Skip to content

The Power of Social Media Platforms in Activism During the Russo-Ukrainian War


Abstract

The Russo-Ukrainian War had its beginnings in 2014, which was escalated by Russia into a full-blown invasion of Ukraine in 2022. It sparked an interest in online activism that is mostly advocating for Ukraine. This paper examines how pro-Ukrainian activists utilize social media platforms such as Instagram, Facebook, and X/Twitter to fact-check disinformation from Russia, create online fundraising efforts to send humanitarian aid to Ukraine, and raise awareness of the impacts of the war on Ukrainians by using viral hashtags like #StandWithUkraine. Some online communities used humour and memes as a way to advocate for Ukraine and hold pro-Russian figures accountable on social media platforms. One of the online communities is the North Atlantic Fellas Organization (NAFO), an online organization that posts pro-Ukrainian memes on X/Twitter. The efforts of pro-Ukrainian activists on social media platforms show how useful social media is during times of war.

Introduction

The Russo-Ukrainian War has lasted for over a decade, and its beginnings can be traced back to 2014 when Russia invaded Crimea in February and March 2014 before illegally annexing it on March 18th, 2014, even though Russia had previously recognized the European agreements and principles after resolving some issues. It caused other countries to condemn Russia’s actions by suspending the country from the G8 club of rich countries. It also caused Russia and its president, Vladimir Putin to be excluded from joining a meeting with the other world leaders (Waterfield et. al, 2014). 8 years later, a full-scale invasion was launched by Russia on Ukraine on February 24th, 2022, which sparked one of the most significant wars in the history of Europe (Crawford, 2022). As a result, Russia was condemned once again, this time by the United Nations (UN), which was supported by 143 countries in total who voted against the condemnation of Russia.

35 countries abstained from voting while 5 countries, including Russia, voted against the UN condemning Russia (Al Jazeera, 2022). It has also caused several numbers of pro-Ukrainian activist movements that aim to bring an end to the war, where pro-Ukrainian activists have used social media platforms to rally their support for Ukraine. This paper argues that pro-Ukrainian activists effectively utilize Instagram, Facebook, and X/Twitter to advocate for Ukraine as a way to prevent further destruction and genocide of Ukraine and its citizens by countering propaganda and false information from Russia, sending humanitarian aid to Ukraine, and raising awareness and advocacy through digital campaigns.

Section 1: Countering Propaganda and False Information from Russia

One of the ways that pro-Ukrainian activists make use of Facebook and X/Twitter to show advocacy for Ukraine is by countering Russian propaganda and misinformation regarding the Russo-Ukrainian war from the Russian media. The activists utilize several methods to dispel pro-Russian propaganda and misinformation regarding the conflict, such as fact-checking, reporting false content, and sharing verified information from credible sources. According to an article by Paul (2022) from The Guardian, an activist group named the Real Facebook Oversight Group actively monitors the policies of Facebook, and they have urged Facebook to take stronger measures against misinformation about the Russo-Ukrainian war from the Russian media outlets. The activist group has also urged Meta to completely block access to Russian state-funded media and to suspend any pro-Russian accounts that attempt to justify the aggression of war. Additionally, the Real Facebook Oversight Group requested additional information on the amount of resources that are allocated by Facebook to content moderation in Russia and Ukraine, particularly in local languages. Users of VKontakte (a Russian social networking site that is similar to Facebook) and other social media platforms reposted a photo that was taken in Lviv. The reposting occurred in March 2014, and according to a description of one of the reposts, it stated that an elderly woman was trampled by some

people when she was about to lay flowers at Lenin’s monument. StopFake, an organization that aims to dispel any false news from the Russian media, debunked the photo where they said that there had been no monument of Lenin in Lviv for more than two decades. Plus, the event of the elderly woman in question is actually a man, and he was not beaten up by others. Instead, he and other people were in a participation of a public performance during a protest against illegal immigration in 2009, which has no connection to the Russo-Ukrainian war at all (Mejias and Vokuev, 2017). The work of these pro-Ukrainian activists shows the power of online advocacy in combating misinformation, which is shown through the efforts of pro-Ukrainian activists on Facebook and X/Twitter. It also shows the importance of social media in dispelling Russian propaganda and misinformation during the Russo-Ukrainian war, where pro-Ukrainian activists try to push strict policies against Russian media and pro-war narratives, to ensure that certain accounts on social networking platforms are held accountable for spreading disinformation. Hence, not only do these digital efforts help to combat misinformation from Russia, but they also help to maintain the truth about the Russo-Ukrainian War, which ensures that credible news sources are able to deliver the latest updates on the situation regarding the citizens and military of Ukraine during the war.

