Skip to content

The correlation between curated online identities enabled through YouTube, and cases of domestic abuse


Abstract

This conference paper examines how the social media platform YouTube encourages users to construct a specified online identity, which may distort the audience’s reality of their perception of them. Conducting a content analysis on South Korean YouTuber Tzuyang’s domestic abuse case, pinpointed how a curated online identity can deceive viewers for obtaining self-preservation. In contrast, research also leads to understanding YouTube as a major platform to combat condonement of domestic abuse, with ongoing chains of advocacy for social change regarding awareness and action.

Discussion and Analysis

YouTube channels may disguise domestic abuse cases if the channel alters the audience’s perception to be in favour of their curated identity. An online platform, for instance YouTube, allows its users to construct a preferred identity to present to an audience online. This fosters creativity, freedom and ambiguity for the platform holders to master the version of themselves they seek to publicly advocate via their video channels. To construct an online identity, one must confine their target audience and create a persona to match the audience’s demand. Once a content creator has their audience’s appeal, it is difficult to perceive them as anything else than the image they have created (Li, 2023). This notion alludes users masking behind curated identities and implies the likelihood of deception, altering their audience’s reality of them online. Lanchimba et al., 2023, discusses social media as a contributing factor to influencing domestic violence situations, which can be linked with the concepts of deception and self-preservation in a user’s presented online identity.

YouTube is a form of social media which provides its users with platforms to upload videos, which are made discoverable for other users for viewing and interaction purposes. YouTube’s existing popularity enhances the platforms appeal for newly introduced content creators, because of accessibility to audience reach, shareability and payments upon channel growth (YouTube, 2025). Uploaded YouTube content is generally pre-recorded and may assist in abetting domestic abusers to construct a likeable online persona, filtering out what the abuser chooses to hide from public view. In Tzuyang’s case, her ex-partners strategy in using YouTube to exploit her was financially driven, profiting off her channel by entitling himself to her earnings. Tzuyang is a popular South-Korean youtuber with over 10million followers, well-known for producing mukbang videos and has acquired an international and domestic following. Tzuyang’s mukbang videos are described as content her audience resonates with, as opposed to just food consumption on screen. She is bestowed as a beloved online companion, due to her inviting nature and energetic presence. Her persona attributes portrayed on screen are innocent, happy and fixated with mukbang’s, making it difficult to distinguish suspicions of a sinister situation behind the scenes.

 After 5 years of uploading mukbang content on her channel, Tzuyang posted a YouTube video revealing her identity as a domestic abuse victim and survivor. Tzuyang shared her story virally reaching her following of 10million people plus, as well as external viewers, where she detailed the severe abuse endured over those 5 years from her ex-partner (Yim, 2024). It had been revealed that Tzuyang was forced by her ex-partner into her role as a mukbang youtuber, to produce mukbang content for a living. He crafted the identity she would advocate online for her viewers, revealing how her online identity deceived her fans from realising the truth behind her channel (Dragiewicz et al., 2018). Through threatening to disclose intimate videos taken of her to the public, he blackmailed her into granting him the position of CEO of her agency and claimed 70 percent of the revenue she earned. Tzuyang was left with only the remaining 30 percent and couldn’t afford necessities without financial assistance. When Tzuyang attempted to halter the continuation of her mukbang videos, she received an increase in physical, emotional and sexual abuse from her ex-partner. Her videos would often feature her with bruises and wearing plasters and bandages, but when asked to address her injuries, she would deflect saying she was clumsy, with her fans assuming her injuries were from food related incidents. Therefore, the possibility of an abusive situation was ruled out, and she continued with her Mukbang videos as normal, with her fans believing the curated narrative. Behind the scenes, her ex-boyfriend would strategically avoid using physical violence against her face, focusing only on her body so that she would present healthy to her audience and could continue to create her content, mostly pictured wearing long sleeves to cover up evidence of her injuries. Tzuyang suffered in silence for 5 years before mustering up the courage to file multiple evidence-based lawsuits against her ex-partner, although the case was discontinued when her ex-partner took his own life.

