Skip to content

Unboxing Identity: Blind Box Toys as a Tool for Self-Expression in Online Platforms


With the rise of user-generated content through social media, the sharing of diverse interests has led to various online communities that different users resonate with. Among these interests are blind boxes, which refer to toy collectibles sold in sealed packaging that conceal the specific item or design the consumer will receive. Blind boxes have become an online phenomenon with users publishing their own unboxing and collection videos. This paper examines ways in which blind box toys have transitioned from simple collectibles into instruments of self-expression within toy-centred online communities. It argues that the affordances of digital platforms and the culture of collecting within online communities have transformed the blind box collecting hobby as a method of affirming psychological identity and performing personality and social class. The essay examines how information exchange regarding blind box toys contributes to the development of self-importance and confidence in one’s own abilities, and how preferences in blind box toys that are associated with distinct themes signal personality. Finally, it investigates different collecting habits exhibited online, primarily on TikTok, demonstrating how collectors implicitly and explicitly express their social class and financial abilities. Through investigating the various collecting activities involving social media, the paper concludes that blind box collectibles, through the facilitation of online platforms, have become a mechanism to present and express self-identity.


In a digital age where content creation has been democratised, even a tiny figure pulled from a mystery box can imply who we are or want to be. A blind box toy refers to toy collectibles sold in sealed packaging that conceal the specific item or design the consumer receives (Xiao, 2022). Blind boxes are often classified by series, with the box demonstrating what potential toy can be obtained (Xiao, 2022). Consumers, therefore, purchase the product blindly without a guarantee of which variation they will receive, only revealing its content once they finalise the purchase and conduct an unboxing (Xiao, 2022).

Pop Mart has popularised the contemporary concept of blind boxes globally, making it a prominent company in the industry (Li, 2025). It began in 2015 with the release of its first-ever blind box series featuring its original character, Molly, whom customers admired and loved (Li, 2025). At the same time, numerous companies have released their own versions of blind boxes, significantly boosting the blind box market and offering various choices for consumers (Li, 2025). Some well-loved blind boxes include characters such as Sonny Angels, Smiskis, and Pop Mart’s Labubu or those based on popular intellectual properties such as Pokémon and Hello Kitty (Ryan, 2024).

Online platforms like TikTok have played a pivotal role in boosting the mainstream popularity of blind boxes, giving rise to a wave of blind box influencers. Within a platform’s content format, everyday users feature their unboxings and, as a result, showcase their reactions as they unbox and reveal what figure they obtain. This suspenseful and curiosity-piquing experience has established a vibrant community centred around these surprise toys. In platforms like TikTok, repeated interaction with these types of content alerts the algorithm, which improves its suggestions based on user engagement habits, resulting in increased recommendations for such content, further amplifying blind box culture (Zulli & Zulli, 2022).

This essay will argue that blind box toys have evolved from simple collectibles into a self-expression tool within toy-centred online communities, enabling users to affirm their psychological identity and perform personality and social class. 


Establishing the Value of Self through Blind Boxes

Participation in blind box communities enables users to boost their sense of self-worth and accomplishment through information exchange and communication within online platforms. Within a blind box series, a certain style can be classified as ordinary or rare, with the rare ones, referred to as secret or hidden, being most sought after by collectors (Xiao, 2022). However, the probability of getting the secret item is lower than ordinary variations, typically 1/144 boxes (Ziwei, 2021). Therefore, when blind box collectors share their experiences on online platforms, including completing a particular series, they often garner admiration and respect from other collectors (Li, 2025; Qi et al., 2024). With the affirmation gained from fellow collectors through proudly showcasing accomplished blind box sets on online platforms, individual collectors can better ascertain personal value through a sense of achievement within the blind box community. Collectors can develop a greater sense of self-appreciation as their confidence in their knowledge, dedication and expertise in the realm of collecting increases based on the recognition from the online community. 

