Online Networks and Social Change

Privacy on social platforms are quite at risks nowadays, what are your views?

Abstract

Social media privacy helps individuals to mind their business without interference from the outside world, social media helps to fascinate an identity on the virtual aspect and let you communicate with one another with the helps of the innovative aspect of some outstanding social media of today. However, the breaches may affect the level of privacy to an extent where some of your personal data that is mail and so one can be leaked. On the other hand, the data stored by the social media as Whatsapp and Facebook will be stored on a host that is a third party for all the transactions and if the users do not agree their account will be removed and your data? Only the company will know. In addition, it seems that the invasion of privacy is the seed empowering the growth of power, in other words the more a company knows about one and each other the more powerful he will be.

Privacy on social platforms are quite at risks nowadays, what are your views?

People shared a sense of having difficulties not being constantly connected. (personal communication, 30 March 2016). Whether for working purposes or private use the majority of people nowadays are constantly connected through social media platforms, from a video conference to sharing, posting and furthermore, all these data records are stored by few severs but where and by who? That is the real question. Everyone is at risks on the web as everything you post, write, likes or even shares leaves a data trail on the internet. Heikkinen, Aada. (2020). Social media platforms as Facebook or even Instagram has helped the new generation to create a new identity based on posts, photos and information they share, well it is under certain circumstances good as for some people it is important to look good on the web rather than in real life, it is called the digitalisation. However, information given to such platforms can be used against ourselves in many ways that we were unable to think as we had in certain ways ‘lower down our guards’. In addition, new communicative social platforms as Whatsapp for example, are re-writing their terms and condition for their level of privacy and actually do not attempt to let consumers a chance to decide, they are imposing their laws and a delay. “A privacy nightmare hegemony” as described by some CEO’s. Privacy has always been one of the important pillars of every decent civilisation and have you ever questioned yourself about whether privacy is still being considered as it were in the 1990’s. China being under a communist state and eventually their law for privacy is quite different from any other country living in a democratic political status. Baker, S. (2014). They use a special privacy laws to punish different opinions questions. A world without privacy will be considered not different of China, a dictatorship movement. What can be understand is that social media platforms are slowly taking the control upon consumers and can lately result in the seed empowering the growth of an empire who will be able to decipher every single details about one another as no privacy will no more exist.

Using social media has become not only a privilege but a necessity. Alam, Shafin .(2019). Nowadays, everyone is connected to social media, the multi platforms has bring another dimension to our reality. The number of internet users worldwide increased by 8.6% over the past 12 months, with 350 million new users leading to an overall total of 4.437 billion at the start of April 2019 (Chow, 2020). This statistic speaks of itself, each and everyone are creating new sensitive account giving our attributes and personal information about ourselves to create such a sense of identity to a virtual system which stored every single data about everything we like, post, share or comments for example on the well known social platform as Facebook. Such technology offers the opportunity to form supportive social relations in multiple context that don’t strongly overlap. Simmel, (1960). To sustained the argument above, in other words social media is a pathway to socialise not in life but in a virtual way that is on community such as the modern one. Being beside a screen and trying to be someone that we are not actually able to be in real life is actually a sense of false identity and this can be seriously dangerous for each other as we don’t know what to expect and if we can trust that people. Even if the basement of social network was made for these set up, a web based service that allows to construct a public or semi public profile. I personally think that at this moment where it first emerged we didn’t take false identity and privacy breach as a real threat.

When social network was first established people thought actually that the majority will control their self and protect the most of their identity as there would be a sense of network self. According to Papacharissi, “sociability is practiced to the network via the network.” In other words, these social performances oriented must carry a meaning for multiple publics and audience without actually sacrificing one’s true sense of self. With some innovation unit as some social media update their software in order to increase the sense of realism as for instance, the location and further more the motion of sharing our location when one another is travelling is a very dangerous situation. Those innovations of Facebook and Twitter is making more and more people at risks more particularly their home and few precious stuff, the “Check In” that uses a location tracker on Facebook can alert one another where you are travelling for instance. This is making a flout out the level of privacy unit as firstly nearly everyone or at least their virtual friends can see what they are posting, however, there are also hackers who actually target those things for robbery. Social media putting aussie home safety at risk. (2011, Dec 15). As said previously our privacy is not one the safe side with such technology nowadays, hackers that operates in the dark will hit right on the spot when we actually think we are safe.

