Skip to content

TikTok Lifestyle Content Creators and Social Media Authenticity Crisis


Abstract: This paper examines the complex relationship between authenticity and content creation on TikTok, particularly focusing on lifestyle influencers and the challenges they face in maintaining genuine self-expression. TikTok’s unprecedented growth, with over one billion users globally and exceptional engagement rates, has created an environment where authentic content paradoxically becomes increasingly manufactured and performative. Through analysis of the authentic performance phenomenon, monetisation pressures, and algorithm-driven behavioural modifications, this research explores how TikTok’s ecosystem influences content creators’ self-presentation and their relationships with their community. Additionally, revealing a fundamental tension between algorithmic success and authentic expression, highlighting how commercial pressures and platform dynamics contribute to authenticity in the realm of social media.  

Introduction  

The rise of TikTok has fundamentally transformed the social media landscape, introducing unprecedented challenges to authenticity in digital spaces. TikTok has emerged as a dominant force in social media, offering users a platform for creating and sharing short-form video content ranging from one to ten minutes in length. The platform’s unmatched growth is evidenced by its status as the most downloaded application in 2020, amazing a user base exceeding one billion people (Ceci, 2023, as cited in Meza et al., 2023). The application has a greater advantage in user engagement compared to other social media platforms. Over 100,000 profiles reveal the platform’s significant higher engagement metrics, with users interacting with content at a rate of 52.1% (Yu, 2019, as cited in Green et al, 2022). These remarkable engagement metrics underscore TikTok’s overwhelming influence in contemporary social media and establish its significance as a primary content discovery platform. However, this environment has fostered culture where content creators, particularly lifestyle influencers, frequently priorities highly curated representations of their daily lives, personal experiences, and commercial collaborations, potentially compromising authentic self-expression in the process. Ebben and Bull (2023), argue that the term ‘Authenticity’ as a general concept and practices is difficult to define.  

However, in the context of social media, authenticity manifests as a carefully constructed presentation of self and deliberately crafted online identity. As content creators navigate the complex intersection of personal expression and algorithmic success, a crisis of authenticity has emerged that threatens the foundation of genuine community engagement. This paper argues that the TikTok’s platform dynamics have created a paradoxical crisis of authenticity where content creators, specifically lifestyle influencers, must navigate the inherent tension between genuine self-expression and the demands of algorithmic success, resulting in a performative authenticity that transforms even unfiltered moments into carefully manufactured content for maximum engagement.  

The Rise of ‘Authentic’ Performance 

The rise of social media influencers has introduced a fascinating and complex phenomenon known as “authentic performance”, a uniquely paradoxical presentation of ostensibly unfiltered content that, in reality, demands meticulous curation and careful consideration. This intriguing dynamic illuminates the intricate and multifaceted interplay between digital self-presentation and the evolving expectations of social media platforms (Ebben & Bull, 2023). Within TikTok’s dynamic ecosystem, content creators find themselves constantly navigating an increasingly sophisticated balance between maintaining an appearance of authenticity while simultaneously crafting compelling and engaging personas that resonate with their audiences. Barta and Andalibi (2017) present a compelling argument that contemporary digital platforms create unprecedented challenges for authentic self-presentation, particularly concerning the delicate reconciliation between audience expectations for consistently positive, uplifting content and the genuine expression of emotional experiences in their full complexity. This phenomenon becomes particularly evident when examining popular social media trends like the widely recognized “That Girl” movement. The trend serves as a perfect illustration of how deeply personal daily routines and intimate moments become transformed into carefully packaged, commercialised content, with creators meticulously arranging their morning rituals and productivity-focused lifestyle elements into aesthetically pleasing, highly curated video presentations (Molinar, 2023). In this digital landscape, lifestyle content creators dedicate considerable time and effort to crafting and presenting extensively polished, aspirational versions of their daily routines and lifestyle choices. They meticulously select and showcase specific elements that align seamlessly with audience expectations while deliberately minimising or completely excluding the more mundane, challenging, or less photogenic aspects of their lived experiences.  

