Skip to content

Reddit has rewired how people think about community by shifting it from traditional, place-based bonds to interest-driven, networked individualism


INTRODUCTION

Over the past two decades, directly coinciding with the rise and evolution of web 2.0, social media spaces and technological advances; the erosion of ‘traditional’ community pertaining to physical face-to-face interaction and place bounds has been a space for contention (Putnam, 2000). Paradoxically however, owing to foundations provided by online spaces and social media websites, whilst community rooted in physical ties is on the decline; born is a new form of community based on flexible, individualized networks organized around shared interests rather than geographic proximity (Hampton & Wellman, 2018). The advent of these digital spaces has allowed for ‘virtual’ communities to reach unprecedented sizes, all the while allowing dissemination of highly specialized knowledge, shared norms, and cultural identities (Delanty, 2018) to thrive, heightening the communities’ reach.

At the forefront of this transformation stands Reddit – a platform structured around thematic, user-driven subreddits that challenge almost all conventional ideas of community, certainly that of physical proximity.

This paper argues that Reddit has fundamentally rewired how people think about community by enabling a form of networked individualism (Rainie & Wellman, 2012), supporting persistent engagement through interest-driven discourse (Zhang et al., 2021), and fostering social capital through pseudonymous yet consistent identity performance (Hu, Zhao, & Huang, 2015; Dholakia & Bagozzi, 2004). At the same time, Reddit’s model, and the overarching virtual social model, introduces new contentions and limitations, including issues of cultural exclusion, volatility in engagement (Thukral et al., 2018), and the labor of community governance (Matias, 2019).

Using both foundational theories and recent empirical studies, this paper explores how Reddit users construct, sustain, and adapt communities in digital spaces. Rather than mourning the decline of traditional forms, it reframes Reddit as a platform that exemplifies the new architecture of community in the digital age.

FROM PHYSICAL BOUNDS, TO VIRTUAL PLATFORMS

“The person—not the place—is the node in the social network.” – Wellman, B. (2001)

Traditional definitions of community have roots in shared geography, kinship, or long-term affiliation, and had largely remained untouched prior to advancements in wide-spread accessible communication – the World Wide Web. However, the shift from physical to digital environments has weakness in this definition: proximity between individuals is no longer a barrier, kinship between strangers can now be nurtured through online interaction and long-term affiliation is increasingly replaced by modular, interest-based participation not rooted in strong ties like that of organic communities (Delanty, 2018).  As Rainie and Wellman (2012) describe, we now live in a world of networked individualism, where individuals are the centre of their own web of personalized, role-based connections. This transformation is not a loss of community but a restructuring of its foundations and continually challenges the distinction between virtual communities and that of ‘real’ or proximity-based groups (Delanty, 2018).

Foth (2005) similarly critiques this outdated community definition tied to “place,” urging urban designers and sociologists to account for how new media technologies allow people to maintain meaningful ties beyond geographic constraints. This sentiment of place bound ties gaining antiquity in the modern community model is core to Delanty (2018) argument that virtual communities, mediated by digital technologies, redefine social connections as fluid networks facilitated by communication rather than geographical proximity. Reddit exemplifies this shift. Unlike traditional community spaces, Reddit’s communities, known as “Subreddits” are entirely interest-based, borderless, and self-organized. Users selectively participate in multiple groups simultaneously, reflecting their multifaceted identities and evolving interests (Wang et al., 2021). 

The existence of subject-based “Subreddits” creates a multilayered ecosystem of affiliation, whereby users can identify with the overarching umbrella community of “Redditors,” while simultaneously splintering into smaller, more niche communities tailored to specific interests or identities (Fiesler et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2017). This mirrors the structure of traditional proximity-based communities, where individuals might be part of a broader town or regional network but also participate in more focused groups – be it profession, hobby, or shared concern. On Reddit, however, these layers are not bound by physical space but by discourse, algorithmic discovery, and personal relevance, allowing for a far more fluid and dynamic experience of community (Delanty, 2018).

Importantly, this interest-based network structure is not unique to Reddit. Dholakia and Bagozzi (2004) described early virtual communities like Slashdot as “geographically dispersed groups” that offered emotional and cognitive identification highlighting the cracks in traditional community definitions that were surfacing even in the Worldwide Webs’ infancy. Reddit continues this lineage by providing a modular, anonymous structure where community membership is a choice rather than inherited or assigned as would be historically.

