Skip to content

Impact of Social Media and Online Communities on the Mental Wellbeing of Australian Teenagers


Abstract

This paper critically examines the impact of social media and online communities on the mental health of Australian teenagers. Collecting crucial findings from scholarly research and secondary data, this paper explores both positive and negative effects of belonging to an online community with the rise of social media. This essay also reveals how digital identity formation, online gaming and social activism shape young people’s psychological wellbeing. The discussion has been supported using theoretical frameworks such as Social Identity Theory, Social Capital Theory, and Self-Presentation Theory. Finally, the paper suggests practical strategies for minimizing the negative impacts of social media with the aim of imposing more resilient mental health practices among teenagers.

Rise of social media and online communities has become a significantly important topic of concern in recent years, specifically in relation to the mental wellbeing of Australian teenagers. In this essay, I’m going to explore how being part of online community can impact the mental health of Teenage Australians both, positively and negatively. The young demographic of Australia uses social media for numerous causes which manoeuvres their mental health critically and I’ll argue that by sharing the information collected after researching on a range of scholarly sources and secondary data. This paper highlights how having a digital identity and belonging to an online community shape young people’s psychological well-being. I have examined the relationship between social media and online community with mental health and supported my argument by relevant theoretical frameworks. By focusing on Australia-specific data and insights, this essay aims to address existing knowledge gaps in the literature and offer a detailed perspective on the broader implications of social media usage.

Social media, nowadays, is considered an integral part of people’s life. According to researchers, social media offers numerous benefits to people, such as connection, knowledge sharing, and facilitating communication (Santos, Oliveira, & Chaves, 2021, p. 351). The use of social media is increasing day by day by global people and Australians as well. The social distancing measures at the time of COVID-19 pandemic has fuelled the use of social media as people started using social networks to cope with the isolation and loneliness during social distancing. Similar to other nations, Australia implemented social distancing to prevent the pandemic from breaking out. Social networks offer a multitude of convenience that positively affect various aspects of their lives. People can make personal connections and gain professional opportunities by using social media (Jain, Sahoo, & Kaubiyal, 2021, p. 2157). Some major advantages of social media usage are communication and enhanced connectivity, awareness and access to information, and business opportunities. Though social media provides the opportunity to improve people’s lives, there are various negative impacts of “social media” on people’s “mental health”.

In Australia, there is a continued increasing trend in the population who are actively using social media for different purposes (Hughes, 2023). According to the report of 2022, nearly 82.7% of the population in Australia are active social media citizens compared to 58% of the population in 2015. The most popular “social media platform” in the nation was Facebook, as per the report of 2019 (Hughes, 2023). General Australians use social media for a variety of activities. The most common use of social media is communication. More than half of the users use “social media” to send private messages, and 50% of users use it to comment on social media posts. Active social media users share videos and pictures. Over 90% of Australian people are using social media, who belong to the age group 12 to 55 (Hughes, 2023). The statistics prove that most Australian teenagers use social media.

Teenagers are vulnerable to mental health problems because of the use of social media. Nowadays, adolescents cannot imagine a life without social media (Gupta et al. 2022, p. 1). These people have an easy access to social media via multiple gadgets such as tablets, smartphones, desktops, and gaming systems. The excessive use of social media has created a complicated horizon for teenagers. The media environment has created several hazards and threatens the mental health of teenagers. Studies have indicated that social media”can influence young people to adopt unnatural behaviours and convey unusual attitudes. Mental health problems such as depression and the use of social media are correlated (Gupta et al. 2022, p. 1). Excessive use of social media can increase the exposure of teenagers to self-harm behaviour, decreasing empathy, loneliness, and other issues. Teenagers use social media for viewing and lurking on social media. A binary distinction can be observed between passive and active users, which do not expose a specific behaviour which is goal-directed or suggests procrastination.

