Abstract
This paper explores the development of an online community centred around a common interest: a school. This online community is hosted by a Facebook page that was established for marketing purposes but transformed into much more; an active online space for people to interact and connect, share relevant knowledge, and an opportunity to belong to a community. Through emotional attachment and authentic interactions, the real-life close-knit culture has been extended online. Oldenburg’s (Soukup, 2006) “third place” concept and Delanty’s (2018) “thick communities” contribute to the success of the page in terms of fostering relationships, being inclusive and encouraging interactions in a supportive environment. Practical benefits, challenges and risks are discussed in relation to knowledge sharing in this contemporary setting. The Facebook page has been valuable for fostering a sense of community and enhancing the real-life social experience of the school.
Keywords: Facebook, belonging, connection, knowledge sharing, online communities
Introduction
A small independent school in Noosa (Queensland) set up a Facebook page in 2014 originally for marketing and boosting of advertisements to the wider community, however, the Facebook page evolved into a vibrant and busy, close-knit online community.
The Facebook platform facilitated easier collaboration with a large school community that traditionally was difficult (Bohn, 2021 para. 12) and the platform’s structure along with persistent posting by the school facilitated the basis of an online space where Facebook users were given the opportunity to engage and interact in this “virtual gathering place.” (Gruss et al., 2020, p. 204). Although this school’s Facebook page is just one of many social media communities that users engage with, it fosters strong connections among its members and cultivates a deep sense of belonging along with being a knowledge sharing facility, centred around one shared interest: the school.
Strong Connections
The real life close and supportive school culture extends to the online community with teachers, staff, students (past and present), relatives of students, local businesses and local Noosa community members all contributing to the page via comments, shares, likes, and tagging. People who are involved in the school have access to this additional social environment where they can interact. This ‘third place’ as described by Oldenburg (Soukup, 2006) brings people together which has proved beneficial especially for those who are not in close proximity geographically (e.g., relatives of students and staff, past students and families). This is a place away from the pressures of work and home offering a sense of belonging and inclusion. It enhances relationships and bonds with community members as it facilitates social interaction, engagement and discussion. (Soukup, 2006, p. 423).
Noosa Christian College’s Facebook community has strong ties due to authentic interactions by the school and members having an emotional attachment. The sharing of, for example, personal stories and announcements, school and staff insights and student experiences, demonstrates a human approach. The attentive and immediate response to comments and questions indicates that community members’ input is valued. This coupled with encouraging conversations and asking for opinions assists in the formation of strong connections.
Hampton and Wellman (2018) argued that advancements in technology have caused community structure to not be diminished, but rather to be reformed. Social media was highlighted as a facilitator of expanding interactions in communities, “fostering networked, supportive, persistent and pervasive community relationships.” (p.649). Even though this may present challenges such as to authenticity and privacy, opportunities to form relationships and engage in group activities are available in ways that were not previously due to not having the technological means.
The type of online public that Noosa Christian College’s Facebook community can be best described, is a “thick community”. This is different to the thin online communities that Delanty (2018) discussed that comprise of strangers from all over the globe, consisting of passing exchanges, resulting in weaker social ties.
This difference with the school’s Facebook community is also contributed to the fact that most members know and see each other regularly and share similar life and family experiences each day due to being part of the same close-knit ‘actual’ community. While participating in the virtual community together, the members share the same values, rituals, and enthusiastically contribute to the conversations.
This everyday community is expected to engage in regular school activities, and do so with their children, which differs from Wellman’s (2005) computer-mediated communities that “fight against face-to-face contact.” (p. 54). Wellman suggests that in modern society, community ties have become more specialised, whereas traditionally we relied on a single source or small group of people for support and belonging, such as the school’s real-life community. In contemporary society people tend to turn to social media platforms, especially Facebook and ask members for advice. Group participants offer information, emotional and other types of support. Whilst the school community offers its members face-to-face support, the Facebook communal space is valuable for those who cannot physically participate face-to-face. Boyd and Ellison (2007) reiterated that users are mainly connecting with people they already know and are often not focused on seeking new connections or networking.
Facebook’s affordance of profile visibility aids users in seeing who has commented. If a member tags or mentions another person on the page they have as a Facebook friend, this appears in bold font. This network connection is visible to others and can be utilized by those who would like to network with friends of members.
User-generated content also appears on the page and shared with members and contributes to relationship building. This could be for outside opportunities or events that students or school families may be interested in attending; or for congratulating external successes of teachers, family members or students. This inclusive environment welcomes and supports all members regardless of their opinions, race or background, and contributes to the page possessing strong connections in this digital space.
Knowledge Sharing
Mobile technology advancements have made social media a daily practice. Smartphones are carried by people wherever they go, and social media use is high in society with Facebook alone having 2.9 billion monthly users and being the most popular social media platform worldwide (Dixon, 2024).
For this reason, Facebook is a great choice for knowledge sharing. Noosa Christian College has used this space to inform members of important announcements that may affect their children or families; a space where they may see images of their children engaged in school activities, and a place where parents can view live updates of their children on excursions, camps and participating in other activities.
Members of the Noosa school’s Facebook page adjust their phone app settings to receive a notification whenever a post is made so they can be immediately informed.
Whilst this knowledge sharing is practical, important and sometimes vital, it competes against “hyper-competitive attention economies where a variety of content strands are vying for viewer attention and constantly overshadowing each other.” (Abidin, 2021, p. 4). Knowledge and content sharing on Facebook as Boyd (2010) points out, is perpetual, continuous and saturated, preventing purposeful consumption, and can certainly be overwhelming.
The school’s Facebook audience receives content that is tailored to meet the members’ interests and needs. This can be in the form of text, videos, images, slideshows, polls, links to other websites and platforms, school and important advertisements, and expert articles such as child psychologist blogs (Refer Figure 1). Collaboration with other individuals and organisations can be seen in tagging these external parties on posts, (refer Figure 2). These collaborative posts can include local or parent businesses, educational institutions such as University of the Sunshine Coast advertising their information evenings and programs for secondary students, government departments, e.g., thanking them for school equipment purchased via a government grant, or promoting local council school holiday or sport activities. Individuals can also be tagged, for example, authors that will visit the school during Book Week.
Figure 1
Sharing and Tagging Informative Posts – Dr Justin Coulson, Child Psychologist

Note. Adapted from Noosa Christian College’s Facebook Page, by Noosa Christian College, 2024 (https://www.facebook.com/NoosaChristianCollege). Copyright 2024 by Noosa Christian College/Facebook.
Figure 2
Tagged Informative Posts – Collaboration with the University of the Sunshine Coast and Noosa Council
Note. Adapted from Noosa Christian College’s Facebook Page, by Noosa Christian College, 2024 (https://www.facebook.com/NoosaChristianCollege). Copyright 2024 by Noosa Christian College/Facebook.
Knowledge sharing can also attract fake news, clickbait and misinformation which can create distrust and waver confidence. Due to Noosa Christian College being a private school and essentially a business, the organisation does not share or engage in any misleading content such as clickbait. Abidin (2021) described the purpose of these actions as persuading and tricking users with attention grabbing messages that lure them to their webpages. (p. 9). Whatever the school posts in this public forum can be shared to a seemingly endless amount of people, so information must be credible. The page’s members trust that the posts will not be clickbait, whereas with many other Facebook pages it may be hard to interpret what is true and what is not. Kim et al. (2021) researched and made recommendations on fake news and reported that because Facebook allows users to “freely produce and distribute content” (which has been done to earn an income from advertising fees), this practice has accelerated significantly. (p. 7). School community members would not want to belong to an online community that published misinformation.
A Sense of Belonging
Social media has fundamentally redesigned ‘belonging’. Social media platforms have for a number of reasons promoted inclusion; they have broken down geographical barriers and allowed users world-wide to connect in real-time; provided a space for marginalised groups to share perspectives to a wider audience; and platforms can facilitate online support networks where users can communicate with others who face or have faced similar challenges.
Delanty (2018) debated that place, location and symbolic relationships are losing their meaning. More transient forms of social relations, maintained by communication processes have taken their place and these relationships are devoid of substance.
The Noosa Christian College Facebook community does not consist of transient social relationships. Solid relationships exist between most members which results in a feeling of belonging. The desire to belong publicly as described by Büttner and Rudert (2022) is expressed to others via social media, for example, in describing activities with others in text or image posts and tagging those in the post. (p. 139). Refer Figure 3 which presents a post showing members of the Noosa Christian College Facebook page having tagged other Facebook users.
Figure 3
Noosa Christian College’s Posts with Page Members Tagging Other Facebook Users

Note. Adapted from Noosa Christian College’s Facebook Page, by Noosa Christian College, 2024 (https://www.facebook.com/NoosaChristianCollege). Copyright 2024 by Noosa Christian College/Facebook.
Baylor Scott and White Health (2017) published a blog about research studies which confirmed that people who use social media platforms frequently were at least twice as likely to experience social isolation due to social media replacing authentic social experiences. (para. 5). Horan (2024) detailed this further in his research and discovered that social networks caused people to sense social isolation and this increased for every extra hour spent on these networks. This did decrease for those living in suburbia, however increased for individuals who resided in urban areas. (p.1). The Facebook community of Noosa Christian College does not replace face-to-face social experiences but acts as a medium that complements these connections. Most members socialise in person and this online involvement adds to the overall social experience and sense of belonging.
In a Social Influence Journal (2015), Tobin et al. compared their Facebook study findings with those of Baumeister and Leary’s claim back in 1995 that people need to belong. However, not everyone on Facebook feels that they belong. These studies indicated that participants’ sense of belonging was lowered when regular positive interactions with other Facebook users, and the development of enduring online connections over time were affected. “Participants who did not receive feedback on their updates had lower levels of belonging, self-esteem, control and meaningful existence and a lack of information sharing and feedback can threaten belonging needs.” (p. 31).
Cyberbullying also threatens belonging and platforms can be used to discriminate and harass. ‘Hate speech’ can hurt individuals both mentally and socially and they can feel alienated from a group. Hate speech also undermines free expression, inhibiting open dialogue. Udanor and Anyanwu (2019) studied hate speech on social media and found that it is spreading on social media platforms and those that are responsible show no remorse. Due to the ease of being anonymous online (refer Figure 4 post on a Facebook community noticeboard), it makes it easier for users to be unaccountable for what they write.
Figure 4
Anonymous Post on Facebook

Note. Adapted from Cooroy Community Noticeboard’s Facebook Page, by Cooroy Community Noticeboard, 2024 (https://www.facebook.com/groups/228255257919298). Copyright 2024 by Cooroy Community Noticeboard/Facebook.
Conclusion
This study delved into the Noosa Christian College Facebook page’s functions, dynamics, related research and concepts such as Oldenburg’s (Soukup, 2006) “third place” and Delanty’s (2018) “thick communities”, and identified how social media, and in this case, Facebook, has supported the creation of this online community. Evidence presented is significant in substantiating the argument that the school’s Facebook page fosters strong connections, knowledge sharing and belonging, with members having one common interest, a school.
The analysis highlights the importance of the role social media plays in community building and the ability to be able to create supportive and inclusive online environments. Facebook in this case facilitated active engagement and interaction which has created a positive experience for individuals in this community.
However, this case study only examined the use of one Facebook page as an online community. Broader research could be done to consider other social media options this school could use for community engagement such as setting up a Facebook group or using another social media platform. Research into how other schools run their online communities would also be beneficial.
Presently this Facebook page is serving as a valuable resource for Noosa Christian College in an ever-changing digital landscape.
References
Abidin, C. (2021). From “networked publics” to “refracted publics”: A companion framework for researching “below the radar” studies. Social Media and Society, 7(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120984458
Baumeister, R.F., & Leary, M.R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
Baylor Scott & White Health. (2017, June 2). Why social media is making me anti-social. Scrubbing In, Family & Relationships. https://www.bswhealth.com/blog/social-media-making-anti-social#
Bohn, K. (2021). How social media is changing the way people get to know one another. Penn State University. https://www.psu.edu/news/research/story/how-social-media-changing-way-people-get-know-one-another/.
Boyd, D.M., & Ellison, N.B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
Boyd. D.M. (2010). Streams of content, limited attention: The flow of information through social media. Educause Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2010/10/streams-of-content-limited-attention-the-flow-of-information-through-social-media
Büttner, C.M., Lalot, F., & Rudert, S. (2022). Showing with whom I belong: The desire to belong publicly on social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 139, 107535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107535
Delanty, G. (2018). Community (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Dixon, S.J. (2024). Leading countries based on Facebook audience size as of January 2024. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/268136/top-15-countries-based-on-number-of-facebook-users/#:~:text=With%20around%202.9%20billion%20monthly,revenue%20is%20generated%20through%20advertising
Gruss, R., Kim, E., & Abrahams, A. (2020). Engaging restaurant customers on Facebook: The power of belongingness appeals on social media. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 44(2), 201-228. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348019892071
Hampton, K.N., & Wellman, B. (2018). Lost and Saved … Again: The moral panic about the loss of community takes hold of social media. American Sociological Association, 47(6), 643-651. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/26585966
Horan, T. (2024). The effects of urbanization and social media use on individual’s perceived social isolation. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 14(1), e202411. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/14171
Kim, B., Xiong, A., Lee, D., & Han, K. (2021). A systematic review of fake news research through the lens of news creation and consumption: Research efforts, challenges, and future directions. PloS ONE, 16(2), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260080
Soukup, C. (2006). Computer-mediated communication as a virtual third place: building Oldenburg’s great good places on the world wide web. New Media & Society, 8(3), 421-440. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444806061953
Tobin, S.J., Vanman, E.J., Verreynne, M., & Saeri, A. (2015). Threats to belonging on Facebook: Lurking and Ostracism. Journal of Social Influence, 10(1), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2014.893924
Udanor, C., & Anyanwu, C.C. (2019). Combating the challenges of social media hate speech in a polarized society: A Twitter ego lexalytics approach. Data Technologies and Applications, 53(4), 501-527. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/DTA-01-2019-0007
Wellman, B. (2005). Community: From neighborhood to network. Communication of the Association for Computing Machinery, 48(10), 53-55. https://dl.acm.org/doi/fullHtml/10.1145/1089107.1089137
Figures
Figure 1
Facebook. (2024). Sharing and tagging informative posts – Dr Justin Coulson, Child Psychologist. Noosa Christian College. https://facebook.com/NoosaChristianCollege
Figure 2
Facebook. (2024). Tagged informative posts – Collaboration with the University of the Sunshine Coast and Noosa Council. Noosa Christian College. https://facebook.com/NoosaChristianCollege
Figure 3
Facebook. (2024). Noosa Christian College’s posts with page members tagging other Facebook users. Noosa Christian College. https://facebook.com/NoosaChristianCollege
Figure 4
Facebook. (2024). Anonymous post on Facebook. Cooroy Community Noticeboard. https://www.facebook.com/groups/228255257919298
Header Image by Author (with paid subscription to RIPL)
RIPL. (2024). RIPL Header Image. RIPL. https://ripl.com
To download a PDF copy, click on the link below –

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.