love that you mentioned Adele Maree – she’s one of my favourite TikTok influencers at the moment! And you’re absolutely right, her and many others seem to invite vulnerability from their followers. I too wonder whether this is an intentional action, or rather if sympathy and increased support are simply a byproduct of genuine authenticity. To your last point, I believe honesty and authenticity are crucial components to ensure the positive reception of a branded post (Kim & Kim, 2021), though differentiation and uniqueness definitely go further in securing SMI success. One example that comes to mind is Doja Cat. She has a really unique style of content on TikTok that people seem to really respond to – she’s not just authentic and raw, but also has this really funny and ‘weird’ persona that allows her to promote products and events effortlessly. I think this goes to show that genuineness and authenticity are rewarded with consumer loyalty.

      Thanks again for engaging with my paper! 😊
      All the best,
      Brooke

  3. Ciera Green says:

    Hi Brooke,
    A great read! I loved how you used Zoella as an example because i personally love watching YouTube and have watched Zoella before which i know has a very close and emotional bond with her following, which leaves a good example of how close and connected fans are and the loyalty they show the brands that influencers promote to their fans. I also have experienced vloggers crying when they upload something that fans react badly too or (like you mentioned) their products did not meet standards of how they described them to be, which usually works when tears become involved as she is actually a really nice girl who could easily win back her fanbase. With exposure to their lives, It’s almost like you are their real life friend by the way they expose their lifestyle to you. I like how you mentioned influencers exposing their faces with little to no makeup in their vlogs, being their real, authentic self, which creates a positive response by their viewers as they aren’t portraying false identities and being fake, holding expectations to their viewers.
    I myself tend to purchase many products that influencers promote over celebrities as i can relate more to SMI’s as i am exposed to their lifestyle which i compare to my own, not being far off my usual day. It is less fake and more honest as i have created close bonds that involves strong trust in opinions.

    With the pandemic occurring, I sometimes question if SMI’s get desperate in isolation that they promote brands that actually do not trust and provide misinformation about their experiences with the product/service in order to get paid with a higher viewing due to isolation. Do you think the pandemic has affected the promotion from influencers of unreliable brands to fans?

    Thankyou and look forward to hearing about your opinion.
    Ciera

    • Brooke Birch says:

      Hi Ciera,

      Thank you for your comment! I too grew up watching a lot of Youtubers, including Zoella, and found them to be authentic, relatable role models. Their content seems a lot less curated and manipulated compared to that of celebrities, and I think this is a crucial factor in their ability to successfully market to mass audiences. I definitely relate to your point about buying from influencers rather than celebrities – our lifestyles align more closely with influencers, so we possess a greater desire to attain what they have as it is conceivable that we would need the same. You bring up a really interesting point that I hadn’t considered before. During the pandemic, many brands decreased their advertising expenditure and thereby lessoned the paid opportunities for influencers. While I think inauthentic promotion of brands is present in the industry, I would argue that this shift has cemented the importance of influencer authenticity. Brands are now increasingly particular in who they select as brand ambassadors, and will generally only pick those they feel are the most genuine and receptive to their audience. I found a really interesting article about this if you would like to read more: (https://martechseries.com/mts-insights/guest-authors/how-has-influencer-marketing-changed-in-the-midst-of-covid-19/). I think this change also brought about the need for creative sponsorships, increased specialisation, and fan engagement – which all serve to increase authenticity.

      Thanks again for your insights, and for bringing my attention to a point I hadn’t yet considered!
      Good luck with the rest of the conference 😊

      Brooke

      • Ciera Green says:

        Hi Brooke,
        Thanks for getting back to me,

        You’ve raised some very important ideas that I hadn’t even thought of. I like how you mentioned the cut in marketing costs as budgets from businesses went down as they suffer and go through a financial crisis. The pandemic definitely changed influencers lifestyles by having them stay at home to try and keep their follow count by being creative and coming up with ideas to do at home, e.g. home workouts, cooking, etc seemed to be an everyday challenge with creating content. I just read your article and it helped me answer my own question too, “2020 is the year that pushes fake influencer marketing wave to break and then bring in authentic messaging”. Covid has provided the chance for influencers to develop authenticity throughout their posts with more genuine and in the moment posts. The website gave me much more to think about in terms of how covid has impacted influencer marketing. I agree with how choosing certain influencers led the change to bring in the need of creative sponsorships, fan engagement and increased specialisation would help increase authenticity, nicely said!

