Skip to content

Social Media’s Role in the “Women, Life, Freedom” Protests


Abstract

This paper looks at how social media helped drive social change during the “Women, Life, Freedom” movement in Iran after Mahsa Amini’s death. When news of her death spread, platforms like Instagram, X (Twitter), and TikTok gave people a way to share their voices, show what was happening, and reach the world. This study aims to understand how online voices can challenge unfair rules and support women’s rights. Even though the protests did not lead to quick political changes, they made people around the world pay more attention. Governments placed sanctions, NGOs gave help, and more Iranians started to resist daily control. Although the Iranian government increased censorship and arrests, the movement still continues online. This case shows that even in difficult places, social media can give people the power to make their voices heard and to start long-term change.

Introduction

Social media can be a great way to drive people’s emotions and create opinions. Social platforms can influence social change. While in this case, it also had the effect of spreading rapidly to the world when Mahsa Amini in Iran was killed by the morality police due to the unregulated wearing of the hijab. In September 2022, 22-year-old Mahsa Amini, who was visiting Tehran with her brother, was stopped and arrested by the moral police. According to reliable sources, she was tortured and ill-treated in the police car for resisting, resulting in unconsciousness. She died three days after being taken to the hospital (Amnesty International, 2023). This incident caused Amini’s death to resonate with the Kurdish movement that has been campaigning against the killing of Kurdish women for decades. So they chanted ‘Jin, Jiyan, Azadî ’ (Woman, Life, Freedom) at Mahsa Amini’s funeral in protest. Some women even removed their headscarves in protest. Security forces clashed with the crowd and news of the clashes spread quickly from the Internet (Pelham, 2024). Hence, the paper will be study on the role of social media in the ‘Women, Life, Freedom’ movement in Iran, illustrates how digital platforms can drive social change by exposing government oppression, empowering grassroots activism, and challenging traditional norms, ultimately leading to increased resistance and women’s awareness.

The Death of Mahsa Amini and the Spark of Protest

The protests soon erupted in other Iranian cities from Instagram and X (Twitter), two major social media platforms that used by Irian (Hassani, 2025 ; The Lancet, 2022). Later, participatory culter exists as the news was also spread to Tiktok and telegram sparking a global debate. People also started protesting in the streets in an attempt to get the government to respect women, and this action has  managed to get the morality police to back off temporary (Pelham, 2024). Unfortunately, the Iranian government refused to acknowledge or respond to any questions regarding Mahsa Amini’s beating and the cause of her death. While the morality police did disappear for a short period, they eventually returned to the streets once the uproar had subsided. (Hafezi, 2023). Even more heartbreaking and controversial is that many women protesting on the streets were killed, sparking widespread outrage and condemnation.The Iranian government used unnecessary and excessive force to suppress protests after Mahsa Amini’s death, including sexually assaulting detainees. The months-long crackdown resulted in over 500 deaths and more than 22,000 arrests. Iranian officials refused to respond to these findings (Gambrell, 2024). This is why, after the incident, news articles with headlines like “The Failure of the Mahsa Amini Protest” started appearing one after another on Google. The roots of this slogan can be track back to women in the Kurdish National Liberation Movement in Turkey as part of the women’s rights movement (Askew, 2023). In 1998, during International Women’s Day, the Ideology of Women’s Liberation was introduced, emphasizing that women needed to break free not only from traditional social roles and the attitudes that reinforced them but also from the need for total autonomy and self-organization. Later, the Kurmanji Kurdish slogan “jîn, jîyan, azadî” (Women, Life, Freedom) started gaining popularity (Natakallam Blog, n.d.). Following the Mahsa Amini protests, this slogan was widely adopted in Iran, becoming a central rallying cry against religious extremism and in the fight for women’s freedom. 

