Identifying the impact of Social Media and Communities: Challenges and Communities

Posted on

by


Lai_21315361_Conference Paper

 
Abstract

The purpose of the study is to determine the opportunities and challenges faced by the members of various communities around the world through social media. This particular purpose has been fulfilled by presenting adequate evidence on the respective arguments made within the study. Apart from this, a thesis statement has also been made by the researchers in the initial stage of the study allowing other future researchers to acknowledge the importance of this study. Key concepts prevailing within the research topic have also been highlighted in this study along with providing proper reasoning backed up with the logic for the impact of social media on various communities.

 

Introduction

Social media has played importance in fleecing the connectivity level among the people living within the respective communities. However, this study is going to summarise the key findings of this research topic along with highlighting the evidence supporting the practice arguments. An explanation will also be provided regarding the evidence and its contribution to the respective topic. Apart from this, connections will also be made between social media and connectivity among the members of the communities. Essential research terms will also be defined along with discussing the purpose of the study as well as the thesis statement.  

Discussion

Social media such as Facebook and Instagram have taken over most of the business proceedings around the world allowing business managers to create brand awareness in the respective communities. Reports have indicated that the presence of media platforms has allowed business giants to penetrate the target market and ensure an effective business expansion process in a short period of time (Venegas-Vera, Colbert & Lerma, 2020). However, this paper is also going to focus on the benefits and challenges faced by community members through the usage of such social media platforms. Apart from this, social media have also been able to influence the cultural norms prevailing within the respective community and enable miscommunication regarding any crucial matter.   

Thesis statement

Social media have simplified the connectivity among the various members of the communication along with influencing the cultural norms of society as well causing major challenges within the respective community.

Key concepts

In this case, social media has played a major part in improving the connectivity among the members of the community including cohesiveness. It has also been observed that social media platforms such as Facebook, Instagram and Twitter have increased communication in every corner of the world. This has been possible after the community has decided to share their interests and experiences as well as their opinion on social media platforms. On the other hand, socialism has led to the dissemination of information available among community groups. This is an example of the awareness level, which has been possible after the accessibility to social media has increased among the practice population. Reports have suggested that the presence of social media in around 90% of the communities has enabled the members to engage in social political campaigns around the world and thus protect the interest of the prospective organisation (Steinsbekk et al. 2021).

These campaigns have been essentially generated by the social media platform allowing business managers as well as business leaders to engage in CSR activities and thus influencing the brand popularity level in the international marketplace. Such initiatives taken by business firms around the world have also helped communities to unite by establishing effective communication through such mediums. Apart from this positive impact of social media on the community, renowned business leaders and governmental bodies have also been able to identify negative aspects of social media as well, leading to the disruption of communal peace and harmony. In this domain, the hate speech prevailing in every corner of the world has been amplified through the introduction of social media platforms in the 21st century. Due to this reason, around 65% of the community members have developed negative attitudes against each other indicating the difference in cultural backgrounds and norms as well (Ebrahim, 2020). There is also the cyber bullying factor, which has affected the mental health as well as the well-being of the respective people living in communities around the world.

It has been observed that people from various corners of the world have used social media platforms to facilitate hate speech regarding gender, sex, race, and religion from every corner of the world. This has been another form of harassment, which has been conducted on online platforms by mob groups targeting a wide section of society including certain individuals. In order to reduce such gate crimes online government bodies have established laws regarding such activities (Cheung et al. 2021). Such laws have allowed the local legal authorities to prosecute individuals or a group of individuals who have been involved in this kind of activities leading to the increase in justice all around the world.

On the other hand, privacy concerns are another key concept, which is associated with the social media world, and the harm caused to the certain sections of communication. In this case, the social platform has the potential to draw out a large amount of data regarding the personal information of the respective individual who registered on the respective platform including Facebook and Instagram (Zafar et al. 2021). Such business proceedings executed by the top business leaders of the world have generated data privacy issues leading to the potential misuse of personal information.   