Section 2: Sending Humanitarian Aid to Ukraine

Furthermore, pro-Ukrainian activists have utilized social media platforms such as Instagram and Facebook to mobilize humanitarian aid for the Ukrainians who are affected by the Russo-Ukrainian war. According to a study done by Khardikova (2023), social media has played an important role in raising awareness on the war, particularly through activism. As the Russo-Ukrainian war escalated, the activities of pro-Ukrainian activism and content creation surged to mutually support one another. The Ukrainians who live inside and outside of their home country shared content on Instagram regarding the impacts of the war on their daily lives. Due to the constant shelling from Russia, traditional activism has transitioned into digital activism, which allows Ukrainians to create petitions, making announcements, spam major brands, and block pro-Russian propaganda, with the help of online networking, which is also one of the ways for Ukrainians to reach out to international media. The contents that were shared by Ukrainians on Instagram showed their current life situation, with lots of bombings and

shootings, along with the destruction of Ukraine’s infrastructure, and call for aid to support those who are affected by the war. The constant digital activism through constantly posting and re-sharing content regarding the war caused the Russo-Ukrainian war to become a viral news on social media. As a result, Ukraine received a huge media attention, which led to the country receiving financial and military support, along with humanitarian aid from other countries. The huge support that Ukraine received after the war became a sensation on social media has also helped Ukrainians to survive by being guided out of war zones, receiving medical aid, and getting evacuated out of the country to safety. Apart from Instagram, Facebook has also played a major role in mobilizing humanitarian aid during the Russo-Ukrainian war. According to an article by Ronzhyn et. al (2023), social media platforms have become important tools for activism and response to crisis. As the war escalated, fundraising became the most common initiative that is organized on social media. Several humanitarian organizations such as Come Back Alive, Razom, Hospitallers, Pidtrymai Armiyu Ukrayiny, and Armiya SOS actively used Facebook to raise donations on fundraisers for humanitarian aid. Few public figures suchas Dorje Batu and Serhiy Zhadan were also involved in online activism through fundraising on Facebook. The personal Facebook profiles of these two individuals received high engagement from audiences, with some profiles of other public figures reaching nearly 8% engagement from their audiences, particularly the official Facebook page Serhiy Prytuly Charity Foundation, which is operated in a similar manner as a celebrity page due to the great influence of its founder even though it is officially a charity organization. However, the Facebook pages of the aforementioned organizations had a lower rate of engagement that is around 0.8%. Despite that, their reach is able to be expanded through being tagged in Facebook posts. Visual content played a great role in boosting the rate of engagements, where videos mostly generated the engagement from the audience. The posts regarding war efforts and updates on the fundraising were also quite effective on the engagement from audiences, particularly those that features stories from volunteers, soldiers, and civilians. Thus, social media platforms have proven to be powerful tools for pro-Ukrainian activists from all over the world to mobilize humanitarian aid during the Russo-Ukrainian War without being physically involved, which can possibly put the activists in a dangerous situation with the Russian military.

Section 3: Raising Awareness Through Digital Campaigns

Moreover, pro-Ukrainian activists have also raised awareness of the effects of the Russo-Ukrainian war on Ukrainians through digital campaigns on social media platforms. According to the findings of an article by Odejide et. al (2024), the effectiveness of these digital campaigns is strongly supported by the data that is presented in the article. The data collection of the article involved asking respondents about how much they engage with posts from humanitarian organizations on social media in terms of liking, sharing, or commenting on posts. The analysis of the study from the article shows that a huge majority of respondents who participated in the data collection believed that hashtags such as #StandWithUkraine and #StopRussianAggression played a great role on in raising awareness about the dire situation in Ukraine on social media platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, and X/Twitter. 41.5% of the respondents evaluated the hashtag as “Effective”, while 23.5% of the respondents considered the hashtag as “Very Effective” when it comes to raising awareness on the current situation in Ukraine. These results proved how a strategic use of a hashtag is important for maintaining social movements and capturing the attention of the media and public. Additionally, memes have also played an important role in showing advocacy for Ukraine. For example, the North Atlantic Fellas Organization (NAFO) organizes and run digital campaigns with the aim to show their advocacy for Ukraine by creating and sharing tongue-in-cheek memes on X/Twitter that depicts Ukrainian soldiers as “Fellas” (a cartoon Shiba Inu dressed in Ukrainian military gear) which mocks and trolls Russia (Smalley, 2022). During one instance on Twitter in 2022 after Russia occupied the Crimean Peninsula and parts of the Donbas region in Ukraine, Mikhail Ivanovich Ulyanov, a Russian foreign service officer who has served as Permanent Representative to international organizations in Vienna for Russia since 2018, said on his twitter account where he has no mercy for Ukrainians. It captured the attention of the NAFO, where they flooded his comments that mocked him and they also made memes about him because of his support for the genocide of Ukrainians. It resulted in Ulyanov becoming frustrated with the NAFO, where he replied to one of the NAFO members by infamously saying, “You pronounced this nonsense, not me”. His reply became a meme to the point where it became the official slogan for NAFO (Sweeney, 2023). Therefore, the importance of the role of pro-Ukrainian activists in raising awareness about the impact of the Russo-Ukrainian war and advocating for Ukraine on social media platforms like X/Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram is shown through the usage of hashtags such as #StandWithUkraine and #StopRussianAggression has proven to be essential in showing support for Ukraine, which shows that Ukraine’s struggle for freedom receives a huge amount of international support on social media.

The emergence of online communities such as the NAFO shows how effective humour and the meme culture are in fighting against Russian propaganda and holding pro- Russian figures responsible for their anti-Ukrainian statements online.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this essay proves that the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine has emphasized the importance of online activism on social media platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, and X/Twitter. These digital platforms have become a common place for pro-Ukrainian activists to fight against Russian propaganda, raise awareness on Ukraine’s struggle, and provide humanitarian support for Ukraine. Through the efforts of fact-checking possible misinformation from Russia, creating online pro-Ukrainian campaigns, and fundraising events has shown how online activism played a great role in influencing public opinion and showing global support for Ukraine. Not only did social media platforms provide a platform for advocacy, but they also ensured that Ukraine’s resistance against the Russian invasion remains a global priority. As Ukraine continues to fight for its freedom, maintaining the role of pro-Ukrainian activism on online platforms is essential for Ukraine to continue gaining international support. With that being said, continuous online activism and advocacy for Ukraine allow Ukraine’s fight for freedom and sovereignty to remain important in a global sense, which reinforces the hope for the future of Ukraine that is built on justice, resilience, and peace.

References

Al Jazeera. (2022). UN condemns Russia’s annexation move: How did countries vote? https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/10/13/un-condemns-russias-annexations- in-ukraine-how-countries-voted

Crawford, C. (2022). The Russo–Ukrainian War: “Explanations Come to an End Somewhere.” Israel Journal of Foreign Affairs, 16(3), 379–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/23739770.2022.2154503

Khardikova, A. (2023). Ukrainian Digital Media Activism On Instagram Stories During The War Against Russia In 2022: An Analysis Of Kharkiv-Related Users’ Digital Activity During March 2022. https://www.diva- portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1786280/FULLTEXT01.pdf

Mejias, U. A., & Vokuev, N. E. (2017). Disinformation and the media: the case of Russia and Ukraine. Media, Culture & Society, 39(7), 1027-1042. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443716686672