In 2013, a bunch of the Bush’s family was leaked with a dozens of private mail, celebrities are not only the aim of hackers, if powerful people are being targeted and abused then   what is up to our privacy? Tsukayama, H. (2013). The idea of surveillance can be applied as whatever the privacy level that can be used to protect our data, someone can always have access to those personal attributes as the few example shown above, data breaches is on of the serious problems that until now no one have solved but that do not stop people to continue sharing content and let a high level of their privacy visible to an extent.

Furthermore, new communicative technologies are bringing new responsibilities for organizations, those new changes make us question our perception on whether is it reasonable to trust the safety and privacy measures on social media. Normally, social media privacy helps individuals or company to mind their business without interference from the outside world, that is, they are able to do press conference, power point and further group work and financial transactions online and instantly which is really advantageous for them in terms of time and more. One of the most popular social media, Whatsapp, has decided to update his level of privacy in parallel with Facebook as they are owned by only one company. The most popular aspect of Whatsapp is actually his fast communicative aspect which really helps for the crisis the world is undergoing due to the Covid-19, online working has become the new essential trend as it helps for the running of the company’s work and furthermore the economic aspect. However, the social media has decided to update his privacy policy and asking the constant users to share their data. The new policy targets mainly business interactions, transactions and other related business interactions which allows Whatsapp and Facebook to support a third party industry / company to store all data messages. A shocking message to all the users on the globe as it will host all data with Facebook, its parent company and furthermore, the most unreal one is that if users do not accept these terms their account will be deleted. Julian Assange said in 2010 that there is a single difference between Mark Zuckerberg and him, “I give private information on corporations to you for free, and I’m a villain. Zuckerberg gives your private information to corporations for money and he’s Man of the Year.” Amid WhatsApp controversy (2021, Jan 15). This quote actually makes us quite suspicious about the what such empire as Facebook and other social media do with our data with or without our concern. Well even if this conflicts was seen as a normal thing by some spokesman of the industry: “ No one mandates users to share private data.”

It is seen as a standard industry practice by them in other words, it tells a lot about how they treat the level of privacy of their users. The 2-3 trillion dollars company will thus share transaction data, mobile device information, IP addresses, and other data on how users interact with businesses on WhatsApp and with Facebook group companies. A privacy nightmare hegemony,” wrote Sairee Chahal, founder and CEO of SHEROES. Romita Majumdar. (2021). A company so cruel about its data can make everybody shivers, as if hackers was not enough, the company itself is doubtful. In terms of other, company it is a real disaster as they can be mis-selling record of all our personal data. Unsatisfied and not approved by few users around the globe they decided to give the chance to another social communicative media which is named Telegram. What is interesting with this newly launched application is that it has took advantages of the fault of Whatsapp privacy which has results to an increase in users for the company. ContentEngine, L. L. C. (2021, Feb 03).  Threats when publishing our profile online for a company is that others are also collecting information and analysing the behaviour and sending ads. Nguyen, Thong. (2019). Company marketing has been created to spies entries of the social media data that is, most likely, comments, things people share, likes and posts by some software for their innovation, this system clearly shows that the protection of our level of privacy can easily be breached by other people and that no information or data will be on hundred percent safe. Spying and social media. (2015).