Molinar (2023) provides an in-depth analysis of how the trend encourages women to adopt empowering lifestyle practices that thoughtfully blend feminine expression with comprehensive mental wellness routines, placing particular emphasis on the establishment and maintenance of structured daily routines and organised living. However, this increasingly sophisticated form of performative authenticity inevitably creates unrealistic expectations among viewers and perpetuates an endless cycle where even supposedly “authentic” content transforms into another carefully constructed performance within the broader social media landscape. The growing disparity between behind-the-scenes reality and carefully curated posted content reveals an increasingly concerning disconnect between genuine lived experiences and their digital representations. 

Bailey et al. (2020) effectively demonstrate how contemporary social media content creation consistently priorities aspirational elements over authentic representation, ultimately leading to an elaborately orchestrated presentation of idealized experiences. This selective curation process manifests itself through various forms of content, including meticulously staged travel documentation, carefully curated social interactions, and precisely composed lifestyle presentations. The cumulative effect of these practices ultimately fosters a significant and noteworthy disconnect between carefully constructed digital personas and the nuanced complexity of lived reality, raising important questions about the nature of authenticity in modern digital spaces. 

Monetisation and Authenticity  

The monetisation of influence introduces profound and multifaceted challenges to authentic expression within contemporary social media environments. Content creators find themselves navigating an increasingly intricate web of pressures as they attempt to maintain meaningful parasocial relationships with their audiences while simultaneously fulfilling various commercial obligations and partnership requirements. According to Ekinci et al. (2025), the widespread proliferation of brand partnerships and sponsored content among content creators has created significant obstacles in their ability to foster and sustain genuine, meaningful relationships with their audience members, potentially compromising the fundamental authenticity of their digital presence and online persona. This dynamic clearly illustrates how the increasing commercialisation of these parasocial relationships through strategic brand partnerships creates an intricate and delicate balance where authentic connection must constantly compete with mounting business obligations, ultimately threatening to undermine the very foundation of trust and authenticity that initially made these parasocial relationships so valuable and engaging in the first place. 

Influencers have developed sophisticated methods to facilitate parasocial engagement through increasingly automated content distribution mechanisms, enabling widespread audience participation in various forms of discourse and activities while simultaneously fostering vibrant digital communities centered around their carefully crafted personas (Farivar et al. 2022). As TikTok’s platform continues to evolve and expand, algorithmic features such as the “For You Page” have increasingly encouraged highly mechanised approaches to community building through automated content delivery systems and complex engagement metrics, potentially diminishing the natural, organic nature of the relationship between creators and their dedicated audience members. 

In the specific context of TikTok lifestyle influencers, content creators meticulously craft and portray an aesthetically pleasing format of their daily lives to promote an idealistic version of their existence. According to Scarcello (2022), the increasingly pervasive nature of lifestyle content creators’ self-disclosure on social media platforms raises critical and thought-provoking questions regarding the authenticity and credibility of their carefully constructed digital personas. This research indicates that this particular type of self-disclosure frequently manifests through intricately curated content that substantially blurs the traditionally distinct line between genuine personal expression and strategic personal branding techniques.  

As lifestyle influencers continuously strive to maintain their carefully cultivated perception of authenticity while simultaneously meeting ever-increasing audience expectations and demanding platform metrics, they must navigate increasingly complex decisions about which aspects of their personal lives to share and precisely how to present these carefully selected moments to their audience. This fundamental tension between growing monetisation demands and maintaining creator authenticity raises significant questions about the long-term sustainability of these relationships with audiences, particularly as influencers become increasingly dependent on these parasocial connections to achieve commercial success within the highly competitive social media landscape.