        • Brooke Birch says:

          Hi Ciera,

          I loved that quote from the article too! You’re definitely right in saying that the pandemic forced influencers to create more ‘in the moment’ and less curated/crafted content. Influencers seemed to thrive off the unexpected circumstance, and had the potential to capitalise markets on an unprecedented scale in unique and creative ways.

          Thank you for your continued interest in this topic!
          Brooke

  4. Amy Jeitz says:

    Hi Brooke,
    Very interesting read! I love learning about influencer culture- it’s one of my favorite topics to talk about! I really liked how you deep-dived into the different persuasive techniques that influencers are using to market products and elicit an authentic persona- I hadn’t really thought about it too much and realise now that some of my favorite influencers are most definitely using these techniques.
    I have also written about influencers in my paper about TikTok marketing and would love to get your opinion on it!
    https://networkconference.netstudies.org/2022/csm/938/the-blue-glassons-top-sopha-dopha-and-the-fall-of-white-fox-boutique-why-tiktok-is-a-detrimental-tool-in-marketing-to-gen-z-fashion-lovers/
    -Amy

    • Brooke Birch says:

      Hi Amy,

      Thanks so much for taking the time to read and engage with my paper. I love learning about influencer culture as well, it is such a new and exciting industry to discuss! I too learned a lot while researching this topic, and it opened my mind to the (often unintentional) techniques influencer’s utilise to garner loyalty from their audience. I will definitely give your paper a read as TikTok is one of the platforms I am most interested in!

      Thanks again,
      Brooke

  5. Nadarajan Munisami says:

    Hi Brooke, your paper was interesting; I loved how you blended in all the various points and explained how communities could easily be connected, thus facilitating e-marketing. Your point on how covid-19 changed the ways business is conducted is well elaborated and up to date with the situation. The pandemic has been challenging for all of us, and businesses suffered the most and had to transition from face-to-face to online to thrive during this phase. Influencers have also been of great help in promoting local businesses online, allowing them to have more visibility. Great paper.

    You can check out my paper on how social media helped in creating terror and panic during the covid-19 pandemic in Mauritius below:

    https://networkconference.netstudies.org/2022/csm/374/social-media-helped-in-creating-terror-and-panic-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-in-mauritius/

    • Brooke Birch says:

      Hi Nadarajan,

      Thank you so much for your comment! I really like your point about influencer’s promotions of local brick-and-mortar stores, as well as online ones. This is something I only briefly touched on in my paper, but is definitely another capability of influencer marketing. One Perth influencer that comes to mind in discussing this idea is @Ramonisrael. He is a TikTok influencer who promotes a lot of Perth cafes, restaurants, and hotels. Some of his videos are sponsored by certain businesses, but many are simply featured as part of his daily vlogs and general content. I personally have been influenced by his videos to visit some of these local stores, and they have alerted me to new restaurants and things to do in Perth which I was previously unaware of (as you mention – influencers increase visibility!). I think this relates back to the authenticity of influencer content. If I had seen a paid promotion for a local cafe on instagram or TikTok, I would be less inclined to check it out, but seeing one featured in a popular influencer’s vlog comes across as much more appealing and genuine. I’d love to hear if you have had any similar (or different) experiences with influencer marketing and promotion.

      I will be sure to check out your paper, it sounds like a great topic!

      Thank you,
      Brooke

      • Nadarajan Munisami says:

        Hi Brooke, I agree with you on that. Yes, I did have similar experiences with you. Still, with an influencer in Mauritius,@adishbalkisson, who posted many stories on his Instagram page, I was inclined to visit these restaurants and the shops he was vlogging about, as it was not paid promotion but his honest opinion on them.

        • Brooke Birch says:

          Hi, Nadarajan. It definitely seems that vlogging invites feelings of intimacy and authenticity, driving higher sales and successful exposure for businesses online! Thank you so much for sharing your experience. Good luck with the rest of the conference! 😊

  6. Jordan Kendall says:

    Hi Brooke,

    I loved reading your paper. Your points about how SMIs are able to generate leads with higher authenticity than celebrities are great. I definitely think that users/followers are more incline to trust the authenticity of SMI’s over celebrities because of their ‘everydayness’. I saw an article in America about two guys on TikTok who are now Americas most trusted Journalists. These two guys were/are DJ’s and because of their following, relatability and ‘everydayness’ they are being treated as if their content is the most trusted source in America. https://www.vice.com/en/article/93y5g5/these-djs-on-tiktok-are-americas-most-trusted-journalists. Do you think that the term social media influencers will become so broad that they will be seen as celebrities in the future?

