Skip to content

The role and influence of Douyin in online networks and social change in China


With the rapid development of digital technology, online network has gradually become an important force to promote social change. In China, a country with a huge Internet user base and highly digital development, social media is not only a tool for entertainment, but also an important space for people to express their opinions and spread culture. As the most influential short video platform in China, Douyin plays a unique role in contemporary Chinese society. Through his algorithmic recommendation mechanism and low-threshold creation environment, he has aroused the enthusiasm of many ordinary users, especially young groups. Promoting the expansion of grassroots expression and cultural innovation. In the process, however, Douyin has also demonstrated the complex interaction between digital platforms and national governance. While promoting content diversification, the platform also strengthens the spread of state-led ideology through censorship and public opinion guidance. Therefore, this paper argues that Douyin plays a dual role in China’s social change, that is, as a catalyst to promote social expression and cultural change, but also to maintain the existing power structure to some extent, reflecting the reality of the coexistence of possibilities and limitations of social change in China’s digital media environment.

As a mass oriented short video platform with a low threshold, Douyin provides ordinary users, especially young groups, with an expression channel that has never existed before. On Douyin, users can show their own views and attitudes by filming their daily lives, creating short plays and Posting comments. In this low-cost, high-communication environment, a large number of grassroots writers have gained considerable attention, so as to break the discourse structure monopolized by mainstream media in the past. (Zeng & Abidin, 2021) The emergence of many “rural vloggers” in recent years is a good example. These bloggers quickly attract the interest of a large number of urban users by showcasing rural life, local cuisine and traditional crafts. To a certain extent, it makes up for the impression of urban users on rural life. At the same time, it also reshaped the imagination of the countryside to a certain extent. The popularity of this kind of content is both a cultural backward compatibility and a rebuilding of identity in the age of social networks. (Zhao, 2023) In addition, the interactivity and immediacy of the Douyin platform enable the rapid spread of social hot spots. Users participate in public discussions through likes, comments, retweets, etc. (Sun, 2022) For example, in the themes of “anti-internal volume” and “migrant workers”, a large number of young users express their ridicule and dissatisfaction with the pressure in reality by creating relevant content. Although these voices often present playful or humorous expectations, this manifestation is a real social anxiety and dilemma. (Zhang & Negro, 2021) In this sense, Douyin is not only an entertainment platform, but also a platform that can carry social emotions and promote expression, which has a non-negligible impact on social ideology.

In addition to promoting the expression of people without backgrounds, Douyin has also played a large role in the generation and dissemination of youth culture. Through the creation and sharing of short videos, young users not only show each other’s different styles and interests, but also make some of them constitute an identity. Whether it is the revival of Hanfu in recent years, secondary culture, hip-hop, fitness and other lifestyle content, Douyin Douyin has become an important platform to promote the development of youth culture. These cultures are more than just entertainment, they are a social expression. These contents reflect the emotional space and self-discourse power constructed by the young generation in the face of realistic pressure. It is worth noting that Douyin will accurately push relevant internal messages based on different preferences and interests of customers. It further strengthens the formation of interest community. Although these societies vary in size, they are highly cohesive and interactive. Through likes, comments and imitation challenges, emotional links are established between users to form a niche with a common cultural identity. For example, some young people get a lot of sympathy and support by sharing their gender identity, career choices or relationship experiences. This is difficult to achieve in a traditional media environment. Douyin is both a content distribution platform and a cultural meeting place, giving more visibility to fringe topics. (Jin, 2020) However, this machine-algorithm-led cultural transmission is not without negative impressions. A platform’s preference for the most-viewed attention content may lead creators to cater to a particular style or topic in order to gain traffic. As a result, traffic standardization occurs. Within a seemingly pluralistic inner tone, partial independent or critical cultural expression remains at risk of marginalization. In addition, the platform’s guidance of positive content also affects the choice of subject matter and the way of expression of young people’s creation. This kind of data-driven cultural engagement, despite its wide coverage and spreading power, also reflects the still hidden complex relationship between platforms and social norms. Douyin, then, is not just a social tool, but a medium that can be embedded in culture, slowly shaping the boundaries of expression while providing opportunities for free expression.