Algorithm-Driven Behaviour Changes  

TikTok’s algorithm-driven ecosystem has fundamentally altered creator behaviour. The platform’s emphasis on viral success has led to content adaptation strategies that priorities algorithmic performance over authentic expression. Audrezet et al. (2020), argues that brand partnerships and sponsored content can undermine creators’ authentic expression by shifting focus away from their genuine interests and expertise. Indicating that as content creators employ various strategies to appease the algorithm at the expense of genuine expression, they frequently adjust their video length to match perceived optimal durations, deliberately use trending sounds and music regardless of relevance, and participate in viral challenges that may not align with their usual content style. In addition, creators often modify their speaking pace, gestures, and editing style to mimic successful viral formats. Scarcello (2022), examines the distinct characteristics of lifestyle influencers, demonstrating how these content creators differentiate themselves through comprehensive documentation of their everyday experiences across various life domains, in contrast to content creators who focus on specific niches or subject areas.  

Overall, the pressures to maintain consistent engagement metrics often leads lifestyle creators to priorities algorithm-friendly content over authentic representation of their daily lives. This is particularly evident in how creators structure their “day in the life” videos, morning routines, and aesthetic lifestyle montages to fit within TikTok’s preferred content, potentially misrepresenting the realistic aspects of their lifestyle to achieve higher engagement metrics. In addition to content adaptation for viral success, the issue of trend jacking emerges. According to Hendrayati et al. (2024), the term ‘trend jacking’ describes the strategic leveraging of current trends and popular topics to maximise audience engagement and visibility across digital platforms. The opportunistic adoption of viral trends often comes at the expense of their authentic voice. Consequently, the tension between authenticity and algorithmic performance highlights the considerable personal toll that content creators face in today’s digital landscape, where the line between genuine expression and strategic content optimization becomes increasingly blurred.  

In summary, TikTok’s influence on content creation reveals a fundamental paradox in digital authenticity. The platform’s algorithmic nature, combined with monetisation pressures, has created an environment where authenticity itself has become a performance. Content creators, particularly lifestyle influencers, face significant challenges in balancing genuine self-expression with the demands of algorithmic success and commercial viability. The ‘authentic performance’ phenomenon has led to increasingly manufactured content, where even seemingly unfiltered moments are carefully curated for maximum engagement. The transformation of daily routines into commercialised content, exemplified by trends like ‘The Girl’, demonstrates how platform dynamics can turn genuine experiences into carefully orchestrated performances. Furthermore, the algorithm-driven behaviours modifications have fundamentally altered how creators present themselves, often at the expense of their authentic voice. This crisis of authenticity raises important questions about the future of digital self-expression and the sustainability of creator and audience relationships in an increasingly commercialised social media landscape. 

Reference 

Audrezet, A., Kerviler, G, D., Moulard, J,G. (2020). Authenticity under threat:  

When social media influencers need to go beyond self-presentation. * Journal of Business Research, 117(2020),557-569. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296318303229 

Bailey, E.R., Matz, S.C., Youyou, W. et al. Authentic self-expression on 

Social media is associated with greater subjective well-being. Nat Commun 11, 4889 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18539-w 

Barta, K., Andalibi, N. (2021). Constructing Authenticity on TikTok: Social Norms and  

Social Support on the “Fun” Platform. Human-Computer Interaction, 5(1), 1-29. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3479574 

Ebben, M., Bull, E. (2023). Constructing Authenticity: Social Media Influencers and the  

Shaping of Online Identity. Online Identiy – An Essential Guide. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373956602_Constructing_Authenticity_Social_Media_Influencers_and_the_Shaping_of_Online_Identity 

Ekinci, Y., Dam, S., Buckle, G. (2025). The Dark Side of Social Media Influencers: A  

Research Agenda for Analysing Deceptive Practices and Regulatory Challenges. Psychology & Marketing, 42(4),1201-1214. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mar.22173 