Furthermore, senior collectors who are well-versed in predicting which figures are contained in each box often preach their strategy to new collectors. These strategies include differentiating blind boxes based on the sound or weight of the boxes when shaken (Ziwei, 2021). Information can be relayed online, either through video tutorials or detailed posts. The guiding and expert roles collectors assume within online blind box communities like TikTok “fulfil a psychological desire for self-importance” (Qi et al., 2024, p. 34). Through informative exchanges and inputs regarding what may seem like a trivial hobby, individuals perceive themselves as a core member of the group, thereby elevating their sense of purpose and contribution. When other collectors successfully secure their desired figures based on the advice of these expert collectors, advisers may discern themselves as pivotal influencers of a thriving community, further uplifting self-perception and psychological identity. Ultimately, the online blind box community have expanded beyond a place for merely showcasing toy collections. It has now evolved into a space where collectors can reinforce their sense of personal significance and shape their self-perception. The transformation of blind boxes from simple collectibles into something more meaningful and complex can be further understood by assessing how individuals engage in blind box communities on social platforms as a marker and reflection of their personality.


Collectors’ deliberate sharing of their personal preferences for blind boxes and collection journeys on online platforms transforms the art of collecting into a marker of identity, often tied to aesthetic expression and taste. According to Marwick (2013), Identity is dynamic, with individuals varying their self-presentation in accordance with specific circumstances. The rise of social networking sites has provided more avenues for individuals to facilitate self-expression through “text, photographs, and other multimedia capabilities” (Papacharissi, 2010, p. 304). This results in a more intentional, consistent, creative presentation of self (Papacharissi, 2010). This concept correlates to how blind box collectors conduct themselves online. On social platforms like Instagram, TikTok, or YouTube, individuals share their toy collections, preferences, and unboxing experiences in a curated way, implying their sense of self. Blind box series are meticulously constructed by designers, thus resulting in highly distinct appearances and design themes (Dai, 2024; Zhan, 2024). Collectors give each character particular connotations, converting them into symbols that resonate with an individual identity (Zhan, 2024). For example, the Pop Mart character, Hirono, is suited for individuals with mischievous traits who unapologetically express their emotions (Rosario, 2024). Meanwhile, the character Molly leans toward a playful and quirky persona (POP MART AUSTRALIA, n.d.). As a result, collectors’ mere selection of a specific blind box series to showcase on their online platforms becomes a method of self-expression wherein taste and aesthetics are determined. Through the consistent feature of specific blind boxes on a collector’s platform, whether it favours a specific brand, showcases a themed display or follows a certain colour palette, blind box collectors signal aspects of their personality, preferences, and identity that align with the characteristics of the toys themselves. 

Furthermore, a specific blind box series can have a prominent endorser, or a public figure associated with it. For example, Lisa, a member of the well-known Korean girl group BLACKPINK, shared her love for Pop Mart’s character, LABUBU (Wu, 2024). Considering this, individuals may intentionally align their collecting preferences with those of influential figures as a form of social signalling on social media. Collections that resemble those of a famous figure can communicate an aspiration towards a particular lifestyle and personality. This can also exemplify possessing similar immaculate tastes and ideals as the widely idolised persona. Thus, blind box toys, by extension, become a mechanism for expressing identity and values online, intentionally or subconsciously.

In addition to the unique figures, how the blind box experience is showcased speaks volumes about the collector’s identity. The aesthetic choices in collection presentation result from the user-friendly affordances of social platforms like TikTok, which provides a wide gallery of music, filters and editing tools to supplement content creation (Vaterlaus & and Winter, 2021). An unboxing with a mellow sound and soft filter of one collector may signal a calm and collected character. In contrast, others may utilise humorous music and be hyper and loud with their toy unboxing, reflecting a more extroverted and spontaneous personality. This demonstrates that the presentation of the blind box experience online, with varying aesthetic choices, dictates the perception regarding the collector. This further exemplifies that the blind box community on social media tends to become an extension or performance of the personal identity of collectors beyond the main subject of toys. Ultimately, blind boxes have become a self-expression tool and a concrete portrayal of a collector’s ideals, aspirations, and traits in the digital age. The affordances of social platforms enable individuals to communicate their varied collecting experiences in ways that align with their identity. This trend exemplifies how blind boxes, beyond their inherent value as collectibles, function as markers of social identity in the digital age.


Another way individuals project their identity in online communities, utilising blind box toys, revolves around the signalling of social class and discretionary spending power. According to Shin et al. (2021), Gen Z -Pop Mart’s main target market- often consumes premium-priced items and famous brands for self-expression on social media. Participation in online blind box communities can be a method to perform wealth, as blind box toys employ a rarity system and limited edition drops that are positioned at a high value (Xiao, 2022). As previously mentioned, ‘secret’ toys within a blind box series appear less frequently; thus, these items have a higher value in the resale market, which can be six times the retail price of the blind box, amplifying the toys’ perceived value (Xiao, 2022; Zhan, 2024). Thus, in social media, when collectors flaunt their hard-to-get figures, emphasising their rarity through dialogues and narratives about the struggles of obtaining the toy within their unboxing or collection content, blind boxes, by extension, become a tool to signal spending ability and financial status, whether it truly reflects individuals’ circumstances or merely a performance. Additionally, the capability to pay exorbitant resale prices for a non-necessity item further signals wealth.