Evidence

One of the important benefits, which have been gained by common living in the communities through social media, is connectivity. In this case, the social media platforms available in the 21st century including Facebook, Instagram and Twitter have allowed the respective customer to gain perspective on the living conduction of other people around the world. Reports have also suggested that around 72 people in the US aged between 25 and 45 are present on Facebook (Nytimes, 2023). Such presence has allowed them to acknowledge the living standards of the other people in the nation. Moreover, a cultural description has also been painted through such social media platforms including interests, hobbies and expectations. It has also been noticed that connectivity present among community members through Facebook has enabled rich individuals to show empathy towards the poor living in the respective community. This has been possible after the respective individual has made friends with each other on Facebook indicating the establishment of a relationship across the line of the class.

Studies have shown that around 70% of friends online have a higher income range with an expectancy of a 20% increase in their salary package in the future (Chen & Wang, 2021). According to a report released by external research, it has also been observed that the economic relations have also been strengthened due to a rise in opportunities or the weaker sections of the people. On the contrary, the public for hate crimes has also used social media platforms such as Facebook. According to newspaper agencies, hate crime is a negative factor of Facebook, which has been amplified by the stronger section of the communities. In this case, some powerful people have taken advantage of such social media platforms to target certain individuals in the community. It has also been observed that the entire management team behind Facebook have only been able to remove only 5% of the hate speech by introducing the community standard guidelines (Theprint, 2023).

The senior managers of Facebook and thus a situation of threat within the respective community have overlooked around 90% of the hate speeches prevailing within the site. This has caused trouble in almost 80% of the communities with prior records based around the world (Cao et al. 2021). However, big politicians and business leaders to target certain individuals or a group of individuals and thus exploit the situation at their convenience have also used this particular platform. On the other hand, Facebook has also helped business leaders to engage in CSR activities with the help of digital campaigns launched on social media platforms such as Facebook. It has also been seen that Facebook has an annual customer level of around 2.9 billion allowing people belonging to various communities to unite for a single objective (Businessnewsdaily, 2023). These campaigns usually tend to focus on environmental matters such as global warming and climate change.

Thus, it can be said business managers have used these platforms as well as marketing managers to grow their customer base in the international marketplace. Moreover, Facebook has also been used by the senior managers of large multinational organisations to target a wide range of customers all over the world with various cultural backgrounds. This has offered a meaningful connection for the community members who have been engaged in such campaigns and thus influencing the brand popularity level in the international marketplace (Carlsen, Toubøl & Brincker, 2021). On the contrary, social media platforms such as Facebook have also been criticising the learning of personal data of individuals to other people (Pulido et al. 2020). In this case, the US senators have implicated the senior management team and CEO of Facebook to be involved in illegal activities including leaking the private data of its users to other politicians and business owners.

Reports have suggested that the personal data of around 50 million users have been leaked on Facebook during the presidential campaigns of Trump and thus comprising the security features prevailing within the platform (Nbcnews, 2023). The leakage of such data on Facebook has used concerns regarding data privacy as well as the misuse of users’ private data.    

Reasoning

According to reports, social media platforms such as Facebook and Instagram have been used for many beneficial purposes to unite all communities under one shed. However, these platforms have been considered as the reason for bringing disruption in the business proceedings and in the lives of common people lying within the respective community. It has also been noticed that the hate speech rate on Facebook has been increasing day by day allowing the business leader to put from certain incidence caused to a group of individuals living within the community (Seyyedamiri & Tajrobehkar, 2021). Moreover, such initiatives by the respective individual have led to the change in the behaviour pattern of users present online leading to the increase in hatred for certain communities based around the world. Reports have also indicated that renowned politicians and celebrities discouraging members of the communities and thus affecting the behavioural pattern of the respective users have written speeches.

In this case, discriminating messages have also been displayed on Facebook allowing certain politicians to gain profit from such activities and thus increasing the effectiveness of politics in the future. The presence of hate speech on Facebook has also been seen to rise by a significant level, as the senior managers of the platform have been unable to block such comments through the introduction of the community standard guidelines. Thus, it can be also said that the guideline introduced by Facebook at the beginning of 2018 has been proven ineffective allowing millions of users to post hate comments (Selkie et al. 2020). These comments have also been able to drive negativity on such platforms affecting thousands of communities around the world. On the contrary, social media platforms such as Facebook have allowed their users to share information with others easily. Such access has provided benefits to established relationships with every member of the community and thus reduced the communication gap in the entire world.