Farivar, S., Wang, F., Turel, O. (2022). Followers’ problematic engagement with  

influencers on social media: An attachment theory perspective. Computers in Human Behavior. 133(2022),107288. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563222001108 

Green, D., Polk, X. L., Arnold, J., Chester, C., Matthews, J. (2022). The Rise Of TikTok:  

A Case Study Of The New Social Media Giant. Management and Economics Research Journal, 8(1), 1-6. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.hataso.com/journals/merj/articles/538/pdf 

Hendrayati, H., Setyawati, I., Waluyo, T. (2024) Trendjacking Strategies by Influences :  

Their Impact on Engagement and Costumer Purchase Decisions in the Digital Era. International Journal of Educational and Life Sciences, 2(8), 1022-1038. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383899434_Trendjacking_Strategies_by_Influences_Their_Impact_on_Engagement_and_Costumer_Purchase_Decisions_in_the_Digital_Era   

Meza, R, M., Mogos, A., Prundaru, G. (2023). Idols of Promotion and Authenticity  

on TikTok. Media and Communication. 11(4), 187-202. https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/7123/3426  

Molinar, Irene, “THE PATRIARCHY BECOMES THAT GIRL: TIKTOK AND THE  

MEDIATIZATION OF HEGEMONIC FEMININITY” (2023). Electronic Theses, Projects, and Dissertations. 1644. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd/1644  

Scarcello, M. (2022). AUTHENTOK: UNCOVERING THE AUTHENTICITY OF LIFESTYLE  

TIKTOKING.https://scispace.com/pdf/authentok-uncovering-the-authenticity-of-lifestyle-tiktoking-kavk73cinw.pdf 

Share this:

Search Site

Your Experience

We would love to hear about your experience at our conference this year via our DCN XVI Feedback Form.

Comments

11 responses to “TikTok Lifestyle Content Creators and Social Media Authenticity Crisis”

  1. PGriffiths Avatar

    This essay beautifully unpacks the tension between authenticity and algorithmic performance, but let’s push it a bit further:

    The ‘Authenticity Industrial Complex’: You point out how even “unfiltered” moments get staged (e.g., ‘That Girl’ trends). But maybe this performative authenticity in itself is a new form of authentic expression? For Gen Z creators, is the awareness of performance (e.g., ironic greenscreen cuts) a meta-commentary on digital identity?

    Algorithmic Gaslighting: When do creators adapt speech/mannerisms to conform to viral templates (as quoted)? Does TikTok’s algorithm indirectly impose a monoculture of behavior? Are we witnessing the rise of a “TikTok accent” or “influencer body language” or as standardized as corporate office culture?

    Who Owns ‘Realness’? The piece mentions monetisation’s deconstruction of trust, but could platforms like TikTok perhaps quantify authenticity? Imagine an “Authenticity Score” on things like Consistency between on/off-camera personas (e.g., leaked behind-the-scenes vs. posts), Brand deal transparency (e.g., % of sponsored content labelled as #ad) and Audience literacy (e.g., polling followers: “Does this feel staged?”)

    Provocation: If authenticity is a craft these days (e.g., editing or hashtagging), are we entering an era where the most “authentic” creators are simply the best actors?

    1. Student20559304 Avatar

      Thank you for this thought-provoking commentary on my paper. Your analysis raises several valuable points that deserve careful consideration:

      Regarding your “Authenticity Industrial Complex” observation: You raise an intriguing perspective about performative authenticity potentially being a new form of genuine expression. This aligns with my discussion of how lifestyle creators navigate the complex intersection of personal expression and algorithmic success. Your suggestion about Gen Z’s self-aware performance being a meta-commentary adds a fascinating layer to my analysis of authentic performance.

      Your point about “Algorithmic Gaslighting” effectively builds upon my discussion of algorithm-driven behavior modifications. While I addressed how creators adapt their content to match algorithmic preferences, your suggestion about a potential “TikTok accent” or standardised “influencer body language” merits further investigation. This could expand our understanding of how platform dynamics shape not just content but behavioral patterns.