Odejide, G. S., Owolabi, B. O., Ikeokwu, K. O., & Nwachukwu, E. C. (2024). Harnessing Social Media Power: Human Rights Campaigns and their Influence During the Ukraine Crisis. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, VIII(XII), 412–420. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2024.8120032

Paul, K. (2022). Flood of Russian misinformation puts tech companies in the hot seat. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2022/feb/28/facebook-twitter- ukraine-russia-misinformation

Ronzhyn, A., Cardenal, A. S., Batlle, A. (2023). Collective Action on Facebook and Telegram During the Russia–Ukraine War. European Conference on Social Media 10(1):223-230. https://doi.org/10.34190/ecsm.10.1.1057

Smalley, S. (2022). How one group of ‘fellas’ is winning the meme war in support of Ukraine. CyberScoop. https://cyberscoop.com/nafo-fellas-and-their-memes- ukraine/

Sweeney, A. (2023). Dogs of war: Cartoon characters are taking the fight to Russia. Irish Examiner. https://www.irishexaminer.com/opinion/commentanalysis/arid- 41246980.html

Waterfield, B., Dominiczak, P., Blair, D. (2014). Russia Suspended From G8 Club Of Rich Countries. Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/russia- temporarily-kicked-out-of-g8-club-of-rich-countries-2014-3

Share this:

Search Site

Your Experience

We would love to hear about your experience at our conference this year via our DCN XVI Feedback Form.

Comments

11 responses to “The Power of Social Media Platforms in Activism During the Russo-Ukrainian War”

  1. Yazhu Wei Avatar

    Hi Elijah,

    The Ukraine-Russian war has really shown the world that events and current day happenings are easily influenced by what is shown on screens.

    As you have talked about misinformation, there are many other instances of videos from other conflicts being used to push a narrative of what is happening in the world.

    I liked how you have talked about activism for aid to Ukraine, one not discussed is the Saint Javelin Foundation that used proceeds from buying their merchandise in order to send humanitarian aid or lethal aid to Ukraine.

    1. Elijah Ethan Avatar

      Hi Yazhu Wei,

      Thank you for your thoughtful comment! You are indeed right about how something like the war can shape the public perception of ongoing events and issue, especially when it comes to misinformation that are being spread through unrelated videos to shape certain narratives. This can also cause activists and journalists to have difficulties receiving and presenting updates on the situation in Ukraine from sources that may or may not be credible.

      It is great to hear that you enjoyed reading my point about how humanitarian aid is mobilized in Ukraine through efforts in activism. I also appreciate that you brought up the Saint Javelin Foundation, because according to their official website (https://www.saintjavelin.com), they create 95% premium-quality products ranging from shirts, scarves, mugs and Ukrainian flags in Ukraine. Their official website also states that they aim to support local companies and artisans by creating 100% Ukrainian-made products by this year. Saint Javelin Foundation has also collaborated with the 2402 Foundation to support Ukraine together by creating joint projects to strengthen that support during the invasion. You can read more about their partnership here: https://2402.org/2402-foundation-and-saint-javelin-join-forces-to-support-ukraine/

      Thank you once again for your comment! I also appreciate your insight on the Saint Javelin Foundation, which is something new that I have learnt from your comment.

  2. Sherlyn Onsie Avatar

    Hello Elijah, I find your paper very informative. I learn so much from reading it. It was well written in a good and neat sequence, which is very easy to read through.

    I saw that you wrote about the false information that the pro-Russian created, and I feel like society easily believes what they read online, and I’m glad that several activists have ways to dispel the misinformation that they created.

    I wonder if you have any thoughts on what lessons future advocacy campaigns can learn from Ukraine’s digital activism?

    1. Elijah Ethan Avatar

      Hi Sherlyn,

      Thank you for your kind comment and for taking the time to read through my paper. I’m glad to hear that you find my paper informative!

      You asked a great question about what kind of lessons future advocacy campaigns can learn from Ukraine’s digital activism. One great lesson is the power of storytelling and visual media, where pro-Ukrainian activists have shared their personal stories, photos and short-form videos of the Russo-Ukrainian War, to evoke empathy from global audiences. This approach is one of the ways to counter misinformation by presenting lived experiences that are harder to distort.