Teenagers prefer to communicate with like-minded people. On social media, it is a common phenomenon that people with similar mentality often create a community where they can share their feelings. YesFam community is a famous online community in Australia and all around the world where teenagers engage with each other. The community believes that friends need to be treated as their own family because they can choose their friends (YesTheory, 2025). This type of online community often presents idealised versions of people and their lives. The community members may feel inferior and inadequate when they are compared to other people. As a result, they become unsatisfied with their lives and often start to desire a utopian world free from despair and agony. Gradually, teenagers become detached from reality and continue to dwell on imagination. They start to experience loneliness and depression in their mind, which leads to severe mental problems.

Apart from online communities, online gaming is also responsible for the deteriorating mental health condition of teenagers. Online gaming is viewed negatively as drinking addiction and gambling (Purwaningsih & Nurmala, 2021, p. 260). Since the “commercial introduction” in the 1970s, these games have become an inseparable part of people’s life that uses those as leisure and entertainment activities. Online gaming communities are formed by online gamers who play online games. The negatives effects of excessive online gaming among adoloscents have been seen as aggressive behaviour, impulsivity, and a tendency to self-harm. Stavropolous’ research indicates that the adverse effect of gaming is internet gaming disorder (Purwaningsih & Nurmala, 2021, p. 261). During adolescence, teenagers go through psychological stresses and significant mental challenges. For teenagers, dysfunctional stress management is added to the “Practical problem-solving strategies”. Online game addiction refers to the compulsive and excessive use of online video games. Such addiction leads to social and emotional problems. Teenagers invest an increasing amount of time and effort in video games, which deteriorates their mental health.

Online gaming is a popular leisure activity in Australia. The number of users playing online games in the digital media market in Australia is estimated to grow by 1.2 million users by 2027 (Statista, 2025). The number is forecasted to reach 11.82 million users by 2027. This is a concerning matter as an increased share of the teenage population in Australia will be vulnerable to mental health problems. Gaming addiction can lead to sleep deprivation and sleep deprivation (Shehzadi & Akhter, 2024, p. 30). The “blue light” coming from mobile or computer screens and the compelling nature of online content can cause poor sleep and disturbed sleep patterns among teenagers. Games are designed with features that promote addictive behavior and result in excessive use.

Online gaming and online communities, on the other hand, may be beneficial for treating mental health problems of teenagers. The application of gamification in mental health promotion is a new approach that needs special recognition (Gkintoni et al. 2024, p. 1). However, the development of these gaming platforms must be appropriate and convenient for users for teenagers. Several gamified interventions can promote changes in behaviour of people and improve mental health outcomes. According to “Social Capital Theory”, people share knowledge to bridge cultural boundaries and generate trust levels (Van Bakel & Horak, 2024, p. 263). Social platforms can intervene in the creation of online social communities and create social capital. These interventions leverage intrinsic motivation in teenagers and adolescents. While playing appropriate online games, teenagers can socialise with others and improve their socialisation skills. Gamification can be used to push teenagers towards the adoption of healthy behaviour.

Online networks work as a significant catalyst for social change in the era of digital technologies. The interconnected attributes of the internet and social media platforms have empowered teenagers and online communities. According to some scholars, social networks amplify moral outrage and bring changes to society (Brady et al. 2021, p. 1). Moral outrage is an emotion which promotes social cooperation, punishes moral transgression, and catalyses collective actions that bring social change. Moral outrage in teenagers is criticised for creating social ills such as political polarisation, destruction of democracy, and the spreading of fake information. Young people are demotivated by the false information shared by people and they tend to believe that information. Political parties use social networks to influence young people and spread hate and indifference. Again, social networks provide opportunities for young people to organise campaigns and protests.

Identity and online advocacy are other aspects which need to be addressed. Teenagers engaging in online advocacy are a way to publicly express their opinions and core values. Online advocacy manifests people’s accounts of how they are present on social media to accomplish their goals (Schermuly, Petersen, & Anderson, 2021, p. 2). Teenagers are still developing self-identity, therefore, intense engagement with online advocacy can lead to over-identification. It can overshadow teenagers’ aspect of identity development. Continuously experiencing the opinions and counter-opinions of other people can make teenagers feel compared and undermined. The discrepancy between the online identity of a teenager and their online experience can cause conflict in their personalities. “Self-presentation Theory” entails that people like to present their identity and beliefs on social platforms to create desired impressions (Gordon, 2023). Teenagers carefully develop their online identity and how they communicate with other people aligns with their online advocacy.