Moreover, some blind box enthusiasts would go to great lengths, such as travelling to overseas flagship stores like Thailand and queueing for hours to obtain their desired toy (Hardianti & Oktalisa, 2024). Others may employ intermediary services, who earn commission by sourcing and selling blind boxes at an additional cost (Hardianti & Oktalisa, 2024). These practices are heavily documented online through ‘POV’- style content. For instance, one collector documents travelling to two countries – Hong Kong and Macau, to visit Pop Mart stores. Thus, the nature of blind box collecting paired with democratised social media transforms toy collecting into a form of conspicuous consumption where spending power that fuels extreme collecting behaviour and access to rare goods are used to subtly signal elevated social status and financial freedom to an online audience. Additionally, blind box toys are not confined to shelf displays but have transcended as fashion and lifestyle accessories. Pop Mart’s Labubu has emerged as a trendy bag charm, often spotted with celebrities and royals (Zhang, 2025). Due to the surrounding scarcity and high demand for these toys, flaunting these items as a part of their everyday fashion on personal socials, e.g. casually wearing them as a keychain, implies a level of affluence and nonchalance toward goods deemed as priced possessions. Using these high-value items with no reservations serves as a performance of wealth. In this way, blind box collecting becomes a form of lifestyle branding where taste and wealth are communicated through digital platforms. In essence, participation in the online blind box culture can involve a performance of wealth, thereby projecting a particular facet of an individual’s identity.


Blind box toys transcended their role as collectibles, now serving as a meaningful vehicle for self-identity on social platforms. Through the communities and engagement these toys foster, individuals navigate self-image and exemplify personal traits and social status to others. Firstly, collecting achievements such as the completion of a blind box set leads to the identification of personal worth because of the affirmation obtained from other collectors. Individuals who facilitate information regarding toy collecting assume an expert role, instilling a sense of purpose and contribution. Furthermore, as each blind box character bears different connotations, a collector’s preferences in the categories of toys they highlight on social platforms extend as a form of self-presentation. A similar idea of identity signalling in online toy-collecting communities can be concluded when an individual’s collection resembles that of a famous personality, and through the deliberate use of platform tools to document their collecting experiences. Lastly, social class can be ascertained by an individual’s collecting habits shared online, further reinforcing blind box collecting as an avenue for displaying personal attributes, whether explicitly or implicitly. Given these insights, future studies may examine how long-term participation in online blind box communities impacts self-perception, particularly when trends shift and the popularity of blind box toys decreases. This may include investigating whether its power as a self-representation tool diminishes or persists despite decreasing mainstream relevance. It also invites the question of whether reduced public attention to blind box collecting leads to a more authentic pool of collectors, making identities expressed through collections more genuine.


Dai, T. (2024). Analysis of Product Characteristics and Marketing Strategies of Blind Box Based on the Study of Consumer Propensity—Take Pop Mart as an Example. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 54, 106-111. 

Hardianti, F., & Oktalisa, N. E. (2024). The FoMO Labubu in AISAS Approach Digital Communication Study of Instagram User Behavior on Labubu Dolls. International Conference on Communication and Media Digital, 

Li, S. (2025). Research on marketing strategies of trendy toy brands under the “blind box economy”: A case study based on POP MART. In (1 ed.). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003564966-87

Marwick, A. E. (2013). Online identity. A companion to new media dynamics, 355-364. 

Papacharissi, Z. (2010). A Networked Self : Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites. Taylor & Francis Group.http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/curtin/detail.action?docID=574608

POP MART AUSTRALIA. (n.d.). OUR IP & Designershttps://au.popmart.com/pages/our-designers?srsltid=AfmBOoohI2wJZRMW24-rCP0Lgz4IrUp5jKTdiVDlO9sj1wvRBzqCj9D8

Qi, A., Sudtasan, T., Kewprasopsak, T., & Suriya, K. (2024). The Impact of online community on blind box repurchase intentionChiang Mai: Graduate School, Chiang Mai University]. 

