The Reality of the K-Pop Stan Community: Understanding the Discord Between Fans

Posted on

by


The Reality of the K-Pop Stan Community: Understanding the Discord Between Fans – Rithy Thach

 Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to analyse the nature of the K-pop industry its fan communities on X/Twitter, and how these fandoms that come together in hopes of celebrating K-pop idols together can turn into a competition between community members – creating a negative space for social media users instead. This paper will discuss the adverse effects that K-pop has on platforms such as X/Twitter, such as the utilisation of social media to grow and promote the industry in hopes of garnering dedicated fans to come together can instead promote and encourage harmful habits within ‘K-pop stan communities’. Overall, the points presented in this paper aim to highlight that, even with good intentions such as promoting harmony between K-pop fans, the usage of social media can bring negative consequences to the industry and its fans.

Introduction:

When it comes to promoting celebrities with garnering new fans as a goal, utilising social media platforms is essential as it allows for positive engagement and the growth of their fanbases – but it also has the possibility of causing harm to existing fans and dividing fan communities (Malik, 2023). Korean popular music, more commonly known as K-pop, along with other forms of South Korean media – such as TV shows and movies – have been made immensely popular worldwide thanks to the ‘Hallyu’ phenomenon – which translates to ‘the Korean Wave’ (Lacap et al., 2024). One thing that makes K-pop unique to other genres of music is the fact that the artists – referred to as ‘K-pop idols’ – rely heavily on building parasocial relationships with fans to build a stable and loyal fanbase, meaning entertainment companies (labels behind K-pop idols, e.g. JYP Entertainment, SM Entertainment) focus primarily on making sure their artists present themselves as a ‘perfect’ image on social media platforms for people to look up to (Lacap et al., 2024). Hence, the utilisation of social media platforms, such as X/Twitter, are perfect for the K-pop industry and its idols to use and promote themselves on due to the already established ‘K-pop stan community’ on the platform (Malik, 2023) – with the term ‘stan’ originating from rapper Eminem’s song of the same name, combining the words ‘fan’ and ‘stalker’. The K-pop stan community on X/Twitter is largely built upon parasocial relationships and celebrity worship due to the false self-presentations these idols produce as a marketing tactic, meaning disagreements within the community can cause online harassment and cyberbullying (Sandrila, 2023). While K-pop fan communities on X/Twitter share the intent of bringing people together to bond over their mutual admiration of idols, the encouragement of celebrity worship and fanatical behaviours can easily cause divisive conflict and harm to these same communities – ultimately undermining the original intent these fanbases had.

Discussion:

As visuals, physical appearance, and personal image in general are huge aspects of the K-pop scene, the entertainment companies managing these idols/idol groups are often the ones who are in control of what gets posted onto their social media accounts. However, when these companies’ main goal is to make a profit off of their signed artists, how these idols are represented on social media may be a marketing tactic to favour the K-pop agencies (Cai, 2021). This brings into question the self-presentation of idols – with self-presentation meaning the way in which people portray themselves to others, usually with the intention of making a desired impression to their audience – in this case, the K-pop stan community (Strimbu, 2019). As K-pop entertainment companies usually have an image in mind for their idols and their respective groups, they heavily monitor what gets posted. This is a major reason as to why newer K-pop groups rarely ever have individual social media accounts for their group members on platforms such as X/Twitter and Instagram, as it is a big risk and could ruin their public image – which could harm their popularity. As such, the K-pop market can be filled with idols being forced to represent themselves in a way that isn’t authentic but instead manufactured by their labels – a clear example of false self-presentation. While false self-presentation may not be a bad thing on its own, K-pop fans may have the tendency to fully accept these carefully curated images as the hard truth – believing that what they see on social media is the reality for these idols. As South Korea is known for having physical appearance as an important part of their culture, most (if not all) K-pop groups have a member placed into the ‘Visual’ role – which is designated to the member who fits the Korean beauty standards the most out of the group (Wu, 2020). This usually is narrowed down to having a more ‘youthful’ appearance – meaning pale, clear skin and a slim body are highly valued not only within the K-pop industry but in South Korea as a whole. This emphasizes that visuals are arguably of equal importance – if not more so – than vocal and dancing skills when it comes to the current groups and trends in K-pop (Wu, 2020). Both K-pop idols and their companies are known for touching up and editing photos in order to make them seem ‘prettier’ and more in line with the Korean beauty standards – usually slimming down the nose, making the body skinnier, etc. When this ‘perfect’ image is the only thing fans on social media are able to see, this can raise their expectations – and when fan communities are built off these unrealistic expectations, it’s questionable if these fans are really rooting for the idol or just their imagination.