Atkin (1973) defined behavioral adaptation as one of the primary motivation to seek information because of an individual’s need of information that is useful for directing anticipated behaviour. The more we know about someone the more powerful we are and the person will be somehow mostly vulnerable, that is why Russia and his outstanding president Vladimir Putin has push forward a new privacy law that will help his country vis a vis the others. Putin signs personal data protection law. (2014, Jul 22). That is not even Mark Zuckerberg and his privacy system or whatever company will know more about the level of legal privacy as they must abide to the law of the Russian. Does the invasion of privacy is actually the seed to empowering the growth of power? That’s why Putin will do everything that is in his power to kept his information private, as the more people know about you and your privacy, the more you are vulnerable. The law gives the “telecommunications, information technologies and mass media oversight service Roskomnadzor the right, pursuant to a court order, to limit access to information being handled with violations of the law on personal data protection.”

To sum up privacy can be compared to a weapon that can make you ruled more than someone for instance, Julian Assange discovered that years before, as his crime was to show confidential information to the world for free. Social media terms and policy privacy are worth the read as they are very tricky in terms of words and act, furthermore, people are mostly convinced about the high security posted on the social network that their data will be safely stored with low breaches from hackers, however, marketers used their data to form strategies for their market research. Privacy is such a great word that is the world is not ready to pronounce with ease.

Reference:

Amid WhatsApp controversy, chomsky quotes assange to explain how facebook’s zuckerberg becomes ‘man of the year’. (2021, Jan 15). Kashmir Monitor Retrieved from https://link.library.curtin.edu.au/gw?url=https://www-proquest-com.dbgw.lis.curtin.edu.au/newspapers/amid-whatsapp-controversy-chomsky-quotes-assange/docview/2477838472/se-2?accountid=10382

Baker, S. (2014). China’s use of privacy law to punish dissent raises questions for privacy advocates. Retrieved from https://link.library.curtin.edu.au/gw?url=https://www-proquest-com.dbgw.lis.curtin.edu.au/blogs-podcasts-websites/chinas-use-privacy-law-punish-dissent-raises/docview/1537276817/se-2?accountid=10382

Heikkinen, Aada. (2020). Re: What is your opinion on privacy and social media?. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/post/What-is-your-opinion-on-privacy-and-social-media/5f1fdcd95bedeb0ce54d9ada/citation/download.

Putin signs personal data protection law. (2014, Jul 22). Interfax : Russia & CIS General Newswire Retrieved from https://link.library.curtin.edu.au/gw?url=https://www-proquest-com.dbgw.lis.curtin.edu.au/wire-feeds/putin-signs-personal-data-protection-law/docview/1547512315/se-2?accountid=10382

Papacharissi, Z.,&Trevey. M. T. (2018). Affective Publics and Windows of Opportunity ; Social Media and the Potential for social change, In M, Graham. (ed) The Routledge Companinon to Media and Activism. Routledge.

Spying and social media: Dos and don’ts for guerrilla marketing in the internet age. (2015). Strategic Direction, 31(11), 37-39. Retrieved from https://link.library.curtin.edu.au/gw?url=https://www-proquest-com.dbgw.lis.curtin.edu.au/scholarly-journals/spying-social-media/docview/1732340391/se-2?accountid=10382

Social media putting aussie home safety at risk: The increasing popularity of social media such as facebook and twitter is putting the homes and valuables of australians at increasing risk of robberies and theft. (2011, Dec 15). PR Newswire Retrieved from https://link.library.curtin.edu.au/gw?url=https://www-proquest-com.dbgw.lis.curtin.edu.au/wire-feeds/social-media-putting-aussie-home-safety-at-risk/docview/911036170/se-2?accountid=10382

Tsukayama, H. (2013). Bush, celebrity hacks raise profile of privacy concerns (posted 2013-02-08 20:27:55): Hacker’s release of highly personal.

Translated by ContentEngine, L. L. C. (2021, Feb 03). Users seek alternative to WhatsApp after privacy controversy. here are some. CE Noticias Financieras Retrieved from https://link.library.curtin.edu.au/gw?url=https://www-proquest-com.dbgw.lis.curtin.edu.au/wire-feeds/users-seek-alternative-whatsapp-after-privacy/docview/2486459324/se-2?accountid=10382

14 thoughts on “Privacy on social platforms are quite at risks nowadays, what are your views?