Australia is the home for indigenous people who have experienced intergenerational trauma of feeling violated via television, news, and social media. Racism is associated with overall “negative outcomes” for “mental health” among indigenous people in Australia (Kairuz et al. 2021, p. 2). The online diaspora of indigenous people helps them connect with people who live outside their territories and use social networks to keep up with their cultures, festivals, and languages. Social network offers a great convenience to facilitate and strengthen the online diaspora by mitigating the geographical barriers. However, indigenous people expressing their diaspora online experience discrimination and hateful behaviour from the mainstream society. Unequal access to social media and digital literacy is a significant barrier to many indigenous people. According to Social Identity Theory, people derive parts of their identity by forming membership in social groups (Guan & So, 2022, p. 1). Indigenous people tend to create and maintain social identity by being a part of the online diaspora.

The recommendation for teenagers who are experiencing mental health deterioration is to encourage their self-awareness. Teenagers have to identify the factors that trigger them and make them feel low. For example, they can feel triggered when someone criticises their idol, favourite football clubs, or players. Self-awareness can be noted as the multiplicity of views and thinking (Carden, Jones, & Passmore, 2022, p. 142). They have to be encouraged to consider the physical signs of stress that are generated when they are using social platforms. By setting time limits, teenagers can refrain from the overuse of social media and engage in creative activities. Some times in the day should be considered as social media free times, such as before sleeping, while eating food, and while talking to friends and family. The hateful content on social media must be avoided because those can trigger negative emotions among teenagers. Schools must take steps to stop social media addiction among students. 

In this paper, it has been examined how social media and online communities can affect the mental health of teenagers in Australia. The analysis showed that digital space participation impacts young people’s psychological health through both beneficial and harmful effects. Although, social media delivers connection and support to teenagers, it also creates mental health issues including anxiety, depression and identity conflicts. The argument was validated using current Australian social media usage statistics and theoretical approaches including Social Identity Theory and Self-Presentation Theory, while also drawing evidence from case studies like the YesFam community and online gaming platforms. The discussion about gamification, advocacy, and online diasporas showcased the dual roles of social media as both a harmful and healing force. This paper showed that even though teenage lives heavily depend on online platforms today, their psychological effects require careful understanding and management through education and self-awareness together with targeted interventions to protect the mental health of future Australian generations.

References

Brady, W. J., McLoughlin, K., Doan, T. N., & Crockett, M. J. (2021). How social learning amplifies moral outrage expression in online social networks. Science Advances, 7(33), eabe5641. https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.abe5641

Carden, J., Jones, R. J., & Passmore, J. (2022). Defining self-awareness in the context of adult development: A systematic literature review. Journal of Management Education, 46(1), 140-177. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1052562921990065

Gkintoni, E., Vantaraki, F., Skoulidi, C., Anastassopoulos, P., & Vantarakis, A. (2024). Promoting physical and mental health among children and adolescents via gamification—A conceptual systematic review. Behavioral Sciences, 14(2), 102. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/14/2/102/pdf

Gordon, K. O. (2023). Toward a Full Embrace of Goffman’s Dramaturgy within Self-Presentation Analyses. In Social Media in Sport (pp. 163-176). Routledge. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Kiernan-Gordon/publication/376450966_Toward_a_full_embrace_of_Goffman’s_dramaturgy_within_self-presentation_analyses/links/6578c0216610947889bf4ed5/Toward-a-full-embrace-of-Goffmans-dramaturgy-within-self-presentation-analyses.pdf