The Role of Social Media in the Movement

The key point here is that although this protest is often labeled as a “failed” protest, it has, in fact, successfully drawn worldwide attention through social media. As Rahman & Al-Azm (2023) stated, Iran is still overshadowed by the dominance of patriarchal culture and an ideology that defends gender inequality in all aspects of society. Although the majority of Kurdish people are Muslim, the main significance of removing the hijab is not the hijab itself, but the ‘compulsion’. Many Kurdish women are opposed to a system that turns religion into a tool of domination and oppresses women’s bodily autonomy by making it legally mandatory for all women to wear a headscarf  (United Nation, 2024). Therefore, the fact that this resistance has spread across the world is already a significant step toward success. Despite the Iranian government has long exercised control over traditional media, but social media created a space where truth could be broadcast beyond borders. Platforms such as Instagram, X (Twitter), and TikTok became not only channels for real-time updates and eyewitness reports, but also virtual battlefields for resistance and solidarity. After this large-scale protest, there has been a noticeable rise in awareness among Iranian Kurdish women. We can see them gradually embracing and expressing themselves more freely on social media, whether it’s appearing in public without a headscarf or openly supporting feminism online. Under the government’s increasing oppression and authoritarian control, the courageous actions of Kurdish women in Iran remain truly admirable.

Global Solidarity and International Political Responses

Furthermore, as the incident gained international attention, people around the world start and continued to protest in solidarity. News reports show that on September 16, a year after the case, demonstrations were still taking place not only in Iran but also in cities like Paris, Brussels, and Berlin. One protester emphasized their determination by saying, “We just wanted to let everyone know that this is not going to finish,” meaning the movement will persist and their voices will not be silenced (Law et.al 2023).  Other than that, numerous world leaders and international organizations have openly condemned the Iranian government’s response to the protests and have taken concrete steps to address the situation. For example, the European Union imposed sanctions on Iran’s Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution, along with eight high-ranking individuals, including judges, lawmakers, and clerics believed to be connected to the violent crackdown on demonstrators (AP News, 2023). They also enforced travel bans and asset freezes on members of the squad involved in Mahsa Amini’s arrest, senior officials of the Revolutionary Guards, and Iran’s Interior Minister, Ahmad Vahidi (Reuters, 2022). Plus, according to The White House official website, the United States has taken action to support Iranian citizens by improving access to secure internet platforms and external digital services. In addition, the U.S. has held accountable key Iranian entities and individuals such as the Morality Police for their role in suppressing civil society through the use of violence (The White House, 2022). These responses, while mostly symbolic, added to the growing international pressure and signaled a broader shift in global attitudes toward gender-based oppression and authoritarian control.

NGO Support and the Power of Global Networks

In addition to governmental actions and public demonstrations, numerous non-governmental organizations (NGOs) have played a pivotal role in supporting Iranian protesters and amplifying their voices on the international stage. Organasations such as Amnesty International has been at the forefront, meticulously documenting human rights violations and issuing urgent calls for global action against the Iranian authorities’ brutal crackdown (NCRI Women Committee, 2024). Beyond documentation, NGOs have facilitated solidarity movements and statements. For instance, a coalition of over 80 organizations, activists, academics, and lawyers released a joint statement urging the Iranian government to repeal discriminatory laws restricting women’s freedoms (Parsa, 2023). Additionally, international women’s organizations have actively supported Iran’s protest movement, condemning the harsh government crackdown and advocating for the expansion of women’s rights (Katulis, 2025). Additionally, there are also NGOs take part in beyond statements of solidarity by offering tangible support to Iranian women activists. Organizations like United for Iran and the Center for Human Rights in Iran have created emergency funds to assist protesters facing legal consequences, loss of income, or physical and psychological trauma (United4Iran, n.d.; Center for Human Rights in Iran, n.d.). These funds have been used to provide legal defense, mental health services, and even shelter for women under threat. The collective efforts by NGOs have not only shed light on the oppressive actions of the Iranian regime but have also fostered a global network of support, empowering Iranian activists and sustaining the momentum of the “Woman, Life, Freedom” movement. Social media has played a critical role in amplifying these efforts, enabling NGOs to rapidly disseminate information, coordinate global solidarity campaigns, and connect with activists on the ground. Through platforms like Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube, the world has been able to witness the protests firsthand and respond with meaningful action (YouTube, n.d.; X, n.d.).