  1. Hey Joel!

    Great post! You have defiantly opened my eyes more to privacy. I think the terms of service that we all don’t even bother to read are too long and over complicated. I remember an article saying that it would take 76 days to read through Apple’s terms and conditions. I’m curious to know, do you think more could be done by organisations to condense these terms and make users aware on how their data is being used?

    Thanks for sharing your paper!

    Nick

  2. Hi Joel!

    Well done on your paper! I’m glad someone else had the idea to write about privacy issues regarding todays social media platforms as it was a topic I considered perusing when first brainstorming some ideas. It really is quite amazing how easily people give out sensitive information online to large corporations such as Facebook or Instagram, or the WhatsApp platform as mentioned in your paper. Do you think society as a whole should put more of an emphasis on educating youth about the sorts of information they should share online? Do you think it would make a difference? Would love to hear your thoughts on the matter.

    Regards, Jacob.

  3. Hi Joel,
    Your paper was very interesting, privacy online is a real question, users of internet do not really know to what extend their date is private or not. It only big companies online like Google or Facebook who really know where our date is going!
    Overall very interesting paper!

  4. Hey Joel,

    What an insightful paper regarding the risks to a user’s privacy on social media, privacy and the terms and restrictions are often overlooked whilst signing up onto such media platforms as Facebook. I resonated with your quote ‘using social media has become not only a privilege but a necessity (Alam Shafin, 2019), firstly adopted within the latter half of the 2000s, this new and exciting Web 2.0 platform provided its users with the new abilities of liking, comment, status and direct messaging whilst establishing an online persona for others to view and interact with. Nowadays it is essential to have some sort of social media as it has become the established norm to communicate with friends or family in the wider community, personally I have group-chats for sport, work, friends and family, this has become highly successful when organising who can work or where we are playing. This privilege has become overlooked as the privacy does not work as effectively as the platform itself. Social media has become a playground for hackers and fake accounts to play around on invading and impersonating other for their personal gain. As mentioned within your paper, social media platforms need to adopt a better strategy to protect its users against the weak protection that these social media platforms provide. Overall I thoroughly enjoyed reading this paper

  5. Hi Yohann,

    I really enjoyed reading your paper on privacy. You are right, our privacy may be in danger online. First of all just the fact that we need to accept cookies when entering a website or even give our personal information such as name and email address to create an account. While it is kind of scary to think that we are 24h under surveillance, papers like yours really put this issue in light.
    You have been able to strengthen all your arguments with good reasearch which gives a lot of weight to your paper! As someone who has done a lot of research on the topic and wrote a paper on this issue, what do you think could be done in order to rectify this situation?

    Overall it is a great paper! Well Done!

    I encourage you to check out my paper on “Black Natural Hair Vloggers on YouTube Are Empowering Their Audiences’ by Encouraging Them to Embrace Their Black Identity.”
    The link: https://networkconference.netstudies.org/2021/2021/04/26/black-natural-hair-vloggers-on-youtube-are-empowering-their-audiences-by-encouraging-them-to-embrace-their-black-identity/#comment-2718

  6. Hi Joel,

    The issue of online privacy and surveillance is a really interesting topic so thank you for your thoughts and research on the topic.

    Online communities that generate comments (like blogs or social media) by nature are a form of social surveillance where the members are monitoring the blogs and comments as well as being aware of the fact they are also being monitored (Marwick, 2012, p379 as cited by Orton-Johnson, 2017, p5) – does this impact the way members behave online knowing they are being watched do you think? Do you think people realise they are being surveilled in the comment section?