After the news release of her case, Tzuyang took 3-months off from posting content on her YouTube Channel. This was due to the assumption that with her cases public reveal, it wouldn’t be possible to continue her line of work anymore. Although Tzuyang was initially forced into the content creation industry, she wanted to launch her comeback and continue her mukbang content which she gained popularity for. This was because although her online presence stemmed from an abusive situation, her audience who loved her content is what kept her going, indirectly aiding her with the courage and confidence to truly take ownership of her platform and continue producing her mukbang videos. After her time off, Tzuyang released a 23-minute video on her YouTube channel titled “it’s been a while” (tzuyang쯔양, 2024). The video features her in front of the camera, answering comments on live stream about the aftermath of the public release of her story. In her video she addresses comments, concerns and shares insights on her current life in a friendly open-minded and respectful manner. Tzuyang managed to reinvent herself online and not let her endured abuse dictate and define her, ultimately using her platform to speak out on raising awareness of her situation, in hopes to prevent others from experiencing similar (Hyun-hee, 2024). Tzuyang’s story reinforces how curated online identities can distinctly distort an identity holder’s reality for their viewers. Her story demonstrates the dangers of one-sided portrayal for identities advocated online, and how easy an audience can become so consumed in content, that they are unable to discern an abusive situation. Tzuyang’s story also highlights how having an online platform can bring immense confidence to a user, even if they are situated in the lowest of moments. The love and support Tzuyang felt from her platforms following, encouraged her to persevere forward in life despite her suffering, and externally aided her through tough times. Tzuyang’s channels audience was the reasoning behind wanting to resume her Mukbang channel; to continue the established connection she has made with her fans.

When a curated online identity is advocated specifically to the public, speaking out about an important cause in a rightful and authentic way, an audience often feels inclined to engage their gratitude and support towards the platform, which may instigate a movement for social change (Nolet et al., 2020). Correspondingly, when a famous YouTube personality reveals to be a victim of an abuse case, other creators, regardless of their platform size feel inclined and encouraged to speak out about their thoughts on the situation, sharing personal stories sparking a conversationalist movement on the topic. Because Tzuyangs domestic violence case was broadcasted throughout South-Korea and internationally, this started a wave of discussions with many creators using their platforms to share their own experiences, as a safe space to advocate themselves, and in support for Tzuyang amongst other victims of domestic abuse cases.Liberating Tzuyangs story to the public, encouraged other South Korean YouTubers to use their platforms for advocating the importance of Influencer well-being. Although not all content circulating this topic was related to domestic abuse, Tzuyangs story was another case made public to initiate media conversations about surrounding issues of mental health and all forms of abuse. Her story contributed to combatting an on-going issue which has inspired more people to come forward with their own stories. The goal of this conversationalist movement is to raise awareness and prevent other people from succumbing to abusive situations. Using media platforms to advocate against domestic violence and for mental health, in particular influencer mental health, can provide a sense of comfort to people experiencing abusive situations, for reassurance that they are not alone, and that there are accessible resources for support and assistance. Additionally, an individual in an abusive environment may not realise the detrimental effects of their situation and be unaware that they are experiencing abuse. Therefore, online advocacy for domestic abuse awareness, may enlighten a person of their situation, providing the clarification they need to seek refuge (ANROWS, 2016).  These actions may equip from online movements in the form of campaigns, which stem from publicly disclosed abuse cases. A past global YouTube hashtag campaign known as the #MeToo movement, sparked the beginning of a symbol of unity for victims who experienced forms of domesticated abuse. #MeToo was introduced to the media in 2017, following a worldwide movement of people using their platforms to come forward with videos using the ‘#Me Too’ in their captions, sharing their victim stories. The hashtag campaign allowed victims to feel empowered and heard, enabling global action for a specified focus on the topic of sexual partner abuse (Global Fund for Women, 2021). #MeToo was the beginning of an activist movement for raising awareness and aiding support for all abuse victims and was a beacon for actioning social change, using YouTube as the frontline network to do so. Gordon, 2023, explains that the launch of #MeToo, has increased the discussion for domestic abuse awareness and support platforms. The platforms provide content ranging from victim documentaries to short narrative videos, assisting in understanding the effects of domestic abuse. Having this content accessible contributes heavily to supporting victims, providing educational and emotional aid.  