Social Changes Triggered by the Movement

As most of the above relates to the role social media played during the protest, we will subsequently address the social change in this case due to social media. After successful people’s protests and the murder of Mahsa Amini, common usage of social media has ushered in various significant cases of social change, both in Iran and globally. To begin with, it broke the walls of censorship within Iran, allowing citizens, especially women, to reclaim their voice and document state brutality in real time. This exposure forced the Iranian regime to make a temporary withdrawal, showing how online exposure forces authoritarian regimes to back down, even if momentarily. Beyond Iran’s borders, the protests driven by viral content witnessed increased global solidarity. People worldwide went onto the streets in protests, converting one a national movement into an international explosion seeking the rights and freedom of women. The shared vocabulary of images and hashtags formed a solidarity that was above politics and culture. Organizationally, social media mobilization forced global governments and NGOs to respond. Sanctions were slapped, access to the internet widened, and dollars were spent in order to expand the rights of women (United4Iran, n.d.; Center for Human Rights in Iran, n.d.). These are tangible fruits of a revolution spawned and fostered on the internet. But not all had improved for the better. The regime struck back with greater cyber-surveillance and repression. But even in repression, the movement continues to bear witness as the power dynamic has been changed with social media, with ordinary citizens having a platform where they can force global attention and response. And from this, it is clear that even social media protests can’t always lead to wholly positive change. Still, it is certain that in most instances, social media is the sole medium which can raise the issue and seek assistance.

Conclusion

Conclusion, the protests that followed the killing of Mahsa Amini were not only domestic protests but an international call for justice, women’s rights, and human dignity. Notwithstanding the Iranian regime’s efforts to stifle these voices by using brutal repression, social media was central to the transmission of the truth, raising awareness, and mobilizing people across borders. Social media platforms such as Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube became resistance tools whereby citizens were able to record state brutality, facilitate diaspora communities to mobilize solidarity protests, and compel the global community, including global leaders, NGOs, and human rights groups to respond. These online platforms not only kept the memory of Mahsa Amini alive but turned her into an international symbol of resistance. The social change enflamed by the movement was wildly varying from economic sanctions and diplomatic pressure on the regime in Iran to strengthening feminist networks and civil society groups. More significantly, it demonstrated how ordinary citizens, not to mention women, could resist hard-wired patriarch regimes by the power of their voice and connectivity. While social media activism in itself will not topple authoritarianism overnight, it most definitely gives access to international discourse, policy change, and support networks beyond previous reach. The “Women, Life, Freedom” movement is an example of how online activism, although not overnight, has already begun to shift opinion, disrupt oppressive structures, and organize global solidarity. It reminds us that real social change is frequently difficult and incremental, but even in opposition, the hundreds of thousands of voices that echoed through electronic media have the potential to initiate a struggle that will smolder for decades to come.
References

Amnesty International: Two years after “woman life freedom” uprising, impunity for crimes Reigns Supreme. NCRI Women Committee. (2024, September 16). https://wncri.org/2024/09/14/amnesty-international-report-2/  

AP News. (2023, March 20). EU targets top Iran body, 8 officials over rights abuses. AP News. https://apnews.com/article/eu-iran-sanctions-protests-morality-28c12c33f3e43d675ca25c847f5a9558  

Askew, J. (n.d.). Words have power: The origins of “woman, life, freedom.” euronews. https://www.euronews.com/2023/01/11/words-have-power-what-are-the-origins-of-woman-life-freedom-iran-protest-chants  

Bell, M. (2024, March 21). The Kurdish roots of “Woman, life, freedom.” NaTakallam. https://natakallam.com/blog/the-kurdish-roots-of-woman-life-freedom/  

Center for Human Rights in Iran. (2025, January 31). https://iranhumanrights.org/  