    To quote your paper – “The more we know about someone the more powerful we are and the person will be somehow mostly vulnerable”. This reminds me of the privacy issues bought up by Zuboff (2019). In one section of her book (p49) she talks about Mark Zuckerberg and how he claimed: “privacy was no longer the social norm” when faced with criticism over Facebook’s use of personal data and targeted algorithms. What is your stance on our interactions being used for targeted marketing? Is it any better than television advertisements because it is targeted to what we actually might want or need or is it worse for this reason?

    References
    Marwick, A. (2012). The Public Domain: Surveillance in Everyday Life. Surveillance & Society, 9. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v9i4.4342

    Orton-Johnson, K. (2017). Mummy Blogs and Representations of Motherhood: “Bad Mummies” and Their Readers. Social Media + Society, 3(2), 2056305117707186. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117707186

    Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism : the fight for a human future at the new frontier of power / Shoshana Zuboff (First edition.. ed.). New York, New York : PublicAffairs.

  7. Hi Joel,
    I really enjoyed reading your paper – it is scary to consider that we, the users of social media, are both the consumer AND the commodity! It makes me remember something I learned a while ago, about the “ten year challenge” that was circulating Facebook, which involved users to post comparison photos of themselves with a 10-year difference (Hopper, 2019). Allegedly, this allowed Facebook’s algorithm to accurately track our facial recognition as we aged (Hopper, 2019), meaning they’d be able to track us even years down the track! It is a scary consideration.
    I question I put to you, therefore, is; should social media be a private enterprise, or state-run (or yet; perhaps community controlled)? For example, the Chinese government has control over many aspects of the primary social media platform in China, WeChat (Harwit, 2016), while Mark Zuckerberg owns the Western world’s largest platform, Facebook, privately.
    And do you think either forms of control would solve this issue of privacy and personal data being used against us?
    Thanks,
    Amelia

    References:
    Harwit, E. (2016). WeChat: Social and political development of China’s dominant messaging app. Chinese Journal of Communication, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2016.1213757.

    Hopper, T. (2019, January 17). The 10 year challenge is probably a scam to steal your picture. National Post. https://nationalpost.com/news/world/the-10-year-challenge-really-really-looks-like-a-data-mining-operation

  8. Hi Joel,

    I share your thought that privacy on social media platforms are at risk. In the first place, users have to give their personal information when creating their account already put their privacy at risk. With the availability of new software to track one’s location while travelling further worsen one’s privacy. It looks as if people are spying on the individual.

    It is time that all users exercise extra caution when communicating via social media platforms.

    Looking forward to seeing more world leaders following the good example of President Vladimir Putin in introducing more privacy laws.

    Best regards,
    Elaine

  9. Hi Yohann,
    Your paper was very interesting and you provided some insightful pieces of information pertaining to the topic of privacy, we tend to forget how our privacy is at stake on social media platforms. You mentionned that the new generation has the habit to create a new identity online and that it is good under certain circumstances, I do understand the nuances here but isn’t it actually a deceitful and unreal perfomance of one’s identity?
    Your argument on how user data is being sold to companies is an aspect frequently talked about when it comes to privacy online, I would like to know your opinion on the matter and also in what way do you think this would affect the user who’s data is being sold?
    Since your topic is on privacy and here in Mauritius the ICT Act for regulating social media is the main subject of conversations relating to this topic nowadays, what do you think about it and how our privacy will be affected by the changes they want to implement for regulating social media through this law?
    On the overall, it was a pleasure reading your paper. I invite you to read and comment on mine: https://networkconference.netstudies.org/2021/2021/04/27/the-lifestyle-and-fashion-influencer-community-on-instagram-stimulates-portrayals-of-identities-by-adjusting-and-adapting-to-fake-ones/

    Awaiting for your response!

  10. Hey Joel,

    I found your paper to be quite interesting with the alternative view on social media that I haven’t yet come across within this stream. To be honest, I am quite willing to contain all my personal details when signing up to new platforms, which definitely shows my unawareness to such a prevalent and scary issue. It’s crazy to think that these platforms hold a higher power and control over users who don’t realise how vulnerable they are.