Furthermore, domestic abuse awareness platforms remain as beneficial eye-opening material for YouTube’s audience, which holds importance amongst curated identity content. Vahed et al., 2024, unravels how an audience’s viewing pattern filters out negative behaviours to present most platform holders in a positive light, appealing to the likes and interest of their audience. These viewing patterns ensure difficulty to differentiate between real identities and curated identities, as the identities we perceive online are made specifically for us, meaning we seek to believe they are reality, with most circumstances highlighting that they are not (Lestari et al., 2019). Tzuyang’s Case was one of thousands of victims of domestic abuse, many who may also portray an online identity which has been curated to mask underlying issues. With increasing numbers of YouTube viewers, educating themselves on the forms of domestic abuse through the awareness channels, Platforms like Tzuyang’s YouTube channel which may be disguising abusive situations, can be unmasked sooner, as viewers will be more equipped to facilitate recognising warning signs and distinguishing curated content from reality.

Conclusion

To summarize, YouTube enables platform holders to create curated online identities, distorting the viewers reality of them. YouTube gifts a user with the ability to invent a new persona curated in favour of the platforms target audience, and the platform holder themselves. Broadcasting a new persona online and gaining audience attention and support, assists in building confidence and creativity. However, although a platform’s curated identity may attract high levels of audience appeal, a popular YouTuber’s perceived identity admiration may be susceptible to disguising domestic abuse cases. Tzuyang’s story, of a YouTube personality silently battling domestic abuse from her ex-partner over 5 years, reveals how much a curated identity can influence our perception. The #MeToo movement initiated a call for awareness on the seriousness of domestic and sexual abuse, enabling many campaigns and media usage to follow, keeping the topic live and heard. To conclude the analysis, a viewer’s education towards the topics of domestic abuse awareness via viewable media platforms like YouTube, may assist in bringing to light a disguised domestic abuse case, in daily consumed content.

References

ANROWS. (2016). Media representations of violence against women and their children: Final report | ANROWS – Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety. ANROWS – Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety. https://www.anrows.org.au/publication/media-representations-of-violence-against-women-and-their-children-final-report/

Dragiewicz, M., Burgess, J., Matamoros-Fernández, A., Salter, M., Suzor, N. P., Woodlock, D., & Harris, B. (2018). Technology facilitated coercive control: domestic violence and the competing roles of digital media platforms. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 609–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1447341

Global Fund for Women. (2021, June 7). “Me Too” Global Movement. Global Fund for Women. https://www.globalfundforwomen.org/movements/me-too/

Gordon, S. (2023, April 28). What Is the #MeToo Movement? Verywell Mind. https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-the-metoo-movement-4774817

Hyun-hee, K. (2024, October 9). YouTuber Tzuyang Returns After Three-Month Break. K-En News. https://www.k-ennews.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=4334

Lanchimba, C., Díaz-Sánchez, J. P., & Velasco, F. (2023). Exploring factors influencing domestic violence: A comprehensive study on intrafamily dynamics. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14(1243558). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1243558

Lestari, T., Mulyana, E. H., Nurzaman, I., Gandana, G., & Apriyaningsih, E. (2019). Exploring the integrating potentials of role playing with YouTube in building student’s self confidence. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1318(1), 012014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1318/1/012014

Li, J. (2023). The Practice of Social Media in Relation to Identity and Online Self-Curation. Journal of Linguistics and Communication Studies, 2(4), 28–33. https://doi.org/10.56397/JLCS.2023.12.03

Nolet, A.-M., Morselli, C., & Cousineau, M.-M. (2020). The Social Network of Victims of Domestic Violence: A Network-Based Intervention Model to Improve Relational Autonomy. Violence against Women, 27(10), 107780122094716. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801220947169

tzuyang쯔양. (2024, October 4). 오랜만에 인사드려요. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jrlZoC_LImQ

Vahed, S., Goanta, C., Ortolani, P., & Sanfey, A. G. (2024). Moral judgment of objectionable online content: Reporting decisions and punishment preferences on social media. PLOS ONE, 19(3), e0300960–e0300960. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300960

Yim, H. (2024, July 11). South Korean YouTuber Tzuyang says she was victim of dating violence. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/south-korean-youtuber-tzuyang-says-she-was-victim-dating-violence-2024-07-11/

YouTube. (2025). YouTube. In YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/

Share this:

Search Site

Your Experience

We would love to hear about your experience at our conference this year via our DCN XVI Feedback Form.