Rosario, M. D. (2024, November 8). The MEGAStyle Gift Guide: The Perfect Pop Mart Figure for Every Personality. MEGAhttps://mega-asia.com/lifestyle/culture/the-megastyle-gift-guide-the-perfect-pop-mart-figure-for-every-personality/

Ryan, M. (2024, December 24). What are blind boxes? The latest Asian retail craze to hit Minnesota. The Minnesota Star Tribune.https://www.startribune.com/pop-mart-miniso-blind-box-ebisu-barnes-noble-toy-art-collectible-figurine/601198734

Shin, S.-A., Jang, J.-O., Kim, J.-K., & Cho, E.-H. (2021). Relations of Conspicuous Consumption Tendency, Self-Expression Satisfaction, and SNS Use Satisfaction of Gen Z through SNS Activities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(22), 11979. https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/22/11979

Vaterlaus, J. M., & and Winter, M. (2021). TikTok: an exploratory study of young adults’ uses and gratifications. The Social Science Journal, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2021.1969882

Wu, S. (2024). The Rise of Blind Boxes: Cultural, Marketing, and Consumer Trends Behind Bubble Mart’s Global Success. 1(10), 1-5. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.61173/nn89jm39

Xiao, L. Y. (2022). BLIND BOXES: OPENING OUR EYES TO THE CHALLENGING REGULATION OF GAMBLING-LIKE PRODUCTS AND GAMBLIFICATION AND UNEXPLAINED REGULATORY INACTION. Gaming Law Review, 26(5), 255-268. https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2022.0012

Zhan, H. (2024). Research on the Impact of Blind Box on Consumers and Marketing Strategies. SHS Web of Conferences, 

Zhang, T. (2025, February 20). How the Fluffy Figurine Labubu Is Catching Fire as the ‘It’ Bag Charm for Royals, Socialites and Lisa. Women’s Wear Dailyhttps://wwd.com/fashion-news/fashion-features/labubu-bag-charm-royals-celebrities-fashion-1236847325/

Ziwei, Z. (2021, 2021/07/12). Research on Blind Box and its Marketing Strategy. Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Economic Development and Business Culture (ICEDBC 2021), 

Zulli, D., & Zulli, D. J. (2022). Extending the Internet meme: Conceptualizing technological mimesis and imitation publics on the TikTok platform. New Media & Society, 24(8), 1872-1890. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820983603

Share this:

Search Site

Your Experience

We would love to hear about your experience at our conference this year via our DCN XVI Feedback Form.

Comments

15 responses to “Unboxing Identity: Blind Box Toys as a Tool for Self-Expression in Online Platforms”

  1. Jiahao Avatar

    Hi Hazelr,
    I really like the topic that you are discussing in your paper. As someone interested in purchasing surprise boxes, I found it interesting that you linked online identity with surprise box collecting. Knowing how simple blend box collecting can reflect on personality on social media is interesting. Some of the ideas you have communicated in your paper are things that I have never considered before. Your paper highlights that unboxing and sharing these items go beyond just the excitement of the reveal. It’s a way for collectors to express their personality, social class, and aspirations.

    1. hazelr Avatar

      Hi Jiahao, thank you for reading my work. As a person with a growing collection of toys, I have come to realise that the way in which I curate and present my collection is closely tied to what I identify as my personal branding and the version of myself I aspire to be. Online content that uses terminology like ” smiski girl” or “sonny angel girl” helped me make the connection that within a collection, a certain vibe or identity starts to form—this was actually what sparked the idea for my paper. I think this argument could also apply to other types of collections. For example, being a sports car or vintage car collector can also say a lot about a person’s values, lifestyle, or aspirations. Do you think that you subconsciously consider the connotations or aesthetics associated with a blindbox series before purchase?

      1. Jiahao Avatar

        Hi Hazelr,

        I think for me personally, blindboxing happens in two situations, one is very substantial and I take my time to think about whether I really like the design and everything and whether I can afford not to get the one that I really like. The other situation is when I just impulsively buy something that I feel like buying at the time, maybe it is something that is cute or satisfies a sudden urge.

        To answer your question, I think yes, I do subconsciously consider the aesthetic or vibe of the Blindbox range before I decide to buy. Whether the product is sold online or offline, I think there has to be a certain type of design that appeals to me. Personally I really like the cute and food shaped blindboxes and a lot of the blindboxes I buy are those styles without me even noticing. That’s why I think the collections that I have aren’t just the items it is a product that fits into my version and express my emotion.