      The concept of quantifying authenticity through an “Authenticity Score” is an innovative suggestion that connects well with my analysis of monetisation pressures. However, I would caution that attempting to measure authenticity could paradoxically contribute to further performative behavior, potentially exacerbating the authenticity crisis I’ve identified.

      Your final provocation about authenticity becoming a craft reinforces my paper’s central argument about the paradoxical nature of authentic expression in digital spaces. This could be a valuable direction for future research, particularly in examining how this evolution affects creator-audience relationships.

  2. maxf Avatar

    Hey! Thanks for posting your paper. I found it very insightful.

    A key theme of a lot of the papers I have read in this conference is the balance of real self-expression against algorithmic demands. With AI and deepfakes only getting better with time, that will be another issue creators/ viewers will have to deal with in the near future when it comes to authenticity.

    As someone who uses the platform every day, it often baffles me what gets views/ engagement. Sometimes, some lifestyle content on the platform comes off as very The Truman Show to me. Do you think that most viewers prefer curated perfection over genuine imperfection, or is the authenticity crisis driven solely by platform algorithms?

    Thanks again for posting your paper.
    Max.

    1. Student20559304 Avatar

      Thank you for your thoughtful engagement with my paper. Your observation about the parallel between TikTok lifestyle content and The Truman Show is particularly appropriate. It highlights the performative nature of “authentic” content that I discuss in my research.

      Your point about AI and deepfakes adds an important dimension to the authenticity crisis that deserves further exploration. As these technologies become more sophisticated, they may further blur the lines between genuine and manufactured content, potentially exacerbating the issues I’ve identified in my paper.

      Regarding your question about viewer preferences versus algorithmic influence, I would argue it’s not a simple either/or scenario. Based on my research, it’s more of a complex feedback loop: algorithms promote content that generates engagement, viewers respond to and internalise these content patterns, and creators adapt their content accordingly. This creates what I would call a “curated authenticity ecosystem” where both platform mechanics and audience expectations shape content creation.

      Your comment about being baffled by what gains traction on the platform raises interesting questions about the disconnect between content value and algorithmic success – perhaps a worthy avenue for future research.

      Thank you for this discussion

  3. Ashley Avatar

    Hey!

    This was a great read and your paper was extremely insightful which was really enjoyable to read!

    As someone who is constantly using TikTok, I have noticed that TikTok’s algorithm has definitely altered user and creator behaviour not just on myself but others surrounding me and on the platform too. This often forms as a result of other users taking inspiration of a trend and recreating similar content, it then starts circulating all over the platform from other content creators participating in the trend/behaviour that users watching the content also subconsciously participate in such behaviours too.

    It’s interesting how your paper also links very closely with mine regarding the use of social media platforms including TikTok that the content we view, as it exposes users to content and alters our daily routines or influences us to participate or develop new skills we see on the platform. It shares similarities in the exploration of algorithms and goes beyond that through emphasis on allowing for skill development through these platforms altering our view on certain activities and encourages many to participate which ultimately demonstrates the impact of creator behaviour!

    Here’s the link if you are interested in checking in out:
    https://networkconference.netstudies.org/2025/csm/5154/how-social-media-educates-and-inspires-skill-development-through-online-communities/#comment-5393

    – Ashley

    1. Student20559304 Avatar

      Thank you for your thoughtful engagement with my paper. Your personal experience with TikTok’s algorithmic influence provides valuable validation of the research findings regarding behaviour modification and trend adoption. Your observation about how trends circulate and influence both creators and viewers aligns well with the paper’s discussion of algorithm-driven behavioural changes.

      I particularly appreciate how you’ve connected this work to your own research on skill development through social media platforms. However, I would be interested in hearing more specific examples of how these behavioural modifications manifest in skill development contexts. This could provide an interesting extension to my analysis of authenticity crisis, particularly in how acquired skills might be presented differently for algorithmic success versus genuine learning processes.