Guan, M., & So, J. (2022). Social identity theory. The international encyclopedia of health communication, 1-5. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mengfei-Guan/publication/369140764_Social_Identity_Theory/links/640b51f892cfd54f84eede82/Social-Identity-Theory.pdf

Gupta, C., Jogdand, S., Kumar, M., & Jogdand, S. D. (2022). Reviewing the impact of social media on the mental health of adolescents and young adults. Cureus, 14(10). https://www.cureus.com/articles/109723-reviewing-the-impact-of-social-media-on-the-mental-health-of-adolescents-and-young-adults.pdf

Hughes. C., (2023). Active social media users as percentage of the total population in Australia from 2015 to 2022. Retrieved on: 29the March 2025, from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/680201/australia-social-media-penetration/

Hughes. C., (2023). Use of social networking sites in Australia as of March 2018, by age. Retrieved on: 29th March 2025, from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/729928/australia-social-media-usage-by-age/

Jain, A. K., Sahoo, S. R., & Kaubiyal, J. (2021). Online social networks security and privacy: comprehensive review and analysis. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 7(5), 2157-2177. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40747-021-00409-7.pdf

Kairuz, C. A., Casanelia, L. M., Bennett-Brook, K., Coombes, J., & Yadav, U. N. (2021). Impact of racism and discrimination on physical and mental health among Aboriginal and Torres Strait islander peoples living in Australia: a systematic scoping review. BMC Public Health, 21, 1-16. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s12889-021-11363-x.pdf

Macur, M., & Pontes, H. M. (2021). Internet Gaming Disorder in adolescence: investigating profiles and associated risk factors. BMC public health, 21, 1-9. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s12889-021-11394-4.pdf

Purwaningsih, E., & Nurmala, I. (2021). The impact of online game addiction on adolescent mental health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences (OAMJMS), 9(F), 260-274. https://repository.unair.ac.id/123624/1/C11_Full_Text.pdf

Santos, R. F., Oliveira, M., & Chaves, M. S. (2021). Are you getting full benefits from the use of Social Media? A review combining the concepts of Social Media, Social Capital and Knowledge Sharing. Revista de Administração da UFSM, 14(2), 349-368. https://www.scielo.br/j/reaufsm/a/956Jnn465bnrqTcKXMdScbC/?format=pdf&lang=en

Schermuly, A. C., Petersen, A., & Anderson, A. (2021). ‘I’m not an activist!’: digital self-advocacy in online patient communities. Critical Public Health, 31(2), 204-213. https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1031&context=sc-research

Shehzadi, K., & Akhter, S. (2024). Exploring the interplay in gaming addiction, social behavior, sleep deprivation and academic performance among university students. PAKISTAN ISLAMICUS (An International Journal of Islamic & Social Sciences), 4(03), 29-36. http://pakistanislamicus.com/index.php/home/article/download/149/153

Statista, (2025). Number of users of mobile games in Australia & Oceania from 2018 to 2027. Retrieved on: 29th March 2025, from: https://www.statista.com/forecasts/1301048/mobile-gamers-australia-and-oceania

Van Bakel, M., & Horak, S. (2024). Social capital theory. In A Guide to Key Theories for Human Resource Management Research (pp. 261-267). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sven-Horak-2/publication/377150511_Social_Capital_Theory/links/672162b177b63d1220cb69be/Social-Capital-Theory.pdf

YesTheory (2025). MEET THE YES THEORY COMMUNITY. Retrieved on: 29the March 2025, from: https://yestheory.com/community/#community

Share this:

Search Site

Your Experience

We would love to hear about your experience at our conference this year via our DCN XVI Feedback Form.

Comments

12 responses to “Impact of Social Media and Online Communities on the Mental Wellbeing of Australian Teenagers”

  1. sophie.ashby Avatar

    Hi Abu,
    I found this paper was written on a really interesting topic and is extremely relevant in today’s society. It was intriguing reading about online gaming and the impact this is having on mental health, particularly how the number of users is expected to grow by 1.2 million users by 2027. I didn’t realise how big the gaming industry was and the sheer impact it is having on teenagers’ mental health! Overall, a great read.
    Thanks, Sophie

    1. Abu Bakkar Avatar

      Hi Sophie, thank you so much for your kind words and for taking the time to read my paper!