By doing so, Reddit rewires community as something actively constructed, self-selected, and untethered from geographic monopolies.

NETWORKED INDIVIDUALISM: REDDIT AND IT’S USER-CENTRIC ECOSYSTEM 

“Dive into anything.” – Reddit’s slogan

Networked individualism, coined by Barry Wellman and further expanded upon by scholars, emerges when people prioritize personalized, loosely bound connections over fixed group affiliations. In this context, Reddit’s infrastructure is perfectly positioned to harbour and facilitate this practice. Unlike social platforms that emphasize participation through user engagement (e.g., Twitter), Reddit abstracts communication up to centralized content and themes via “Subreddits”. “Redditors” do not commonly “friend” each other; instead, they subscribe to these communities and navigate through diverse discussions based on their interests.

Hu, Zhao, and Huang (2015) provide an important psychological lens to this structure, showing that individuals reconstruct their virtual identities in communities of interest to express aspects of their ideal or aspirational selves. Reddit’s use of pseudonymity offers a safe space for this reconstruction, where expressive freedom and continuity of identity can coexist with anonymity, a relationship previously not able to be made in traditional communities. This dynamic helps illustrate the concept of benign disinhibition, where anonymity facilitates increased self-disclosure and encourages sharing of personal thoughts, feelings, and experiences that may be suppressed in a face-to-face environment (Clark-Gordon et al., 2019), broadening participation and enabling a greater depth of engagement and emotional authenticity.

This relationship between identity continuity and anonymity through pseudonyms, surprisingly, does not limit coherence or credibility across Reddit’s ecosystem, rather, it enables a modular form of self-expression and persistent presence. This aligns with the findings of Wang et al. (2021), who show that users with a “distinctive personality of topics” frequently span diverse communities, fostering inter-community linkages and contribution. When remaining stable over time, pseudonymous personas can foster trust and support in these virtual communities (Chewar et al., 2004), values which are core in traditional proximal based communities. This is furthered through Reddit’s various social accountability systems: karma (a cumulative score consolidating posts, upvotes etc), post history, and user flair collectively form a virtual reputation system enabling users to accrue social capital across otherwise disparate communities (Parmentier & Cohen, 2019; Morrison & Hayes, 2013).

“Dive into anything.”, Reddit’s slogan and tagline highlights the ability for users to quickly manoeuvre and find place and roles in diverse communities: support seeker in r/relationships, expert in r/AskHistorians or a critic in r/movies. While historical definitions of community often depend on physical proximity or familial bonds, Reddit disrupts traditionality and embodies networked individualism to forge self-curated communities.

THE POWER OF SHARED DISCOURSE 

Where networked individualism pertains to the breadth of Reddit engagement, shared discourse reflects its depth. Zhang et al. (2021) show that Reddit communities with high linguistic distinctiveness and dynamic evolution retain users more effectively and help foster a sense of connection and community. “Subreddits” that develop inside jokes, recurring motifs, and specialized vocabulary create a strong sense of belonging and shared identity, a notion that applies to face-to-face communication as well (Bachwerk & Vogel, 2012). Unlike platforms which revolve around “friend” based systems, Reddit’s interest-driven design choice brings discourse central to the creation of social cohesion (Arazzi et al., 2023).

However, linguistic identity and community complexity may introduce barriers and act as a deterrent to newcomers. Zhang et al. (2021) notes the emergence of “acculturation gaps,” where newcomers struggle to adopt the language norms of entrenched communities. While this signals strong internal culture, it also risks exclusivity – a recurring tension in Reddit’s community dynamics.

Core to Reddit’s design choice is the maintenance of long-form discussion threads which evolve and grow over time, sharing the same continuity necessary for communities to be born and stay relevant (Chewar et al., 2004). Reddit posts can be “late bloomers,” reignited by new comments or “cross posted” to other communities and “Subreddits”, enabling a layered archive of shared discourse (Thukral et al., 2018). This continuity via long-form discussion is further reinforced by the platform’s perceived content quality – users rate Reddit content as up-to-date, easily readable, and understandable, which supports long-term participation and return engagement (Scheibe & Zimmer, 2020). 

Rather than encouraging fleeting interactions, Reddit’s structure incentivizes browsing, revisiting, and re-engaging with topics across time – essential behaviours in the cultivation of sustained, topic-based community belonging.

