Online communities play a pivotal role in mitigating the psychological distress for people on a disease journey

Posted on

by


PDF download: Online communities play a pivotal role in mitigating the psychological distress for people on a disease journey – Sarah WILEY

Abstract:

In recent decades, the significance of social media and online communities has soared, becoming integral to our daily existence. This conference paper argues that these online communities are essential resources for alleviating psychological distress for people on a disease journey. It explores how online communities provide crucial support to individuals and those surrounding them, offering a safe space for emotional expression and shared experiences. Additionally, the paper demonstrates how these platforms facilitate timely access to disease-specific resources, foster solidarity, empowerment, and resilience, and help reduce stigma.

 

Introduction:

During recent decades, the significance of social media and online communities in individuals’ lives has increased exponentially. With a staggering 4.88 billion users worldwide, spending, on average, over six hours daily online (Social Media Perth, 2024), these platforms have become an intrinsic part of daily existence. This paper argues that online communities serve as crucial resources for reducing psychological distress for individuals navigating the complexities of a disease journey. Explicitly, it will explore how online communities offer vital support to individuals and their families, providing them with a safe space to access emotional support and share experiences. Furthermore, this paper will demonstrate that these platforms can facilitate access to disease-specific resources in a timely fashion, foster solidarity, empowerment, and resilience, and reduce associated stigma, demonstrating that online communities play a pivotal role in mitigating psychological distress. In this paper, the term disease journey refers to the time after diagnosis, until the end of the disease. And includes the person diagnosed and those around them involved in their care and support, including family members and carers, with a personal link to the person living with the disease.

 

Discussion:

In recent decades, online communities have evolved, transforming from rudimentary discussion forums into sophisticated platforms that play a central role in shaping social interactions and support networks (Delanty, 2018). An online community is ostensibly the same as an offline one, with traditional geographical boundaries blurred. However, much like the front garden talk of many suburban households, these communities are a place to share knowledge and satisfy a social need, albeit without a limit on how many people can connect. Some scholars argue that traditional communities were never as localised as this might suggest though (Hampton & Wellman, 2018), but this paper will argue that online communities provide a third place to connect outside home and work environments (Fong et al., 2021). Third places can also provide a space where people who feel socially marginalised, whether for health or physical reasons, outside of the online space, can connect and find their sense of community (Littman, 2022). These online open networks make way for more diversity than often seen in their offline versions (Hampton & Wellman, 2018). Early iterations of online communities included bulletin boards, chatrooms, and forums where people could share information. However, this form of online interaction was not in real-time, and the rise of Social Networking Sites (SNS) revolutionised online communities. SixDegrees.com, launched in 1997, is considered to be the first SNS and inspired the sites we know today (Boyd & Ellison, 2007). Still, it was not until 2007 when the hashtag was used for the first time, that online communities were able to grow beyond the user’s existing sphere of influence. Hashtags allow users to find the information they are looking for easily and, in turn, find people talking about the same issues. In the case of online communities for people on a disease journey, hashtags allow for the formation of disease-specific groups (Katz et al., 2016; Pemmaraju et al., 2016). This paper is more concerned with online communities on platforms like Facebook. Facebook’s search function and algorithms have simplified how people can find the information and online communities (groups) they seek (Facebook, n.d.). When a group is found, Facebook suggests similar groups, and through experimentation and connection within these groups, the consumer can decide which one to stay in. Facebook also has other features that are helpful for online communities to thrive; group administrators can set questions that must be answered before a person can join, which can help filter out people with negative intentions. Facebook introduced anonymous posting in 2021 (Ahmed, 2021), which supports posting without the need to identify oneself. I will discuss the value of this feature later in the paper. It is also important to note that there are many other online platforms that people go to find information and to connect with other people on a similar journey (Lin & Kishore, 2021), such as Reddit and X. I argue that this allows consumers of the information to use the platform most suited to their needs and everyday usage, rather than having a change to an unfamiliar platform. Online communities have increased the touchpoints people can have when looking for support and information at a time of distress or confusion. This paper agues that without these spaces the psychological distress for people on a disease journey could be much greater.

 

Psychological distress is applied to a combination of symptoms, including depression and anxiety, and is considered both an indicator and outcome of diminished mental health (Drapeau et al., 2012). The psychological distress that a person on a disease journey can experience is widely documented (Banks, 2010; Barry et al., 2019; Tareke et al., 2022), and there is considerable research into the power of online communities in supporting a reduction in this distress (DeBlaere et al., 2014; Jackson, 2017; O’Connell et al., 2021), but there is limited literature specifically relating to people on a disease journey. Kaasa et al. found that 69% of people living with an end-stage cancer diagnosis in their study, reported a high level of psychological distress and social isolation (Kassa et al., 1993) and this is backed up by Byles et al., whose findings show that there are true associations between disease and psychological distress (Byles et al., 2014). Their findings conclude that public health policies should be developed to understand further this complex area and better fund mechanisms to support people living or supporting someone with a life-limiting disease and experiencing psychological distress (Byles et al., 2014).

 

Psychosocial supports are non-therapeutic interventions that address both psychological and social needs. Organisations increasingly understand the need to address these issues, and one way is to facilitate peer support for people on a disease journey (Aoun et al., 2022); this can be achieved virtually with online communities. Disease-specific online communities can provide a space for people to feel emotionally safe. Emotional support can be achieved in several ways, including feeling connected and not alone, fostering healthy emotional attachment (Wu & Bernardi, 2021), and the anonymity that some online communities afford (Deas et al., 2023). Anonymity allows users to discuss personal issues they might not be ready to be identified with yet. In the motor neurone disease support (MND) group, I am linked to (MND (Motor Neurone Disease) Support and Information Group, 2024) there are many posts where people choose to post anonymously as they do not want family members to find out their diagnosis yet, or they are unable to accept their diagnosis and being anonymous makes this less real. In addition, it is my experience that carers post anonymously so they can ask questions about dealing with the emotional burden of supporting someone with MND without being identified. In the case of MND, which is classified as a rare disease, with a prevalence in Australia of approximately 8.7/100,000 Australians (Aoun et al., 2021), it can be hard to find support locally from people on a similar journey. In this case, online communities are vital for emotional support and shared experiences from people with lived experience of the disease, in turn helping to mitigate the psychological distress for people.