      Another great lesson is platform adaptability, where pro-Ukrainian activists have strategically used online platforms such as Instagram and X/Twitter to adapt their content to fit both platforms’ features such as viral hashtags, infographics, or threads, to maintain visibility and engagement from the global audience. Through this flexible approach, future pro-Ukrainian campaigns could benefit from it.

      Thanks again for your thoughtful comment!

      Regards,
      Elijah

  3. Kai_Armstrong Avatar

    Hi Elijah,

    You’ve done a great job highlighting how pro-Ukrainian activism has leveraged the power of social media to rally global support, raise funds, and counter disinformation. What struck me most was how effective these efforts have been in the short term; Especially with viral hashtags and memes like those from NAFO gaining widespread traction.

    However, it raises an important question about sustainability. Digital activism often thrives on virality, but what happens when the global attention span shifts? As news cycles evolve and platform algorithms prioritise newer trends, there’s a risk that advocacy for Ukraine may lose momentum, even though the war continues. I wonder if this dependency on online engagement metrics makes long-term support more vulnerable to decline, despite the severity of the crisis.

    That said, your analysis does show how creative and adaptive these activist networks can be, which offers hope for maintaining relevance even in the face of digital fatigue.

    Do you agree with me when I say that the risk for promoting activism online is great for short-term awareness; however it holds a high risk of getting “lost in the algorithms” as time passes? How can we change this so that momentum in the online awareness campaigns is at a constant rise whilst the wars are still being fought?

    Looking forward to hearing from you,

    Best,
    Kai

    1. Elijah Ethan Avatar

      Hello Kai,

      I’m really glad that you brought up the question of sustainability. I do agree with you that one of the biggest challenges of online activism is how it tends to depend on virality and online engagement metrics, which can affect long-term support and advocacy for Ukraine due to platform algorithms and the rapid shift of global attention span.

      As you pointed out in your comment, the efforts of digital campaigns that are held by global communities such as NAFO have been quite effective due to the humour, relatability, and shareability of their memes. However, keeping that momentum going over time is difficult, because I agree with what you said about how online activism can risk in getting “lost in the algorithms”. This is due to the emerging of new trends and the rapid shift of global media.

      In my opinion, I think future activism could benefit from a few strategic changes, such as building a cross-platform collaborations with influencers or credible news sources to circulate the updates regarding the situation in Ukraine, which can ensure that online awareness campaigns consistently visible. Plus, online communities can also help with raising awareness on the situation in Ukraine, even when the public interest in the war decreases.

      Thank you for your comment and for asking an interesting question on sustainability.

      Best,
      Elijah

  4. SubjectArc Avatar

    This was a great and thoughtful paper. I think it opens an opportunity for a wider discussion about the value of human-centric groups’ ability to combat disinformation not just in the Russia/ukraine sphere, but the wider social media environment as a whole.

    Telegram and other non conventional social media platforms are both a bit of a throwback and forward looking. It tends to downplay the traditional social media “wall” format of a feed, and allows for chat functionality more similarly to Web 1.0 chatrooms.

    It seeks to have had the result of a flatter, more anarchical approach to information dissemination, as opposed to algorithmically curated items seen on mainstream platforms

    This is an extremely thought provoking paper, thank you for sharing it!

  5. Xavier Hans Anak Henry Apex Avatar

    Hello Elijah,

    You made a strong thesis, particularly the arguments you established in your paper.

