{"id":289,"date":"2019-05-06T03:38:27","date_gmt":"2019-05-05T19:38:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/networkconference.netstudies.org\/2019Curtin\/?p=289"},"modified":"2019-05-06T04:29:46","modified_gmt":"2019-05-05T20:29:46","slug":"real-identity-and-authenticity-are-facades-on-social-networking-sites","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/networkconference.netstudies.org\/2019Curtin\/2019\/05\/06\/real-identity-and-authenticity-are-facades-on-social-networking-sites\/","title":{"rendered":"Real Identity and Authenticity are facades on social networking sites"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
Real Identity and Authenticity are facades on social networking sites<\/a>Download<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Abstract<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

This\npaper puts forward the idea that social networking sites such as Instagram and\nFacebook are detrimental to one\u2019s identity and self-presentation online. Social\nmedia is essential in forming user\u2019s real identity as it has been proven that\nthe amount of time an individual spends scrolling on these online sites has a\ndirect impact on their self-esteem, confidence, anxiety and depression levels\nand even authenticity. These factors are leading to an increase in the level of\ninauthenticity a user may portray on SNSs. There are also influences like the\nneed for validation and trends that affects the way a normal person would\nproject himself online. This paper lines up with the concept of identity in\ncommunities and networks as it shows how social media is pushing users to\nknowingly or unknowingly express a fake identity and consequently to not be\nauthentic in society. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Keywords: <\/strong>Social\nmedia, online identity, Instagram, self-presentation, Inauthenticity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Introduction<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The purpose of this paper is to study\nthe lack of authenticity of users online through alteration of their identity.\nIt will focus on the multiple layers of identity in general on social\nnetworking sites, especially Facebook and Instagram, and the ways it enables\nusers to manipulate their authenticity and self-representation. It will delve\ndeeper into topics such as the use of pseudonyms and anonymity on SNSs to hide\none\u2019s real identity. While the founder of Facebook refutes any modification of\nidentity and stand by the fact that their company ensures that users\u2019 stay\nauthentic through the process of registration, Facebook is considered the most\nfamous site for trolling or catfishing. Additionally, Instagram is having more\nand more cases of fake accounts called \u2018Finsta\u2019 as users are willing to have\nplanned self-presentation (Kang & Wei, 2019). I will be exploring the features\nsuch editing tools, trends or challenges, that encourage identity-play. Finally,\nI will be giving examples and use studies to illustrate how inauthenticity and\ntrolling are extremely common on social media sites. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Social Networking Sites and its effect on\nIdentity<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Boyd & Ellison (2007) state that social networking sites are internet-based facilities that build a close or semi-private profile within a limited organization. They allow users to create a list of friends who they approve of and interact with them, formally or casually. While joining an SNS platform, an individual must fill out a series of question to verify his name, age, email address, interests and profile photo. Then the user must make the decision whether he wants his profile to be private-which will be visible to only his list of friends or public and in that case, anyone online can have access to it (Boyd & Ellison, 2007). Social media sites have caused major shifts in people\u2019s lives especially on the virtual sphere. When SNSs first became popular, users were not interested on conversing with strangers but rather in solidifying their existing offline relationships (Papacharissi, 2009). Over time and with millennials joining social media, this concept has changed as they do engage with strangers online and offline as well as disclose private information. While social media enables peer-to- peer communication and is beneficial for the growth of an individual, it can be noxious for one\u2019s well being. For a few decades, SNSs have been criticized for causing users to modify their real identity hence impacting on their authenticity online. It can be highlighted that these sites create a great contrast between an individual\u2019s identity he grew up with and his online self.\u00a0 <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Identity can be defined as \u2018who an\nindividual is\u2019 (Knight & Saxby, 2014). Extrapolating this definition, it\nrefers to the physical facts that cannot be separated from one person such as\nDNA and the biographical elements that include one\u2019s name or gender. Identity\nencompasses personality, mannerism and interests. However, identity is shaped\novertime as exposure to society, situations in life or the different roles that\nare led. This causes people to have different identities to fit in different\nroles. A student may be obedient and shy at school but extrovert and\ntroublesome within the barriers of his home. In the long run,\nself-presentation, also known as \u2018impression management\u2019 fluctuates to respond\nto cultural expectations or even peer pressure in the case of younger\naudiences. Hu, Kumar, Huang & Ratnavelu (2017) state that the self can be\nclassified into three categories namely: the \u2018actual self\u2019 which are how an\nindividual or his entourage believe his traits are, the \u2018ideal self\u2019 which\nrefers to the characteristics one wishes to own and the \u2018ought self\u2019 which one\nor others want to see in individuals such as responsibilities or duties. Hence,\nthe three categories can be applied to someone\u2019s online identity as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Digital identity is mostly\nconstructed and can be altered in various ways such as name to appearance to\nliving locations. This can be an advantage in certain cases such as people who\nwant to keep a strict privacy rule, but this makes the virtual world trickier\nto navigate on. When Friendster or Facebook first came out to the public, people\nwere not disclosing their identity and preferred the safeness that anonymity\nbrought to them (Stoller, 2013)<\/a>. It is important to\nacknowledge the extent to which online personae have evolved with years and\nwhat they have become. Younger generations have grown up with the accessibility\nto Facebook and Instagram which makes them not be afraid of the consequences of\nsocial media. While their parents might think twice before posting something\nonline, students share mostly everything attached to their real-life identity (Stoller,\n2013). Factors that drive people to alter their identity can vary from person\nto person, yet the most relevant ones will be discussed below.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The use of Pseudonyms online<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