Although Douyin provides a relatively open space for cultural expression and social interaction, Douyin has always been under strict regulation in China. As a platform that receives national policy guidance, Douyin must obey China’s social system of political security and public opinion orientation in terms of content recommendation and review. The platform will block sensitive terms, downgrade specific topics and block accounts that violate the platform’s rules. This constitutes a filter structure for social expression. Users have to think about the formality of speech in order to avoid running into some political red lines. This limitation not only affects the diversity of information, but also reshapes the boundaries of public perception of what constitutes reasonable speech (Repnikova, 2020). In this environment, although Douyin presents a diverse and active content landscape on the surface, the technical policy logic behind it has shaped the distribution of discourse rights. For example, some critical social topics involving feminism, labor rights, environmental protests, etc., are often quickly deleted or suppressed. This makes creators have to find a delicate balance between entertaining and expressive. Sometimes creators use metaphors and other means to circumvent the platform’s monitoring. This phenomenon shows that the platform can not be completely free of expression, but under the dual role of national ideology and platform business logic of the governing media space. (Fang & Repnikova, 2018) In addition, Douyin’s own algorithmic logical structure is also invisibly involved in this process of technical governance. The platform prioritizes videos that align with mainstream values and spread positive content. At the same time, the platform will marginalize some so-called unstable topics. This is not only in line with the state ideology, but also to cater to advertisers and the mainstream market. Under such a mechanism, the space for expression is expanded, but it will not be completely equal. Some creators who have strong content production capabilities and are familiar with the logic of platform operation are more likely to get exposure, while marginal creators or critical content will be submerged in a lot of entertainment information. This stratification of power also makes the social discussion on Douyin have hidden control mechanisms under the seemingly open surface. Therefore, the social expression brought by Douyin has a certain progressive nature, but it is also restricted by the system and environment. On the one hand, it stimulates the expression desire and creativity of ordinary people, and also creates a limited, open, controllable and inclusive region under the control of the state and commercial interests. This complex pattern of freedom and restriction is an important part of understanding social change in China’s digital media environment.

Douyin’s role in China’s digital society is not single, but has diversified and complex characteristics. On the one hand, it does provide an expression platform for ordinary users, especially the young generation, to break through the traditional discourse system, so that those voices without economic background can be heard by people to a certain extent. In addition, it is also constantly adjusting the possibility of such expression in the interweaving of national ideology and platform interests. This duality determines that Douyin is not a radical agent of social change, but rather a space that gradually operates in order to release expression. (Yang, 2022) This limited release mechanism makes Douyin promote a kind of spiritual social change, which will subtly affect users. Subsequently, more changes in individual consciousness, cultural identity and public sentiment are reflected, which is not a direct challenge to the system. This kind of reform has a certain degree of concealment and dispersion. For example, in the process of constantly blurring the boundary between entertainment and expression, users gradually form new ways of perceiving social issues; Some creators construct public discourse by means of metaphors and other expression techniques that can avoid monitoring, which will also invisibly expand the types and boundaries of expressible themes. The social impact of Douyin is not only reflected in its own content, but also in the continuous interaction between users and the platform. The censorship mechanisms established by the platform on the one hand, on the other hand, have to be adjusted according to the behavior of customers and the content of the dissemination. This model of platform management of user negotiation makes the platform internal communication show the characteristics of compliance internal negotiation. Some of the creators have developed some techniques that can flexibly correspond to the creative logic of the platform, and wrap the core content through funny, ironic and other means, so as to bypass the censorship mechanism and spread. In the constant game between creators and platforms, although the platform has absolute power, users are not completely passive. These behaviors and social phenomena will gradually shake the absolute status of mainstream ideology on the Internet. Therefore, the social change caused by Douyin will not be radical and conflict with the mainstream social consciousness, but will slowly shake the mainstream ideology in a complex mode of negotiation. In short, freedom is opposed to control.