 

False self-presentation is dangerous in the K-pop community, as the manufactured ‘perfect’ image these idols put out can cause fanaticism/fanatic behaviours amongst stan communities – even when the intentions are meant to be good. Fanaticism can be defined as the belief in a fanatical object/person, where this attitude results in enthusiasm, emotional attachment, and also a feeling of love for said fanatical object/person which others may seem ‘extreme’ or ‘excessive’ (Eliani et al., 2018, as cited in Ardhiyansyah et al., 2021, p. 68). Since these behaviours can be seen as excessive or extreme in nature, it can drive people to engage in aggressive behaviours – especially online. This can be things such as verbal aggression against others who don’t share the same opinion as the fanatic, or to those who disagree with them in general (Ardhiyansyah et al., 2021). Since K-pop relies heavily on building parasocial relationships between idols and fans, this easily explains the prevalent presence of fanatics and fanatical behaviour seen in the K-pop stan community on X/Twitter. K-pop stan communities on social media often encourage this fanatical behaviour amongst other users, with the intention of promoting these idols and encouraging them to do well in life – however, it can also be fuel to the online harassment fire. For example, when it comes to cases of cyberbullying within the K-pop fan space, the offender may feel provoked when encountering a post on the platform that belittles, criticizes, or spreads fake information regarding their favourite idols – responding to said posts in hopes to defend the idol (Sandrila, 2023). It should also be noted that aggressive behaviour and/or cyberbullying may occur even when unprovoked, as fanatics may think that idols really are the perfect, flawless singing & dancing machines they see on social media – with arguments starting over things as little as when fans offer their own constructive criticism or their own harmless opinions on K-pop idols. It has reached the point that in both South Korean and Western media, there is a running joke to not critique or say anything remotely negative about the K-pop scene – as doing so could place you in the target of online harassment from fanatic K-pop fans (Rashid, 2022). A case where this is seen in action comes from entertainment reporter Juwon Park. When Juwon Park, on X/Twitter, had questioned why BTS (Bangtan Sonyeondan) and TXT (Tomorrow X Together) – both leading K-pop boy groups under the same entertainment label, Big Hit Music – had worked with artist Bobby Chung, who was accused of sexual assault against two women, Park became the target of online abuse from K-pop stan X/Twitter accounts which did not conclude after weeks (Rashid, 2022). The importance placed on wanting fans to engage in fanatical behaviours may benefit these entertainment companies, but it does not do much for the fan community at all – as it does not connect fans together, but rather divide them and spark meaningless competition over the idols.

K-pop fans coming together to root for and admire their favourite idols isn’t harmful at all – in fact, it can be a good way for these people to connect and bond over their common interests. However, in the K-pop industry – where competition is rampant between other entertainment labels and idol groups – competition can also arise between fan communities and lead to ‘fan wars’ – where fan communities argue and attack each other on the belief that their favourite idols are better (Purba, 2022). There is no denying that K-pop fans won’t like every idol they come across – and of course, there are bound to be people who dislike certain idols. When these fans will go to extreme lengths to both praise and defend their favourite K-pop artists, they may not shy down from belittling other idols in hopes to elevate the reputation of their favourites. The rise of social media has changed the way that fan wars can occur, as they no longer need face-to-face interactions – but instead allow people to post whatever they want on platforms like X/Twitter, enabling users to write messages or post with the intention of sparking fan wars with other fan communities (Purba, 2022). The K-pop industry also focuses a lot on awards and music charts, and fans often want to see their favourites receive lots of prestigious awards and/or also be seen at the top of the music charts to feel a sense of pride in their favourite artists (Purba, 2022). Consequently, when there are multiple fan communities rooting for their respective artists, the competition between one another can spark disagreements and harassment – leading to fanwars. While fan wars are often depicted as two different fan groups arguing against one another, fan wars can happen within the same fanbase – showing the true divisive nature of the K-pop stan community. For example, back in 2020, BLACKPINK – one of the most popular K-pop girl groups worldwide under YG Entertainment – released their music video (MV) for the song ‘How You Like That’ (Purba, 2022). The MV featured a statue of Ganesha, which is God from Hinduism, where its use in the video made Hindu ‘BLINKs’ – the name given to fans of BLACKPINK – feel insulted as they had felt their religion was being mocked, and raised protests to both the group BLACKPINK and YG Entertainment (Purba, 2022). On the other hand, there were also BLINKS who felt as though the matter wasn’t something that should be taken as offensive, and that the protests demanding action to be taken on the matter were uncalled for (Purba, 2022). This only resulted in fanwars occurring between BLINKs, showing the discord between fans in a community that was formed in hopes of connecting them together to share their interest in the K-pop group BLACKPINK.