    As I was reading your conference paper, one of the sections caught my eye, which is “Raising Awareness Through Digital Campaigns”.
    In this section, you wrote that “Additionally, memes have also played an important role in showing advocacy for Ukraine. For example, the North Atlantic Fellas Organization (NAFO) organizes and run digital campaigns with the aim to show their advocacy for Ukraine by creating and sharing tongue-in-cheek memes on X/Twitter that depicts Ukrainian soldiers as “Fellas” (a cartoon Shiba Inu dressed in Ukrainian military gear) which mocks and trolls Russia (Smalley, 2022). During one instance on Twitter in 2022 after Russia occupied the Crimean Peninsula and parts of the Donbas region in Ukraine, Mikhail Ivanovich Ulyanov, a Russian foreign service officer who has served as Permanent Representative to international organizations in Vienna for Russia since 2018, said on his twitter account where he has no mercy for Ukrainians. It captured the attention of the NAFO, where they flooded his comments that mocked him and they also made memes about him because of his support for the genocide of Ukrainians. It resulted in Ulyanov becoming frustrated with the NAFO, where he replied to one of the NAFO members by infamously saying, “You pronounced this nonsense, not me”. His reply became a meme to the point where it became the official slogan for NAFO (Sweeney, 2023).”

    From here, I thought of “Wouldn’t Mikhail Ulyanov escalate the war due to the provocation of meme culture since some individuals do not take humorous jokes well?” From my perspective, meme culture can be used as an advocacy feature in digital campaigns, but this culture can escalate the situation that crosses the boundaries, especially for those who view meme culture as provocative.

    I would like to know your perspective regarding whether “meme culture” can alleviate situations with intensification, as they are acknowledged as advocacy features.

    1. Elijah Ethan Avatar

      Hi Xavier,

      You made a great point – while memes are powerful tools to advocate for something, especially in raising awareness on the effects of the Russo-Ukrainian war on Ukrainians and countering any kind of misinformation from Russia, they can also provoke certain reactions from those that are targeted by memes. When it comes to the NAFO, they build a great solidarity among Ukrainians, and counter Russian propaganda with the humour in their memes. However, they can also risk in escalating tensions between Ukraine and Russia, especially when their memes target a Russian official such as Mikhail Ulyanov, who took the memes personally.

      With that being said, meme culture can both advocate for a country and risk in intensifying a conflict between both countries, depending on the context and audience of the memes.

      Thank you for your comment.

  6. wingshan.sy Avatar

    Hi Elijah

    Thank you for sharing such a well-researched and compelling paper. I really appreciated how you showed the power of social media in shaping global support for Ukraine during the Russo-Ukrainian War. Your analysis of how platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and X are used for fact-checking, fundraising, and digital campaigning was very clear and insightful. I found the example of NAFO particularly interesting. The way they use memes and humour to challenge propaganda shows how creative digital activism can be in high-stakes conflicts. It reminded me of how ordinary users can reshape political narratives through accessible and relatable content.

    My paper also explores how digital platforms support resistance in difficult political environments. I wrote about how Telegram and a Hong Kong-based app called WhatsGap were used during the 2019 protests to organise resistance and express political identity through everyday practices like consumption. Like your paper, mine also focuses on how social media helps communities resist oppression and connect globally without relying on traditional media or institutions. I would love to hear your thoughts on something. In your opinion, do you think the use of humour and memes in activism makes movements more accessible or could it risk undermining the seriousness of the issue over time?

    I encourage you to read my paper. I would really appreciate any feedback or comments you might have and I look forward to hearing your thoughts.
    Ally

    1. Elijah Ethan Avatar

      Hi Ally,

      I’m really glad to hear that the part about NAFO stood out to you. I truly agree with you on how memes and humour are powerful tools in digital activism when it comes to a global conflict such as the Russo-Ukrainian War.

      I like how you made a parallel between my paper and your paper, since both of our papers focuses on how digital platforms can help communities fight against oppression. The way protestors used digital platforms that you mentioned which are Telegram and WhatsGap during the 2019 Hong Kong protests shows how communities can coordinate to influence the public opinion in online spaces.

      As for your question: I do think that the use of humour and memes in activism makes movements more accessible, especially for younger audiences who enjoys the type of humour that is shown through everyday memes. However, I also think that humour and memes can risk undermining the serious of the issue, especially when they are overused to the point where they might desensitize the issue or reduce the impact of the message. With that being said, the key here is the balance between the usage of humour to engage with an issue, while keeping it respectful with the issue.

      Thank you for your comment, Ally. I am looking forward to read your paper and give feedback on it!

      Best,
      Elijah