Abstract

This paper discusses how the development of social media sites like YouTube, Instagram, and TikTok has changed the skin and beauty communities. It pays particular attention to how women, particularly young women utilize these platforms to develop their identities, distribute authentic content, and acquire financial and social capital. These online communities, which provide everything from skincare tips to beauty videos, are about more than simply looking nice; they are about empowerment, hard work and occasionally even resistance, challenging certain beauty standards. However, social injustices, unattainable beauty standards, and platform algorithms also influence them. In order to investigate these paradoxes, this paper looks at how digital beauty cultures have responded to platform dynamics, addressed concerns of visibility and inclusivity, and promoted new kinds of self-expression and community.

Introduction

In the 21^st century, the relationship between beauty and digital media has grown to be a significant cultural force, changing not just how beauty is defined, embodied, and marketed, but also how it is consumed. Visual platforms such as YouTube, Instagram, and TikTok have transformed skincare and cosmetic routines into performative material that reaches billions of consumers worldwide. Online beauty groups provide women with strong tools for identity discovery and visibility, particularly young women navigating challenges of self-worth, social pressure, and personal branding. These tools, however, have two sides: they can be used for both empowerment and exploitation.

This paper examines how, in a quickly changing digital environment, women negotiate online beauty groups to create identities, exhibit authenticity, and accumulate various amounts of money. This will explore how digital beauty spaces both reflect and affect broader sociocultural trends, such as post-feminism, racial representation, influencer culture, and platform labor, using examples from the real world. This paper seeks to offer a deeper understanding of these extremely dynamic, gendered online communities by discussing the lived experiences and mediated performances of content creators and consumers.

Digital Beauty: From Personal Practices to Public Performances.

In the past, personal beauty routines including skincare, hairstyles, and makeup application were typically shared among close friends or passed down through family traditions. As social media and smartphones have grown in popularity, these behaviors have become worldwide spectacles. These days, influencers record “Get Ready With Me” routines, stage product unboxing, and give live demonstrations to viewers across continents. Beauty content is now both accessible and aspirational due to the transition from privacy to publicity.

For instance, Skincare by Hyram and other TikTok creators have accumulated millions of fans by providing fun dermatological advice. Similar to this, beauty Youtubers such as Jeffree Star have made a living by creating highly stylized videos and criticizing the lack of diversity in the makeup businesses. These creators blur the boundaries between personal care and professional work by using their beauty routines as instruments for self-branding (Senft, 2008). However, the temptation to always look put together and attractive comes with its own set of demands. An infrastructure of lighting equipment, editing software , and cosmetics is required for every perfect film, making digital beauty a time-consuming process (Marwick, 2015).

Identity and the Aesthetics of  Empowerment.

Online beauty groups become an important place for many women to build their identities, particularly those going through adolescence or early adulthood. Applying makeup or adhering to a skincare routine is no more merely a physical activity but rather a ritual with deeper significance that is frequently connected to empowerment, well-being, and emotional healing. One example of how beauty has been reframed as a self-worth and mental health practice is the prevalence of phrases like “skin positivity” and “self-care Sundays.”

There are several factors to this identification process. Underrepresented groups now have a platform to question conventional notions of beauty due to online spaces. For example, the use of hashtags such as #MelaninPoppin and #AcnePositivity highlight women of color who are proud of their skin tones and people who share unaltered photos of themselves with acne, respectively. Similar to this, Black women have been encouraged by the #NaturalHairMovement to embrace their natural hair textures in opposition to Eurocentric beauty standards (Hall, 1997). These artistic endeavors are significantly political. They strengthen ties within the community while enabling creators to stand up to exclusion. Still, they continue to function in a system where algorithmic favourability, likes, and shares mediate visibility (Shaviro, 2016).

Authenticity in the Age of Filters.

As mentioned before, authenticity is highly valued in online beauty communities. Influencers are more likely to gain audience loyalty and establish trust if they come out out as “real”, “vulnerable”,  and “sympathetic”. However, the definition of authenticity is frequently ambiguous. In a world full with editing programs, filters, and carefully curated aesthetics, authenticity itself can turn into a show. Being honest and vulnerable while simultaneously meeting the platform’s aesthetic standards is what it means to be “real” online. For instance, especially on sites like TikTok, creators who reveal their anxieties or upload uncensored pictures frequently receive more attention (Sebastiao, 2013).