Moreover, Facebook has also been used by marketing managers of large corporations based around the world to connect with customers and ensure an increase in its overall base by making generous product offerings along with heavy discounts. It has also been kti8ced that community members to increase awareness regarding economic, social and environmental concerns have also used such social platforms (Lyu & Kim, 2020). These digital campaigns run by community leaders have also helped the entire community by presenting demand in front of the authorities, which has the potential of inducing such changes within the community.   

Conclusion

It can be concluded that the members of the community have several problems with the social media platforms such as Facebook allowing powerful people to post hateful comments online. In this case, the senior managers of Facebook have been unable to control such activities by inducing the community standard guidelines and thus affecting its cultural as well as social norms. However, this paper has also laid the questions for further research activities such as the major contributions of social media towards the betterment of the community. It can also be concluded that social media have improved connectivity around the world allowing individuals from various cultural backgrounds to unite together to complete one singular objective. It has also been noticed that the digital campaigns, which have been launched by community leaders, have helped individuals to raise their voices regarding the environmental concern prevailing around the world including climate change as well as global warming.

Reference List

Conlin, B. (2022, February 25). Benefits of Facebook. Business News Daily. https://www.businessnewsdaily.com/2534-facebook-benefits.html

Cao, D., Meadows, M., Wong, D., & Xia, S. (2020). Understanding consumers’ social media engagement behaviour: An examination of the moderation effect of social media context. Journal of Business Research, 122, 835-846. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.025

Carlsen, H. B., Toubøl, J., & Brincker, B. (2020). On solidarity and volunteering during the COVID-19 crisis in Denmark: the impact of social networks and social media groups on the distribution of support. European Societies, 23(sup1), S122-S140. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2020.1818270

Chen, J., & Wang, Y. (2020). Social media use for health purposes: systematic review. Journal of medical Internet research, 23(5), e17917. https://doi.org/10.2196/17917

Cheung, M. L., Pires, G. D., Rosenberger III, P. J., & De Oliveira, M. J. (2020). Driving COBRAs: the power of social media marketing. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 39(3), 361-376. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-11-2019-0583

Ebrahim, R. S. (2020). The role of trust in understanding the impact of social media marketing on brand equity and brand loyalty. Journal of Relationship Marketing, 19(4), 287-308. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Reham-Ebrahim-2/publication/338192138_The_Role_of_Trust_in_Understanding_the_Impact_of_Social_Media_Marketing_on_Brand_Equity_and_Brand_Loyalty/links/5e7f6d1d299bf1a91b865676/The-Role-of-Trust-in-Understanding-the-Impact-of-Social-Media-Marketing-on-Brand-Equity-and-Brand-Loyalty.pdf

Lyu, J., & Kim, J. (2020). Antecedents of social media–induced retail commerce activities: Impact of brand–consumer relationships and psychological sense of community. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 20(2), 119-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2020.1769513

Newcomb, A. (2018, March 24). A timeline of Facebook’s privacy issues — and its responses. NBC News. https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/social-media/timeline-facebook-s-privacy-issues-its-responses-n859651

Miller, C. C., Katz, J., Paris, F., & Bhatia, A. (2022, August 1). Vast New Study Shows a Key to Reducing Poverty: More Friendships Between Rich and Poor. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/08/01/upshot/rich-poor-friendships.html

Pulido, C. M., Ruiz-Eugenio, L., Redondo-Sama, G., & Villarejo-Carballido, B. (2020). A new application of social impact in social media for overcoming fake news in health. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(7), 2430. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072430

Selkie, E., Adkins, V., Masters, E., Bajpai, A., & Shumer, D. (2020). Transgender adolescents’ uses of social media for social support. Journal of Adolescent Health, 66(3), 275-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.08.011

Seyyedamiri, N., & Tajrobehkar, L. (2021). Social content marketing, social media and product development process effectiveness in high-tech companies. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 16(1), 75-91. 10.1108/IJOEM-06-2018-0323

Steinsbekk, S., Wichstrøm, L., Stenseng, F., Nesi, J., Hygen, B. W., & Skalická, V. (2021). The impact of social media use on appearance self-esteem from childhood to adolescence–A 3-wave community study. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 106528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106528

Theprint, (2023). Facebook knew hate-speech problem was bigger than it disclosed publicly. https://theprint.com/tech/facebook-knew-hate-speech-problem-was-bigger-than-it-disclosed-publicly/756379/

Venegas-Vera, A. V., Colbert, G. B., & Lerma, E. V. (2020). Positive and negative impact of social media in the COVID-19 era. Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 21(4), 561-564. 10.31083/j.rcm.2020.04.195

Zafar, A. U., Qiu, J., Li, Y., Wang, J., & Shahzad, M. (2019). The impact of social media celebrities’ posts and contextual interactions on impulse buying in social commerce. Computers in human behavior, 115, 106178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106178

 


Search Site

Your Experience

We would love to hear about your experience at our conference this year via our DCN XIV Feedback Form.