Conclusion:

While it’s great to join a community with others to bond over a mutual interest in K-pop, the downsides and negativity these fanbases carry out can bring into question the state of the industry and how it promotes behaviours amongst fans. The toxicity present within such fan communities that revolve around the K-pop industry can make it unappealing for others to join, thus harming the overall image of these fans and forming a negative stereotype. It’s important for these K-pop stans to realise that the way idols are presented on social media platforms, like X/Twitter, are merely just highlights or part of a highly strategic marketing tactic that aims to attract fans – an essential step in preventing the formation of obsessive parasocial relationships. As parasocial relationships and fanatical behaviours form as the basis for the toxicity seen online within these K-pop fandoms, it’s important for these fans to realise that the divisive nature of the fan community can be changed into a more harmonious state by changing the way that they see idols and other K-pop fans. 

 

 

References

Ardhiyansyah, A., Maharani, D. P., Sari, S. P., & Mansur, U. (2021). K-Pop Marketing Tactics That Build Fanatical Behavior. Nusantara Science and Technology Proceedings, 4(4), 66-70. https://doi.org/10.11594/nstp.2021.1007

Cai, A. (2021). How Social Media Helped K-Pop Become a Global Phenomenon. NYU COMM CLUB. https://www.nyucommclub.com/content/2021/11/24/how-social-media-helps-k-pop-become-a-global-phenomenon

Lacap, J. P. G., Cruz, M. R. M., Bayson, A. J., Molano, R., & Garcia, J. G. (2024). Parasocial relationships and social media interactions: Building brand credibility and loyalty. Spanish Journal of Marketing – ESIC, 28(1), 77-97. https://doi.org/10.1108/SJME-09-2022-0190

Malik, Z., & Haidar, S. (2023). Online community development through social interaction — K-Pop stan twitter as a community of practice. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(2), 733–751. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1805773

Rashid, R. (2022). Cyberbullying by K-pop Fans Must Stop. Medium. https://medium.com/@koryodynasty/cyberbullying-by-k-pop-fans-must-stop-c7e1f978fa57

Sandrila, W., & Nengsih, W. (2023). Motives of Cyberbullying Behavior by Teenage K-Pop Fans on Twitter Social Media. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Humaniora, 2(2), 190–196. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v2i2.1351

Purba, N. S., Sundawa, D., & Nurbayani, S. (2022). The Phenomenon of Social Disintegration Through Fanwar Between K- Popers Among College Students (A Case Study at Students Who is K-Pop Fans on Twitter). International Journal Pedagogy of Social Studies, 7(2), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijposs

Strimbu, N., & O’Connell, M. (2019). The Relationship Between Self-Concept and Online Self-Presentation in Adults. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 22(12). https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2019.0328

Wu, J. (2020). The Paradox of the Visual in K-Pop Groups. The Cornell Daily Sun. https://cornellsun.com/2020/10/05/the-paradox-of-the-visual-in-k-pop-groups/

 


Search Site

Your Experience

We would love to hear about your experience at our conference this year via our DCN XV Feedback Form.

Comments

12 responses to “The Reality of the K-Pop Stan Community: Understanding the Discord Between Fans”

  1. Alan Donovan Avatar
    Alan Donovan

    Hi Rithy,

    The complexities inside K-Pop fan networks on social media platforms are brilliantly examined in your paper; particularly the insights into how these platforms can turn planned favourable fan connections into competitive and perhaps harmful exchanges. I enjoyed the discussion of how marketing tactics used by the industry and parasocial interactions affect fan behaviour.

    I would like to know your thoughts on possible interventions. Which tactics, in your opinion, should K-Pop companies or social media sites use to lessen the bad aspects of fan culture without discouraging fan interaction?