  2. Busher Avatar

    Hello,

    I was interested to read your paper as I love collecting blind boxes myself. Blind boxes being a means of self-expression wasn’t an idea that I had ever thought of! I always saw them as simply fun, collectable items which have certainly become a cultural phenomenon.

    I found it interesting how you noted collectors can align their preferences with celebrities and influencers like Lisa from Blackpink (particularly as I know this is where the Labubu craze begun). Do you think this kind of aspirational alignment could diminish an individual’s identity into a sort of curated mimicry? I feel like the lines have become quite blurred between personal taste and the effects of parasocial influence these influencers/celebrities create online.
    I discuss some of this in my paper looking at the negative effects Instagram influencers can have on the formation of a teenage girls’ identity if you want to have a look! https://networkconference.netstudies.org/2025/ioa/6031/the-price-of-perfection-the-impacts-social-media-influencers-have-on-teenage-girls-identities/

    1. hazelr Avatar

      Hey, thanks for having a look at my paper. I agree that, to an extent, individual identity can be diluted by mimicking an influential figure, especially when individuals shift completely from one trend to the next, despite such vastly differing trends. However, I argue that the very choice to emulate someone reflects something meaningful about a person’s identity. Even if the specific aesthetic or behaviour isn’t inherently part of their taste (merely influenced by the idol), the desire to adopt it can signal underlying values, aspirations, or a sense of belonging they’re trying to achieve. I believe personal taste is still reflected in the influential figures individuals engage with, particularly in online communities like the blindbox community. In light of this, I now think it’s quite difficult to distinguish between healthy inspiration and losing oneself to these set trends, especially surrounding seemingly harmless things like toys. Looking forward to reading more of your stance on this in your paper.

  3. Warapon Avatar

    Hi hazelr,

    I was enjoying your paper talking about blind boxes beyond just collectable toys and framing them as tools for digital self-expression. While you identify the way people identify their identity through the blind box they open, I’m one of the people who are enjoying collecting art toys.

    Among the most valuable insights was how TikTok aesthetics and unboxing styles and character choices can reveal parts of a collector’s identity. I hadn’t thought about how collectors would use their items to express both personality traits and social standing as well as their personal goals. Do you find any differences in self-expression between “casual collectors” and “expert collectors”?
    For example, do expert collectors aim to focus more on showcasing knowledge and prestige, while casual collectors focus on fun or aesthetic vibes? I would love to hear more about how these identity performances differ across user types.

    1. hazelr Avatar

      Hi Warapon,

      Thank you for taking the time to read my paper. I appreciate how you’ve put forward a distinction between collectors, them being ‘casual collectors’ and ‘expert collectors’. Based on what I’ve observed in online communities, expert collectors often have more diverse and expansive collections. They engage more broadly within these communities and are typically ‘in-the-know” about upcoming and rumoured releases. Therefore, I would say their self-expression leans more towards knowledge (from roles they assume, such as being the bearer of news), with undertones of social status. Whereas, casual collectors, I would classify as those who once in a while buy these toys, as they don’t invest as much as expert collectors, you’ll find that they choose items based on personal taste and emotional resonance often focusing on specific characters or series rather than building a broad or rare collection. However, this distinction is not absolute, and some expert collectors may choose to focus on a single series, as I’ve noticed with Hirono collectors. But, yes, as a general trend, I would say there is a difference in how blind boxes function as tools of identity among these two collector groups.

  4. Janey Umback Avatar

    Hi Haelr,
    What a great paper, I really enjoyed reading it. I think this is a fascinating analysis of unboxing culture, particularly your discussion of social class and the lengths that people will go to (travelling between countries etc.) to get their hands on blind boxes. I wonder how you think the recent rise of dupes—such as Labubu dupes—might intersect with these dynamics. Could they represent a shift in how authenticity and aspiration are navigated across different socioeconomic groups?
    Thanks,
    Janey

    1. hazelr Avatar

      Hi Janey,

      Thank you for bringing up dupes to the discussion—I think they’re definitely relevant, despite not having the chance to explore them in my paper.