Comments

20 responses to “Identifying the impact of Social Media and Communities: Challenges and Communities”

  1. Dane Goulter Avatar
    Dane Goulter

    Hi ChorYiu.Lai,

    Do you think that a balance between keeping personal data private and regulation to help minimize hate speech can be reached? It is a hot topic at the moment, and it does seem that for one to exist, the other has to recede somewhat. E.g., Better security means less privacy, or more free expression means more room for hate speech.

    The changes in how the internet works does demonstrate it I think, particularly over the past 20 years or so. The internet of the 1990’s was very open and into the 2000’s. When social media became popular and companies began to leverage it for business, this seems to be the point where more regulations came in.

    The benefit to communities overall can be sen though as you suggested. The connectivity alone has allowed for ideas to spread like the Green movement in Iran, or the leaking community, e.g., Wikileaks, Edward Snowden etc that have exposed corruption with governments and corporations. Those likely would not have spread so far without their respective communities in aiding in helping to spread the message.

    Thanks,
    Dane

    1. ChorYiu.Lai Avatar
      ChorYiu.Lai

      Hi Dane,

      Thanks for your participation on my paper. I have read your comment and my answer will be a surely YES, keeping personal information private and controlling hate speech can coexist in harmony. While it is a difficult and complex task, it is crucial to give privacy and fighting hate speech top priority in order to ensure a secure and welcoming online community.

      There are some factors to achieve this balance:
      1. Clear Legal Frameworks
      2. Transparent and Accountable Platforms
      3. User Empowerment
      4. Education and Awareness

      To sum up, it takes constant communication, cooperation, and adaptability to strike a balance between privacy protection and hate speech legislation. It is a continuous process that ought to take various viewpoints and advancing technology into account.

      Best Regards,
      Ben

  2. Stephen.B.Bain Avatar
    Stephen.B.Bain

    Hi Benjamin,

    Your paper’s reference to environmental issues and social media is one that is similar to that which I address in my paper.

    Your comment, “It has also been noticed that the digital campaigns, which have been launched by community leaders, have helped individuals to raise their voices regarding the environmental concern prevailing around the world including climate change as well as global warming.”, sparked my interest. You also address the downsides of social media such as hate speech. Did your research identify undesirable issues such as misinformation/fake-news with respect to environmental issues?

    Kind regards
    SteveB

    1. ChorYiu.Lai Avatar
      ChorYiu.Lai

      Hi Stephen,

      Undoubtedly, the growth of social media and digital campaigns has contributed significantly to the mobilisation of people around environmental issues, such as climate change and global warming. Community leaders, activists, and regular people can now raise their voices and participate in conversations about environmental issues thanks to these platforms.

      Along with the positive aspects, there have also been instances where false information and fake news about environmental issues have spread through social media. Misinformation can skew public perception, prevent well-informed choices, and thwart attempts to effectively address environmental problems.

      There are some common examples of misinformation and fake news related to environmental issues such as climate change denial, conspiracy theories, misleading statistics, and greenwashing are all forms of misinformation spread on social media platforms. Climate change denial involves cherry-picking data or promoting discredited scientific studies to support claims, while conspiracy theories involve unfounded claims and manipulating public perception. Misleading statistics can lead to distorted narratives and misconceptions about environmental issues, while greenwashing can mislead consumers and create a false sense of environmental responsibility.

      It takes a multifaceted approach involving many stakeholders, including social media platforms, fact-checking organisations, educators, and individuals, to address the problem of misinformation and fake news related to environmental issues.

      The public can be given accurate information by identifying and dispelling false information with the aid of fact-checking, media literacy, platform policies and algorithms, and collaboration with experts. Social media platforms can put stricter rules in place, invest in algorithms to promote verified sources, prioritise accurate and reliable information, and flag or hide content that spreads false information.