    Another paper I have read, while it focuses more on the psychological and financial effects on fans themselves, “The Psychological and Financial Impacts of Being a K-Pop Stan,” also examines the implications of intensive fan relationships, touches on similar issues to yours. Both studies draw attention to the pros and cons of social media involvement in fan communities. If you have time, you should read through the paper as I believe you will find it interesting – https://networkconference.netstudies.org/2024/csm/3654/does-social-media-play-a-role-in-making-k-pop-stans-develop-unhealthy-relationships-and-obsessions/#comment-3243

    Expanding upon your work, it’s intriguing to think about the ways in which my investigation into the psychological impacts of social media on introverts compares and contrasts with your discoveries. The significant effects of social media on mental health across a range of user demographics are highlighted by both discussions. While your research delves into the complex dynamics that exist within fan communities, mine focuses on the difficulties introverts encounter in these digital settings due to the constant barrage of social encounters. I think contrasting these viewpoints could improve our comprehension of the wider effects of social media. I’d like to hear what you think about this link and welcome you to read my work: https://networkconference.netstudies.org/2024/csm/3489/the-psychological-impact-of-social-media-on-introverts/

    Alan.

    1. rrthywav Avatar
      rrthywav

      Hi Alan,

      Thank you for taking the time to read my paper.

      To answer your question, there’s been an increasing amount of K-pop companies taking action against things such as misinformation and malicious comments made against idols that belong to their label. I think this is a step in the right direction, as it shows to fans that there can be consequences to engaging in negative fan interactions.

      I also do think that companies could stop placing such importance on forming parasocial relationships with the fans – which would be one of the most effective ways to help to lessen these negative aspects of the stan community. However, I don’t think this would happen anytime soon as it’s highly profitable for K-pop companies and is an integral part of the industry.

      Thank you for your comment, and I’ll also be sure to read your paper too!

      Regards,
      Rithy

  2. djamal Avatar
    djamal

    Hi Rithy,

    Such an informative piece on fan behaviour on social media. As someone who’s been into Kpop for a decade, I can definitely agree with the cyberbullying amongst fanatics, especially talking negative about other idols or idol groups who aren’t their favourites. There is especially a toxic Stan community on X/Twitter with the constant comparison between idols. I also appreciate how you highlight the stereotypical features of Kpop idols being pale, clear skin and slim figured, which increases the cyberbullying on idols who don’t share those features. Kpop idols are curated to look and act a certain way which is unfortunate for those passionate idols who just want to show case their talents.

    Do you think young fans are fixated on these stereotypical features, and do you think it affects their own self representation?

    Excited to know what you think,
    Camila

    1. rrthywav Avatar
      rrthywav

      Hi Camila,

      First of all, thank you for taking the time to read my paper.

      I definitely do think that the younger fans in the K-pop space are fixated on the stereotypical features that idols have – and it definitely doesn’t help that physical appearance is so important in so many social media platforms nowadays, regardless of being K-pop related or not.

      It does also negatively impact how these young fans see themselves. I remember there was a situation not too long ago where members of a boy group were making fun of another member as friendly banter, comparing them to an ‘elephant’ and a ‘wild boar’ in terms of physical appearance. This sparked hate against the group as many people saw that, although this was just friendly banter, it could harm the way that fans see themselves as they could compare themselves to the aforementioned member.

      Personally, I think that fans overall should realise that these beauty standards are highly unrealistic and what’s seen online is rarely ever how these idols really look.

      Regards,
      Rithy

  3. Nemat Almonjed Avatar
    Nemat Almonjed

    Hey there,

    I examine thru your paper on the effect of social media on K-pop fan communities, and I actually have to mention, you probably did an intensive process of studying the dynamics at play. I particularly appreciated your perception into how the emphasis on curated self-presentation by way of K-pop idols can on occasion create unrealistic expectancies amongst fans, main to fanaticism and competitive behavior within stan groups. It’s a vital point that frequently gets overlooked in discussions about the K-pop enterprise.

    Your discussion on how social media platforms like Twitter/X help to promote competition and division among fan communities became interesting. I believe that bringing attention to the phenomena of fan wars and how they can intensify due to celebrities’ need for fulfillment and popularity adds a deep level of understanding to the intricacies of the K-pop fandom way of life.