Comments

16 responses to “The correlation between curated online identities enabled through YouTube, and cases of domestic abuse”

  1. Yana_Chua Avatar

    Hey Jacinta, your post really caught my attention especially the way you approached such sensitive topic with care and thoughtfulness. I appreciate how you highlighted Tzuyang’s story. As one of her viewers myself , I was shocked to learn about what she had been going through behind the scenes. It really shows how much we can miss when we only see the curated versions of influencers online. I completely agree with your point about how sharing these stories can create a ripple effect and empower others to speak up. How do you think online platforms can better support influencers who speak out about abuse or mental health struggles?

    Also, here is the link to my article if you would like to take a look! Thanks! : https://networkconference.netstudies.org/2025/csm/5553/tiktok-and-the-paradox-of-addiction-its-potential-as-a-tool-for-healing/

    1. Jacinta Robless Avatar

      Hi Yana,

      Thankyou for your response to my paper, I was very passionate about discussing Tzuyang’s story with caution and care for the basis of my analysis. Her story examples the concepts of curated online identities, deception, self-preservation and domestic abuse inherently well . It is devastating to realise that her curated online identity enabled through YouTube and perceived well by fans, was later revealed to have deceived her audience and had disguised her real identity as a victim of domestic abuse for 5 years. Her court case was unexpectedly leaked publicly, forcing her to release an explanation video of her domestic abuse story on her YouTube channel. Although she was met with mostly support from her viewers and other creators upon the release of her story, she also received backlash and mockery from news outlets and conversationalist platforms. I imagine this would have caused her immense distress and detrimentally affected her mental health, as the backlash was extremely insensitive to her personal situation and was purposely designed to invalidate her and prompt a reaction.

      To answer your question, I believe online platforms should audit their content filtering strategies to heavily advance their flagging systems in their algorithms, ensuring negativity is flagged immediately, filtered out and that there are greater consequences for spreading unnecessary hateful conversations. This should especially be carried out at the extent of a creators mental health, after publicising something personal for education and awareness purposes. This is to avoid disincentivising creators to speak on topical issues like abuse and mental health struggles, to ensure positive and insightful discussion remains in the social conversationalist movement chains which surf platforms across the internet.

      I hope my explanation was helpful in answering your question, please let me know if you would like me to clarify or answer anything else. I look forward to reading your paper!.

      Thank you again.

      Jacinta

  2. Aparna Avatar

    Hi Jacinta,

    I really enjoyed your paper and it offers a powerful and necessary scrutiny of how curated online identities, particularly on YouTube, can conceal painful realities like domestic abuse. The study of Tzuyang’s case not only personalises the discussion but also highlights how difficult it is for the followers to see past the perfect content creators make. I think one of the biggest strengths of this paper is that it addresses the mental health of creators, which is rarely discussed. It also challenges the common misconception on the joyful and carefree lives of influencers and emphasises the emotional labour and potential trauma behind the scenes.

    As someone who personally knows a few individuals who have endured domestic abuse, I found the paper particularly moving. It is incredibly hard to be in such a vulnerable position, and even more so while being in the public spotlight. This paper not only helped me in understanding digital identity and audience perception but also opened up further space to reflect on how advocacy unfolds in online spaces. So I would like to know your thoughts on the potential and effectiveness of online campaigns like #MeToo in offering real-world support systems and policy reforms?

    Overall this paper is a great contribution and you did a great job of balancing theoretical insights with a real world case study.

    Thank you for a thought-provoking paper.

    1. Jacinta Robless Avatar

      Hi Aparna,

      Thank you for your thoughtful discussion and response to my paper. In terms of the effectiveness of social media driven online campaigns like #MeToo, I believe that actioning an online campaign is a great start for instigating awareness and actioning support platforms quickly for an important issue. I do believe that #MeToo’s succession was enhanced by it’s call to action from viewers to encourage as many people as possible to voice their opinions and share their personal experiences regarding the topic of gender partner abuse. Therefore I believe that online campaigns specific to signifying an important cause will provoke an effective response, as long as the campaign includes a call to action from its viewers to encourage user generated content. This is because a campaign which incentivises or encourages users to provide responses, will increase campaign participation and engagement rates. This will contribute to generating awareness efficiently with increased audience reach, further leading to arising demand for opportunities regarding enhanced support systems and revaluated platform safety policies.