    Please have a read of my paper MILLENNIALS USING TIKTOK TO PROMOTE OFFLINE ACTIVISM, RESULTING IN SOCIAL CHANGE and let me know what you think regarding the situations that arise on social media and TikTok.
    https://networkconference.netstudies.org/2022/onsc/1293/millennials-using-tiktok-to-promote-offline-activism-resulting-in-social-change/

    Kind Regards,
    Jordan

    • Brooke Birch says:

      Hi Jordan,

      Thank you for commenting! It’s so funny – as I was reading your comment I was thinking about the ‘fact or cap’ guys from TikTok, and that’s exactly who the article was referring to. I personally find their content really engaging and trustworthy, which is likely a result of their genuine personas and the seemingly amateur production of their content. Your question about the ‘celebrification’ of influencers is really thought-provoking. I touched on this very briefly in my paper, so thank you for giving me the opportunity to expand on it further! As Brooks et al. (2021) explain, the celebrification of influencers requires the transportation of audiences across different platforms (such as on social media, television, podcasts, etc.). One influencer who has reached great status is Charli D’Amelio. She currently has over 140 million followers on TikTok, has her own Hulu show, and has a drink named after her at a popular coffee franchise in the U.S. Even with all of this success, I still wouldn’t necessarily describe her as a celebrity. I think regardless of how ‘big’ they get, how much of an influence they exert, or how large a following they obtain, influencers will always be relatively distinct from traditional celebrities. They almost always feel more accessible and relatable, due to the type and frequency of content they post, and their responsiveness to fans. In addition, most celebrities can be considered ‘house-hold names’ – for example, the names Ariana Grande, Justin Bieber, or Kim Kardashian are a lot more recognisable than say Charli or Emma Chamberlain. Influencers also seem much more in-tune with their following, and have to maintain their relationship with such to experience long-term success and loyalty – celebrities don’t really have this requirement. I think while the boundaries between celebrity and influencer can be blurry, there will always remain a distinction, even when SMIs are capable of influencing greater audiences than traditional celebrities. I found this article you might find interesting (https://www.forbes.com/sites/pauljankowski/2021/03/05/not-all-influencers-are-celebritiesnot-all-celebrities-are-influencers-part-2/?sh=401647881f35) which discusses this overlap and the definition of celebrity in a little more detail.

      Your paper was super insightful, and I have left a comment!

      Thanks again 😊
      Brooke

  7. Felicity Dureau says:

    Hello Brooke,

    I found your paper a great read. I loved how you discussed how influencers can get cancelled and often use an explanation to help create empathy in the community. I was curious about your thoughts on after an influencer has been “cancelled” do you think they will ever be as respected as they were prior to the issue? and do you think this will forever impact their future sponsorships?

    Thanks, Felicity.

    • Brooke Birch says:

      Hi Felicity,

      Thank you for your comment! Cancel culture is something I would have liked to expand more on in my paper, so thank you for bringing it up. Cancellation online is such an interesting and consistently relevant topic – it seems like a new influencer is being cancelled each week! You bring up two points which I think have different answers. After being cancelled, influencers can definitely lose a great deal of respect from their following, though I would argue that this doesn’t necessarily inhibit their marketing success or potential to gain future sponsorships. It will of course depend on the extent to which the influencer has ‘messed up’. If serious allegations are made, this can cause sponsorships to cease and for brands to cut ties with influencers. However, in the majority of circumstances, and even in some instances where there have been severe accusations, influencers are often largely unaffected. This is due to the exhibition of remorseful behaviours, emotional labour, and apology videos or statements (Mardon et al., 2018). I researched a bit more into cancel culture and found this article by Haylock (2020) – https://www.proquest.com/docview/2479176917?accountid=10382&pq-origsite=primo&forcedol=true. She lists some recent examples of influencers being cancelled, only to return days later to an unwavering audience, and often an increased follower-count. One example that sticks out is James Charles. The SMI seems to consistently find himself in drama and inappropriate circumstances. Though he lost one partnership with Morphe after sexual assault allegations, he still has over 24 million subscribers on YouTube, is consistently sponsored by brands on a multitude of platforms, and easily surpasses 1 million views on each of his videos. I think online audiences are quick to forget and move on from such circumstances, as the internet is such a fast-paced environment. As in seen in Jenna Marble’s apology video (whereby she removed herself from the YouTube platform and genuinely took accountability for her actions), influencers who exhibit remorse and authentically apologise after cancel-worthy actions, are often rewarded with sympathy and great praise, rather than condemnation.

      I’d love to hear your thoughts on cancel culture and influencer authenticity if you get a chance!