Still, pursuing authenticity can also turn into a performance, particularly when connected to influencer marketing. Many women use “calibrated amateurism,” as defined by Duffy and Hund, 2015), in which they painstakingly create an unrefined appearance to seem authentic. For example, even utilizing subtle edits and clever lighting, a creator may publish a photo without makeup and reveal their insecurities in the caption of the post. Creators must constantly adjust their identities to strike a balance between apparent “realness” and business connections as consumers become more perceptive. For women, the gendered demands of openness and relatability frequently collide with this ongoing performance of authenticity, which is a type of emotional and affective work (Duffy & Hund, 2015).

Digital Labor and Invisible Work.

Moving on, the unpaid and frequently unseen labor of its participants is what drives the digital beauty economy. The majority of content creators devote a great deal of time, effort, and resources to their work with little to no financial return, but the top 1% of influencers may make six figures from brand deals and affiliate marketing. Scripting videos, researching items, answering comments, organizing teamwork, editing film, and staying on top with current trends are among the tasks that require both technical expertise and emotional commitment (Duffy, 2017).

Since women already endure a disproportionate amount of the weight of emotional and aesthetic labor offline, this work can be considered more taxing on them. Additionally, because algorithmic promotion is unpredictable, success is frequently arbitrary and prone to abrupt increases or decreases in engagement. Through the usage of user-generated content to increase engagement and ad income, platforms such as Instagram and TikTok profit from this labor, making creators both employees and products (Fuchs, 2014). Women end up in a vulnerable situation because of this dual role, continuously striving for attention while juggling burnout and unstable finances.

Wealth in Beauty Communities: Cultural, Social, and Financial.

Opportunities to build up different types of capital are provided by taking part in online beauty groups. One can increase their visibility and impact by accumulating social capital, which includes likes, shares, and follows. Cultural capital, which includes knowledge products, trends, and vocabulary, increases the authority of a creator. Moreover, sponsorship, affiliate agreements, and products partnerships are followed by economic capital. Many young women find the path from posting in their free time to becoming a full-time influencer to be inspiring, particularly those who are looking for flexible, creative professions (Bourdieu, 1984).

Unfortunately, not everyone has equal access to this capital. Most commonly, light-skinned, slender, Eurocentric creators who adhere to prevailing beauty standards frequently get greater sponsorship and recognition (Noble, 2018). Notably, despite frequently producing more inventive, inclusive material, creators who are Black, plus-size, disabled, or gender non-conforming encounter additional obstacles to success. The difference between Black and White beauty influencers, even when follower counts and engagement levels are comparable, is a prominent example. This illustrates how, even in supposedly democratized digital settings, capitalism perpetuates and reinforces preexisting inequalities.

Algorithmic Bias and the Politics of Visibility.

The type of material that is amplified or hidden is heavily influenced by algorithms. Content that conforms to conventional beauty standards and steers clear of controversy is frequently favored by these opaque systems. According to research by Bishop (2020) and Noble (2018), creators who express issues like feminism, race, or health inequities are frequently not prioritized in platform searches or “shadowbanned”. This inevitably has an impact on their earning potential in addition to their visibility.

Numerous influencers have expressed their experiences of facing consequences for advocating for diversity. Creators who post about gender fluidity or body positivity, for instance, say they get fewer views or are labeled as “sensitive.” This supports a limited set of voices and aesthetics that are deemed acceptable. In addition to that, it puts more strain on underrepresented producers who have to battle algorithmic “gatekeeping” and systematic prejudice in order to reach their audience.  

Sustainability and Conscious Consumption.

The influencer economy, which constantly pushes followers to try the newest trends and purchase new goods in order to keep ahead of competition, is a major factor of beauty consumerism. A culture of “newness” where the newest cosmetic product that is always only a click away is maintained by this cycle of continuous consumption, which is fueled by social media. However, a counter-moevment focused on thoughtful consumption, sustainability, and minimalist practices are gradually emerging within the beauty industry as a response. Influencers like @thebodsociety are now promoting ingredient transparency, cruelty-free testing, and a more thoughtful view of beauty. Others support low-waste beauty methods, which lessen the industry’s environmental impact while encouraging beauty routines that are healthy for the environment and the people (King, 2021).