As one of the most influential online platforms in China, Douyin has played a unique role in social change. On the one hand, it promotes the creation of people without background and economic strength and the spread of youth culture by lowering the threshold of expression. It stimulates the enthusiasm of individual expression and promotes public participation in cultural innovation. In addition, under the dual constraints of the rules of national ideology and the commercial logic of the platform, it regularly screens the content it contains, so that the expression activities are always within the controllable boundary. Under this system of freedom and control, Douyin forms a non-confrontational path to social change. By analyzing user participation, cultural expression, platform governance and censorship mechanisms, this paper points out that Douyin is not a simple communication tool, but a cultural system full of negotiation and game. Not only does it reflect the complexity of the structure of contemporary digital public Spaces in China, ye shows how digital platforms can create possibilities within limitations. Douyin is difficult to shake the existing rule system in the short term, but through long-term accumulation, with the awakening of youth consciousness, it may constitute a deep social impact in the future. To sum up, Douyin’s role in online networks and social change must be understood from an instrumental perspective and comprehensively examined from its media, cultural and political elements.

Reference list

Fang, K., & Repnikova, M. (2018). Demystifying “authoritarian resilience”: The Chinese Communist Party’s media strategies. Journal of Contemporary China, 27(111), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2018.1389011

Jin, D. Y. (2020). Cultural politics in the platform economy: The case of Douyin. International Journal of Communication, 14, 4625–4643. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/14909

Repnikova, M. (2020). Chinese authoritarianism and the contested politics of digital media. Communication and the Public, 5(1–2), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057047319899165

Sun, W. (2022). Chinese digital platforms and the reconfiguration of public expression. Media, Culture & Society, 44(3), 387–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437211015770

Yang, G. (2022). The politics of platformization in China: Transforming the entertainment-public sphere. International Journal of Communication, 16, 1455–1473. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/18039

Zeng, J., & Abidin, C. (2021). From internet celebrities to collaborative influencers: The evolution of social media influencer ecology in China. Global Media and China, 6(2), 200–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/20594364211013941

Zhang, C., & Negro, G. (2021). Platformization of cultural production in China: The Douyin paradox. Chinese Journal of Communication, 14(1), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2020.1861042

Zhao, Y. (2023). Digital rurality and the rise of village influencers in China. Information, Communication & Society, 26(4), 689–705. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2092041

Share this:

Search Site

Your Experience

We would love to hear about your experience at our conference this year via our DCN XVI Feedback Form.

Comments

12 responses to “The role and influence of Douyin in online networks and social change in China”

  1. 21251902@student.curtin.edu.au Avatar

    Hi, Liulin Ai

    I really like the role you pointed out in your article that Douyin plays in promoting grassroots expression and the dissemination of youth culture. Especially when you cited the examples of Zeng & Abidin (2021) about “grassroots creators” and “rural vloggers”, it was very vivid and accurately demonstrated how Douyin lowers the threshold of expression and stimulates the creativity of ordinary users. This cultural loosening is indeed a subtle social transformation brought about by China’s digital platforms.

    This is also highly relevant to my own paper. I am currently studying how the TikTok algorithm affects the spread of feminist topics in China. I have found that although female users can showcase their gender identity and express their predicaments through platforms like Douyin, recommendation algorithms tend to push content that is highly entertaining, emotionally cheerful, and easy to spread, which often makes “deep-rooted” feminist issues (such as gender inequality in the workplace and domestic violence) fail to gain sufficient visibility. This coincides with what you said, “The recommendation mechanism of the platform encourages expression while also redefining the boundaries of what can be expressed.”

    What I would like to further add is that the issue of “content standardization” raised by Zhang & Negro (2021) is precisely a key point for me when analyzing the dissemination of feminist content. When algorithms prefer content forms that are “positive energy” and “low conflict”, feminist topics often have to “disguise” themselves as emotional narratives or entertainment forms in order to gain dissemination opportunities. Although this expression strategy has effectively expanded the audience, it may also have diluted the political and critical nature of feminism itself.

    I also have a question: Do you think Douyin’s algorithm has its own “preferences” when recommending content? For instance, will it automatically push less content related to social issues, even if they don’t violate the rules? I think this is quite a point worth discussing.