      I’m glad that you found the online gaming industry section very interesting. Even it was a shock to me when I found out how massive and rapidly growing industry this industry is. I was surprised when I saw the projected stats for Australia. It’s interesting how something which is seen just as a form of entertainment can also have such a strong impact on mental wellbeing, especially during the foundational stage of life.

      Do you think schools or even game developers have a role to play in promoting healthier gaming habits among teens? For example, should games include built-in wellness reminders or time limits? Or would that be too interfering?

      I’d love to hear thoughts on this!

  2. Cameron Roberts Avatar

    This is a fantastic paper Abu, I thoroughly enjoyed the read. I was most interested in a paragraph you wrote here that’s directly related to my own paper. You wrote:

    “Moral outrage in teenagers is criticised for creating social ills such as political polarisation, destruction of democracy, and the spreading of fake information” and then later in that same paragraph “Political parties use social networks to influence young people and spread hate and indifference.”

    You conclude this paragraph by stating: “Again, social networks provide opportunities for young people to organise campaigns and protests.” I think this is a great way to conclude your paragraph as you highlight the obvious negatives of Social Media on Teenage users then outline how nuanced the argument is by noting that there positives to Social Media use by Teenagers as well.

    My paper is about how social media polarises its users and I came to very similar conclusions. This is the link if you’re interested: https://networkconference.netstudies.org/2025/onsc/5557/social-medias-contribution-to-the-polarisation-of-political-ideologies/

    Do you think that the Australian ban on Social Media use for those under 16 years of age is going to have a net positive or negative impact on how young people form their political opinions? Or, given this is 2 years before they’re eligible to vote anyway, no impact at all?

    Link to an article about it if you’re interested: https://www.corrs.com.au/insights/social-media-use-in-australia-to-be-restricted-for-under-16s

    1. Abu Bakkar Avatar

      Hi Cameron, thank you so much for taking the time to read my paper and sharing your kind feedback. I really appreciate how you pointed out the connection between our work. I found it fascinating how both our analyses converged on the theme of political polarization among young social media users.

      I just read your paper and it was an amazing read. I found your breakdown of echo chambers and algorithmic reinforcement particularly eye-opening. The way you argued that these platforms reinforce our existing biases really tied in well with the concerns I raised about moral outrage and manipulation.

      To answer your question about the proposed Australian ban on social media use for under-16s, I researched a little bit about it. I even read the article you shared with me and thanks for that! I would say it’s a complex issue. On one hand, guarding younger users from potentially manipulative political content could reduce premature polarization however, as you mentioned, this age group is already forming identities and worldviews. Delaying access to social media might actually hamper their early political literacy and engagement, especially since many of them participate in advocacy or social campaigns that are very much youth-led (e.g., climate strikes).

      Do you think this kind of policy could lead to young people seeking out less moderated, alternative platforms where misinformation could actually be worse?

      Thanks again for the stimulating question. I would love to hear your thoughts on how we can strike a balance between protection and empowerment for teen users.

      1. Cameron Roberts Avatar

        Thanks for giving my article a read Abu and for your very kind words.

        That’s a really great point. I hadn’t consider what their alternative sources for information may be and whether they be better or worse or, perhaps even more importantly, if we’re taking away their ability to unify for change around positive causes like you’ve pointed out.

        As for whether I think that the ban may push young people to seek less moderated platforms I really don’t think I can say one way or another.

        On one hand, I’m not at all confident social media is all that well regulated in itself. In fact, shortly after we submitted our Assessment 1 essays there was a Senate hearing with a Facebook whistle blower named Sarah Wynn-Williams. Sarah even states that Facebook considers outrage as a good way to maintain user engagement and accuses Facebook of tracking and exploiting the mood of teenage users to boost advertisement engagement (Forbes Breaking News, 2025).