      I hope my response has answered your question, please let me know if you would like any further clarification.

      Thankyou!

      Jacinta

  3. Ella Avatar

    Hi Jacinta,
    I like this unique take on an issue I don’t think is talked about enough. I loved that there was a positive spin where you talked about accessible education on domestic violence possibly helping viewers spot signs sooner in a similar situation. This strongly resonates with me as sadly, I have been seeing a few creators on different social media platforms recently who I feel may be suffering from some form of abuse. I think having a look at these other case studies would be amazing although I loved your in depth analysis into the case Tzuyang. Do you think this is an issue for all creators on all platforms and perhaps there’s a stigma as well where many feel they have to create a persona/can’t be their authentic selves? This may be because many are creating a business/as with Tzuyang, forced to by their abuser but what are some ways to combat this pressure to create a persona?

    1. Jacinta Robless Avatar

      Hi Ella,

      Thankyou for taking time to read my paper and share your thoughts on my analysis!

      I think you have raised an important discussion point, I do believe their is a pressure to perform online with presenting a persona that creators feel viewers desire. I think trending culture has a huge harmful influence on this, as I believe creators who do not ‘keep up’ with the current trending culture are often black listed on media platforms and are unable to maintain visibility for their platform’s when posting their authentic selves. This is where I think the stigma has developed, combined with the ideology of self-preservation and that it is easier to maintain a curated identity to the public than a realistic transparent approach.

      I do believe there are unfortunately other people out there in a similar circumstance as Tzuyang was once in. Through Tzuyang speaking out on her situation and highlighting the signs of abuse her audience missed, assists in identifying and discerning distrustful content from creators in the future. However, I also see Tzuyang’s case exampling how in some cases we may never understand the reality on the opposite side of the screen, due to only experiencing one side of it. I believe to combat the pressure of presenting curated persona identities online, viewers must seek to engage with platforms advocating positivity and genuineness instead of harmful trends. On the contrary, creators must also defy harmful trends by initiating a movement to embrace a sense of realism, when advocating their pursued identities online.

      I hope my response has assisted your queries towards my paper. Please reach out if you have anymore.

      Thank you!
      Jacinta

  4. Alexia Avatar

    Wow Jacinta, this was incredibly thought-provoking, I honestly had never spent much time thinking about how we are presented with idealised visual representations online when in reality it could be hiding something so sinister.

    A massive reminder not to take everything we see online at face value, and also to look out for our global community if we see something that isn’t right! Amazing work.

    1. Jacinta Robless Avatar

      Hi Alexia,

      Thank you for your compliments towards my paper. Researching this topic has well informed me of how much curated identity content we consume on a daily basis, that could be potentially disguising underlying issues. It indeed is a huge reminder to educate ourselves on these matters and understand that content consumed online demonstrates only one side to a story.

      Thank you again for reading my paper and leaving a thoughtful response!

      Jacinta

  5. John Lim Avatar

    Hi Jacinta,

    What an eye-opening piece! I really liked the way you advocated for Tzuyang within your piece for advocation. Can advocacy be presented in an Essay format too? Just a fleeting thought. Did really well to evoke some emotion in your piece Jacinta well done!

    Reminds me of the Netflix documentary about Ruby Franke and how she abused her family if they did not give her the content that she wanted to appear as a normal family. Really goes to show that people behind the screen can either be hiding their abuse like Tzuyang or the ones doing the abusing like Ruby, but would be hard to believe since she appears as the perfect mom on social media.

    Do you think that these false personas can make it hard for a jury to see or at least influence how a jury would see a person accused of abuse between their social media personality which they may carry over in real life and their crimes? Which in a sense is also asking do you think social media plays a part in how abuse cases are handled by legal proceedings? Also, I’m also curious if fans were the one who pointed out that Tzuyang was being abused and pointed it out to her and encouraged her? If so how did they find the signs? If not, what kind of education or awareness can we bring so people can spot abuse on social media?