    Rainie(Yu Zhou).

    1. Liulin Ai Avatar

      Hi Yu Zhou
      Thank you for your wonderful response! I quite agree with your observations on feminist topics on Douyin. The phenomenon you mentioned that “algorithms prefer entertaining and emotional content” is very real and coincides with my own research experience. In particular, your introduction of Zhang & Negro’s (2021) discussion on “content standardization” further reveals a key issue – when platform algorithms are oriented towards dissemination efficiency, many serious social issues have to self-adjust in a “communicable way”, which undoubtedly weakens their original criticality and political tension.

      Regarding your mention of “whether algorithms have their own preferences”, I also tend to think that the answer is yes. Even if the platform doesn’t explicitly state it, judging from the recommendation logic, data performance, and feedback from many creators, it is indeed more friendly to content that is “emotionally stable” and “does not cause controversy”. Especially in the Chinese context, the content supervision and algorithm recommendation of the platform often operate in combination and are difficult to be completely separated. This kind of “technical choice” is to some extent equivalent to “ideological filtering”.

      Your research is of great value. We look forward to your further discussions on the tension between feminist topics and platform algorithms! Welcome to continue communicating as well ~

  2. 21251915@student.curtin.edu.au Avatar

    Hi, Liulin Ai

    I really like the example you mentioned where “rural Vloggers” have broken the discourse monopoly of mainstream media by documenting daily life and traditional culture. This clearly demonstrates how Douyin empowers ordinary users and expands our understanding of “expression”. This reminds me of the argument about Twitter in my own paper, that is, social media platforms can rapidly promote the spread of social movements, but they can also limit the diversity of information due to algorithmic mechanisms. Your analysis makes me think that although different platforms have different environments, they all have similar algorithmic predicaments. My own paper holds that algorithmic recommendations on Twitter are prone to creating “information cocoons”, which is very similar to the phenomenon you mentioned where Douyin might marginalize non-mainstream voices through the traffic mechanism. It is also related to the concept of “emotional publics” proposed by Papacharissi (2015) – users’ emotions are exploited in platform algorithms to drive content dissemination. Could you further explain how the algorithm on Douyin strikes a balance between “promoting multicultural expression” and “strengthening the guidance of mainstream values”? I think this point is particularly crucial and also very valuable for discussion.

    Best,
    (Jalynn) Jie Zhou.

    1. Liulin Ai Avatar

      Hi Jie Zhou
      Hello! I strongly agree with your analysis of the #KitaJagaKita movement, especially your point that it is not merely humanitarian assistance but also a civic action and an indirect response to government governance. It is truly enlightening. It reminds me of many similar social media movements in recent years, which also present this dual feature of “emotional unity + information mobilization”. I am particularly curious whether, in the context of Malaysia, this kind of digital self-organizing behavior has really had a sustained impact on subsequent policies? Hope to hear more of your opinions!
      Liulin Ai

  3. wingshan.sy Avatar

    Hello Liulin,

    I really enjoyed reading your paper on Douyin and social change in China! Your explanation of how Douyin’s algorithm and low-barrier creative environment encourage grassroots expression, particularly among young people, impressed me as both perceptive and solid. I also liked how you explained the platform’s complicated position in national governance, especially how content monitoring and filtering determine what can and cannot be expressed. You make a really strong argument about how Douyin encourages “limited, open, controllable, and inclusive” expression because it effectively illustrates the conflict between freedom and constraint.

    One part that stood out to me was your discussion of how creators use irony or metaphors to bypass censorship. Do you think that this tactic might develop into a brand-new cultural language? Or do you see it being eventually absorbed or restricted again by the platform and state control? Additionally, you discuss the negotiation that takes place between users and platforms. Do you believe that this negotiation will eventually impact the platform’s governing logic over time, or is it merely a fleeting appearance of participation?