        On the other hand, there are moderators and administrators on legitimate social media apps and at least some level of oversight, if youths do seek out alternatives they’d potentially be entirely unregulated and operate without any legal or ethical oversight or consequence at all and could be far worse.

        As for striking a balance between protection and empowerment. Again this another challenging one to answer. The ban aims to prevent the core problems social media creates for teen mental health but the social media mechanisms that enable the empowerment of teens to unify under a common cause are the same mechanism that cause the mental health challenges issues. Unfortunately, I don’t think there is a perfect balance to be had and we can’t have one without the other.

        What do you think? Is there a balance to be had?

        As an aside, there are far more dire implications for Facebook in the full hearing as well. It’s quite a long watch but there’s plenty of shorter highlight reels on YouTube if you’re interested. I’ll add the link to the full hearing as a reference. I should also note, that these are obviously whistleblower accusations and not peer-reviewed studies but it’s certainly an interesting watch.

        Reference

        Forbes Breaking News. (2025, April 9). FULL HEARING: Facebook Whistleblower Testifies Before Senate Judiciary Committee. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3DAnORfgB8

        1. Abu Bakkar Avatar

          Thank you for your thoughtful response, Cameron! You’ve highlighted some really crucial points around the dilemma of regulation versus freedom and how the same tools that harm can also empower. I completely agree that it’s a tough balance. Also, thanks for sharing that Senate hearing link, I’ll definitely check it out! Really appreciate the thoughtful discussion.

  3. SammLaw Avatar

    Hello Abu Bakkar,

    Your paper caught my attention as when researching my own paper “OnlyFans Being a Viable Career Options for Young Women” I came across a lot of research on teenagers being influenced by OnlyFans models who were using other platforms to market themselves. While I did not focus on mental health of the teenagers I was struck with how many were being influenced down paths I did not think they could fully comprehend at their age, and some of the lifelong consequences like a permanent digital footprint may ultimately cause issues towards their mental health.

    Back to your paper, do you think that things like government restrictions are enough to help with teenage uses and their future wellbeing or do you think other strategies will need to be put in place?

    I really enjoyed your paper, it was an interesting read. Thank you.

    Here is a link to my paper if you are interested:
    https://networkconference.netstudies.org/2025/onsc/5936/onlyfans-being-a-viable-career-options-for-young-women/#comment-4838

    1. Abu Bakkar Avatar

      Hi SammLaw,

      Thank you so much for your thoughtful comment! I’m glad you found my paper interesting and that it resonated with your own research. The idea of a permanent digital footprint is so significant. It’s a concept I hadn’t fully considered but it definitely adds another layer of complexity when it comes to mental health, particularly around issues like self-image and future opportunities.

      In response to your question regarding government restriction, I do think that they can play a vital role but I also believe that more comprehensive strategies are necessary to make noticeable impact. For example, in addition to restrictions, we could focus on creating educational programs that teach teenagers about digital literacy and the long-term effects of their online behavior. Parents, schools, and mental health professionals should also be more involved in guiding young people through the complexities of social media and online communities.

      What do you think about incorporating mental health awareness programs in schools as a proactive strategy alongside government restrictions? I’d love to hear your thoughts!
      Also, I’m definitely interested in reading your paper. I’ll check out the link soon and share my thoughts in the comment section of your paper. Thanks again for sharing your insights!

      Best regards,
      Abu Bakkar

  4. Isabelle Service Avatar

    Hi Abu Bakkar,

    This is a really comprehensive take on the positive and negative impacts of social media on teenagers in Australia, especially when considering both the harmful effects and the potential benefits, such as fostering communities and improving social connections. You’ve presented a solid argument, particularly when discussing the complexities of how social media can impact mental health, with examples like YesFam and online gaming platforms.

    However, it also raises an interesting question about whether the responsibility lies more with platforms, individuals, or society at large to address these mental health challenges. You mention the importance of self-awareness and self-regulation for teenagers, but could this approach be enough in the face of platforms that are designed to be addictive and influence behaviour? At what point does the responsibility of these platforms to protect their users become more important than simply encouraging users to manage their own behaviour?