    Thanks for the read Jacinta, looking forward to learning more from your thoughts.

    1. Jacinta Robless Avatar

      Hi John,

      Thank you for your insightful response to my paper! You have identified some interesting concepts which I’m intrigued to expand on. I appreciate that you felt my paper evoked emotion, I was extremely passionate about Tzuyang’s case and ensuring her story was told with consideration. I do believe an advocacy piece can be presented in an essay format, and I agree that my paper could have adopted this structure more to improve the academic flow of thought. Thank you for observing this, I will be sure to take this into account when writing future essays.

      I am familiar with the Ruby Franke documentary, her platforms existence is sickening now knowing what she put her family through to establish a media presence on YouTube. I considered using her case as the frontline of my analysis before I decided to research Tzuyang, however, maybe the inclusion of both would of made a thorough contrasting discussion for curated online identities associated with domestic and child abuse cases.

      I do believe that falsely portrayed persona’s make it difficult for anyone to discern reality, creating potential bias towards the defendant. Therefore I assume there would be strict processes and resources available to assist in exposing the reality of a situation which has been disguised through social media, before deciding on a ruling for the defendant. Correspondingly, I think that in a legal environment all relevant aspects are assessed. If the case is formulated from activity on social media, an investigative approach would become specific to analysing the plaintiff and defendants digital footprint, to identify signs or evidence of misconduct.

      I mentioned in my analysis that Tzuyang’s fanbase were the one’s who noticed bruises and plasters on Tzuyang’s arms, when she rarely exposed them in videos. Her fans raised concerns about this early on, however she dismissed these through implying her injuries were from ‘being clumsy’. After this, no concerns about her well being from her audience were raised again, with her victim of abuse statement coming to her audience as a shock. I think specified content in our daily search algorithms on social media that highlights the warning signs of abuse, would help keep an openminded and informed approach on the dangers of curated identity content, when navigating social media posts. This would encourage viewers to look out for odd behaviours/out of character moments from creators they interact with online, and generate more online conversations circulating the matter.

      Thank you again for your input and interest in my paper John, I hope my answers were helpful for your questions! Please let me know if you have any further discussion points.

      Jacinta

  6. Milagros Wade Avatar

    Hi Jacinta,

    Thank you for shedding light on such a critical and often overlooked topic, which is the impact of curated online identity on followers’ (viewers’, in this case) perception of reality. Although focused on the South Korean influencer’s case, your paper offered a powerful yet careful exploration of how online identities in general can mask harsh offline realities, particularly in cases of domestic abuse. I wasn’t aware of the story of Tzuyang, and reading about how her carefully maintained online persona continued to thrive while she endured years of abuse was both shocking and deeply moving. It really highlights the terrifying extent to which digital platforms can obscure suffering behind seemingly ‘normal’ or appealing content.

    Your analysis immediately made me think of the case of Gabby Petito, which I’m sure you’re familiar with. After watching the Netflix documentary about her, I couldn’t help but reflect on how social media can both conceal and – paradoxically – reveal abuse. Like Tzuyang, Gabby curated an image of a happy, adventurous life while the truth behind the camera was tragically different.

    Similarly, a recent case from Love is Blind: Argentina resonated with these ideas. A contestant named Emily got engaged to Santiago, who later physically assaulted her. After Emily publicly spoke out, Santiago was heavily scrutinised, and many followers – who had already suspected troubling behaviour (unlike these other online cases) – rallied behind her. Their support and their attention to the signs helped bring the issue to light as it gained a huge virality, ultimately supporting her pursuit of justice. If you want to read about this story, you can do so via the following link: https://buenosairesherald.com/society/love-is-blind-argentina-participant-accuses-co-star-of-abuse?fbclid=IwY2xjawKECg9leHRuA2FlbQIxMQBicmlkETE0Q2NnbnNOTTA5aTNCaHZQAR5NrAsB1JevE0mzwZfL64sEVnziijKv8gCHFXu2oG0l6ZIYlzZrGq8DeTFynw_aem_jg4g-1fD32mPqHilVxzw4g.