SOCIAL CAPITAL AND MODERATION

Briefly touched on in section 3, whilst anonymity is core to Reddit’s design philosophy, its communities are remarkably still able to generate and sustain social capital where traditionally anonymity would lead to the creation of fleeting interactions and communities; especially in online virtual spaces (Bernstein et al., 2011). 

Reddit’s micro-communities, “Subreddits”, operate as informal support networks, where users routinely exchange advice, emotional encouragement and informational resources. This kind of interaction shows how Reddit communities support emotional connection, shared understanding, and a sense of value – key parts of what makes people feel like they truly belong in a virtual community (Dholakia & Bagozzi, 2004).

In addition, the notion of persistent virtual identity, explored earlier, highlights the enablement of trust, visibility, and accountability – factors which form the foundation for social capital. Reddit’s use of volunteer moderators also plays a key role in each “Subreddit”. Matias (2019) conceptualizes their work as “civic labor,” essential for shaping “Subreddit” culture and upholding community driven “reddiquette”: a term coined by members of the reddit community pertaining to community etiquette. Moderators are both gatekeepers and caretakers, to help nurture behaviour that cultivates into inclusion and connectivity, whilst purging practices which entrench exclusion and negativity. Their role in the moderation of “Subreddits” mirrors traditional community leadership.

Still, Reddit’s social capital-based model is not without fault. Thukral et al. (2018) show that while some posts generate rich discussion, many others fade quickly – victims of what they call “Mayfly Buzz.” This uneven distribution of attention, shaped by Reddit’s “karma”, algorithmic delivery and moderation system, poses challenges to the stability of engagement and the equitable distribution of social capital; a flaw which is also present in physical based communities as well (Cozzolino, 2011). Nonetheless, when moderation is effective and discourse sustained, Reddit communities can offer the kinds of emotional and informational support that mimic that of traditional communities.

LIMITATIONS AND COUNTERPOINTS

Reddit’s existence as a virtual space that can house thriving subcommunities under its main umbrella offers promise but also reveals complexity and challenges. As Zhang et al. (2021) and Wang et al. (2021) suggest, strong identity formation and flexible community participation can coexist, but this duality brings challenges. Acculturation gaps and deviations in community linguistics may deter newcomers, while cross-community “topic personalities” might dilute collective identity.

Similarly, the benefits of pseudonymity in bringing forward unfiltered genuine discourse also opens the door to fragmentation where users may disengage from virtual community norms, adopt multiple conflicting identities, or exploit anonymity to maliciously disseminate misinformation or create hostility and bullying (Rehman et al., 2025). Thukral et al. (2018) also reminds us that Reddit is not immune to the logic of the attention economy: posts may go viral briefly or disappear entirely, owing to algorithmic, participatory or cultural bias often leading to the creation of a community with a vocal minority.

Furthermore, as Matias (2019) argues, the unpaid labor of moderation highlights deeper questions about governance and responsibility in digital communities. While Reddit allows users to create and sustain communities, it also depends on an invisible tether of labor provided by moderators, holding up these virtual spaces so they can remain functional and safe.

These complications do not negate Reddit’s role in reshaping community, in fact they only further cement Reddit, and more broadly other virtual spaces, as being no different to the proximal based communities they are based upon, highlighting that no community, virtual or physical, are immune to complications and complexities that arise through diverse interactions between individuals.

CONCLUSION

Reddit does not merely host communities – it redefines them and removes the limitations of proximity-based connection. Through its pseudonymous architecture, topic-driven “Subreddits”, and user-centred design, Reddit exemplifies the shift from place-based to interest-driven, discourse-centred community. It flaunts itself as the manifestation of networked individualism: where each individual can contrive their own social ties from their roles and interests rather than forced through location or kinship, embodying a new form of sociality.

As Rainie and Wellman (2012) argue, the digital age has changed the “social operating system.” Reddit represents one of the most illustrative case studies of this transformation. In reframing how we understand community – what it looks like, how it functions, and who sustains it. 

Through its accomplishments, flaws, and evolving dynamics, Reddit as a medium for community offers a compelling model for how belonging is being redefined and serves no distinction between real versus “imagined”, virtual communities (Delanty, G, 2018).