    I also wonder about the broader implications of this for society: Should there be more systemic changes to social media policies, or is it more about fostering individual resilience and self-regulation in the face of these platforms? Could we find a balance between providing the benefits of social media and minimising its harm?

    What are your thoughts on this?

    Isabelle

    1. Abu Bakkar Avatar

      Hello Isabelle,

      I like how you’ve pointed out the challenge of balancing the benefits and drawbacks of teenager use of social media. Your query about whether it is more a platform responsibility or an individual responsibility is certainly a provocative one, and something that has been occupying my thoughts a great deal. Even within my everyday life.

      You also brought up an excellent point about the addictive potential of social media and whether simply knowing oneself and regulating oneself is actually enough, given the way that those platforms are expressly designed to keep people engaged. I do think that platforms bear a great deal of responsibility within that space. They are able to make some fundamental shifts that would really help stem the negative effects, such as changing algorithms so that people aren’t engaging in patterns of addiction, making data transparency greater, or even including features promoting healthier use, such as screen time reminders.

      Responding to your question about systemic shifts to policies on social media, I do believe balance is essential. We cannot expect individuals by themselves to navigate these platforms responsibly without some form of structural support. Governments and platforms must join forces so that social media is a place for people to connect without taking advantage of users’ vulnerabilities. Policies that emphasize mental health and privacy protection, and putting a cap on addictive features, would go a great distance towards allowing a healthier online community.

      I would appreciate hearing your thoughts on what policies could be put into place to achieve that balance. Can you see any specific measures that would be effective in curbing the harmful effects without compromising the benefits of social media?

      Thank you again for your questions, Isabelle! I am looking forward to hearing what you think.

  5. Suva Pokharel Avatar

    Hey Abu,

    Love your work! As someone who has lost a family member to mental health concerns, I appreciate your research on the topic.

    I’d like to offer a potential counterpoint: Could we be developing an adaptive resilience to social media’s negative effects? As most of us are people who have grown up immersed in social media environments, today’s teenagers might be unconsciously developing psychological defense mechanisms or desensitization to harmful content on the web. In much the same way that prior generations adapted to advancements in technology and media. It might be a great avenue for further research on how we could adapt our mitigation strategy from that of restriction to coping mechanisms and adaptation.

    Would love to get your thoughts on my paper:
    https://networkconference.netstudies.org/2025/csm/5508/reddit-has-rewired-how-people-think-about-community-by-shifting-it-from-traditional-place-based-bonds-to-interest-driven-networked-individualism/#comment-6056

    1. Abu Bakkar Avatar

      Hey Suva,
      Thank you so much for your kind words and for sharing such a personal connection to the topic. It really means a lot to know that my research resonates with you, especially given your experience with the mental health struggles of a loved one.

      I think you’ve brought up a fascinating point about adaptive resilience. It’s true that many of us, especially those who’ve grown up alongside the rise of social media, might be subconsciously developing coping mechanisms or even desensitizing ourselves to harmful content. It’s almost like we’ve had to learn to navigate these digital spaces in a way that helps protect our mental well-being, much like previous generations adapted to other technological changes. This could indeed be a great avenue for future research—how teens today might be developing their own defense mechanisms to social media, and whether these strategies are helping or hindering them in the long run.

      I love the idea of shifting the conversation from restriction to adaptation. Instead of focusing on just limiting exposure, perhaps there’s more we can do to help teenagers build resilience, so they’re better equipped to handle the challenges social media brings. Maybe we could focus on teaching them how to process the content they see, how to set boundaries with their online time, and how to actively engage with content that’s uplifting and supportive. It would be interesting to explore how these adaptive strategies could be integrated into mental health interventions or educational programs.

      Thanks again for such an engaging thought-provoking comment! I’ll definitely check out your paper as well, it sounds like a really interesting read!

      Best regards,
      Abu Bakkar.