    Thank you again for tackling this subject appropriately and with such detailed information. If interested, I can leave you the link to my own conference paper that talks about feminist activism on Instagram: https://networkconference.netstudies.org/2025/onsc/5727/leading-the-feminist-argentinian-community-on-instagram-mujeres-que-no-fueron-tapa-women-who-were-not-on-a-magazine-cover/

    Something tells me you’ll find this topic interesting. Thank you!

    1. Jacinta Robless Avatar

      Hi Mila

      Thank you for taking time to read my paper and for your thoughtful in depth comment, I really appreciate it! It really is horrifying to realise the extent creators go to use digital platforms like YouTube to disguise sinister actions behind the scenes. I have watched the Netflix documentary of Gabby Petito, it is such an emotional watch and leaves you frustrated knowing that only now that she has passed is her story getting out there and told. Your Love is Blind: Argentina example is a great presentation of media coming to a victims defence, and it is good to hear that her followers had already picked up on the signs of abuse. I resonate this with Tzuyang, as her fans were incredibly supportive once they learned of her situation. Still I believe it is devastating that social media can disguise these cases so well that victims only feel supported when they reach out to the public, leaving many not in a position to do that, as Tzuyang once was.

      I have read your paper on feminist activism in Argentina, was truly a well structured and analysed read!

      Thank you again Mila,

      Jacinta

  7. Gracias Avatar

    Hi Jacinta,

    This is a very insightful and well-structured paper that highlights the double-edged nature of online identity construction, particularly on platforms like YouTube. I love how your paper raised an advocacy regarding the case of Tzuyang that is both compelling and timely, especially in how it reflects the complexities behind curated content and real-life issues.

    I also appreciate how you didn’t just focus on the negative aspects, but also emphasized YouTube’s potential as a platform for advocacy and awareness. It made me reflect on how social media can simultaneously distort and empower. One question I had while reading was, because of the numerous cases like this, has YouTube already improved its platform policies to better support victims and prevent the misuse of curated identities for self-preservation?

    In connection with this, I would like to recommend my paper in which shows how social media similarly became a powerful space for political engagement and collective action.
    https://networkconference.netstudies.org/2025/onsc/5358/from-screens-to-streets-social-medias-influence-on-the-pink-movement-in-the-philippines/

    1. Jacinta Robless Avatar

      Hi Gracias,

      It is indeed interesting to dwell upon Youtube’s ability to empower people and also distort realities leading to harmful consequences. YouTube has taken evolving precautions to combat against misuse of the platform, but there are still improvements needed. YouTube has altered functions on the platform such as allowing of filtering comments, blocking users, and flagging inappropriate or abusive content. However this doesn’t directly address identifying performative and manipulative content. I do believe future updates will tackle this better, however for now this still leaves victims vulnerable, and more awareness on this type of abuse needs to be spread, to keep platform dwellers educated on online disguised misconduct.

      Thank you so much for taking time to read and comment on my paper!, I have read yours and it was a highly interesting and engaging read! I have left you a comment as well.

      Jacinta

  8. Evangeline Avatar

    Hi Jacinta,

    Thank you for taking the time to write about a topic which is becoming increasingly concerning in today’s world. I hadn’t heard about Tzuyang’s case until your article but have noticed this happening with other Youtubers as well. I found it really interesting how you brought to light how one person’s experience could spark social change. Do you think there is a way to harness the effect that Youtubers or other influencers have on social movements to purposefully raise awareness on other issues? Could this be used as a tool like social awareness advertising to better reach younger demographics?

    1. Jacinta Robless Avatar

      Hi Evie,

      Thank you taking time to read my analysis! I’m appreciative to know that I have spread awareness to you about Tzuyang’s case, which prompted your reflection upon similar cases of online disguised abuse. I definitely believe creators on online platforms have the ability to harness the influence of their following to instigate spread of awareness and produce social change. Younger demographics are occupying more of social media as technology evolves and audience’s interests become digitalised. This means that younger people are more likely to learn off social media than traditional media like news outlets, and would benefit from positive educational and engaging content which sparks social justice campaigns for online abuse.

      Thank you again for your reflective comment!

      Jacinta