    My own paper also focuses on digital resistance in China, but from a Hong Kong perspective. I looked at how the 2019 Anti-ELAB movement’s demonstrators created decentralised protest networks and transformed routine consumer behaviour into political expression by using WhatsGap and Telegram. I think our topics complement each other well while your paper focuses on state-regulated platforms within the mainland, mine looks at how alternative platforms help citizens circumvent state control in Hong Kong. Together, they show different sides of the same coin.

    I would like to invite you to review my paper, From Streets to Screens: Digital Resistance in Hong Kong’s Anti-ELAB Movement. I’d love to talk to you and hear your opinions!

    1. Liulin Ai Avatar

      Hi, Wingshan. Thank you very much for your detailed reading and high praise of my thesis. Your feedback has greatly encouraged me!

      Your understanding of the algorithmic mechanism of the Douyin platform, the tension between content review and expression space is very in-depth, and you have also raised many questions that are well worth further exploration. Especially the question you mentioned, “Is it possible for irony and metaphor to evolve into a new cultural language?”, this is indeed the direction I have been constantly thinking about during the writing process. Personally, I tend to believe that this strategy does have the potential to create a new paradigm of cultural expression, but it has always been on the verge of being incorporated or disciplined, which is both a form of resistance and a form of negotiation.

      As for whether the negotiation relationship between users and the platform might in turn affect the governance of the platform, this is also the key point that I am currently observing further. I think this kind of negotiation is both temporary and may bring about structural changes during the accumulation process, especially against the backdrop of the platform constantly weighing between maintaining “activity” and “controllability”.

      I am also very interested in your research, especially your perspective on how to establish a decentralized protest network through Telegram and WhatsApp starting from the anti-ELAB movement in Hong Kong in 2019 and transforming daily consumption behaviors into political expressions. It is highly anticipated. I fully agree with what you said. Our research directions approach from different regions, but when discussing the dynamic relationship between state control and digital resistance, they do constitute complementary perspectives.

      I am more than willing to read your paper “From the Street to the Screen: The Digital Struggle in the Anti-ELAB Movement in Hong Kong” and share my thoughts. I’m also looking forward to seeing more sparks of thought in our upcoming exchanges!

      1. wingshan.sy Avatar

        Hi Liulin,

        Thank you so much for your insightful and generous feedback. I really appreciate your close reading, and I’m glad that the connection between affective publics and connective action came through clearly. Your observation about the contrast between Telegram and WhatsGap is exactly what I hoped to highlight. I wanted to show how resistance doesn’t only happen in the streets but can also unfold through everyday habits like consumption and digital coordination.

        Your question about the future of digital platforms under increasing regulation is a powerful one. Personally, I believe these platforms will continue to host forms of subtle, creative expression, especially among younger users who are highly adaptive. But at the same time, I do think there is a growing risk of what you called “moderate absorption,” where activism is either silenced or diluted by algorithmic control and soft censorship. In these situations, expressions of resistance may rely less on direct messaging and more on visual cues, cultural references, or emotional resonance.

        I’d also love to hear your thoughts on something I’ve been wondering. Do you think anonymity, like what we see on Telegram, will remain essential for sustaining activist spaces online? Or do you think the need for visibility, sharing, and virality in digital activism might gradually take over?

        Looking forward to hearing your perspective.
        Ally

        1. Liulin Ai Avatar

          Hi Ally
          Thank you very much for your serious response and in-depth thinking. I’m very glad that we have resonated in our understanding of “emotional public” and “daily resistance”. Your analysis of the differences between Telegram and WhatsGap hits the mark and has also made me realize anew how the mechanisms behind the designs of different platforms profoundly influence the way users are organized and their resistance strategies.

          Regarding the relationship between anonymity and digital activism that you raised, I think this issue is indeed very worthy of continuous attention. In the current technological environment, anonymity still holds significant importance in certain specific contexts, especially when the actor is in a high-risk environment or the expression may lead to political or social consequences. However, as the platform algorithm promotes the logic of “visibility is value” – that is, only information that is seen, shared and forwarded can “exist” – the form of action is also changing.