REFERENCES

  1. Arazzi, M., Nicolazzo, S., Nocera, A., & Zippo, M. (2023). The importance of language for the evolution of online communities: An analysis based on Twitter and Reddit. Expert Systems with Applications, 222, 119847.
  2. Bachwerk, M., & Vogel, C. (2012). Language and friendships: A co-evolution model of social and linguistic conventions.
  3. Bernstein, M., Monroy-Hernández, A., Harry, D., André, P., Panovich, K., & Vargas, G. (2021). 4chan and /b/: An Analysis of Anonymity and Ephemerality in a Large Online Community. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 5(1), 50-57. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v5i1.14134 
  4. Chewar, C. M., McCrickard, D. S., & Carroll, J. M. (2004). Persistent virtual identity in community networks: Impact on social capital value-chains. Proceedings of the Human-Computer Interaction Consortium Workshop (HCIC).
  5. Clark-Gordon, C. V., Bowman, N. D., Goodboy, A. K., & Wright, A. (2019). Anonymity and online self-disclosure: A meta-analysis. Communication Reports, 32(2), 98–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2019.1607516 
  6. Cozzolino, P. J. (2011). Trust, cooperation, and equality: A psychological analysis of the formation of social capital. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(2), 302–320. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466610X519610 
  7. Delanty, G. (2018). Virtual Community: Belonging as Communication. Routledge.
  8. Dholakia, U. M., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2004). Motivational antecedents, constituents, and consequents of virtual community identity. In S. H. Godar & S. P. Ferris (Eds.), Virtual and collaborative teams: Process, technologies and practice (pp. 253–268). Idea Group Publishing.
  9. Fiesler, C., Jiang, J., McCann, J., Frye, K., & Brubaker, J. (2018). Reddit Rules! Characterizing an Ecosystem of Governance. , 72-81. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v12i1.15033.
  10. Foth, M. (2005). A research design to build effective partnerships between city planners, developers, government and urban neighbourhood communities. Journal of Community Informatics, 2(2), 116–133.
  11. Hampton, K. N., & Wellman, B. (2018). Lost and saved… again: The moral panic about the loss of community takes hold of social media. Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 47(6), 643-651.
  12. Hu, C., Zhao, L., & Huang, J. (2015). Achieving self-congruency? Examining why individuals reconstruct their virtual identity in communities of interest within social network platforms. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 465–475.
  13. Matias, J. N. (2019). The civic labor of volunteer moderators online: Reddit’s unseen backbone. Social Media + Society, 5(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119836778
  14. Morrison, D., & Hayes, C. (2013). Here, have an upvote: communication behaviour and karma on Reddit. GI-Jahrestagung.
  15. Parmentier, A., & Cohen, R. (2019). Learning user reputation on Reddit. In 2019 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI) (pp. 242–247). IEEE. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3350546.3352524 
  16. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
  17. Rainie, L., & Wellman, B. (2012). Networked: The new social operating system. MIT Press.
  18. Rehman, S.- ur-., Rehman, N., Saleem, S. ., & Jaffri, Y. A. (2025). An Examination of the Impact of Social Media Anonymity and Intensity of Online Conflict and Aggressive Behavior. Review of Applied Management and Social Sciences, 8(1), 279-290. https://doi.org/10.47067/ramss.v8i1.457 
  19. Scheibe, K., & Zimmer, F. (2020). User-oriented quality estimation of social news systems and its content. In G. Meiselwitz (Ed.), HCII 2020: Social computing and social media. Participation, user experience, consumer experience, and applications of social computing (pp. 636–646). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49570-1_45
  20. Thukral, S., Meisheri, H., Chatterjee, A., Kataria, T., Agarwal, A., & Dey, L. (2018). Analyzing behavioral trends in community driven discussion platforms like Reddit. 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), 662–669.
  21. Wang, Y., Yang, C., Jin, D., & Dang, J. (2020). Integrating group homophily and individual personality of topics can better model network communities. 2020 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM), 611–620.
  22. Zhang, J., Hamilton, W. L., Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C., Jurafsky, D., & Leskovec, J. (2017). Community identity and user engagement in a multi-community landscape. Proceedings of the Eleventh International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM), 377–386.

Share this:

Search Site

Your Experience

We would love to hear about your experience at our conference this year via our DCN XVI Feedback Form.

Comments

10 responses to “Reddit has rewired how people think about community by shifting it from traditional, place-based bonds to interest-driven, networked individualism”

  1. Jiawen Liu Avatar

    Hi Suva, I found your essay on Reddit and the transformation of community in the digital age to be an exceptionally comprehensive and thought-provoking piece. Your integration of foundational theories—like networked individualism from Wellman and Rainie—and empirical studies gives your argument strong academic grounding, while your use of Reddit as a case study brings those theories vividly to life.