      Thank you 😊
      Brooke

  8. Jack Simpson says:

    Hi Brooke,

    Fantastic paper, especially as a Marketing, Public Relations and Web Media student, this is an important topic to consider now as influencers are now being incorporated into the marketing mix. I personally find it difficult to trust influencers with anything to do with marketing, product placement or even just simple the things they use and often they are gifts from PR teams to create good will and relationships between the influencer and the company. In addition, while influencers want to have that participatory engagement with their fanbase, when their fanbase criticises them on say a lack of content being uploaded or even just simply a product they are selling not being of quality of even delivered. Silence is met and often completely swept away. So it’s definitely a balance. In regards to ideology I wonder what you think companies as well as influencers can do through either collaboration or simply in contract about selling an ideology to people, especially young kids online around hating certain topics, being too over the top (say with Stans for example) or even hate raiding other creators on different platforms? Anyway, great paper and while I personally don’t like any sort of celebrity due to that lack of trust the job facilitates, I think that this topic needs more coverage to get people thinking about the creators they engage with and watch online.

    Best Regards,

    Jack

    • Brooke Birch says:

      Hi Jack,

      Thank you so much for your comment! You bring up a lot of insightful points. I have to agree with a lot of the comments you have made – there is definitely an element of deception and distrust in the industry at times. There are, of course, the presence of SMIs who often disregard their fans’ requests, comments or general well-being, in favour of money and sponsorships. I would hope, however, that these influencers are in the minority. Participatory engagement can definitely reduce during times of controversy, when influencers temporarily retreat. The most authentic influencers, however, will rapidly issue apologies to ensure accountability and immense appreciation for their audience (Mardon et al., 2018). As you say, there is definitely a balance of good and bad – my paper chose to highlight the immense affordances of influencers, and spoke little to those who are intentionally deceitful. You bring up a really interesting question! I focused more on the selling of products in my paper, but selling ideologies is another unique capability that influencers possess. I actually read Diana Baric’s paper at the beginning of the conference about right-wing communities on YouTube that enlightened me to some of the issues with influencer culture. I’d highly recommend giving it a read if you haven’t already! In general, I think that influencers have much more responsibility when it comes to promoting ideologies than products. Stan culture can be extremely problematic, as can mass hate encouragement across platforms. Influencers need to be aware of their immense power, and affiliated brands should be wary of influencers, ceasing association if irresponsible actions ensue. Still, the audience should be held accountable for what content they choose to consume.

      Thank you again for your comments and queries, I found them really thought-provoking!

      Thanks

  9. Amber Dwyer says:

    Hi Brooke,

    Thank you for directing me to your paper – what a compelling read! I resonated with so many points you made and found it so interesting to really examine how much of a force social media has had in recent years and the innovative career prospects it has generated. I think it is so true that as social media has evolved and is becoming more and more saturated with SMIs, we as consumers are demanding more from the people we follow. Initially, it was enough for an influencer to have an idealised body/appearance, an aspirational makeup collection or a motivating fitness regime but nowadays, followers want that emotional labour and physical engagement from other users. I wonder if you think that this is a positive thing or if you agree with the sentiment some critiques have proposed that our expectations have gotten too high and that SMIs can no longer just post the content they want and have fun with their platform; everything must be purposeful and have a positive impact on the community?

    I also find it so interesting that whilst we love influencers for their relatability and as you said, ‘ordinary’ status, are SMIs really that similar to us? Whilst we get this personal insight into their lives, being privy to what they eat for breakfast, when they’re having a bad day or when they spend their days doing mundane admin tasks just like the rest of us, these people are being paid absurd sums of money for a couple of story posts, getting flown overseas for brand events and having their PO boxes filled with gifted products every week. I think that the “immediacy and apparent proximity” of SMIs definitely paints that facade that they are ‘just like us’, but when we analyse it deeper, is this just a tactic to gain followers, brand deals etc.? There are also many cases where we follow influencers, and celebrities because of how unattainable their lives are portrayed. I feel like Kim Kardashian is a great example that people love to engage with content almost as a form of escapism. We know that her day-to-day life is far more glamorous than the other 99.9% of the population but we love it anyway. I think people like Kim K are also very aware of this notion and have used it to their advantage, embracing their opulent lifestyle. I wonder if this level of authenticity is actually more genuine than influencers who appear to be relatable on the surface, but are actually living lives far more luxurious than what they show in their vlogs; influencers that choose to highlight the ‘low-lights’ of their day to convey that they are ‘just like us’. I’d love to hear your thoughts!

    • Brooke Birch says:

      Hi Amber,

      Thank you so much for your comment and kind words about my paper. You’re absolutely right! There has been a really distinct shift in the past few years from the popularity of physically beautiful and aspirational influencers, to those who are genuinely authentic with their audience, and value such. To your first question – I personally see the trend towards emotional labour and engagement as an immensely positive thing! I wouldn’t necessarily say that all influencer’s aim to have impactful content – though if they are, I’d imagine this could only have beneficial impacts on online communities. I think influencers can still have fun and be creative with their platforms while remaining accountable, influential and authentic. While this isn’t a requirement to success, it certainly doesn’t harm such. To your second point – the PERCEPTION of influencers being similar to ourselves is definitely stronger than the REALITY. I believe influencers to be on a scale of attainability, sitting between ourselves and celebrities. While we may never attain celebrity success, influencers (more often than not) come from humble beginnings, and simply gain fame through social media as, potentially, anybody could. I think this is where that sense of relatability stems from, rather than the success and brand trips they may be fortunate enough to experience now. Feeling like we could achieve what they did makes us want to share in and celebrate their successes (Brooks et al., 2021). With immediacy, while they may not be reliably available, the level of interaction conducted by influencers is exponentially higher than that of celebrities. So again, I’m somewhat speaking comparatively, but this will also depend on the specific influencer as well. I actually love your last point regarding unattainability being the appeal for some influencers. While I consider Kim Kardashian to be more of a celebrity than an influencer, SMIs like Molly Mae build a brand around designer items, luxury holidays and expensive clothes. You’re absolutely right to say that people aspire to have these things that are likely unattainable, but still love the authenticity of such influencer promotions. It’s definitely a thought-provoking question – and I can absolutely see how an active effort to avoid ‘normalising’ their life and not faking relatability would have a genuine appeal.

      Thank you so much again! 😊
      Brooke

  10. Nathan Huntley says:

    Hi Brooke

    This was such an interesting paper. The idea of viewers seeing SMIs as ‘relatable’ and their lifestyle as ‘attainable’ is actually so overlooked and it’s such a subconscious concept. I feel like we’re more likely to buy products that they are sponsored by or feature in their content not only because it’s literally advertised but also because it makes us feel like we’re sharing part of their life in an odd way. We’re more likely to purchase something from a creator we watch more-so than a creator we happen to stumble across but are not so familiar with. Just curious as to what you think but would you say that there is a point at which an SMIs advertisements and sponsors would eventually make them seem fake or no longer authentic as they once were? (For example an influencer may be putting up sponsored posts too often or collaborating with brands that are irrelevant to their identity)

    Thanks

    • Brooke Birch says:

      Hi Nathan,

      Thank you so much for commenting! I agree that relatability and the perception of influencer’s lifestyles as being attainable can be subconsciously felt by audiences! I really like your point about being more influenced and trusting of influencers we are familiar with. I think this builds really well on my paper’s conceptualisation of authentic community building and the relationships that develop within such. You bring up a really interesting question! There seems to be a fine line between too little and too much promotion. While followers want to see their influencers succeed and be sponsored by brands (Brooks et al., 2021), excessive brand promotion could absolutely tarnish an influencer’s reputation and authentic appeal. I found an article that you might find interesting (https://influence.bloglovin.com/sponsorship-saturation-how-much-sponsored-content-is-too-much-a53c8b594810) which explains that influencers become unappealing to their following if sponsored content makes up more than 44% of their feed. I think the biggest mistake an influencer could make, however, is promoting something that doesn’t align with their community’s interests or their own identity (Kim & Kim, 2021). This would definitely suggest that money was the main incentive for posting, and could result in temporary distrust in the influencer. However, even in these circumstances, I think that the bonds created in online communities are so strong, that audiences are often quick to forgive such, and won’t condemn the influencer, except in the most extreme of incidences.

      Thank you, good luck with the rest of the conference!
      Brooke

  11. Matthew Araya says:

    Hi Brooke,

    Thank you for suggesting I read this, I really enjoyed it. It’s good that someone wrote about influencers as they are becoming more popular with brands using them to promote products for lifestyles. I was going to write a question but Nathan already asked and you answered it. It is interesting that some influencers promote brands or products that don’t align with their values and just seem like they are doing it for money and exposure online.

    • Brooke Birch says:

      Hi Matthew. There are definitely influencers whom post sponsored content that doesn’t align with their values or audience’s interests, though I believe this to be an unusual occurrence, as most brands will sponsor influencers they feel suit their product and target audience.
      Thank you so much for commenting!
      Brooke

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>