There are several factors that support the theory of the multi-faceted self. Pseudonyms have to be the first factor that pushes users to publish deceptive information. Due to the rise in technology and growth of social media, identity takes on a completely different meaning online. While some users stay partially true to their real self, many fall into the dark hole of social media. Social media influences the way we identify and present ourselves virtually. The use of pseudonyms dates to writers using fake names to preserve their privacy (Hogan, 2013). Pseudonyms or account ID are the usernames that people identify as online. Instagram handles are not always true to what a person is in offline environments. Many users tend to use abbreviation of their names or take inspiration from their interests in their offline lives. There are three motivations behind the use of pseudonyms: (1) Functional motivations, (2) situational motivations or (3) personal motivations. In the setting of hiding one\u2019s true identity, personal motivations are involved whereby the user is willing to discard their real self-presentation in order to put forward antisocial behaviors like untruthfulness (Hogan, 2013). Facebook is one the most popular social media platform and has 2.32 billion users interacting worldwide (“Facebook users worldwide 2018 | Statista”, 2019). Although Mark Zuckerberg insists in the fact that he believes having two sets of identities is an act of cowardice and lack of honesty. He assures that there are proper measures taken to prevent that but still, there are enumerable troll accounts and meme accounts made up by users who stay hidden behind a false username. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The lack of authenticity on Social Media<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

With all the problems attached to\ndigital identity and the fragmentation of the true self online, authenticity\nhas been at a high risk. Indeed, authenticity is being manipulated by users to\nportray another identity. Authenticity can be viewed from different perspectives\nas it depends on the context and the circumstances. It can be what is genuine\nand not an imitation or what has been authorized with a real stamp that\ncertifies its legitimacy (Van Leeuwen, 2001)<\/a>. In this\ncontext, authenticity is about the reality behind something or someone and the\nprofoundly felt feelings or words that are being expressed (Van Leeuwen, 2001).\nAuthenticity is socially constructed as it can be influenced by norms or\noffline and online expectations (Salisbury & Pooley, 2017). Hence, it is\ninevitable that social media will impact on people\u2019s authenticity as it is\nengraved in their daily lives. Social media is killing authenticity of users\nwhich reflects on their digital identity as well as impacting on their offline\nselves. This has to do with personal branding and performativity. Having an\naccount on social media nowadays resumes to \u2018selling\u2019 one\u2019s life as a brand.\nFirstly, social media platforms are not free for any reasons. They are using\npeople\u2019s information to their own advantage. Secondly, users are so engulfed\ninto the spiral of projecting themselves and having a nice aesthetics online\nthat they start to produce content that reflect their personal brand when\ncombined altogether (Stoller, 2013). They \u2018perform their brand which drifts\nthem away from their authentic selves. But then again, why is every post on\nFacebook timeline or Instagram feeds similar? Why are users interested in the\namount of likes and shares, more than communicating or collaborating online which\nwas the essence of social media long time back. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The need for \u2018self-presentation and\nextremities of inauthenticity on Instagram<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Furthermore, being obsessed with\nthe idea of having the best feed and projecting the perfect life, users follow\nwhat influencers or celebrities do to boost the views on their posts. Salisbury\n& Pooley (2017) support what many other researchers have stated that the\ntrue definition of authenticity online is \u201cartificial category\u201d.  Another factor to consider is that it is mostly\nteenagers that get easily influenced and this may have an impact on their real\nidentity being shaped into a \u2018plastic\u2019 person. Celebrities receive enormous\namount of attention on social media. They are considered as trend setters,\nmotivational thinkers and influencers. The media also portrays the ideal self\nespecially for women, to be skinny and attractive (Wiederhold, 2018). Most\ncelebrities perpetuate this trend which impacts on the self-esteem of users.\nThey want to achieve that look and be famous on social media. To do so, many\nedit and use filters on their photographs to obtain the \u2018ideal\u2019 look (Brown & Tiggemann, 2016). <\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Even though before Web 2.0 revolutionized society , the manipulation of photos seemed banal and considered to be an artistic genre (Bakhtin, 1981, as cited in Zappavigna, 2016), SNSs intertwined with users demands suggest otherwise. A study conducted on practicing self-portraits, also known as selfies, revealed that a teenager takes up to 60 photos before choosing one to upload on Instagram (Las\u00e9n & G\u00f3mez-Cruz, 2009). Another study discovered that filters are the new natural on Instagram. A user applies an average 13 filters to his photo collection to ameliorate his aesthetic feed and indirectly, his personality (Ferwerda, Schedl & Tkalcic, 2016). These studies prove that users are not interested into portraying their real identity or authenticity on their profiles. Instead, they are inclined to present an ideal identity as they are looking for likes and more views from their audiences.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