    I especially appreciated your distinction between breadth (via networked individualism) and depth (via shared discourse), and how you explored Reddit’s layered identity system through pseudonymity and community-specific culture. The way you addressed the role of moderators as civic labor also added an important ethical dimension, highlighting the invisible work that sustains virtual communities.

    Your discussion on limitations was equally nuanced. The “acculturation gap” and “Mayfly Buzz” effects you described are critical in understanding not just how these communities function, but why they sometimes fracture. It made me think about how these tensions parallel challenges in offline spaces—such as insider language, leadership burnout, and uneven access to social capital.

    One question I’d love to hear more of your thoughts on: given Reddit’s role in normalizing pseudonymous engagement and decentralized moderation, do you think its model could (or should) influence how we design future civic or educational digital platforms? Could elements of Reddit’s structure be repurposed to enhance participatory democracy or student engagement in digital learning spaces?

    Thanks again for such a well-argued and timely analysis I thoroughly enjoyed reading it.

    Jiawen

    1. Suva Pokharel Avatar

      Hey Jiawen, thanks so much for your comment!

      With regards to your question on Reddit’s role in normalizing pseudonymous engagement, I believe there are multiple different lenses to view this in. On the one hand, there has been documented research on how discourse via pseudonyms may lead to positive outcomes. Said research shows pseudonyms allow for people from marginalized communities to not worry about discrimination, and research has also been done illustrating that pseudonyms increase a user’s perceived freedom of speech. Studies have shown that pseudonymity creates safer spaces for honest discussion about sensitive topics and encourages participation from individuals who might otherwise remain silent due to fear of real-world consequences.

      Conversely however, as briefly mentioned in my paper, anonymous activity can also lead to negative outcomes. Aggressive behavior has the potential of revealing itself in the form of, ‘keyboard warriors’. This phenomenon, often referred to as the “online disinhibition effect,” can result in harassment, cyberbullying, and the spread of misinformation when users feel disconnected from accountability for their words.

      As with any any subject matter, I believe there is a role in promoting and discussing how online engagement via pseudonyms can be beneficial specifically with regards to student engagement as you mention, however a holistic learning approach would need to be adopted. Both the positives and the negatives would need to be discussed to provide students with a balanced view, so as to prevent any power fantasies from occurring with a lack of accountability through named connection.

  2. Benn van den Ende Avatar

    Hi Suva,

    Thanks for your insightful paper.

    You touch on some of the characteristics that makes Reddit unique, but I’m wondering if you could expand on what it is about Reddit in particular, as opposed to other social media platforms, that lends itself to the creation of networked publics, etc?

    Thanks!

    1. Suva Pokharel Avatar

      Hi Benn thank you for your glowing compliment!

      What makes Reddit particularly conducive in allowing the creation of networked publics, is its comprehensive community structure that closely mirrors real-world community. Unlike platforms such as Instagram, Facebook, or Twitter, Reddit’s design incorporates every essential feature of real-world communities in an almost one-to-one mapping. Subreddits can pose as neighborhoods or community groups tailored to specific interests, moderation can pose as figures of authority, and the social karma system acts as a peer revied trustworthy rating.

      In addition, users are able to maintain consistent identities without revealing personal information, which can create a balance between one off completely anonymous comments and full personal identification. This pseudonymity also helps surface communities centered around sensitive topics, which may not be as prevalent on other platforms.

      I think one additional ‘feature’ which I had not considered prior to your comment, is the incredibly low friction and barrier for entry. For a user to create an account, all that is necessary is a username and password. From then onwards, users can immediately seek out the relevant subreddits for their own interests, and begin nuanced discourse, unlike Instagram, Facebook, or Twitter—where building a follower base is essential for meaningful engagement. Where a user on another social media platform might need to spend a significant amount of time, nurturing and creating a follower base, a Reddit user would have already had the opportunity to engage in meaningful discussion in their chosen communities.

      With all of these in mind, i believe Reddit lends itself to being incredibly fluid in helping create networked publics.

  3. berenicedeguardia Avatar

    Hi Suva,

    This was a really insightful and well-written paper.
    I enjoyed the way it integrates foundational theories (like Rainie & Wellman’s networked individualism).
    I liked your discussion of how Reddit’s use of pseudonyms lets people be more open and honest, helping them build new kinds of connections. Additionally, you did a great job showing both the benefits and the challenges of these online communities.

    I was wondering, do you think there are ways Reddit could make it easier for new users to feel welcome and included in established subreddits?