    Moreover, your use of actual-existence examples, inclusive of the debate surrounding the usage of non secular imagery in BLACKPINK’s song video, efficiently illustrates the tensions that can get up inside fan communities and how they are able to detract from the authentic purpose of connecting lovers.

    I think you’ve supplied a compelling argument approximately the capability negative results of social media engagement within K-pop fan groups, while also acknowledging the fine factors of fan bonding and mutual admiration for idols

    Great work! Looking forward to hear your opinion if you like on my paper.
    https://networkconference.netstudies.org/2024/csm/4175/social-medias-impact-on-collaborative-learning-communities-unveiling-the-potential-and-challenges/

    1. rrthywav Avatar
      rrthywav

      Hi Nemat,

      Thank you for taking the time to read my paper. And thank you for your comment! I’m glad that you found my paper an interesting read with a lot of insight into the industry and the fan communities surrounding it.

      I’ll definitely have a read of your paper too!

      Regards,
      Rithy

  4. Wynetta Metasurya Avatar
    Wynetta Metasurya

    Hi Rithy,

    I think you did very well in providing quite a thorough analysis and argument about the K-Pop stan community in your paper. The K-Pop stan community is indeed an interesting community to examine and observe. I love how you mentioned the topic of self-presentation among fans in relation to the high emphasis on visuals, such as the “visual” role, in the K-Pop industry.

    Coming from someone who has Twitter and uses it quite frequently and used to keep up with it, as well as knowing some people who like K-Pop as well, I am quite surprised that you didn’t mention the use of hashtags. Although hashtags are commonly used as a form to support the idols, such as to announce MV releases or to raise views, and are mostly utilised for “good” events, there have also been occasions where it’s utilised for diminishing purposes — for example, in fan wars, as you have mentioned. So, just a suggestion: While your paper is already comprehensive, I think it would be good if you could consider how hashtag affordance on Twitter plays a big role in the K-Pop community.

    I’m aware that these negative impacts surrounding the K-Pop stan community are no good for the fans and the idols themselves. Still, I’m curious: do you think these toxicity and obsessive parasocial behaviours are, in the end, an intentional goal for the industry to promote virality and recognition? Do you see a chance of change in this behaviour and change of POVs from fans toward their idols in the near future?

    Nonetheless, well done on your paper! If you can also take some time to read my paper and give some feedback, that’d be amazing! Here’s the link to it, thank you! https://networkconference.netstudies.org/2024/onsc/3461/beyond-the-aesthetics-reassessing-pinterests-perception-as-a-social-networking-site-and-its-potentially-detrimental-influence-on-young-girls-and-women/

    Best,
    Wynetta

    1. rrthywav Avatar
      rrthywav

      Hi Wynetta,

      Thank you for taking the time to read my paper.

      It’s really disheartening to see that visuals play such a big role in the Korean entertainment industry. Very recently, I’ve come across posts where fans have stated that they feel more hesitant to follow K-pop groups if the idols did not have the visuals that attracted fans – regardless of the music they release.

      I also agree that I should have delved into the use of K-pop related hashtags on X/Twitter, both to promote the industry positively, but especially how they also negatively affect both idols and fans. In all honesty, this was something that I only realised I should have included after I finished finalising the paper with the already included themes.

      As for your question, I definitely do think that K-pop companies aim towards promoting their idols and their groups through toxic, obsessive parasocial relationships with fans. A lot of these fans who engage in such behaviour are more likely to spread the word on the idols to others, thus increasing the virality and popularity of both the idols and/or the groups that they belong to. Since the K-pop industry and the many companies that belong to this enterprise rely on sales of their merchandise, these obsessive fans are usually the ones giving these companies the most money – constantly buying the latest merchandise of these idols such as albums, clothing, lightsticks, etc.

      I also don’t really see this changing in the near future at all. This way of promoting idols works and has been working for entertainment companies for a long time, and it can also be said that idols who don’t engage in encouraging parasocial relationships tend to be less popular amongst other members. I also doubt that K-pop fans are able to change their POV towards parasocial relationships like this, as it’s always being so heavily promoted by these entertainment companies which makes it difficult to change these fans’ mind.

      Thank you once again for your insightful comment and your feedback!