 Jackson & Luchner (2018) argue that users\nfeel the necessity to belong to a community and have the need to showcase their\nself-presentation. Social networking sites refute the idea of self-presentation\nas the feature of liking and commenting on other posts can sometimes affect the\nself-esteem of oneself (Besser & Priel as cited in Jackson & Luchner,\n2011). What pushes users to project their \u2018fake authenticity\u2019 is that they want\nto gain recognition and accumulate more likes. A trait that most people have is\nthe demand to of be recognized (Las\u00e9n\n& G\u00f3mez-Cruz, 2009). Even if a user is authentic online and wants to\nmaintain his real identity, feedback and reactions will lower his willingness\nto be real. This may have a negative impact on users\u2019 mental health. Sleep deprivation,\nfear of missing out and body shaming are issues associated with social media (Wiederhold,\n2018). A study conducted by Reece & Danforth in 2017, revealed that users\nwho used darker and grayer color filters on their Instagram posts were prone to\nbe depressed or on the edge of depression. Nonetheless, in today\u2019s day and age,\nhaving a darker feed is trendy and users who are not depressed, portray a\ncharacter that may have issues just to receive attention. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Finsta<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

A rising issue on Instagram is that\nusers are creating fake accounts called \u2018Finsta\u2019. According to (Kang & Wei,\n2019), the motives of the creators of Finsta accounts are to fully express\nthemselves without being judged. Having the ideal self-presentation can cause a\nteen to create a Finsta account for the sake of expressing himself without\nbeing worried of receiving views or likes (Wiederhold,\n2018). On the other hand, some misuse the ability to change the way they can\npresent themselves online. One example is Sarah Rose Mcdaniel, an American\nmodel, who states that she has heterochromia, a difference in coloration and in\nher case, one blue eye and one brown eye. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
McDaniel. R. S. (@Krotchy). Posts (Instagram Profile). Retrieved April 8, 2019, from https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/krotchy\/<\/a> <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

She made videos about how she was bullied as a child for having two-colored eyes but is now able to differentiate herself from other models. People having heterochromia were very supportive and felt empowered. However, she was exposed by fake accounts as she was faking that story to enter a modeling agency. She is now undergoing surgeries to have one blue eye. This goes on the prove her lack of authenticity and also how the lies she was carrying online, impacted her offline life. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion & Limitations<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Overall, there are different existing reasons as to why social media sites allow people to transform their identity and be inauthentic. Social media platforms have features such as creating fake profiles, using other names, liking and commenting on each other uploads, applying filters to photographs as well as following the path of celebrities, all of which add up to be damaging to any avid user. The challenge of satisfying the trend on SNSs have increased the number users leaving behind their true self to adopt and perform a fake identity to attract followers or validation. This has a direct impact on their health and is so ingrained in today\u2019s culture that it seems normal. To solve these issues, users tend to fall deeper in the trap by trying to portray the role of having the ideal identity online. Users are not interested in providing good content but rather click bait that will bring them more followers. Ultimately, identity and authenticity are facades on social media sites which will spread unless users decide to take matters into their own hands. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

This paper has a few limitations as although most of the articles referenced are reliable and up to date, a few of them were in my opinion biased towards the positive side of social networking sites which is the contrary of my argument. Some of the papers were targeting the American society and the findings may not be applied to developing countries. Also, the results obtained through the studied mentioned were conducted with mainly white American or Asian users therefore the findings cannot justify the thoughts of other races across the world. Despite the limitations, the paper focuses on the data available to discuss and present a strong argument on the topic. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