          I tend to think that anonymity and visibility are not necessarily completely opposed, but rather more like a tension relationship. Some digital actions may require anonymous protection to reduce risks, while others must rely on transmissibility and public attention to expand their influence. Therefore, the future cyber action space may present a more mixed and flexible state, that is, it relies on anonymity when needed and seeks maximum visibility at the appropriate time.

          I’m also looking forward to continuing to discuss this topic with you, especially regarding the complex relationship between platform control and cultural creativity. Thank you again for your wonderful feedback!
          Liulin Ai

  4. lexis.leonardi@gmail.com Avatar

    Hi Liulin ai,

    I really enjoyed reading your paper! You did a great job explaining how Douyin is not just for fun, but also gives young people and everyday users a chance to share their voices and cultures. I also liked how you showed both the good sides like creativity and community and the limits, like censorship and control. Your examples, like rural vloggers and youth culture, made everything much more clearer.

    One thing I found really interesting is how users find smart ways to express serious topics through fun or creative videos. It made me think about how do you think Douyin will become more open to different opinions in the future, or will the control always stay strong?

    Great work!

    Lexis

    1. Liulin Ai Avatar

      Hi, Lexis

      Thank you very much for reading my thesis carefully and giving such warm feedback! I’m really glad that you can sense my exploration of the complexity of the Douyin platform from it. I also highly appreciate several key points you mentioned, such as the tension between creativity and control, and how ordinary users express deeper voices in seemingly entertaining environments.

      I was also very fascinated by your mention that users convey serious issues through interesting or creative videos. This combination of “light and heavy” precisely reflects a unique strategy of contemporary social media expression, and it is also part of the tension and contradiction that I hope to present in the thesis.

      Regarding the question you raised: “Will Douyin become more inclusive of different viewpoints in the future, or will it continue to maintain control?” I think this is still an open question and deserves continuous attention. It not only depends on the commercial and political positioning of the platform itself, but is also influenced by the interaction among users’ creativity, social atmosphere and national policies.

      Thank you very much for your encouragement and questions. I also hope that we will have more opportunities to exchange our research and thoughts in the future!

      Wish everything goes well!
      Liulin Ai

  5. Xing Bai Avatar

    Hi Liulin,
    I really enjoyed reading your paper about Douyin and it’s impact on the online networks and social change in China. I find your points about how the platform gives a voice to grassroots creators and helps shape youth culture were really interesting. I find it really amazing on how Douyin can connect people from rural areas and helps forming a new communities and identities.

    At the same time, I found your discussion about the limits of the platform really interesting . It’s like a double edged sword ,Douyin opens up space for creativity but also keeps certain controls in place. I’m curious-do you think Douyin’s mix of creativity and control will lead to bigger social changes over time, or will those restrictions hold it back? I’d love to hear what your thought on this !

    1. Liulin Ai Avatar

      Hi Xing Bai
      Thank you very much for your meticulous reading and such sincere feedback! I’m very glad that you have resonated with the discussion in the paper about how grassroots creators express themselves through Douyin and its role in shaping youth culture. You mentioned how Douyin connects users in rural areas and promotes the formation of new community identities. This is also the part that interests me the most during my writing process – technology is indeed breaking the traditional geographical and class boundaries.

      Regarding your viewpoint that “Douyin is a double-edged sword”, I completely agree. This kind of platform not only provides space for expression, but also embeds powerful control mechanisms (such as algorithmic preferences, content censorship and depoliticization tendencies). I believe that it is precisely this “coexistence of creativity and control” that constitutes the most complex and dynamic appearance of Douyin and many contemporary digital platforms.

      As for the future direction, in my personal opinion, it may either become a force driving social change or be constrained by the limitations of platform logic and governance frameworks. On the one hand, the game between the flexibility of creators and the platform algorithms may stimulate more “gray-scale expressions” – content forms that both avoid risks and retain power. On the other hand, if control tends to tighten, then this kind of “creative space” may be marginalized and its social influence may be weakened instead.

      There is no simple answer to this question, but it is indeed a key node that cannot be bypassed in understanding contemporary Chinese digital culture. I’m really looking forward to hearing your views on this topic again, and I also welcome you to share your own observations in this regard!
      Liulin Ai