      Regards,
      Rithy

  5. veronika Avatar
    veronika

    Hi Rithy,

    First of all I really enjoyed reading your paper. As someone who has been a Kpop fan for a while I can see these trends arising over time, especially girl groups. I think it is important for Kpop fans to understand that being aggressive towards other fans on social media will not change the others opinion as everyone has their own preference.

    I think the placement of the ‘visual role’ is very unnecessary as it may cause chaos between a groups fandom and increase tension within the Kpop industry. I understand it may be because that specific Kpop idol fits into the stereotypical features of an idol but that’s what causes the conflict in the first place. The stereotype of ‘perfect idol’ should not exist as they should be admired by their talent rather than looks which is what Kpop is all about.

    Do you think that the existence of a ‘visual’ idol can be beneficial in some way? If not, how do you think the Kpop fandom can overcome the issue of fighting over who is the better ‘visual’?

    Again, really great paper! All the best with the reset of you studies.
    Veronika.

    1. rrthywav Avatar
      rrthywav

      Hi Veronika,

      Thank you for taking the time to read my paper.

      I do agree with you that girl groups are usually the ones facing the most unecessary criticism and backlash when it comes to the negative aspects of the K-pop stan community. I do also agree with you that fans need to learn that talking down on other idols will not change others’ opinions, and that all it does is create a loop of unecessary hate between fans and idols.

      As for your question, having ‘visuals’ in a group definitely helps – but I don’t think it should be a role on paper for K-pop groups, as it can discourage other members of the group and harm their self esteem. Of course, fans will always be labelling idols as ‘visuals’ or ‘most attractive of the group’, so I don’t think there can be much done to prevent this.

      Also, sometimes the member with the ‘visual’ role can face unecessary harrassment from fans – receiving comments that downplay on their talents and skills, such as “the only reason they’re an idol is because of their apprarance”.

      I think fans should realise that beauty and physical appearance is subjective, and having a ‘visual’ member of the group does not mean every other member is not attractive. It’s important to note that the ‘visual’ role applies to the member who most fits the Korean beauty standards – so for others, these visuals may not appeal to them. Hopefully this answers your question.

      Once again, thank you for your insightful comment!

      Regards,
      Rithy

  6. Zulhairi A Avatar
    Zulhairi A

    Hey Rithy,

    This was a really interesting and informative read! I liked how well you described not only about K-Pop idols and the high beauty standards they’re expected to uphold, but also the discord this leads to between stans, because honestly that is a very big issue within the K-Pop fandom. Personally, I’ve been a fan for many years and during that time have witnessed so many fan wars across several social media.

    It really is sad how important visuals are in a group. In music shows for example, there have been many times where people have voted for a contestant, not because of their talents, but solely on their looks. I feel like this is unfair since it automatically cuts out contestants that aren’t ‘pretty’ or ‘handsome’ enough. Before groups debut, many people even follow them just because of how they look. Unfortunately, I don’t think this will ever change since looks are considered very important in this industry which will only lead to further discord in future as more and more K-Pop groups are being created.

    Since K-Pop companies are heavy on visuals, do you think the current K-Pop groups of now will still exist or be relevant in the future when they’re in their 30s? I sometimes think about this.

    Kind regards,
    Zulhairi

    1. rrthywav Avatar
      rrthywav

      Hi Zulhairi,

      Thank you for your comment, and I’m glad that my paper’s topic resonated with you.

      It really is saddening to see visuals be such a determining factor that plays in whether an idol is popular or not! Or, in even worse cases, the determining factor in whether someone makes it to the idol life or not. There have been many instances of people wanting to be idols on things such as survival shows, to which they’re unsuccessful due to not being ‘pretty’ or ‘attractive’ enough to garner votes from fans.

      To answer your question, I really think it narrows down to how these K-pop idols and groups age and also how they are promoted in the long run. For example, groups like BTS and EXO are still popular and relevant even with most members at or near their 30s – and I think this has to do with the fact that their music still appeals to the general public and they still fit the KBS, whilst also keeping up fan interactions. However, the K-pop market is also so ‘oversaturated’ – so there are only so many groups and idols that the public will focus on at a time. Since K-pop relies heavily on releasing music faster in smaller quantities compared to – say, the Western music industry – people are instead looking to the shiny, newer K-pop groups, idols, and music rather than sticking to older idols who release music much less frequently. Hope this answers your question.

      Thank you once again for your comment!

      Regards,
      Rithy

Leave a Reply

Skip to content