Gambrell, J. (2024, March 8). Iran is responsible for the “physical violence” that killed Mahsa Amini in 2022, UN probe finds. PBS. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/iran-is-responsible-for-the-physical-violence-that-killed-mahsa-amini-in-2022-un-probe-finds  

Hassani, S. T. (2024, March 27). Iran’s Instagram crackdown is jeopardising women’s livelihoods. Bourse & Bazaar Foundation. https://www.bourseandbazaar.org/articles/2024/3/12/irans-instagram-crackdown-is-jeopardising-womens-livelihoods#:~:text=Instagram%20is%20one%20of%20the,hijab’’%20have%20economic%20consequences   

Horton, R. (2022). Offline: Women, life, freedom—and Twitter. The Lancet, 400(10358), 1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01879-7  

Katulis, B., Salem, P., & Vatanka, A. (2025, April 2). How international women’s organizations are supporting Iran’s protest movement. Middle East Institute. https://www.mei.edu/publications/how-international-womens-organizations-are-supporting-irans-protest-movement  

Law, H., Mando, N., Chen, H., Akbarzai, S., & Tawfeeq, M. (2023, September 17). Protests erupt in Iran, one year after Mahsa Amini’s death. CNN. https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/17/middleeast/iran-protests-mahsa-amini-anniversary-intl-hnk/index.html  

National Archives and Records Administration. (n.d.). Statement by president Biden on the violent crackdown in Iran | The White House. National Archives and Records Administration. https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/10/03/statement-by-president-biden-on-the-violent-crackdown-in-iran/  

Parsa, F. (2023, September 19). Mahsa Amini’s legacy: A new movement for Iranian women | carnegie endowment for international peace. Sasa. https://carnegieendowment.org/sada/2023/09/mahsa-aminis-legacy-a-new-movement-for-iranian-women?lang=en  

Pelham, L. (2024, March 8). Mahsa Amini: Iran responsible for “physical violence” leading to death, Un says. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-68511112  

Rahman, M. M., & Al-Azm, A. (n.d.). Social Change in the Gulf Region : Multidisciplinary Perspectives (1st ed., Vol. 8, Ser. Gulf Studies, pp. 1–14). essay, Springer.

Reuters. (2022, November 15). EU sanctions 29 Iranians, three organisations over crackdown on protests. euronews. https://www.euronews.com/2022/11/15/eu-diplomacy

United Nations. (n.d.). Iran: UN experts call for strict new hijab law to be repealed | UN news. United Nations. https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/12/1158171  

What happened to Mahsa/Zhina Amini?. Amnesty International. (2023, September 15). https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2023/09/what-happened-to-mahsa-zhina-amini/  

What has changed in Iran one year since Mahsa Amini protests erupted? | Reuters. (n.d.-a). https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/what-has-changed-iran-one-year-since-mahsa-amini-protests-erupted-2023-09-11/  

Who we are. United4Iran. (n.d.). https://united4iran.org/about/  

X. (n.d.-b). https://x.com/search?q=%23MahsaAmini&src=typeahead_click&f=top  

YouTube. (n.d.). YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=%23mahsaamini  

Share this:

Search Site

Your Experience

We would love to hear about your experience at our conference this year via our DCN XVI Feedback Form.

Comments

6 responses to “Social Media’s Role in the “Women, Life, Freedom” Protests”

  1. Belle Avatar

    Hi Mavis,

    In your essay, you mentioned that the Mahsa Amini protests did not lead to immediate political reform and have been labeled a ‘failure’ by some media outlets, may i know to what extent does the absence of rapid policy change undermine the perceived effectiveness of the movement? Moreover, how might such a label influence the morale of participants and the sustainability of resistance efforts—does it risk discouraging future activism or diminishing the value of ongoing social struggle?

    1. Mavis Avatar

      I really appreciate your engagement with the topic.

      I agree that the absence of rapid policy change has indeed led some to label the Mahsa Amini protests as a “failure,” but I believe this perspective overlooks the broader, long-term impact of the movement. While institutional reform hasn’t yet materialized, the protests brings up a powerful cultural shift, especially among young women in Iran who began reclaiming public spaces, rejecting enforced dress codes, and speaking out despite the risks.