      I look forward to reading your research, as it would undoubtedly contribute valuable theoretical perspectives to my paper.

      -Student20559304

  4. Nemat Almonjed Avatar

    Hey,

    This was such a well-researched and thought-provoking paper—thank you for unpacking the layered tensions between authenticity, algorithmic pressure, and monetisation on TikTok. I was especially drawn to your discussion of “authentic performance” and how even unfiltered moments are becoming curated products. The example of the “That Girl” trend was spot-on in illustrating how aspirational content often masks the more nuanced, less photogenic sides of life.

    Your analysis raised a question for me: Do you think audiences are becoming more aware of these performative tactics, and if so, might this awareness eventually shift the demand back toward truly raw, less curated content? Or are we too far into a cycle where “strategic authenticity” has become the new norm?

    Thanks again for such a compelling and relevant read, looking forward to hearing your thoughts!

    1. Matthew Gilbert Avatar

      I think audiences are becoming more aware, but it doesn’t necessarily mean they want totally raw content. “Strategic authenticity” kind of scratches that itch for realness while still being entertaining.

    2. Student20559304 Avatar

      Thank you for your thoughtful and engaging comment on my paper.

      Regarding your insightful question about audience awareness and potential shifts in content demands, I would argue that this dynamic reflects a broader tension identified in the research. As discussed in the paper, we’re seeing an increasingly sophisticated understanding of “performative authenticity” where even supposedly unfiltered content becomes another carefully constructed performance. The monetisation pressures and algorithmic demands have created what appears to be a self-perpetuating cycle.

      However, your question opens up an important avenue for future research. While my paper focuses primarily on creator behaviour and platform dynamics, investigating audience awareness and its potential influence on content evolution could provide valuable insights into the future direction of digital authenticity. This could be particularly relevant in understanding whether the current “strategic authenticity” paradigm is sustainable or if we’re approaching a tipping point where audiences might demand different forms of creator expression.

      Would you be interested in elaborating on your observations regarding audience awareness? Your perspective could add valuable insight to this ongoing discussion about the evolution of digital authenticity.

  5. Matthew Gilbert Avatar

    Great read! Really interesting points about how authenticity becomes performative on TikTok/Social Media. It made me wonder do audiences even care if it’s curated, maybe all we care about is that it feels relatable? I can see arguments that what we call “authentic” now is less about being factual and more about being emotionally consistent. I wonder if it’s a bit of the illusion of honesty at play? Like we all know things are performative, but we don’t treat them as such, or maybe it’s because of parasocial dynamics we’re now bought in on the “personality”, that we have some form of cognitive dissonance?
    My post is on how parasocial relationships empower fandoms and I think your discussion on how marketing “authenticity” to maintain “meaningful” parasocial relationships connects pretty well with it so I’ll link it here: https://networkconference.netstudies.org/2025/csm/5500/parasocial-relationships-are-a-driving-force-behind-the-success-and-cohesion-of-online-fandom-communities/

    1. Student20559304 Avatar

      Thank you for your thoughtful engagement with my paper. Your observation about emotional consistency versus factual authenticity raises a fascinating perspective that aligns with the paper’s discussion of parasocial relationships and authenticity as performance.

      Your point about audiences potentially valuing relatability over pure authenticity is particularly insightful, especially when considering how content creators have developed sophisticated methods for parasocial engagement while maintaining their carefully crafted personas.

      The cognitive dissonance you mention regarding performative content connects well with our findings about how lifestyle creators must constantly balance authentic self-expression with platform demands. This ties directly into the paper’s exploration of how content creators differentiate themselves through comprehensive documentation of daily experiences while adapting to algorithm-friendly formats.

      I would be very interested in reading your work on parasocial relationships empowering fandoms.