    ( If you have time, please have a look at my paper, I think you might find it interesting!!)

    https://networkconference.netstudies.org/2025/uncategorized/6288/how-does-social-media-support-and-challenge-the-mental-health-of-lgbtq-youth/

    1. Suva Pokharel Avatar

      Hey Bernice thanks so much for your comment!

      Regarding your question, whilst not touched on extensively in my paper, there are avenues which Reddit has incorporated to help alleviate any friction when it comes to new users trying to join into established Subreddit communities. Reddit’s “flair” system is one such feature.

      For example, when a new user joins a Subreddit, it is not uncommon for the Subreddit itself to have an automation setup to provide a flair on the user’s comments and posts such as “New here, be friendly” or “New to the Subreddit”. By adding these flairs to new users, it provides valuable context to other members of the community to potentially forgive any misunderstandings or lack of knowledge on Subreddit inside jokes. Genreally, members of these communities are welcoming of these new users and over time, as the new users engagement increases, the flair may change.

      In addition to the automated flair feature, users are often times also allowed to showcase flairs from other communities, or chose flairs that they have achieved in the same community, for example: “Experienced Historian” or “Top commentor”. This plays on Reddit’s social gathering system.

      Hope this helps answer your question! I’ve also read your paper myself and commented on it! A great read!

  4. 20515539 Avatar

    The moderation question here is a terribly interesting one I think, as someone who has been part of a number of Reddit communities where the moderation was lacking or nearly completely absent which made many spaces uncomfortable or unsafe. I have found myself on more than one occasion wondering if there are better solutions but I’m not sure I’ve seen any movement by Reddit on the issue. Do you know if anything has been trialled?

    1. Suva Pokharel Avatar

      I agree that moderation on Reddit is something that can often be lacking in certain communities. Unfortunately, it is one of the inherit flaws of having a community based system where the users are responsible for both content and moderation. That being said, in extreme cases where moderation is severely lacking, and posts and comments get out of hand, Reddit does have an internal moderation team which moderate public Subreddits. A large number of Subreddits which have had issues arise from unjust or weak moderation, often receive suspensions or bans to the subreddit community itself. This usually presents itself when the Subreddit in question contains adult content as well.

      Whilst the top-level moderation from Reddit itself is a band aid solution, more research would need to be done on potential avenues to alleviate this problem. Hope that helps!

  5. DomenicRifici Avatar

    Hi Suva, I really like how you balance both the optimistic view of Reddit’s role in fostering modern digital communities and the more critical aspects like moderation labor and exclusion. Your use of networked individualism to frame the argument is especially compelling. One thing I’m curious about: do you think Reddit’s model could work in more formal or institutional settings, like education or public services, or is it too dependent on the platform’s pseudonymity and voluntary participation?

  6. Suva Pokharel Avatar

    Hey Domenic, glad you liked my paper!

    Your question somewhat touches on a similar question raised by Jiawen regarding Reddit’s potential use in a more educational setting. As with any social media that harnesses the potential to create these communities, context becomes incredibly important. For example, Discord is another huge social media like platform where users are able to create and foster large communities that are centered around specific topics and communities. Using Discord as an example, many schools and even workplaces actually use Discord as one of the primary methods of communication between students and co-workers. Much like Reddit, Discord allows users to opt-in to pseudonymity and has shown its potential to be used in these formal and institutional settings.

    That being said I believe the distinction between the two platforms, and why Reddit may not be a great platform for said use case, is the format in which discourse appears on each platform. With Discord, there is a level of feedback that cannot be matched on Reddit, such as: Read receipts, notification of users who are currently messaging in each channel and the ability to subsection a “Discord Server” into child nodes in the form of channels and voice chats. When it comes to form and institutional settings, these features are almost mandatory. In Reddits case, it adopts a more traditional forum style message board, which does not lend itself to the sort of fast pace feedback that would typically be required in these more formal settings even though there are communities on Reddit which are tailored to these types of communities: r/programming, r/shopify etc.

    This is why having a diverse ecosystem of social platforms is so valuable. Each platform offers unique features and interaction models that make them suitable for different contexts and communities. Reddit excels at asynchronous, topic-focused discussions where other platforms such as Discord or Microsoft Teams thrive in a synchronous communication style better suited for educational and professional settings. There is no one-size-fits-all solution when it comes to online communities, and this diversity allows users to select the platform that best aligns with their specific communication needs and community goals.

    Hope this helps!