    I really liked your example on the Bush family, as it highlights that no one is safe when it comes to data breaches, causing many to rethink their connections and use of social media, and the security of their personal information. Another relevant example is the story of Cambridge Analytica, which exploited over 50 million Facebook users to influence the 2016 American presidential election. This issue definitely forced me to rethink the trust that I have with social media, as many of these users questioned the loss of control they had over their data at the time.

    All in all, I really enjoyed reading the points you have raised!

  11. Hi Joel,

    Thanks for a differing view on Privacy and Social Media.
    I agree with William’s comment about you seem to be taking a stand against Social Media and being online, if it wasn’t for me doing my studies I would only have Facebook, Skype and Whatsapp. I work in IT and I struggle with the fact that people do actually understand the concept of privacy and the ramifications it can have in the event of a breach – Just consider the use of a Bank Card PIN – and yet they don’t understand that giving their username and password to a co-worker is problematic :-S

    A couple of years ago Whatsapp changed their Privacy Policy – I think Facebook had just acquired them – and with the next update users were informed of the policy changes and either had to accept them or lose the right to use Whatsapp. My Partner at the time, said to me, ‘what is this’ as she pressed accept, my response was ‘ did you actually read what it said? It is a major change to the privacy policy due to Facebook’ her reply ‘oh, oh well’

    I won’t say that I read the privacy policy of every app or website I use, however with companies like Facebook who through the purchase of Whatsapp, Instagram and Occulus can create an almost complete profile on a user and their surroundings.

    Here is an web article on what FB had acquired up to 2019.
    https://www.titlemax.com/discovery-center/lifestyle/everything-facebook-owns-mergers-and-acquisitions-from-the-past-15-years/

    It is good to see that I am not alone in not being overly friendly with social media 🙂

    If you are interested in a completely different topic, please check out my paper.
    https://networkconference.netstudies.org/2021/2021/04/25/anonymous-healthy-and-male-social-media-assists-men-to-join-together-in-supportive-online-communities/

  12. Hi Joel,

    A great paper that is fairly different from so many papers on the conference which actually says no to social media and the online world!

    I found it interesting reading about the Bush family’s privacy being leaked as well as reading about WhatsApp and how they changed their terms and conditions without informing its users. Do you think that with the current situation of Covid-19 and the way in which the world is turning more towards online usage we need to find different alternatives to online collaboration that can be just as good or is it up to software developers and governments to be more proactive with creating and distributing more secure privacy software/laws?

    Thanks!

  13. Hi Joel!

    Your paper was so interesting,

    Your sentence “ Using social media has become not only a privilege but a necessity” really resonated with me because I really think the sense of privilege that social media offers is really often forgotten. I think that social media and access to the internet in general is widely proof of privilege as so many countries have limited access to the internet let alone social media. It is really interesting to look at the possible intersectionalities that may affect this and how we are able to remedy the situation. I think ableism and race are big factors in this type of privilege. I found this article below quite interesting in relation to white privilege and social media!

    https://www.fastcompany.com/90595044/social-media-is-an-extension-of-white-privilege-in-the-office

    I really enjoyed your ideas Joel! I think maybe your paper may need tighter referencing (APA7th) and maybe a little more scholarly sources but in all it was really strong!

    Have a great day 🙂

    Emma

  14. Hi Joel,
    Your point about different countries levels of privacy and what they consider private was interesting.
    I think it’s scary not knowing exactly how much data they are allowed to store. Let alone the dodgy ones that may be storing more of your data than you know.
    But ultimately if you want to participate in these platforms, we don’t have a choice, and do accept their privacy policies. I think we know the risk, but we don’t remember it actively when taking part in these online platforms. It’s kind of the “head stuck in the sand” – it won’t happen to me; they won’t steal my privacy.
    Do you think more education would help people be concerned about the way their data is collected or do you think it won’t change the way people use these platforms?
    Regards,
    Laura

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *