Networked Youth in Rural Australia: How Social Media Shapes Connection and Belonging- By Maya Pizzirani


Abstract: This presentation explores how young people form connections and communicate through the use of social media platforms. These social media platforms including TikTok and Instagram offer a space for youths to express and explore their identity, and feel a sense of belonging. Drawing on concepts such as platform affordances, networked publics, and imitation publics, it examines how visibility enables connection for youth especially for those who are located in remote and rural areas. While these opportunities for youths are fundamentally important to form connections online, social media also introduces risks associated with context collapse, constant surveillance and having to carefully managing how they present themselves online.

#DigitalYouth #TikTokStudies #NetworkedPublics #PlatformAffordances #YouthCulture #DigitalIdentity #MediaStudies #OnlineCommunities

Share this:

Search Site

Comments

One response to “Networked Youth in Rural Australia: How Social Media Shapes Connection and Belonging- By Maya Pizzirani”

  1. 22870146@student.curtin.edu.au Avatar

    Hi Maya!

    I really enjoyed your exploration of how different media platforms offer a space for youths to express and explore their identity and feel a sense of belonging. Your visual slides were really engaging and the way you presented your points was effective in communicating your ideas. I especially liked your case study about rural and remote youth and how social media is used to manage isolation.
    Here are my questions I have for you:
    Q1: I really found your discussion of platform affordances like visibility and persistence interesting, especially for rural youth. Do you think algorithmic curation affects rural youth differently compared to urban youth? For example, in terms of who’s content gets amplified or how easily they can find niche communities?

    Q2:Your discussion on imitation publics was really interesting, particularly the idea that young people connect through shared participation rather than direct interaction. Im interested in how this related to young peoples agency – do these repetitive trends create opportunities for self-expression, or do they place pressure on users to conform?

    Q3: You mentioned both context collapse and the presence of surveillance from adults and platforms. How do you think these pressures shape the way young people present themselves to multiple audiences online? Do they limit their ability to express an “authentic” identity, or lead them to self-censor or carefully manage how they appear?

    🙂

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *