The Power of Hashtag Activism: Twitter’s Role in Driving Online Advocacy and Social Change

Posted on

by


The Power of Hashtag Activism: Twitter’s Role in Driving Online Advocacy and Social Change

Abstract:
This paper explores how social media, in particular twitter hashtags, act as a powerful tool to assert identities and enables users to advocate online and enforce social change. It identifies what online advocacy is and the interconnected processes relating to it. Additionally, the paper recognises social medias importance in developing individuals identity online and why people might be forced to create a fake online persona. The article focuses on exploring LGBTIQ+ hashtags and their purpose to enhance social change, in particularly the #GirlsLikeUs hashtag. The paper also explores how social media promotes online advocacy to enhance social movements. The two examples the paper utilises include the #MeToo movement and the #BlackLivesMatter movement and highlights the importance of both of these social movements to help raise awareness in regard to police brutality, racism and direct attention toward sexual assault.

CONFERENCE PAPER:

Web 2.0 has enabled consumers to gain access to an immense amount of information, which has the potential to influence their own lives (Labrecque et al., 2013). Social media has become a powerful tool for individuals to assert their identities and advocate for social change. Without social media, online advocacy would struggle to promote social modification as it is so reliant on the internet and technology (Melancon, 2007). The use of social media is important in relation to online advocacy and developing one’s personal identity (Melancon, 2007). This is due to social medias characteristics and tools which can help to enhance online identities. These characteristics and tools on social media consist of multiple features including liking and posting, in order for users to share, create and participate with one another (Bowen et al., 2017). Social media networking sites enable people to share similar experiences within groups and organisations, which justifies why it is so popular, as people are able to be themselves (Bowen et al., 2017).

Online advocacy uses the internet and technology to promote social change (Melancon, 2007). Online advocacy consists of four interconnected processes including collecting public information, educating and increasing awareness, coordinating supporters, influencing and pressurising (McNutt, 2006). These four combined functions enable online advocacy to use its resources to its full potential and create the greatest social change on an online environment. Web 2.0 has been a significant influence toward online advocacy over the recent years, enabling cost effective methods which are able to be spread information faster (Özdemir, 2012). Social media networking sites and blogs are two popular platforms for people to reach out, talk in a connective group format to advocate on an online forum.

Social media has influenced individuals to freely express themselves and show their identities in ways that were not possible prior. The term online identity suggests that there is a difference in how people portray themselves online versus in real life (Marwick, 2013). Different social media sites require you to create virtual depictions of yourself. Marwick (2013) recognises identity as subjective, a representation and self – presentation of who we really are. Developing an identity online has a sole focus on self- presentation and is often constructed from the people around us and an interested audience (Marwick, 2013). However, creating an online identity is not necessarily a negative thing if you are differentiating from your ‘real life’ self. Like-minded people, groups and communities are often able to come together to raise awareness as they obtain a strong passion toward social change (Marwick, 2013). For example, if people fear expressing their gender or sexuality in real life, having an online identity makes individuals, groups or communities feel a sense of belonging. Social media is a platform where individuals are able to express themselves freely. The popular platform Twitter utilises popular hashtags including #pridemonth, #equalitymatter, #transrightsarehumanrights (and more) to connect with each other and advocate for their rights (Pelosi, 2020). These platforms have allowed LGBTIQ+ communities to create a sense of community, help to identify their identity and enforce social change.

Additionally, Twitter utilised online advocacy and focused on building a safe community for transgender women on Twitter. The hashtag #GirlsLikeUs, identified that many transgender women struggled to find their identity due to the history of being misrepresented and being stereotyped as violent (Jackson et al., 2018). Research from Jackson et al. (2018), identified that the re occurring hashtags and use of the #GirlsLikeUs tweets held a significant power of transgender women online. The power of this hashtag enabled transgender women to come together to regulate gender citizenship and feel a sense of belonging within present society. The #GirlsLikeUs network was a beneficial online advocacy focus in three ways. The first way was to connect with other people online who were experiencing similar thoughts, feelings and emotions to one another (Jackson et al., 2018). The second way enabled transgender people to open up and advocate on an online platform for their rights. The final way that highlighted success within the network was the ability for the network to steer away from mainstream representations and to emphasise the accomplishments achieved by the community (Jackson et al., 2018).

Social media has been instrumental in facilitating social movements and advocating for change. It is evident that online advocacy creates social change from past social movements including the #MeToo and #BLM movements. The #MeToo movement became a trending Twitter hashtag in October 2017 (Mendes et al., 2018). Members from all over the world came together to advocate toward the issue of sexual violence. Twitter was so important during this period of time and received a great number of media and public attention, which helped boost engagement and direct attention toward these significant issues. Within 24 hours of the first post of the #MeToo hashtag, it had already been used 12 million times (Mendes et al., 2018). #MeToo is one of the most popular online advocacy campaigns to this day and enforces the idea that society is willing to challenge and create change towards significant issues regarding sexism and patriarchy. As multiple online identities came together online, this movement is a suitable example relating to the importance of social media in advocating for social change. Overall, this Twitter hashtag was successful as it did not only advocate toward sexual harassment, but it utilised educational aspects and there was an instant call to action.

Similar to the #MeToo movement, the #BlackLivesMatter movement was driven by social media to highlight and advocate toward racism, inequality and discrimination that African Americans were experiencing, and are still experiencing to this day (Clayton, 2018) (Campbell, 2021). The movement extended a considerable amount of engagement worldwide as in the United States, there were a number of high- profile killings by the police toward African Americans. The movement raises important ethnic and racial social issues. After being exposed to the agony people felt after George Floyd passed away in 2020, social media became a driving force to advocate for African Americans civil rights. The hashtag #BLM has been used roughly 47.8 million times since this horrific incident occurred (Anderson et al., 2020). Both the #MeToo and #BlackLivesMatter movements were successful online advocacy campaigns which raised awareness toward police brutality, racism and direct attention toward sexual assault.

Social media and its relation to advocacy enabled communities, individuals and organisations to build a network of likeminded identities. This would not be possible without its functions and tools. Social media tools including social networks, videos and blogs are important in spreading information, to communities, individual and organisations as fast as possible (Scott and Maryman, 2016). In relation to online advocacy, social media implements offline tactics as well as online strategies (Scott and Maryman, 2016). Some of the offline tactics include community building in real life, protests and events, which pressures policymakers to enact change. These methods are often consumed by people who want to engage in traditional ways of communicating without doing it online. Scott and Maryman (2016) identify that offline and online strategies should be used together in order to create the greatest amount of social change. For example, a successful protest about creating a social change would utilise Twitter to spread the word to ensure people gather offline at the protest. Social media also influences advocacy efforts involving spreading information, reinforcing likeminded relationships and enables the ability to strengthen social revolution through an increased pace of communication (Scott and Maryman, 2016).

Although advocacy has many benefits in order to enhance social change, there are also challenges and limitations attached to it. Some of these limitations include lack of privacy and unreliable information being spread (Benjamin, 2018). As social media has become an immense platform to enable communication, it is common that these issues can spread information, which is often false or misinterpreted. This often results in online disagreements which could be avoided. Moreover, content on social media platforms tends to go viral, where information can reach a large audience fast. This concept recognises that rumours are often spread, and some do not know how to communicate appropriately when this occurs (Benjamin, 2018). Online, we often create our own echo chambers and communicate with things we only agree with, as social media enables you to block out unvaluable information to the consumers desires (Benjamin, 2018). Therefore, this also leads to biases and pre-existing beliefs and false spread of information. Benjamin (2018), identifies that the outcome of liking and hash tagging on social media can often equal no result, meaning that the purpose to advocate had no meaning, as it resulted in no action. Therefore, although advocating does work on most occasions, there are still times when it has no influence at all.

Social media has become one of the most powerful tools for individuals to assert their identities & advocate for social change online, especially due to hashtag activism on Twitter. Identities were able to be asserted due to the increased engagement on social media platforms where people were able to express themselves, connect with others who are sharing similar experiences and amplify their voices to create change. This enables individuals within groups and organisations to recognise their identities and advocate for social change in relation to social issues which are being expressed. By including online activism on social media platforms, important social issues were able to be explored & those who were in the wrong were held accountable. The strategic use of hashtags including #MeToo and #BlackLivesMatter were powerful network implementations to advocate for social change and is influential in order to raise awareness to the public. Although there are some limitations in advocating for social justice on an online platform, it is essential to recognise how powerful social media can be in promoting social change. Continuing to navigate through our role of participating on social media platforms, it is important to recognise how much power & responsibility we hold in order to effect positive social change.

 

 

 

 

 

Reference List
Anderson, M., Barthel, M., Perrin, A., & Vogels, E. (2020, June 10).
#BlackLivesMatter surges on Twitter after George Floyd’s death. Pews Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/06/10/blacklivesmatter-surges-on-twitter-after-george-floyds-death/

Benjamin, T. (2018). Social Media Activism: Limitation and Benefits. INOSR Arts and Management, 4(1), 30-37. http://www.inosr.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/INOSR-AM-41-30-37-2018..pdf

Bowen, G. A., Gordon, N. S., & Chojnacki, M. K. (2017). Advocacy through social media: Exploring student engagement in addressing social issues. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 21(3), 5-30. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1156183.pdf

Campbell, A. (2021, June 13). What is Black Lives Matter and what are the aims? BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/explainers-53337780

Clayton, D. M. (2018). Black lives matter and the civil rights movement: A comparative analysis of two social movements in the United States. Journal of Black Studies, 49(5), 448-480. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021934718764099

Jackson, S. J., Bailey, M., & Foucault Welles, B. (2018). # GirlsLikeUs: Trans advocacy and community building online. New Media & Society, 20(5), 1868-1888. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817709276

Labrecque, L. I., Vor Dem Esche, J., Mathwick, C., Novak, T. P., & Hofacker, C. F. (2013). Consumer power: Evolution in the digital age. Journal of interactive marketing, 27(4), 257-269.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2013.09.002

Marwick, A. E. (2013). Online identity. A companion to new media dynamics, 355-364. https://DOI:10.1002/9781118321607

McNutt, J. G. (2006). Building evidence-based advocacy in cyberspace: A social work imperative for the new millennium. Journal of Evidence-based social work, 3(3-4), 91-102. https://doi:10.1300/J394v03n03_07

Melancon, B (2007, August 4) Definition of Online Advocacy. Open data. https://data.agaric.com/definition-online-advocacy
Mendes, K., Ringrose, J., & Keller, J. (2018). # MeToo and the promise and pitfalls of challenging rape culture through digital feminist activism. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 25(2), 236-246. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1350506818765318

Özdemir, B. P. (2012). Social Media as a tool for online advocacy campaigns: Greenpeace Mediterranean’s anti genetically engineered food campaign in Turkey. Global Media Journal, 5(2), 23. http://gmj-canadianedition.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/v5i2_ozdemir.pdf

Pelosi, S (2020 June 16). Pride Month Hashtags to Thoughtfully Show Support on Instagram. Blogher. https://www.blogher.com/social-media/pride-month-black-lives-matter-hashtags-instagram-773/

Scott, J.T., Maryman, J. (2016). Using Social Media as a Tool to Complement Advocacy Efforts. Global Journal of Community Psychology Practice, 7(1S), pages 1-22. http://www.gjcpp.org/

 

Danaher_ConferencePaper


Search Site

Your Experience

We would love to hear about your experience at our conference this year via our DCN XIV Feedback Form.

Comments

15 responses to “The Power of Hashtag Activism: Twitter’s Role in Driving Online Advocacy and Social Change”

  1. Michael.Dichiera Avatar
    Michael.Dichiera

    Hi Jayne. This was an insightful read. It’s clear that you understand the power behind social media’s ability to portray, relay and advocate via multiple platforms.

    As impactful as ‘Hashtag Activism’ can be, I’m curious to know your thoughts on the darker aspects that Hashtag Activism can bring to the table. For example, in 2013 the Boston Marathon bombing brought online users together via collective social media hashtags and websluething. This become harmful after innocent individuals were victimised and falsely accused. In this respect, hashtag activism showed a very ugly and irresponsible display, negatively impacting a highly sensitive case, as well as disturbing innocent people’s lives.

    In addition, many hashtag activists can operate from a self-serving agenda. When a hashtag begins to blow up or go viral, some individuals use the hashtag for glorification purposes without intending to actively support the change. Because hashtag activism operates on social media, many users also use the hashtag to drive traffic to their personal accounts increasing likes, shares and followers manuiptuling the cause and potentially tainting the purity of the movement.

    I see you briefly touched on the limitations of social activism such as ‘Lack of Privacy’ and ‘Spread of Unreliable Information’ which are major issues, so what are your thoughts on the above points I have mentioned, and what recommendations would you propose in order to ensure ‘Hashtag Activism’ can maintain a positive and powerful online presence at all times?

    Kind Regards,
    Mickey

    1. Jayne.Danaher Avatar
      Jayne.Danaher

      Hello Mickey,

      Thank you for your comment & for raising important points in regard to different aspects of hashtag activism. It is evident that hashtag activism has the power to raise awareness, but as you mentioned there are definitely risks & challenges associated with it.

      The concern in relation to the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing is a serious issue which highlights the importance of responsible behaviour online. This highlights that people need to exercise caution online before jumping to conclusions. Additionally, utilising verified sources can help to maintain the core messages purpose.

      Overall, hashtag activism is dependent on the responsible actions of its participants. To ensure that ‘hashtag activism can maintain a positive and powerful online environment, encouraging correct engagement & critical thinking can create a more impactful online presence and further support social change. Additionally, credibility & research is super important in preventing privacy issues on an online environment.

      Many thanks,
      Jayne.

  2. Hayley.Dodds Avatar
    Hayley.Dodds

    Hi Jayne,

    I really enjoyed reading your paper! You highlighted some great examples of hashtag activism and included some really interesting data associated with the impact of these hashtags. You include how impactful the #MeToo hashtag was, noting that within 24 hours of it first being used, 12 million people had contributed!

    Unfortunately though, these popular and high use hashtags can attract posts that are contrary to the intended message. So I am curious to hear your thoughts on how social media platforms can safeguard hashtags like #MeToo and #BlackLivesMatter, to ensure they remain safe spaces for people to share their stories and valuable information, whilst simultaneously allowing other users to browse them without encountering posts that ridicule important issues.

    Thanks!
    – Hayley.

    1. Jayne.Danaher Avatar
      Jayne.Danaher

      Hi Hayley,

      Thank you for your feedback and for raising important questions about the safeguarding of specific hashtags including #MeToo and #BlackLivesMatter. Ensuring these hashtags remain safe spaces for people to share their valuable information is crucial. There are many suggestions on how social media platforms can safeguard these particular hashtags. The first way is to moderate the content. This means that the different platforms should uses moderating strategies to remove harmful content and posts which violate community guidelines. As technology is advancing so rapidly, these platforms can utilise AI- based systems to improve the algorithm and to understand the difference between activism and abusive content. Additionally, user empowerment can help to safeguard these hashtags. This includes providing users with controlling their own experiences online with social media features of blocking, muting and customising privacy settings. These are only a few suggestions on how to ensure that social media platforms can remain safe spaces for people to share their stories and valuable information.

      Thanks again for your question and I hope these two recommendations can contribute to creating a safer online environment for activism & creating social change

      Regards, Jayne.

  3. Charlotte Phillips Avatar
    Charlotte Phillips

    Hi Jayne,

    Thanks for an interesting paper!

    You mention how important it is “to recognise how much power and responsibility we hold in order to effect positive social change” – I was wondering if you had any ideas or recommendations as to how social media users could do this?

    Regarding your research on the challenges and limitations, did you find any evidence of the damage that “hashtag jacking” can do? For example, during my research on anti-vaxxers on Twitter, I delved quite a bit into hashtag jacking, a tactic the anti-vax community used in order to deflect/redirect attention (essentially steal a popular hashtag and change the original meaning) and therefore become trending themselves. Did you find any evidence of this tactic in your research? If so, what sort of repercussions did it have for the movement?

    Keen to hear your thoughts!
    Charlotte.

    1. Jayne.Danaher Avatar
      Jayne.Danaher

      Hi Charlotte,

      Thank you for your feedback from the conference paper.

      Some recommendations I have in how social media users can recognise how much power and responsibility we hold online include thoughtful sharing, amplifying voices, supporting and participating with others, as all our actions online make a difference and can provoke social change.

      In relation to research regarding the challenges and limitations, I did find some relevant information in relation to “hashtag jacking”. This includes how it can be so damaging and enables users to divert the attention away from the original meaning. Therefore the spread of misinformation can be confusing and be harmful to some social movements as false narratives on the issues at hand. It is quite interesting that during your research you found this information about hashtag jacking on anti-vaxxers. I will have to read your paper to further develop my knowledge as I did not find any evidence during my research phase.

      Thank you for your questions,
      Regards Jayne

      1. Charlotte Phillips Avatar
        Charlotte Phillips

        Hi Jayne,

        Thanks for your response! I agree, the spread of misinformation can definitely be confusing!

        For sure! The hashtag jacking tactic is quite insidious in some ways! In relation to your paper, I think I remember the #BLM hashtag getting used for opposite reasons to its original meaning – some people were trying to change it to mean “blue lives matter”, with the ‘blue’ representing police officers. Did you come across that in your research? It’s such a shame that humans feel the need to constantly undermine other movements!

        Thanks again,
        Charlotte.

  4. Muna.Reshid Avatar
    Muna.Reshid

    Hi Jayne,

    I enjoyed reading your paper and liked having more insight into hashtag activism and the way it can benefit online advocacy. I also wrote my paper based around the use of hashtags on online platforms as a form of advocacy and really liked seeing it in a different aspect.

    I wanted to know more of your thoughts on the use of negative hashtag activism, As you talked about the #BlackLivesMatter movement and how it began, soon after the hashtag was created another one was started as a form of retaliation against it about ‘white lives matter’, do you think that there would be a way to put an end to negative hashtag activism and its false credibility ? and a follow up on my previous point, do you think that hashtag activism when used in a political situation could provide more of a positive insight than it does a negative one ?

    1. Jayne.Danaher Avatar
      Jayne.Danaher

      Hi Muna,

      I’m glad you found my paper an insightful read. I will have to give your paper a read to learn more about this interesting topic and further develop my knowledge!

      I think that there could be a way to put an end to negative activism and false credibility as I believe it is unfair that these hashtags are diverting attention from the original message. It is important to be aware of these misleading hashtags and using the provided educational resources from creditable sources can highlight the correct intentions and goals of these false narratives. Moderating consent is another way to end negative hashtag activism. By actively moderating and taking appropriate action against incorrect activism behaviour can help decrease the impact of negativity online. Additionally, the more voices which are heard can increase positive hashtag activism.

      I think that in political situations, hashtag activism can be useful in providing both positive and negative aspects. This is due to hashtags being powerful tools to raise awareness and bring political attention. However, there are also the negative aspects which need to be considered. Hashtag activism within a political context also depends on various aspects including the issue which is at hand. It’s important to review information from credible sites and use respectful dialogue to contribute positively to political discourse and create social change.

      Thank you for your thoughtful questions!
      Jayne.

  5. Sarah.Bailey Avatar
    Sarah.Bailey

    Hi Jayne,

    Really great paper and topic.

    Shane Bundoo shared a paper (titled ‘ANALYZING THE IMPACT OF ONLINE ADVOCACY ON POLICY CHANGE AND REFORM’) in a similar vein, although he argued that activism such as sharing posts or using hashtags was actually a lazy and inefficient form of activism (‘slacktivism’), that did not amount to tangible change (especially policy-wise). I would be really interested to hear your thoughts on this, and how you would counter this assertion, given that your paper focusses on the merits of online advocacy.

    I’d also be keen to hear your thoughts on how hashtag activism can ultimately detract from social movements. I recall, for example, how the #BlackLivesMatter movement wrongfully became a discussion about looting, rioting, and violent protesting because of the spread of related footage via the hashtag. Ultimately, this drew attention away from the central cause of the movement (i.e., stopping police brutality and racism), and made a more insidious, untrue, arguably racist message the focus. Do you think that the ability for anyone (qualified or not) to share anything (factual or not) within these hashtags poses threats to important social movements that can ultimately be reductive or damaging?

    Looking forward to hearing from you!
    Sarah

    1. Jayne.Danaher Avatar
      Jayne.Danaher

      Hey Sarah,

      Thank you for taking the time to read my conference paper. Also, thank you for mentioning Shane’s paper, I will have to give that a read to further my knowledge on the topic and see the alternative point of view.

      In relation to my thoughts on ‘slactivism’ I can understand that using hashtags can be portrayed as a ‘lazy’ form of activism, however it is still better than nothing. Hashtags are so popular and when one becomes trending, it is known, which means that it can instantly become an online platform to raise awareness and therefore voices can be heard.

      Anyone regardless of their qualifications or intentions can pose threats to social movements due to the unrestricted and open environment which can lead to the spread of information. This is due to the ultimate goal to raise social awareness. Hashtag activism can detract from social movements if hashtags are utilised in the wrong way, however if more people are aware of this, it can be reduced. Even though these threats do exist on online platforms, it is important that social media users and the wider audience can utilise effective techniques, including fact checking and responsible sharing.

      Overall, even though hashtags can be portrayed as a lazy form of activism, it is still beneficial to encourage using them to raise social awareness and encourage social change. These threats can be addressed through education and active participation to protect the integrity and initial purpose of the hashtag.

      Thank you for your comment!
      Jayne

      1. Sarah.Bailey Avatar
        Sarah.Bailey

        Hi Jayne,

        Thank you for your response! I found your perspective on hashtag activism particularly interesting.

        Would you agree then, that despite the ability of unqualified individuals to warp social movements and spread misinformation (or damaging information about the message of movements) within hashtags, that they are still a positive force overall for social change? Given that a fossil fuel lobbyist, for example, could hashtag jack an environmentalist hashtag and damage the reputation of the movement by posing as an activist and sharing questionable content for selfish reasons, do you think hashtags could actually pose a risk to the perception of social movements?

        Looking forward to hearing your thoughts.
        Sarah

        Sarah

        1. Jayne.Danaher Avatar
          Jayne.Danaher

          Hey Sarah,

          I think I would agree- while there are risks associated with hashtag activism, when used thoughtfully and in conjunction with other forms of activism, hashtags can still be a powerful tool for social change.

          Thanks again for the reply!
          Regards Jayne

  6. Ajeng.Wulandari Avatar
    Ajeng.Wulandari

    This was an engaging read Jayne, thank you! I agree with your concept of the importance of social media platforms in promoting online advocacy and enhancing social movements. What other social media platforms, besides Twitter that are effective in driving social change?

    While these are really good insights on creating communities of supporters, sparking important conversations, and driving meaningful change, what are your thoughts on slacktivism? As most users online have the need to be a part of the trend these days (participatory culture), and instead of voicing out their support and concern about certain issues, they resort to liking social media posts surrounding the issues or changing their profile pictures, without actually taking concrete action to address the underlying issues. These actions enable users to have a false sense of accomplishment, leading them to believe they have helped address the issue when in reality, they have not. Additionally, creating the impression that online engagement is sufficient undermines the idea of real-world activism too, detracting from the commitment and hard work required to create real change.

    Here is a journal article you might find interesting on Slacktivism, as most people these days have the need to be a part of a trend instead of driving social change.

    Kristofferson K., White K., & Peloza J. (2014). The Nature of Slacktivism: How the Social Observability of an Initial Act of Token Support Affects Subsequent Prosocial Action. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(6),1149–1166. https://doi.org/10.1086/674137

    1. Jayne.Danaher Avatar
      Jayne.Danaher

      Hey AJ,

      Thank you for your engaging response. Besides Twitter, there are many other forms of social media that have been effective in driving social change. Some of these being Facebook, Instagram and TikTok. Facebook is a commonly used platform used to raise awareness and can help to share information and facilitate discussions. Instagram uses images and hashtags to share powerful information in relation to social issues. TikTok’s feature of short videos allow the creator to engage with a younger demographic and educate their audience.

      Slactivism can create a false sense of accomplishments allowing individuals to not think they have participated, but their actions have made little impact. While these actions can create raise awareness and initiate conversation, they can sometimes not affect the meaning, however I believe any engagement is better than none at all.

      The article you shared sounds interesting, and I appreciate your recommendation. Researching and analysing these impact trends can be beneficial to help understand the gap between online engagement and activism.

      Thank you for your comment!

      Regards, Jayne.

Skip to content