      Rather than undermining the movement, I think the lack of political change has revealed the depth of authoritarian resistance, making the protesters’ courage even more significant. Hence, I believe, in the long run, even when change is slow, movements like this reshape public consciousness and lay the groundwork for future reforms. Social media, in particular, keeps the conversation alive globally, preventing silence from settling in.

      Thanks for this great question, it really gets to the heart of how we define success in social activism.

  2. Ella Wilson Avatar

    Hi,
    This was such a moving and strong piece. I admired how you stressed in the “Women, Life, Freedom” movement both the effects and the constraints of social media, especially the observation that even without direct political change, worldwide awareness and long-term opposition were nevertheless accomplished. The part on NGO participation provided a significant angle I had not thought about. Do you believe the Iranian government’s growing censorship could eventually diminish the online influence of the movement, or has it become too globally linked to suppress?
    Thank you.

    1. Mavis Avatar

      Thank you so much for your thoughtful comment!

      You actually touched on something that quite a few people have also raised, I also received similar feedback through Facebook after sharing my paper. It really shows how deeply people are thinking about the limits of digital activism, especially in countries like Iran where censorship is growing stronger.

      I agree that this is a major concern. While censorship can definitely disrupt communication and limit reach inside the country, I believe the global connections formed through diaspora communities, NGOs, and international media have helped the movement gain a kind of resilience. It’s not immune to suppression, but it’s not easily erased either.

      So yes, it’s something I continue to reflect on as well. Thanks again for raising this, your comment really adds to the conversation.

  3. wingshan.sy Avatar

    Hi Mavis
    Thank you for sharing tyour paper. I was truly impressed by how clearly you explained the role social media played in spreading awareness and building global solidarity around the “Women, Life, Freedom” movement. Your analysis shows how online platforms allowed people to bypass censorship, document state violence, and connect across borders. It was especially meaningful to see how you highlighted both the empowerment of Kurdish women and the international response from NGOs and governments.
    I also found it very interesting how you discussed the lasting social impact beyond the protests themselves. You showed how social media not only sparked action but also became a space for reclaiming identity, expression, and resistance. Your paper reminded me of how important it is to pay attention to online publics as more than just digital crowds but as active, emotional, and political communities.
    My paper also focuses on the political power of digital platforms under authoritarian conditions. I wrote about how Telegram and a Hong Kong app called WhatsGap were used during the 2019 anti-extradition protests to organise resistance and express dissent through everyday acts like political consumption. I think our papers share a strong connection in how we both explore the way social media helps people resist oppression and build community under pressure.
    I am curious to hear your thoughts on one question. Do you think international pressure through online solidarity can truly influence authoritarian regimes in the long term, or is the main strength of these movements found more in the internal cultural shifts they inspire?
    I encourage you to read my paper if you have time. I would really appreciate your feedback or comments and I am looking forward to hearing your thoughts.
    Ally

    1. Mavis Avatar

      Thank you so much for commenting on my paper, and I apologize for the late reply! I really appreciated your question about whether digital resistance can still succeed as governments grow more advanced in censorship. In my view, international solidarity helps amplify issues and apply external pressure, but what truly sustains resistance is the internal cultural awakening it sparks. As your paper beautifully demonstrated, when civic engagement becomes embedded in daily practices like economic choices through WhatsGap, it fosters long-term emotional investment and community building.

      I also found your paper incredibly compelling. Your analysis of Telegram and WhatsGap during the Hong Kong protests was detailed and powerful. I especially admired how you used concepts like connective action and affective publics to frame both decentralized protest coordination and political consumerism. The “Yellow Economic Circle” was a fascinating example of how resistance can extend beyond the streets into everyday life.

      Your conclusion also resonated deeply with me. The idea that resistance doesn’t disappear under pressure, but simply evolves in form. I think your work offers meaningful insights into how movements adapt digitally under surveillance, and it connects strongly with the themes in my own research on the Iranian protest movement.