      Overall, social media platforms play a significant role in spreading awareness of environmental issues, but they also struggle to counter false information and fake news. It takes a team effort to address these problems, with people, groups, and platforms cooperating to spread accurate information and encourage intelligent debate.

      Kind Regards,
      Ben

  3. L.Goapul Avatar
    L.Goapul

    Hi ChorYiu.Lai,

    I have gone through your paper and i completely agree with the arguments that you have brought up. You have mentioned that “Facebook has enabled rich individuals to show empathy towards the poor living in the respective community.” Can you mention one specific example and tell me how these rich individuals after gaining empathy they have helped these people?

    Kind regards
    L.

    1. ChorYiu.Lai Avatar
      ChorYiu.Lai

      Hi Goapul,

      The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (CZI), founded by Facebook co-founder Mark Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan, aims to advance equality and human potential.

      To support educational initiatives, Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan have teamed up with universities, teachers, and organisations. For instance, they contributed $100 million to transform the public school system in Newark, New Jersey, by funding resources, programmes for teacher development, and community engagement. Additionally, they have contributed a sizeable portion of their personal wealth to numerous causes, including supporting initiatives for affordable housing, global pandemic preparedness, and medical research. They have influenced change and supported organisations striving for social impact by using their resources and influence.

      It is important to keep in mind that while Facebook as a platform has given people like Mark Zuckerberg a way to increase their charitable efforts and spread awareness, the effects of their initiatives go beyond the platform.

      Cheers with the effort on my paper, this is an interesting question.

      Kind Regards,
      Ben

  4. Michelle.Sayer Avatar
    Michelle.Sayer

    Hello ChorYiu.Lai,

    Thanks for your essay which points out the balancing act of social media which can facilitate both communication and hate speech. Since each of these has a ripple effect, do you think it is helpful that we now have the potential to work towards identifying the bad actors of society rather than have no idea where they gather?

    Regards to you,

    Michelle Sayer

    1. ChorYiu.Lai Avatar
      ChorYiu.Lai

      Hi Michelle,

      I appreciate the efforts on my paper, my answer for your question would be YES, it is possible to address the issue by working to identify the people or organisations using hate speech on social media.

      Identifying the bad actors behind hate speech can lead to greater accountability, which can serve as a deterrent and discourage others from engaging in similar behavior. Knowing that their actions can be traced back to them can lead to more responsible and mindful online behavior. Furthermore, targeted interventions can be implemented to address the issue, such as warnings, suspensions, or legal consequences. This can help create a safer and more inclusive online environment for diverse communities.

      The protection of privacy, avoiding unfounded accusations, and averting potential power abuse all require a cautious approach to the identification of bad actors. It takes careful thought and strong safeguards to strike the right balance between catching bad actors and defending user privacy and freedom of expression.

      It’s also important to remember that merely identifying hate speech does not address its underlying problems. A comprehensive strategy that incorporates education, community involvement, policy enforcement, and encouraging constructive dialogue is necessary to combat hate speech. Finding bad actors is just one element of a larger plan to make the internet a safer and more welcoming place for everyone.

      Kind Regards,
      Ben

  5. Dushena.Bissoondyal Avatar
    Dushena.Bissoondyal

    Hello ChorYiu.Lai,

    I must say that it is a very interesting paper. Your essay provides a clear outline of the potential and challenges that communities around the world face as a result of social media. I loved that it emphasizes that social media has facilitated community members’ connectivity and influenced cultural norms; nonetheless, there are issues such as hate speech, cyberbullying, and privacy concerns. The paper gives a well-organized and useful review of the subject. One thing to consider is, how social media platforms affect diverse populations and their distinct traditions and beliefs.

    Thank you very much.
    Regards,
    Dushena.

    1. ChorYiu.Lai Avatar
      ChorYiu.Lai

      Hi Dushena,

      Thanks for the compliment, and thanks for the effort on my paper and providing an interesting question. I would say social media platforms can have both positive and negative impacts on diverse populations and their distinct traditions and beliefs.

      Social media provides a platform for diverse populations to share their stories, perspectives, and cultural traditions. It enables individuals and communities to have a voice and reach a global audience, fostering cultural exchange, understanding, and appreciation. It can also facilitate access to information, resources, and educational content, community building and connection, and cross-cultural dialogue. This dialogue can lead to the appreciation and acceptance of diverse traditions and beliefs.