 

We are in an age where immediate access to information has become an expectation rather than a luxury, which can be attributed to the phenomena of Dr Google (Lee et al., 2015) and the new Dr ChatGPT (Zuccon & Koopman, 2023), there is a requirement from consumers that they will be able to find information at any time of the day or night from wherever they are in the world. Google and ChatGPT are recognised as popular sources of information but the immediate need for knowledge is increasingly considered dangerous due to the misleading and incomplete information provided (Van Bulck et al., 2024). This paper argues that online communities for people with the same condition mitigates this issue by the sharing of knowledge from people who have been on the journey longer and, therefore, have lived experience. This is not foolproof, but knowledge from lived experience will always be more appropriate than a computer system, although not to replace direction from a healthcare professional. In my experience of working closely with people living with motor neurone disease, I have found online support groups to be invaluable for people when questions arise outside the office hours of the charity, leading to a lessening of the stress of the unknown, often in the dark hours of the night. All answers received can be corroborated, or not, by professionals in the field at an appropriate time, alleviating further the danger of misinformation and echo chambers (Hampton & Wellman, 2018). This paper argues that this access to information plays a pivotal role in supporting the psychological distress experienced by people on a disease journey.

 

In addition to sharing information, online communities foster individuals’ solidarity, empowerment, and resilience on a disease journey by facilitating a space where belonging and camaraderie can occur. Walsh and Al Achkar support this in their 2021 paper researching online support communities for lung cancer survivors (Walsh & Al Achkar, 2021). The research showed that participants in the online community felt a sense of camaraderie through asking questions, responding to requests for information and, in some cases, simply reading others’ posts (Walsh & Al Achkar, 2021). This is further supported by Liu et al., whose research also found that online communities positively affect users’ sense of belonging and camaraderie (Liu et al., 2020). Online communities can also empower people on a disease journey to become active participants in their healthcare journey (Hickmann et al., 2022; Pekonen et al., 2020). This, in turn, helps to lower costs, drive patient/ healthcare interactions, provide satisfaction and improve overall well-being (Hickmann et al., 2022). Disability and media activism plays a crucial role in the acceptance of disability in society (Ellis, 2018). Online communities not only play a part in providing a space for this activism but also for stories to be heard which are then taken to the mainstream media. This empowerment is crucial for people on a disease journey to feel like they are head and in turn reduce the psychological distress felt.

 

Stigma is well documented as having negative effects on psychological wellbeing (Major, 2006; Markowitz, 1998; Patel et al., 2023), but online communities can help to mitigate the negative effects. Link and Phelan suggest there are “six necessary conditions for stigma, namely labelled differences, stereotypes, separation, status loss and discrimination, power, and emotional reaction” (Link & Phelan, 2001, as cited in Andersen et al., 2022, p. 848). Stigma, whether perceived or self, can be as debilitating as the disease itself. As discussed earlier, online communities provide a space for people living with a disease to interact with others on a similar journey. In the case of motor neurone disease, which, as mentioned earlier, is a rare disease, finding a space to meet others virtually who understand can be very cathartic. MND often causes a person to lose their ability to speak; therefore, communication is through a computer or another means. Losing this ability to communicate as one once could, can lead to feeling stigmatised, particularly when people do not know how to communicate with someone who cannot talk. There is plentiful research into how people living with a mental illness or those from marginalised communities can help to reduce their perceived stigma online (Godard, 2021; Moore et al., 2017; Morgan et al., 2022), but little concerning people on a disease journey. Again, there is plenty of research into the link between being diagnosed with a life-ending disease like motor neurone disease, associated stigma, and psychological distress (Leigh et al., 2021; Mackay, 2023; Simpson et al., 2020) but little linking the importance of online communities in tackling this. This paper argues that these disease-specific online communities are vital to reducing stigma through discussion, belonging and acceptance and, in turn, supporting the reduction in psychological distress.

 

Conclusion:

Throughout this paper, I have shown that online communities provide a space for individuals to access emotional support, enable the sharing of experiences and that these platforms can facilitate access to disease-specific resources in a timely fashion, foster solidarity, empowerment, and resilience, and reduce the perceived stigma perpetuated by the disease. If all this is achieved, then there can be a reduction in the psychological distress experienced by people on a disease journey. There is much more work that can be undertaken in this area. However, my research shows that accessing support online can allow a person to concentrate on the disease, not the associated secondary effects and as online communities are increasingly accessible to the general population, not just those who have grown up with smartphones, this facilitates an all-ages approach to psychosocial support which can help alleviate the pressure on a struggling healthcare system.