      To answer your question, in terms of good quality dupes, it may intersect with the desirability of these toys and the idea of using them as a signal of wealth for those in the higher socioeconomic class. Rise of counterfeit products saturates the market, undermining the sense of rarity and exclusivity that gives the original blind boxes their prestige. Yet for those unable to afford the originals, purchasing dupes may signal a nature of aspiration that moves away from the mere ownership of the item (often to signpost aspects of identity such as financial capabilities and taste) to instead belonging in the community.

      Recently, I have also seen an uptake in creators reviewing lower-quality dupes found in local markets and humorous “Lafufu” content, where individuals proudly showcase odd, low-quality counterfeit versions of Labubu’s. This form of participation in the blind box communities exemplifies a different avenue for presenting an authentic self that embraces humour and resourcefulness over the prestige of owning the real item.

      In a sense, I would argue that dupes foster new approaches to present aspiration and signal authenticity among varying social classes, whether by imitating luxury aesthetics or playfully subverting them.

      Again, I appreciate you taking the time to read my paper.

  5. Xing Bai Avatar

    Hi Hazelr!

    I really enjoyed your paper and strongly agree with your points about blind box toys being a powerful medium for identity expression. In fact, one of my friends is so passionate about this trend that they’ve traveled to different countries just to collect rare editions of Labubu figures! This really highlights how deeply these toys resonate with people, becoming an essential part of their self-expression and identity. Do you think the sense of adventure in chasing these collectibles adds even more meaning to the unboxing experience? I’d love your perspective!

    Thanks

    1. hazelr Avatar

      Hey Xing Bai,

      Thanks for engaging with my paper and sharing your personal account of this blindbox phenomenon. I definitely agree that the uncertainty and sense of adventure in the collection journey add a unique layer to the experience. The act of unboxing becomes more than just opening an item bought, it transforms into an accomplishment and a shared moment of connection. Whether you’re unboxing with a friend and sharing the same excitement, curiosity, or frustration from the figures you get or trading such figures based on each other’s preferences, it creates a bonding moment. Essentially, I believe that when you’re purchasing a blind box, you’re not just buying the item itself, but also the shared journey and emotional highs and lows that come with it.

  6. Khushi Avatar

    Hey Hazelr,

    Wow, I found this paper very engaging! Never really gave blind box toys any deeper thought than that they were collectibles, so appreciate how you’ve opened (literally and metaphorically) the depths of the inner psychological and social meaning to these. Your idea about collectors employing blind boxes as signalers of identity and even on-line social class is particularly interesting, it does show just how personal and performative on-line spaces are now. I also feel like your reference to aesthetic decisions in content development was bang on; it caused me to think about how little details such as music or filters can reveal personality. This was really bold, and a real good read!

    Well done 🙂

    1. hazelr Avatar

      Hey Khushi,

      Thank you so much for having a look at my paper. I appreciate your feedback about my arguments. I certainly was quite proud when I made the link about aesthetic choices and the creator’s personality. I think that these observations really stemmed from seeing content of similar subject matter often and consecutively, thanks to algorithms, allowing for the comparison of their delivery and how they foster engagement in various ways. I think this part of the paper can even be expanded on by itself.

  7. Laurence Avatar

    Hi Hazel,

    I found your paper really unique and intriguing. The fact that even niche items like blind box toys could actually be used for self-expression is something I never would have thought of. Overall, this was honestly one of the most interesting papers I have read. I just wanted to ask, as for content creators who make content related to these kinds of topics for profit and views, would you think this is still some form of self-expression on their side?

    1. hazelr Avatar

      Hey Laurence,

      I’m glad you’ve enjoyed having a read through my work. To answer your question, I believe that for those creating blind box content with monetisation as the intention, the form of self-expression or identity exploration they derive from these toys is likely tied to my first argument of assuming expert roles and perceiving themselves as a core member of the community. They can position themselves as a person of importance or knowledge within these communities, reporting on releases, sharing insider knowledge, collecting tips, etc.

      Additionally, how they present their content and curate their personal brand within blind box communities can serve as an extension of their identity, reinforcing how they wish to be perceived.
      For instance, one may dedicate an account focused towards in-depth critiques of figure designs, while another might lean into a chaotic, repetitive undboxing in search of a particular figure.

      However, to an extent, for those focused on making a profit, their participation in the community may be driven by audience demand rather than what they personally want to showcase. Still, their approach to or delivery of content may still underline who they are as a person or want to appear as – e.g, an expert, humorous, etc. In a sense, the aim to monetise collecting experiences doesn’t cancel out self-expression; instead, it reshapes it by still leaving room for identity performance.