References<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Boyd, d., & Ellison,\nN. (2007). Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal\nOf Computer-Mediated Communication<\/em>, 13<\/em>(1), 210-230. doi:\n10.1111\/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brown, Z., & Tiggemann, M. (2016). Attractive\ncelebrity and peer images on Instagram: Effect on women’s mood and body\nimage. Body Image<\/em>, 19<\/em>, 37-43. doi:\n10.1016\/j.bodyim.2016.08.007 <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Facebook users worldwide 2018 | Statista. (2019).\nRetrieved from https:\/\/www.statista.com\/statistics\/264810\/number-of-monthly-active-facebook-users-worldwide\/<\/a>\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ferwerda, B., Schedl, M., & Tkalcic, M. (2016).\nUsing Instagram Picture Features to Predict Users\u2019 Personality. Multimedia\nModeling<\/em>, 850-861. doi: 10.1007\/978-3-319-27671-7_71<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hogan, B. (2013). Pseudonyms and the Rise of\nthe Real-Name Web<\/em> [Ebook] (pp. 290-307). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hu, C., Kumar, S., Huang, J., & Ratnavelu, K.\n(2017). Disinhibition of negative true self for identity reconstructions in\ncyberspace: Advancing self-discrepancy theory for virtual setting. PLOS\nONE<\/em>, 12<\/em>(4), e0175623. doi: 10.1371\/journal.pone.0175623 <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jackson, C., & Luchner, A. (2018). Self-presentation\nmediates the relationship between Self-criticism and emotional response to\nInstagram feedback. Personality And Individual Differences<\/em>, 133<\/em>,\n1-6. doi: 10.1016\/j.paid.2017.04.052 <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kang, J., & Wei, L. (2019). Let me be at my\nfunniest: Instagram users\u2019 motivations for using Finsta (a.k.a., fake\nInstagram). The Social Science Journal<\/em>. doi:\n10.1016\/j.soscij.2018.12.005<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Knight, A., & Saxby, S. (2014). Identity crisis:\nGlobal challenges of identity protection in a networked world1. Computer\nLaw & Security Review<\/em>, 30<\/em>(6), 617-632. doi:\n10.1016\/j.clsr.2014.09.001 <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Las\u00e9n, A., &\nG\u00f3mez-Cruz, E. (2009). Digital Photography and Picture Sharing: Redefining the\nPublic\/Private Divide. Knowledge, Technology & Policy<\/em>, 22<\/em>(3),\n205-215. doi: 10.1007\/s12130-009-9086-8<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Papacharissi, Z. (2009). The virtual geographies of\nsocial networks: a comparative analysis of Facebook, LinkedIn and\nASmallWorld. New Media & Society<\/em>, 11<\/em>(1-2), 199-220.\ndoi: 10.1177\/1461444808099577 <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Reece, A., & Danforth, C. (2017). Erratum to:\nInstagram photos reveal predictive markers of depression. EPJ Data\nScience<\/em>, 6<\/em>(1). doi: 10.1140\/epjds\/s13688-017-0118-4 <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Salisbury, M., & Pooley, J. (2017). The #nofilter\nSelf: The Contest for Authenticity among Social Networking Sites,\n2002\u20132016. Social Sciences<\/em>, 6<\/em>(1), 10. doi:\n10.3390\/socsci6010010 <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Stoller, E. (2013). Our Shared Future: Social Media,\nLeadership, Vulnerability, and Digital Identity. Journal Of College And\nCharacter<\/em>, 14<\/em>(1), 5-10. doi: 10.1515\/jcc-2013-0002 <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). What is Authenticity? Discourse\nStudies<\/em>, 3<\/em>(4), 392-397. doi: 10.1177\/1461445601003004003 <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Wiederhold, B. (2018).\nThe Tenuous Relationship Between Instagram and Teen Self-Identity. Cyberpsychology,\nBehavior, And Social Networking<\/em>, 21<\/em>(4), 215-216. doi:\n10.1089\/cyber.2018.29108.bkw<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Zappavigna, M. (2016).\nSocial media photography: construing subjectivity in Instagram images. Visual\nCommunication<\/em>, 15<\/em>(3), 271-292. doi: 10.1177\/1470357216643220<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Creative<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Abstract This paper puts forward the idea that social networking sites such as Instagram and Facebook are detrimental to one\u2019s identity and self-presentation online. Social media is essential in forming user\u2019s real identity as it has been proven that the amount of time an individual spends scrolling on these online sites has a direct impact… Continue reading Real Identity and Authenticity are facades on social networking sites<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":31,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[83,11,28,22,10,52],"class_list":["post-289","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-identity","tag-facebook","tag-inauthentic","tag-instagram","tag-online-identity","tag-self-presentation","tag-social-networking-sites"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/networkconference.netstudies.org\/2019Curtin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/289","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/networkconference.netstudies.org\/2019Curtin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/networkconference.netstudies.org\/2019Curtin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/networkconference.netstudies.org\/2019Curtin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/31"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/networkconference.netstudies.org\/2019Curtin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=289"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/networkconference.netstudies.org\/2019Curtin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/289\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":338,"href":"https:\/\/networkconference.netstudies.org\/2019Curtin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/289\/revisions\/338"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/networkconference.netstudies.org\/2019Curtin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=289"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/networkconference.netstudies.org\/2019Curtin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=289"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/networkconference.netstudies.org\/2019Curtin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=289"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}