      However, it’s also critical to recognise any potential harm that social media may cause to various populations such as social media can spread hate speech and discrimination, reinforce stereotypes and inaccurate portrayals of different populations, and aid in cultural appropriation. Additionally, not all communities may have equal access to social media platforms, creating a digital divide that may limit the participation and representation of some diverse populations. This may result in misconceptions and incorrect interpretations of customs and beliefs.

      Social media platforms, users, and society at large should work towards responsible and respectful online behaviour in order to lessen the negative effects and encourage positive engagement. This entails encouraging cultural sensitivity, halting hate speech and discrimination, having informed conversations, and fostering diverse representation and viewpoints on social media.

      Kind Regards,
      Ben

  6. A.Nguma Avatar
    A.Nguma

    Hello ChorYiu.Lai,

    Your paper demonstrates awareness based on the challenges and communities that might be encountered inside social media and communities. However, what do you believe may potentially assist social media and communities in balancing what is going on between society and hate speech?

    Regards,
    Anna

    1. ChorYiu.Lai Avatar
      ChorYiu.Lai

      Hi Nguma,

      I believe there are some ways to balance between society and hate speech which may assist social media and communities.

      First of all, social media platforms should establish and enforce community guidelines that explicitly prohibit hate speech, providing a framework for users to understand what constitutes hate speech and the consequences for violating them.

      Besides, AI and machine learning can be used to improve content moderation efforts, but it is important to ensure that AI moderation systems are continually improved to minimize false positives and false negatives and address potential biases. Moreover, social media platforms can promote positive dialogue and counter-speech against hate speech by highlighting stories of tolerance, diversity, and empathy.

      In a nutshell, it’s critical to understand that combating hate speech calls for ongoing efforts, flexibility, and cooperation. It is possible to promote a more equitable and inclusive digital space that reduces the prevalence and impact of hate speech by combining technological advancements, policy measures, community engagement, and education.

      Thank you for the comment which made the paper becomes more interesting.

      Kind Regards,

      Ben

  7. Sudipa.Nepal Avatar
    Sudipa.Nepal

    Hi ChirYiu,
    Thanks for sharing the negative and positive impacts of social media in communities. Social media has, in fact, made it easier for people to interact with one another and with one another, as well as impacting cultural norms and creating significant problems within the group in question.
    As you mentioned, one of the positive parts of the internet, social media platforms allow businesses to influence the brand popularity level in the international marketplace. How do you think social media enabled businesses to increase brand awareness in their respective communities?

    1. ChorYiu.Lai Avatar
      ChorYiu.Lai

      Hi Sudipa,

      Thanks for your effort on my paper, this is a very good question that I am interested in.

      For your inquiries, there are many ways to enable businesses increasing brand awareness in their respective communities. Social media platforms provide sophisticated targeting options that let companies create brand messaging and content that will appeal to their target audience.

      Besides, businesses can effectively communicate their brand values, offerings, and unique selling propositions through engaging content and collaborations with influencers can aid businesses in spreading their brand’s awareness among their target market.

      Futhermore, user-generated content (UGC) promotes credibility and trust among the community members. Businesses can develop a positive brand image and relationships with their customers by participating in the community. Localised marketing enables companies to target particular neighbourhoods or regions, adjusting their brand messaging to appeal to regional audiences.

      To sum up, businesses can effectively raise brand awareness within their communities by strategically utilising social media. They are able to engage with community members, leverage social media influencers, reach their target audience with tailored content, and encourage brand advocacy through user-generated content. Together, these initiatives help create a strong brand presence and reputation within the neighbourhood.

      By the way, you’re spelling my name wrongly, should be Chor Yiu. Cheers.

      Kind Regards,
      Ben

  8. B.Baldorj Avatar
    B.Baldorj

    Hello ChorYiu.Lai,

    Your paper analyzes social media’s impact on global communities. Understandably, social media platforms such as Facebook and Instagram have transformed many communities’ business procedures and cultural norms. So, are social media platforms useful for businesses to engage in corporate social responsibility?

    1. ChorYiu.Lai Avatar
      ChorYiu.Lai

      Hi Baldorj,

      I appreciate your thoughtful inquiry and participation. Base on my understanding for your question, I will say YES. Businesses should approach social media as a CSR tool with authenticity, transparency, and a sincere desire to create positive change. Businesses can effectively engage with their audience, enhance their brand reputation, and scale up their CSR initiatives to make a significant impact on society by strategically utilising the power of social media platforms.

      In my opinion, how social media platforms can support and enhance CSR efforts would be increased visibility and reach, real-time engagement, storytelling and emotional connection, crowdsourcing and collaboration, metrics and measurement.

      Kind Regards,
      Ben

      1. B.Baldorj Avatar
        B.Baldorj

        How much has the global connectivity of social media platforms contributed to uniting communities despite cultural differences? What methods can we use to measure this impact?

        Regards,
        Buuvei

        1. ChorYiu.Lai Avatar
          ChorYiu.Lai

          Hi Buuvei,

          Good to see you again!

          The global connectivity of social media platforms has contributed to uniting communities across cultural differences to a significant extent. There are some ways to measure the impact of social media in this regard. Insights into how social media platforms have aided in bridging cultural gaps can be gained from surveys and interviews with users from various communities. Quantitative indicators of the effect of social media on bringing communities together can be found through data analysis. Case studies can be used to comprehend how social media has aided in the mingling of individuals from various cultural backgrounds. This qualitative method can clarify how social media sites promote cross-cultural dialogue and understanding.

          Overall, it is significant to note that assessing how social media helps communities come together despite cultural differences is a challenging task. To gain a thorough understanding of the phenomenon, it is frequently necessary to combine qualitative and quantitative approaches, which can each offer complementary perspectives.

          I hope this comment reply you well, feel free to ask me more questions.

          Kind Regards,
          Ben

          1. B.Baldorj Avatar
            B.Baldorj

            Hello Ben,

            Thank you for your comprehensive response to social media’s role in bridging cultural gaps and uniting global communities. Your explanation of quantitative (data analysis) and qualitative (user surveys, interviews, case studies) methods to measure this impact makes sense. I appreciate your honesty about the inherent challenges in this process.

            However, could you dig slightly deeper into the potential pitfalls during this process? For instance, can these measurement methodologies introduce biases or inaccuracies?

            Moreover, as social media platforms evolve and new ones emerge, do you think these methodologies will remain relevant, or will there be a need to develop effective strategies to estimate social media’s influence in uniting culturally diverse communities?

            I am looking forward to hearing your thoughts on this.

            Best regards,
            Buuvei

        2. ChorYiu.Lai Avatar
          ChorYiu.Lai

          Hey Buuvei, 

          For your enquiries about potential pitfalls and biases associated with measurement techniques: It is true that measurement techniques used to evaluate social media’s role in bringing together culturally disparate people can include biases or mistakes.

          Here are some potential pitfalls to watch out for: a) Selection bias: People who are more active or engaged on social media platforms may be given preference in surveys or interviews, which may not be representative of the entire population. b) Self-reporting bias: Survey or interview responses are based on self-reporting, which is susceptible to social desirability bias or the respondents’ own perceptions of their own behaviour. c) Lack of generalizability: Results from case studies or small-scale research may not be applicable to larger populations or diverse cultural contexts, which restricts the results’ ability to be generalised. d) Limited scope of analysis: Quantitative data analysis might ignore qualitative or subtle cultural nuances that could affect how well social media bridges cultural divides.

          When planning and analysing research studies on the effects of social media, it is critical to recognise and take steps to avoid these potential biases and pitfalls.

          Methodologies’ applicability as social media changes: It will be necessary to adapt and create efficient strategies to gauge social media’s influence on bringing together culturally diverse communities as platforms for social media change and new ones appear.

          To fully understand the distinctive qualities and effects of the platform being studied, research methodologies must be customised for it. Mixed-method approaches: By combining quantitative and qualitative methodologies, researchers can gain a deeper understanding of how social media affects cultural cohesion.

          In conclusion, existing methodologies might serve as a starting point, but ongoing adaptation and development of research approaches will be necessary to accurately estimate the role that social media plays in bringing together culturally disparate communities as platforms continue to change.

          Feel free to comment with any enquiries.

          Best Regards,
          Ben

Skip to content