This change is especially apparent among Gen Z women, who are more outspoken about ethical behaviour and less trusting of conventional advertising. By encouraging DIY skincare, careful purchasing, and even “no buy” challenges, these innovators are reinventing what beauty means. By doing this, they are opposing the myth of excessive consumption and urging people to see beauty as a way of life based on awareness and ideals rather than merely as a commodity. By doing this, they are challenging the notion that beauty is about overindulging and establishing that it is a discipline focused on sustainability and mindfulness.

Community, Care and Resistance.

Online beauty groups are still places of resistance, group care, and emotional support despite commercialization. With that being said, women can exchange stories, give support, and form bonds in forums devoted to skin disorders such as PCOS or eczema. These networks serve as unofficial peer support systems, especially for people whose issues are disregarded by conventional medical care or socially ostracized.

Furthermore, a lot of creators often question prevailing myths about gender expression, femininity, and aging through their platforms. For instance, Mikayla Nogueira, a TikTok creator, frequently goes online without makeup on to highlight her genuineness while sharing honest stories about her battles with mental health, body image, and acne. Many young women connect with  her work because they perceive her as both talented and approachable, and it blends cosmetic tutorials with candid personal stories. Even though this kind of content does not necessarily fit in with viral aesthetics or conventional beauty standards, it builds a devoted following and encouraged a more inclusive, wide-ranging definition of beauty (Gill, 2007).

Conclusion

In conclusion, online communities for skin and beauty complex ecosystems are influenced by resistance, work, aspiration, and identity. They provide many women with opportunities for financial possibilities, connection, and self expression. They also rely on the unpaid work of producers, perpetuate social injustices, and uphold limited standards of beauty. These online environments are places of empowerment and exploitation that are simultaneously freeing and constricting.

The community may better comprehend how social media platforms continue to change cultural norms and gendered labor by looking at these groups through the lenses of identity, authenticity, and capital. The digital beauty industry is a force that influences, commodifies, and challenges society rather than just reflecting it.

Reference List:

Bishop, S. (2020). Algorithmic Experts: Selling Algorithmic Lore on YouTube. Social Media + Society, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119897323  

Bourdieu, P. (1984). Introduction. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (pp. 1-7). Harvard University Press.  https://www.mit.edu/~allanmc/bourdieu1.pdf 

Duffy, B. E. (2017). (Not) Just for the Fun of It: The Labor of Social Media Production. (Not) Getting Paid to Do What You Love: Gender, Social Media, and Aspirational Work (pp. 45-97). Yale University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1q31skt 

Duffy, B. E. & Hund, E. (2015). “Having it All” on Social Media: Entrepreneurial Femininity and Self-Branding Among Fashion Bloggers. Social Media + Society, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115604337  

Fuchs, C. (2014). Social Media and the Public Sphere. Triple C, 12(1), 57-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.31269/vol12iss1pp57-101

Gill, R. (2007). Postfeminist media culture: Elements of a sensibility. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 10(2), 147-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1367549407075898 

Hall, S. (1997). REPRESENTATION: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices.  Sage Publications. https://ayomenulisfisip.wordpress.com/wp- content/uploads/2015/08/hall-1997-representation.pdf 

King, T. (2021). Looking good, feeling… not so good: the impact of advertising and social media on body image. Cranfield School of Management. https://www.cranfield.ac.uk/som/thought-leadership-list/looking-good-feeling- not-so-good-the-impact-of-advertising-and-social-media-on-body-image 

Marwick, A. E. (2015). Instafame: Luxury Selfies in the Attention Economy. Public Culture (pp. 137-160). Duke University Press. https://depthome.brooklyn.cuny.edu/oer/tvra/032_Marwick_InstafameLuxurySelf ies.pdf 

Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism.  NYU Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1pwt9w5 

Sebastiao, S. P. (2013). Zizi Papacharissi (2010, Malden, MA: Polity Press), A Private Sphere: Democracy in a Digital Age [Review of the book A Private Sphere: Democracy in a Digital Age, by Z. Papacharissi]. Comunicação e Sociedade, 23(306). http://dx.doi.org/10.17231/comsoc.23(2013).1631 

Senft, T. M. (2008). Camgirls: Celebrity and Community in the Age of Social Networks (2008). Peter Lang. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343786951_Camgirls_Celebrity_and_C ommunity_in_the_Age_of_Social_Networks_2008 

Shaviro, S. (2016). 2.2 Post-Cinematic Affect. Post-Cinema: Theorizing 21^st-Century Film (pp. 129-144). University of Sussex. https://reframe.sussex.ac.uk/post- cinema/2-2-shaviro/