 

References:

Ahmed, A. (2021, June 5). Facebook is rolling out a feature which will allow users to post anonymously on groups. Digital Information World. https://www.digitalinformationworld.com/2021/06/facebook-is-rolling-out-feature-which.html

 

Aoun, S., Birks, C., Hogden, A., & Mathers, S. (2021). Public policy in MND care: the Australian perspective. Public Policy in ALS/MND Care: An International Perspective, 29-49. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-15-5840-5_2

 

Aoun, S. M., Stegmann, R., Deleuil, R., Momber, S., Cuddeford, L., Phillips, M. B., … & Gill, F. J. (2022). “It is a whole different life from the life I used to live”: assessing parents’ support needs in paediatric palliative care. Children9(3), 322. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9030322

 

Andersen, M. M., Varga, S., & Folker, A. P. (2022). On the definition of stigma. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical pPractice28(5), 847-853. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13684

 

Banks, E., Byles, J. E., Gibson, R. E., Rodgers, B., Latz, I. K., Robinson, I. A., … & Jorm, L. R. (2010). Is psychological distress in people living with cancer related to the fact of diagnosis, current treatment or level of disability? Findings from a large Australian study. Medical Journal of Australia193, S62-S67. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03931.x

 

Barry, V., Stout, M. E., Lynch, M. E., Mattis, S., Tran, D. Q., Antun, A., … & Kempton, C. L. (2020). The effect of psychological distress on health outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Journal of Health Psychology25(2), 227-239. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105319842931

 

Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of computer‐mediated Communication13(1), 210-230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x

 

Byles, J. E., Robinson, I., Banks, E., Gibson, R., Leigh, L., Rodgers, B., … & Jorm, L. (2014). Psychological distress and comorbid physical conditions: disease or disability?. Depression and anxiety31(6), 524-532. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22162

 

Deas, N., Kowalski, R., Finnell, S., Radovic, E., Carroll, H., Robbins, C., … & Brewer, L. (2023). I just want to matter: Examining the role of anti-mattering in online suicide support communities using natural language processing. Computers in Human Behavior139, 107499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107499

 

DeBlaere, C., Brewster, M. E., Bertsch, K. N., DeCarlo, A. L., Kegel, K. A., & Presseau, C. D. (2014). The protective power of collective action for sexual minority women of color: An investigation of multiple discrimination experiences and psychological distress. Psychology of Women Quarterly38(1), 20-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684313493252

 

Delanty, G. (2018). Virtual community: Belonging as communication. Community (3rd ed. pp. 200-224). Routledge

 

Drapeau, A., Marchand, A., & Beaulieu-Prévost, D. (2012). Epidemiology of psychological distress. Mental illnesses-understanding, prediction and control69(2), 105-106. https://doi.org/10.5772/30872

 

Ellis, K., & Goggin, G. (2018). Disability and media activism. In The Routledge companion to media and activism (pp. 355-364). Routledge.

 

Facebook. (n.d.). www.facebook.com.

 

Fong, P., Haslam, C., Cruwys, T., & Haslam, S. A. (2021). “There’s a bit of a ripple-effect”: A social identity perspective on the role of third-places and aging in place. Environment and Behavior53(5), 540-568. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391652094710

 

Godard, R. J. P. (2021). Finding similar others online: social support in online communities of people with a stigmatized identity (Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia). https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0396674

 

Hampton, K. N., & Wellman, B. (2018). Lost and saved… again: The moral panic about the loss of community takes hold of social media. Contemporary Sociology47(6), 643-651. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094306118805415

 

Hickmann, E., Richter, P., & Schlieter, H. (2022). All together now–patient engagement, patient empowerment, and associated terms in personal healthcare. BMC health services research22(1), 1116. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08501-5

 

Jackson, S. D. (2017). “Connection is the antidote”: Psychological distress, emotional processing, and virtual community building among LGBTQ students after the Orlando shooting. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity4(2), 160. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000229

 

Kaasa, S., Malt, U., Hagen, S., Wist, E., Moum, T., & Kvikstad, A. (1993). Psychological distress in cancer patients with advanced disease. Radiotherapy and oncology27(3), 193-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8140(93)90073-H

 

Katz, M. S., Utengen, A., Anderson, P. F., Thompson, M. A., Attai, D. J., Johnston, C., & Dizon, D. S. (2016). Disease-specific hashtags for online communication about cancer care. JAMA oncology2(3), 392-394. https://doi.org10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.3960

 

Lee, K., Hoti, K., Hughes, J. D., & Emmerton, L. M. (2015). Consumer use of “Dr Google”: a survey on health information-seeking behaviors and navigational needs. Journal of medical Internet research17(12), e288. httsp://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4345

 

Leigh, N., Simpson, J., & Eccles, F. J. (2021). Does a lack of social support and perceived stigma influence the relationship between motor neurone disease‐related stress and psychological distress?. British Journal of Health Psychology26(2), 289-306. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12476

 

Lin, X., & Kishore, R. (2021). Social media-enabled healthcare: a conceptual model of social media affordances, online social support, and health behaviors and outcomes. Technological Forecasting and Social Change166, 120574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120574

 

Littman, D. M. (2022). Third places, social capital, and sense of community as mechanisms of adaptive responding for young people who experience social marginalization. American Journal of Community Psychology69(3-4), 436-450. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12531

 

Liu, S., Xiao, W., Fang, C., Zhang, X., & Lin, J. (2020). Social support, belongingness, and value co-creation behaviors in online health communities. Telematics and Informatics50, 101398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101398

 

Mackay, C. J. (2023). Stigma and quality of life in people with neurodegenerative conditions featuring visible motor symptoms: a systematic review; and, self-stigma, psychological flexibility, emotional distress and quality of life in people living with multiple sclerosis. http://dx.doi.org/10.7488/era/3734

 

Major, B. (2006). New perspectives on stigma and psychological well-being. In Stigma and group inequality, 207-224. Psychology Press.

 

Markowitz, F. E. (1998). The effects of stigma on the psychological well-being and life satisfaction of persons with mental illness. Journal of health and social behavior, 335-347. https://doi.org/10.2307/2676342

 

Moore, D., Drey, N., & Ayers, S. (2017). Use of online forums for perinatal mental illness, stigma, and disclosure: an exploratory model. JMIR mental health4(1), e5926. httsp://doi.org/10.2196/mental.5926

 

Morgan, A. J., Wright, J., & Reavley, N. J. (2021). Review of Australian initiatives to reduce stigma towards people with complex mental illness: what exists and what works?. International Journal of Mental Health Systems15, 1-51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-020-00423-1

 

MND (Motor Neurone Disease) Support and Information Group [Facebook page]. Facebook. Retrieved April 6, 2024, from https://www.facebook.com/groups/233314290163041

 

O’Connell, S. B. L., Gelgoot, E. N., Grunberg, P. H., Schinazi, J., Da Costa, D., Dennis, C. L., … & Zelkowitz, P. (2021). ‘I felt less alone knowing I could contribute to the forum’: psychological distress and use of an online infertility peer support forum. Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine9(1), 128-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2021.1884556

 

Patel, R. S., Makwana, D., Shukla, R., & Pandey, V. (2023). Comparative study of health-related quality of life, psychological well-being, impact of illness, and stigma in epilepsy and migraine: A comprehensive analysis. Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research, 14(12), 1651-1658. 10.48047/jcdr.2023.14.12.191

 

Pekonen, A., Eloranta, S., Stolt, M., Virolainen, P., & Leino-Kilpi, H. (2020). Measuring patient empowerment–A systematic review. Patient education and counseling103(4), 777-787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2019.10.019

 

Pemmaraju, N., Thompson, M. A., & Qazilbash, M. (2017, October). Disease-specific hashtags and the creation of Twitter medical communities in hematology and oncology. In Seminars in hematology, 54(4), 189-192. WB Saunders. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.seminhematol.2017.08.004

 

Simpson, S., Smith, S., Furlong, M., Ireland, J., & Giebel, C. (2020). Supporting access to activities to enhance well‐being and reduce social isolation in people living with motor neurone disease. Health & Social Care in the Community28(6), 2282-2289. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13049

 

Social Media Perth. (2024). Social media statistics for 2024. https://www.smperth.com/resources/social-media-statistics/

 

Tareke, M., Bayeh, A. B., Birhanu, M., & Belete, A. (2022). Psychological distress among people living with chronic medical illness and the general population, Northwest Ethiopia: A comparative cross-sectional study. Plos One17(12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278235

 

Van Bulck, L., & Moons, P. (2024). What if your patient switches from Dr. Google to Dr. ChatGPT? A vignette-based survey of the trustworthiness, value, and danger of ChatGPT-generated responses to health questions. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing23(1), 95-98. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvad038

 

Walsh, C. A., & Al Achkar, M. (2021). A qualitative study of online support communities for lung cancer survivors on targeted therapies. Supportive Care in Cancer29, 4493-4500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-05989-1

 

Wu, P. F., & Bernardi, R. (2021). Community attachment and emotional well-being: an empirical study of an online community for people with diabetes. Information Technology & People34(7), 1949-1975. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-06-2019-0293/full/html

 

Zuccon, G., & Koopman, B. (2023). Dr ChatGPT, tell me what I want to hear: How prompt knowledge impacts health answer correctness. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.13793


Search Site

Your Experience

We would love to hear about your experience at our conference this year via our DCN XV Feedback Form.

Comments

37 responses to “Online communities play a pivotal role in mitigating the psychological distress for people on a disease journey”

  1. SarahW Avatar
    SarahW

    Thank you for taking the time to read my paper and I look forward to reading all your comments. Please don’t hesitate to ask any questions you might have.

  2. Wynetta Metasurya Avatar
    Wynetta Metasurya

    Hi Sarah,

    First of all, I like that you have a specific and niche target audience you’re looking into that many people might not frequently consider. As someone who loves the Facebook group feature, I think Facebook is a great example that you have used to support your argument, especially when discussing the people with disease journey community. It’s also interesting how your paper mentions anonymity and how that feature helps the community in many ways, especially the one where you said it makes it “less real” for people who are still having difficulty accepting their diagnosis, which is not the first thing that pops in my mind when the topic anonymity is discussed.

    When reading your last paragraph in relation to the stigma that people with disease journey might receive and how online communities can help them, I thought of a question. I believe that individuals going through a disease journey can experience reduced psychological pressure when stigmas are addressed and diminished. Are there ways to facilitate connections between individuals in disease-focused online communities and those outside (still within the online realm) who may hold certain stereotypes or perceptions about them? I feel like, this way, individuals with disease journeys could engage in communication and maybe explain themselves, potentially fostering greater understanding and empathy from those who have stigma or misperceptions towards them. I hope that makes sense, and looking forward to your opinion on this!

    Also, if you can please consider reading my paper and leaving feedback, that would be much appreciated! It analyses Pinterest as a social networking site and its impact towards young girls and women. You can check it out through this link. Thank you! https://networkconference.netstudies.org/2024/onsc/3461/beyond-the-aesthetics-reassessing-pinterests-perception-as-a-social-networking-site-and-its-potentially-detrimental-influence-on-young-girls-and-women/

    Wynetta

    1. SarahW Avatar
      SarahW

      What a great question, thank you.

      I think it’s an interesting idea and reminiscent of the ABC program You Can’t Ask That (https://iview.abc.net.au/show/you-can-t-ask-that). The program aims to dispel myths and better understand people from marginalised communities. This could be achieved through a Facebook group but it needs to be highly moderated with very clear ground rules.

      Do you think this could work?

      1. Wynetta Metasurya Avatar
        Wynetta Metasurya

        Hi Sarah,

        That is actually a cool idea! I’ve never known or watched that series before, and I directly skim-watched it earlier. I think it’s such an interesting and fun concept to be applied. I do wonder how that would work in a Facebook group setting.

        I think it could work, but again, as you said, it needs to be highly moderated with clear grounds. One way to do it will probably be to send the questions to the admin of the group or some of their representative active members, and they can choose whether it’s appropriate and whether to approve it or not for that question to be sent to the whole group.

        1. SarahW Avatar
          SarahW

          I think that’s a great idea – a committee of “gatekeepers” who are subject matter experts and can field any overtly negative comments and/ or questions!

  3. fredefai Avatar
    fredefai

    I can’t imagine how much harder isolation during the pandemic must have made that experience. As you mentioned, online communities, specially SNSs really filled an important gap in access to emotional support when in-person contacts decreased due to social distancing. Do you think the pandemic may have had on strengthening the roles that SNS plays? Given the likelihood future public health crises may cause more isolation, I think governments and healthcare organizations should look more closely at how to formally recognise and integrate quality online peer support communities into emergency response planning.
    -21096200

    1. SarahW Avatar
      SarahW

      Thank you very much for taking the time to read and comment on my paper.

      I have no doubt that the pandemic helped to strengthen online communities by combating the isolation felt. The pandemic also showed us a new way of living, which has stuck with us since the restrictions were lifted.

      As for your question about recognising peer support communities, I believe this should be looked at regardless of the potential of future public health crises. Many people are isolated and were long before the COVID-19 pandemic. There are communities that are feeling their own crisis right now, and my research highlights the importance of providing a space for people to connect virtually now when they need it the most.

      I look froward to your response.

  4. Kevin Susanto Avatar
    Kevin Susanto

    Hi Sarah,

    I think you wrote an interesting paper. It is great that individuals can ask for help or share knowledge with others who too suffer from the same condition, rather getting information from Google and ChatGPT which might not be accurate or safe.
    I can only imagine those who suffer in silence without wanting to worry their families and friends know about their condition. It helps that they can find comfort in knowing that they are not alone and they can find in support in such communities.

    Do you think it will be helpful if let’s say there is another Facebook group where patients can ask doctors questions anonymously as well?

    Regards,
    Kevin

    1. SarahW Avatar
      SarahW

      Thank you for taking the time to read and comment on my paper, Kevin.

      It’s an interesting question you raise, and whilst I haven’t checked to see if such a group already exists, I think the idea has pros and cons.

      I think the group would need to be disease-specific as there wouldn’t be many doctors who are well-versed in all conditions, and without this, I believe they would just send the poster to their regular GP for further clarification. If the group were disease-specific, it would have to be so heavily regulated that it would be hard to manage.

      In my experience with Motor Neurone Disease I know people would (generally) be in favour of the idea, but being a rare disease, the cohort would be small.

      I will ponder on, thank you!

  5. 20801979 Avatar
    20801979

    Great meaningful story Sarah! I think your information about people being able to remain anonymous was a great point in backing up your argument.
    I’d love to know how you feel about online platforms in general, not specifically groups, but platforms contributing to distress for people suffering a disease. As you mentioned about information online not always being accurate, do you think some people could have more distress by reading this misleading information?

    1. SarahW Avatar
      SarahW

      Great question, and I thank you for taking the time to read and comment!

      In my experience with people newly diagnosed with Motor Neurone Disease, I find some take great comfort from reading about the disease as it helps them to take back control. Whereas others are so devastated reading about what is to come that they spiral out of control.

      So I think it’s less about reading misleading information for some propel; it’s about reading any information when there isn’t someone, like a healthcare professional, to help them unpack what they have been exposed to.

  6. Jarryds Avatar
    Jarryds

    What an amazing insight, I had never thought of some of the challenges people would face while being online during a disease journey. Your experience with the MND group you mentioned was relatable and I could see how that would be powerful source of information to others impacted by it.

    What other features do you think social media could implement to help better these individuals? The anonymous posts are a great!

    Jarryd

    1. SarahW Avatar
      SarahW

      Thank you, Jarryd, for reading and commenting on my paper.

      It’s a very interesting question, and I’m not entirely sure, but if I think big, then a feature that linked people to health professionals in real time could further mitigate psychological distress. In my experience with people living with Motor Neurone Disease, there is a great deal of confusion when people are first diagnosed, and they don’t always think of the questions they want answered at the time. Having a button they could press on an online community platform, which went straight to a medical professional, would be invaluable but very hard to administer.

      Do you have any thoughts?

      1. Jarryds Avatar
        Jarryds

        Hey Sarah,

        Absolutely, I love this idea! I think this would be a great advantage for not only the person diagnosed but it could help cater their online platform around them to help prevent any phycological stress. Much like the ‘Marked as safe’ feature within Facebook like my paper, I wonder if someone could mark themselves as diagnosed (although personally/privately) and sites could change their interaction / ads and so forth to cater towards positive suggested communities.

        Jarryd

  7. monikawalter Avatar
    monikawalter

    Hi Sarah,

    I found this topic interesting to explore. Specifically, I understand why some people may prefer to remain anonymous when discussing their psychological problems to avoid making it too personal. However, do you believe that not communicating with others (family, friends, etc) and instead relying solely on online communities could lead to more distress? because as you stated it makes it seem less “real” and some people may use it as a coping mechanism to only discuss it and get support while not taking required actions to overcome their issue. Let me know what your thoughts.

    1. SarahW Avatar
      SarahW

      Thank you for taking the time to comment on my paper!

      I absolutely agree that not telling family and friends is likely to lead to further psychological distress, but in the example in my paper, I am talking about a disease that is incurable with an average life expectancy of 27 months; this is something that many people take a long time to come to terms with, if ever. As such, I believe people need to be respected to deal with their emotions in a way that suits them.

      Grief is often regarded as a 5 or 7-stage process, with acceptance coming last. I believe that providing people with a space to work through this grieving process is vital to their ultimate healing.

      Remembering in all this that I am not a health professional, just someone with a keen interest who is blessed to work with people and support them at the hardest time of their life.

  8. El Ashcroft Avatar
    El Ashcroft

    Interesting read. Your paper shows there is a clear need for online communities when it comes to mitigating the psychological distress for people on a disease journey. It also highlights the importance for the ability to post anonymously which is something I hadn’t considered.

    You’ve mentioned that Google and ChatGPT are recognised as popular sources of information, do you know if there is any research on how many people rely on these rather than getting information from experts or people with lived experience? I hope with the rise of online communities that Dr Google and Dr ChatGPT (which I haven’t heard of before) are being used less and less.

    Overall, your paper has convinced me that online communities play an important role in people becoming active in their healthcare journey and providing support for not just people who have conditions but also their families and carers.

    1. SarahW Avatar
      SarahW

      Thank you so much for taking the time to read and comment on my paper.

      A 2019 survey (https://www.medicaldirector.com/news/clinical-practice/are-australians-addicted-to-doctor-google/) showed that 54% of people turn to Dr Google for health-related information at least once a week. Additionally, Temsah (2023) reported that 18.4% of their respondents had used Dr ChatGPT for healthcare purposes. These figures are astonishing.

      I was talking to a healthcare professional friend of mine recently, and she told me she was going on a course that day. The course was on how to use ChatGPT for health professionals to support their knowledge. I was surprised, but there are published journals backing this up, such as Dave (2023), who states that “ChatGPT is a tool that can assist in various domains of healthcare and medicine such as in structuring scientific literature, analyzing vast literature, and functioning as a conversationalist agent.” He goes on to say that the system isn’t 100% accurate, but the power of ChatGPT should be harnessed for good!

      I don’t believe that Dr Google and Dr ChatGPT are going away any time soon.

      I hope this answers your question.

      1. El Ashcroft Avatar
        El Ashcroft

        Wow, I’m surprised your friend was doing that course too. If health professionals are being encouraged to use Dr ChatGPT to advance their knowledge I’d say you’re correct in saying it and Dr Google probably aren’t going away any time soon. Hopefully it means that Dr ChatGPT doesn’t contain any misinformation and is a reliable source for the public to use for medical advice. If not, I wonder how health professionals will be taught to sift through the misinformation.

  9. oohsam Avatar
    oohsam

    Hey Sarah! Sam here. Please don’t take any of this negatively, your article is great, but just some things that went through my mind while I was reading. First of all, your abstract and introduction lay a strong foundation for discussing the major role of online communities to provide psychosocial support for individuals on the disease journey. Here are some suggestions, and some thoughts on how to further refine and enrich your paper:
    Your abstract captures the essence of your argument concisely, so that’s fine. To contribute to engagement, one should consider including in the opening line a statistical fact or an interesting instance, or something really interesting about the subject, to get the reader’s attention at the beginning. Perhaps you could start by presenting a short story or experience about how a person was able to find support from an online community during a hard health journey.

    Your introduction does a good job of the scope of the paper. It would be best if there was a clear idea of what to expect from the paper if it is pointed out briefly which psychological constructs you are going to discuss.
    In relation to The role of online communities , the discussion is good at pointing out the transformation of online communities and their growing role in health-related support. You might consider mentioning traditional support systems, such as support groups, in use today, and then discuss the unique advantages of online communities above and beyond that.
    I noted that with evidence and examples, even if you have cited many a study, including more direct quotes and more detailed findings would help reinforce your argument. For instance, when you discuss reduced stigma attained with the use of online communities, mentioning specific examples or case studies in which an individual felt his or her stigma dissipated would really make the argument much more powerful.
    You refer to modern technologies such as hashtags and search algorithms which help these communities. Perhaps it will be quite interesting to talk in detail about how these technologies help the support provided for each other. How, for instance, do algorithm changes affect the visibility of support groups, or how do privacy settings affect the willingness of people to disclose sensitive health information?
    Perhaps the counterarguments in the critical analysis could have been outlined more. For instance, the possible drawbacks of online support, such as misinformation, dependency on digital literacy, and the inconsistency in the quality of support that people are able to receive on various platforms, could be elaborated upon. This would make the text more balanced and would show that a person who has understood the subject matter had a good grasp of the subject.
    Perhaps it could be very useful to add a section in the conclusion to the future research directions. What are the gaps in existing research on online communities and disease management? What are the new technologies or social media innovations which can further help in the support provided by these communities?
    Where the tone of the paper is at times personal, it should have been maintained throughout, and this would make the text more personable. Sharing more of your personal insights or reflections, especially in the conclusion, would leave a lasting impression.

    Working on the above aspects would mean a more comprehensive and engaging exploration of the critical role online communities play in supporting individuals throughout their disease journey, thereby adding more academic value to the work, as well as its practical implications on those who seek a similar kind of support.

    1. SarahW Avatar
      SarahW

      Hi Sam,

      Thanks a lot for your detailed feedback on my paper. I appreciate your insightful comments and suggestions for improvement.

      I agree that starting with a compelling anecdote could grab the reader’s attention from the beginning. However, I began with a concise overview of the paper’s argument to set the tone and provide a clear roadmap for the discussion. I believe this approach ensures clarity and helps readers understand the paper’s scope immediately.

      You’re absolutely right that outlining the specific psychological constructs to be discussed could enhance the introduction’s clarity.

      While I see the value in comparing online communities to traditional support systems, I focused primarily on the unique advantages of online communities in this paper.

      I appreciate your suggestion to include more direct quotes and detailed findings to strengthen my arguments. However, I believe the paper already incorporates substantial evidence from relevant studies to support its claims.

      While discussing the importance of modern technologies like hashtags and search algorithms in facilitating online support, I aimed to focus more on the broader impact of online communities rather than delving into technical specifics.

      I understand your point about elaborating on the potential drawbacks of online support to provide a balanced perspective. However, I believe the paper already acknowledges the limitations of online communities in passing.

      While adding a section on future research directions is a valuable suggestion, I aimed to keep the conclusion concise and focused on summarising the paper’s key findings.

      I agree that maintaining a consistent personal tone throughout the paper could enhance its relatability. However, I aimed to balance a professional tone and personal insights to ensure the paper’s credibility while also making it engaging for readers.

      Once again, thank you for your thoughtful feedback; I appreciate the time you took.

      Sarah

  10. Faisal Al Zubaidi Avatar
    Faisal Al Zubaidi

    Hi Sarah

    I found your paper truly engaging, thank you for sharing it with me. I do 100% agree that social media is considered a third place. Especially the range of diversity and how it allows individuals easy access to find their sense of community. I also agree that social media does a much better job than Google or ChatGPT in providing individuals with knowledge from lived experience which can better help in coping with their conditions.

    Regarding the accessibility of information for individuals on a disease journey, do you believe that the potential psychological distress caused by exposure to stories of extremely rare complications which is usually recommended by algorithms, outweighs the benefits of a shared community for individuals on a disease journey?

    Faisal

    1. SarahW Avatar
      SarahW

      Thank you so much for taking the time to read and comment on my paper!

      Whilst I appreciate, and have seen firsthand, the distress that can come from the overwhelming number of very sad stories that can be found online, I believe that this gives greater argument for the establishment of more supporting online communities to combat this.

      For people diagnosed with conditions like Motor Neurone Disease, where there is no cure or effective treatment, the internet is a very scary place, but support groups like the example cited in my paper are the silver lining for many.

      I hope this answers your question.

      Sarah

      1. Faisal Al Zubaidi Avatar
        Faisal Al Zubaidi

        Hi Sarah

        That does answer my question thank you. Motivation to provide more support in an online community certainly does sound better than no community at all.

  11. Scarlett Grimwood Avatar
    Scarlett Grimwood

    Hi Sarah o/

    Just read through most of your paper, and I plan to finish reading and comment fully in a bit. There’s a few points about the formation of the internet I’m fairly sure aren’t completely accurate, but it doesn’t affect the primary focus of your paper. However, I have to ask, what do you mean by “disease journey”? I’m so sorry if I missed where that was defined but I want to give your paper my full thoughts and I’m not completely sure what it means. Is it referring to terminal or life-long ailments like cancer or depression? Disabilities? Literal diseases like influenza or smallpox? All of the above?

    1. SarahW Avatar
      SarahW

      Thank you for your comments.

      I define disease journey in the introduction “ In this paper, the term disease journey refers to the time after diagnosis, until the end of the disease. And includes the person diagnosed and those around them involved in their care and support, including family members and carers, with a personal link to the person living with the disease.” My work is with people living with Motor Neurone Disease but my paper is equally true to anyone living with a disease that might impact their psychological wellbeing.

      When you refer to inaccuracies regarding the formation of the internet, what do you mean?

      1. Scarlett Grimwood Avatar
        Scarlett Grimwood

        Thank you for clarifying. I thought that disease journey was a general term for any long-term ailment that can cause psychological distress, but just wanted to be sure.

        “However, this form of online interaction was not in real-time” is wrong in reference to forums, and especially chat rooms. Messages and posts were transferred instantly, it was possible to have entire conversations in just an hour. The limitations of these platforms was actually the devices of the time. Before 2007, and the release of the iPhone, access to these websites could only be done while at a personal computer. The slower nature of online communication was because there were times where people were simply doing other things and not at their computer. You are correct that their is a fundamental difference between the way people interacted with forums then and social media now, but it is mostly because of the convenience that a smartphone provides. Apps allow prominent notifications and immediate access to social media, whereas a forum has to be regularly checked through a web browser. Reddit is a successful attempt at “modernising” the forum format by collating many separate communities into one app accessible with one account.

        I’d also argue that “until 2007 when the hashtag was used for the first time, that online communities were able to grow beyond the user’s existing sphere of influence” isn’t quite right either. It was easy to find a forum about a specific topic through search engines, long before hashtags were needed, because they would be focused on one topic and were generally named after that. Honestly there’s a lot of things going on at once to unpack and like I said it’s kind of nit-picking because it doesn’t change your argument’s validity at all. Basically social media platforms collated many users with many interests into one place with one account so it was easier to explore topics and find like-minded people without having to commit to joining a forum, so a lot of people switched over, and then when social media platforms added hashtags it became easier to fully replicate the community experience that a forum would provide. To top it all off, the algorithmic and all-encompassing nature of social media made it easier to find “unsearchable” things, something a person wants to know about or be involved in, but doesn’t have the right words to put into a search engine to find themselves.

        Alright my apologies, I really like your paper! I think mental health is something our society as a whole desperately needs to address and is personally important to me. You’ve done well to explain the benefits of online spaces while mentioning their shortcomings and what can be done to improve the situation. It’s surprising just how many ailments fit under this topic, and I think your broader look at the topic shows just how significant of a problem it is. This isn’t a niche benefit to a few rare diseases, ailments as universally known of as cancer are benefiting from what online spaces can provide.

        My own family discourages talk about what someone may be going through mentally while dealing with health issues. Online spaces are a place where all of that pressure and sometimes even hostility isn’t present. I imagine the use of search engines such as Google and ChatGPT are also partially the fault of real-life stigmas and a fear to ask others for information physically. It’s so important that these people who are struggling get support and I’m glad that online spaces can facilitate that, although I hope that one day that online spaces are less required because real-world societies have become more accepting of people struggling.

        Once again, thank you for the enjoyable read!

  12. Mohamed Ali Avatar
    Mohamed Ali

    Hi SarahW,

    I find this article extremely compelling because it presents a convincing argument that online communities are crucial in alleviating psychological distress among individuals on a health journey. Your explanation of how online communities provide support, critical access to resources, community, solidarity, empowerment, and reduce stigma is particularly fascinating. Furthermore, the article’s emphasis on the communal aspect, such as the emotional support and commiseration that these platforms allow, is significant. When reflecting on the future of online communities for individuals on a health journey, how do you envision the evolution of technology tailored to meet the specific needs of diverse populations seeking healthcare services? Finally, how do you believe these online communities can remain crucial in reducing stigma and enhancing mental health for individuals living with diseases today?

    Thanks,

    Mohamed Ali

    https://networkconference.netstudies.org/2024/csm/3415/does-it-make-or-…unity-engagement/

    1. SarahW Avatar
      SarahW

      Thank you for your questions.

      Regarding the evolution of technology to meet specific needs, I believe that this will likely emerge through community-driven innovation, with users actively participating in designing and developing platforms that address their specific needs and preferences. Co-creation processes involving patients, caregivers, healthcare professionals, and technologists will drive the creation of more inclusive and effective online communities.

      In addition to my paper highlighting the importance of fostering safe and supportive environments, as well as communities that provide education and awareness and the empowerment of peer support, I also believe that online communities serve as platforms for advocacy, enabling individuals to advocate for their rights collectively. By amplifying the voices of marginalised communities and challenging systemic barriers, these communities contribute to reducing stigma.

      Sarah

  13. 20668255 Avatar
    20668255

    Hi Sarah,

    I really enjoyed your paper focusing on the role of online communities in mitigating psychological distress. Similarly, to my paper we both dived into exploring the evolution of online communities and how social media platforms have facilitated the formation of digital communities and authentic connections.

    Specifically, I enjoyed your examples drawn from Walsh and Al Achkar’s research on lunch cancer survivors, and how this illustrates how these communities can create a sense of empowerment and participation.

    As this paper acknowledges the role of online communities in mitigating stigma, could you elaborate on specific strategies within these communities that have been particularly effective in challenging stigma and fostering acceptance?

    1. SarahW Avatar
      SarahW

      Thank you for taking the time to read and comment on my paper.

      As you have said, there are synergies between our papers, and our discussion in your paper about authentic connections is interesting.

      Regarding your question, I believe storytelling is one of the most powerful strategies for challenging stigma. I think that ABC’s series You Can’t Ask That is a perfect example of this in action. The show aims to break down barriers by heading stories from some of the most marginalised and misunderstood Australians. Stories dispel myths, humanise experiences and combat stereotypes.

      Sarah

  14. Amy.W Avatar
    Amy.W

    Hi Sarah,

    I enjoyed reading your paper and the discussion about the positive impacts that online communities can have on groups of people expressing their experiences with certain health issues and diseases by acting as a support system. It’s interesting that you and I both discussed this topic which goes to show the strengths that these online communities can have.
    I’m curious to know if you think that it would be beneficial to patients for healthcare providers to recommend particular online communities as support mechanisms when diagnosing patients with diseases? And do you believe that misinformation could be a big risk to patients as some community members could manipulate information or articulate information and experiences to sound better or worse than what they were?

    I’m curious to hear your thoughts.

    Thanks,
    Amy

    1. SarahW Avatar
      SarahW

      Thank you for taking the time to read my paper, Amy!

      In answer to your question about healthcare providers recommending online communities, I am a big advocate of this! While I am not an allied health professional, I do work with people with a life-limiting disease, and I regularly signpost people to the group I have referenced in my paper. I understand that there might be misinformation, but it is my experience that the groups are so heavily peer-reviewed that the misinformation gets dispelled very quickly. I appreciate this wouldn’t be across the board, but the power of the community can’t be undervalued, as we have both researched!

      Sarah

  15. Mathew.C Avatar
    Mathew.C

    Hey Sarah,

    I enjoyed reading through your paper and thought you did an amazing job exploring numerous benefits and supports these communities can provide to those on a ‘disease journey’. I can attest I went on a bit of a reflective journey whilst reading through and thinking about your paper and the evolution of readily available and accessible digital platforms have really been a tremendous benefit for so many people who would otherwise have little to no access to any “real” information and resources outside of the summaries and blurbs provided by their brief interactions with medical professionals.

    As you have detailed throughout your paper, these communities really do SO very much to enable people to connect, explore, gain an understanding of their situation, while giving them a voice and a platform to, empowering them to build resilience, regain control and to step through the whole experience on their own terms. The affordance of anonymity to help the individuals avoid any stigmas, or to ease them into participating in the process is also a big benefit to more traditional ‘in-person’ supports.

    In your paper you confirm there is a lack of research towards the efficacy of utilising online communities for people on a disease journey and their perceived or afforded benefits. Are you aware of any support/advocacy groups who are pushing for more support for research and/or funding in this area? (and if known, what hurdles have prevented them from gaining further traction in support of this cause?)

    I’m keen to hear more😊

    All the best,

    Mat

  16. SarahW Avatar
    SarahW

    Thanks for reading and commenting on my paper, Mat!

    To answer your question, I am in the very early stages of my research. However, I want to explore this further, but I haven’t asked enough questions of support groups to ascertain who is pushing for more research in the area. Saying that, at my organisation, there is a big push to recognise the psychosocial needs of those people supporting someone with a life-limiting disease, and Professor Samar Aoun is an expert in this area. Some of her more notable papers include: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/9/3/322, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7385836/ and https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0269216312455729.

    Sarah

    1. Mathew.C Avatar
      Mathew.C

      Hey Sarah,

      Thanks for the supporting reading materials!

      As we’re counting down the final hours until the conference closes, I likely won’t be able to find the time to read the material and respond to you further, however I will endeavour to check them out in due course – promise!

      I wish you all the very best with your research! It’s truly a very interesting topic with tremendous potential to help so many people. For what it’s worth, if you plan to host your research on any public-facing webspace, I would love to keep up to date with how it’s progressing if you’re able to share a link (or find me in the student directory to contact me directly, pretty sure I’m the only Mathew C there with one T :D).

      Best of luck with your future endeavours!

      All the best,

      Mat

      1. SarahW Avatar
        SarahW

        Thanks for taking the time to reply, especially so late in the day.

        I appreciate your positive words, and I will certainly look you up in the future.

        Sarah

Leave a Reply

Skip to content